[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: foucault.jpg (283 KB, 1429x2048)
283 KB JPG
This preoccupation with replacing unpleasant words with softer or more ambiguous words in order to promote tolerance and acceptance is a sign that we are a decadent society with the wrong priorities.

You know what they called mental asylums in the olden days? People would call them things like "Home for the Feeble Minded". And they'd call people with Downs Syndrome "retards". You know why? Because "retard" comes from the Latin word for slow. And retards are intellectually slow. Makes sense, don't it? They wouldn't call homosexuals "gays" or "heroes" or whichever way they want to be addressed in 2026 because they were "sodomites". The act that made the homosexual distinct from the ordinary man who is attracted to women is sodomy. So it follows that you would call them "sodomites".

The disinterest in politically correct speech in times past teaches us two things: one, that hard times force people to be practical. And practical people don't have the time to sugar coat things. Second, it tells us that people of the past were more rational than we are today because they understood that fixing the word does not fix the thing. Irrationalism is rife among our university educated middleclass because we sent these people to university to gain wisdom but instead the professors gave the students Foucault - the French philosopher of post-modern queer theory. And because they studied Foucault, the students came to believe that reality can bend to their will just by speaking in gibberish Foucaultese.
>>
>>536930212
If you own the definitions of words you control what your opponents can think.l unless they have access to sources of information outside your control.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MalRDaQrttI

Doesn't seem very slow to me.

He's doing exactly what Mozart did, upon one hearing.
>>
>>536930212
do you have as much heat for the right playing with words as well when they use the word "ally" to define a country that regularly abuses our trust and good will and ropes us into unjustifiable wars
>>
>>536930863
Right.
Israel doesn't even have a mutual defense treaty with the US.
Literally not an ally.
>>
>>536930212
I've never seen Foucault used by a queer theorist

Foucault language is about power structure, discipline, human sciences

The theorists don't speak Foucault at all he's too masculine for them, he just happens to be gay

He's also basically the only genuine Nietzschean, Crowley was weird, Althusser was a communist

And then you have Judith Butler etc. who are actually responsible for theory
>>
>>536930212
miggers on this board ALL THE TIME use and create "ambiguous words" to codify their lack of tolerance or acceptance
>>
>>536930212
>The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought — that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc — should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods.
>>
>>536932111
I don't need to tolerate or accept you.
>>
>>536932111
What was fictional about it? It was from a peer reviewed paper in Nature magazine.
>>
>>536930212
You can change reality by changing what words mean and the french fell down that rabbit hole and occasionally you can hear pickaxes coming from the hole. Faggots and their enablers then use this as a prybar to decriminalize homosexuality by attacking the foundation of human civilization. I'm not sure if the actual effect is just turning everything into brown goo though
>>
>>536930212
Words really are reality, they're not merely representational. The color blue did not exist in the ancient world until there a word was invented for it.
>>
>>536935549
>The color blue did not exist in the ancient world until there a word was invented for it.
Nonsense. There are many ways to express blue without a word for it. Pointing at something else blue for example.
1984 was written about 1948 England. Words are used to control the masses.
>>
>>536931965
The way Foucault buggered those Tunisian children was quite Dionysian.
>>
>>536930212
It is a Jewish tendency for conjuration magic, thinking you can change things by changing names. You see it all the time in traditional Jewish magic and esoteric doctrine. It's also present in their folklore, the best known is the infamous golem, a monster of clay that is animated by some rabbi carving the word "life" on its forehead, and after its rebellion against the Jews the golem is killed by changing one of those letters to mean death.
There are idiots ITT promoting those Jewish views. They are Jewish and/or best goyim.
Besides >>536931965 is correct and Foucault was based, some idiots in mutt academia just became obsessed with their retarded retelling of Foucault (he's the most cited man in academia ever, largely because of Americans making easy references they don't understand). He's wrong thoughbeit because Bataille is the other genuine Nietzschean.
>>
>>536930212
the simple answer is the left does it because it's simple and anyone can do it - you don't have to be in charge
rightoids do the same thing
>>
>>536930212
>This preoccupation with replacing unpleasant words with softer or more ambiguous words in order to promote tolerance and acceptance is a sign that we are a decadent society with the wrong priorities.
It's a lot to do with females and weaker minded creatures trying to soften emotional blows and not be the butt of jokes in emotionally heated conversations they tend to start or initiate.
>>
>>536936885
But what is the obsession with etiquette? I mean, that's all it is - manners. Completely trivial in moral and political terms.
>>
>>536930212
Bump for effortposting
>>
>>536930212
>>536930212
Just give them backlash.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roald_Dahl_revision_controversy?wprov=sfla1
>>
>>536937195
Remeber to save all your original Dahl books

>Dahl's comments and writing have received criticism. In the August 1983 issue of the Literary Review, a review by Dahl of Tony Clifton's God Cried appears, in which he writes that the United States is "so utterly dominated by the great Jewish financial institutions" and asks, "must Israel, like Germany, be brought to her knees before she learns how to behave in this world?"[4] In a 1990 interview with The Independent, Dahl said that he had become antisemitic, "in as much as that you get a Jewish person in another country like England strongly supporting Zionism".[5]
>>
File: leftist2.jpg (1.2 MB, 800x8500)
1.2 MB JPG
>>536930212
>why
because leftism is a mental disorder

imagine claiming men get pregnant and girls have dicks

???
>>
File: sally-kohn-hypocrisy.jpg (140 KB, 1511x613)
140 KB JPG
>>536930212
>modifying words
Genuine and useful thread on pol. An exceptionally rare item. Get a bump.
>>
Unalive yourself. Just kidding, great thread OP. Internet censorship has been one of my all time obsessions. One reason is the sheer baffling I have that another person would so gleefully ban and remove a comment, like through moderation. Most Moderators have no financial interests in the topic discussed, yet like zealots or as if it depended on their livelihood moderators online in ALL spaces but here will remove your comment for no-no thoughts. America is living under a cursed manufactured consensus, and I have no idea how to break people out of it because the benefactors are also this untouchable God class called minority or Jew or Woman. sinister trap we are in
>>
>>536937065
Ego. A lot of people here think good manners=just being submissive towards them. They wont be that for you. Always putting themselves first, but it's rude and disrespectful for you not put them first in your priorities too.
>>
>>536930212
along similar lines I'm absolutely disgusted when I see things like
>r*ped
>g*n
>k*lled
in articles and anyone's comments. I get it's allegedly for some algorithm thing but frankly makes no sense since there are millions of unfiltered results using any of the words people self censor. I can't help but ask myself what sort of people even comply with that type of faggotry.
>>
>>536937403
People power trip, for sure, having no power in their own lives. They indulge when they get power over others.
>>
>>536930212
Jews
>>
>>536937620
Right? It's becoming ridiculous and silly and we're destroying our language to appeal to the censorship bots that were created to protect advertisements from lawsuits.
>>
>>536930212

You realize ‘Home for the Feeble Minded’ was the euphemism, right? Before that, ‘idiot,’ ‘imbecile,’ and ‘moron’ were actual medical terms. Every generation softens the old words—then those become insults, and the cycle repeats. That’s not decadence, it’s just how language works.

Calling people ‘sodomites’ wasn’t ‘rational’—it reduced a whole human to one sex act they were condemned for. Switching to ‘gay’ wasn’t sugar-coating; it was recognizing identity instead of branding people as criminals.

And Foucault didn’t say reality bends to words. He said power works through classification—which is exactly what you’re doing when you call old labels ‘more rational.’

If changing words doesn’t fix anything, why does it bother you? Either it’s trivial (so why complain?) or it matters (and then past people did it too, just with different terms). Hard times produce slurs, not just honesty.
>>
>>536937065
Brainwashing
>>
File: 1780518591631492.mp4 (1.84 MB, 720x1280)
1.84 MB
1.84 MB MP4
>>536932111
>says the jamnigger at the bottom of his slave races caste system...
>>
>>536937701
You are a sodomite. That is who you are. Feel proud?
>>
>>536930773
Based confused poster.
>>
>>536931965
>I've never seen Foucault used by a queer theorist
When he was told about AIDS he dismissed it as imperialist propaganda because it only seemed to affect gays and niggers.
guess what he died of.
>>
>>536937829

That quote just proves my point. ‘You are a sodomite’ wasn’t a neutral observation—it was a condemnation. They weren’t trying to be ‘practical’ or ‘rational’; they were trying to shame and criminalize. And when they added ‘Feel proud?’ it was sarcastic, designed to mock the very idea that someone could accept themselves.

So yeah, people stopped using ‘sodomite’ because it was never just a label—it was a weapon. Replacing it with ‘gay’ or ‘homosexual’ wasn’t about being soft. It was about refusing to let bigots define someone’s entire existence by an act they considered sinful. If you think calling someone a ‘sodomite’ was more honest, ask yourself: would you want to be reduced to the one thing your enemies hate most about you?
>>
>>536937701
>it reduced a whole human to one sex act
That is literally what every sodomite faggot does every single fucking day of their lives. Gay culture is literally nothing more than sexual perversion on display for the sake of demoralization. You are all sick mentally ill people that reproduce by continuing the cycle of sexual assault that happened to you as a child on the next generation of children and need to be institutionalized, sterilized and/or euthanized.
>>
>>536930212
Leftists believe in magic.
They believe that words change physical reality.
They believe in spells.
>>
>>536938225
What is the difference between a homosexual man and a straight man other than the former commits sodomy?
>>
>>536938247
yeah? and what are you gonna do about it Timmy? Nothing.
>>
>>536930212
>And because they studied Foucault, the students came to believe that reality can bend to their will just by speaking in gibberish Foucaultese.
And they're correct, which is why they must be opposed.
>>
>>536937852
Foucault lived a wretched life.
>>
>>536937701
>He said power works through classification
This sado masochistic faggot was obsessed with power. Being a power bottom
>>
>>536935954
Plenty of experiments have been done on primitive people whose languages don't have a word for blue. They literally can't see blue. You can show them a set of colored disks, 9 green and one blue, and I don't mean bluish green, just straight blue, and they can't pick out the one that is different, while any modern child can do this instantly.
>>
>>536930212
With Socrates Greek taste veers round in favour of dialectics: what actually occurs? In the first place a noble taste is vanquished: with dialectics the mob comes to the top. Before Socrates’ time, dialectical manners were avoided in good society: they were regarded as bad manners, they were compromising. Young men were cautioned against them. All such proffering of one’s reasons was looked upon with suspicion. Honest things like honest men do not carry their reasons on their sleeve in such fashion. It is not good form to make a show of everything. That which needs to be proved cannot be worth much. Wherever authority still belongs to good usage, wherever men do not prove but command, the dialectician is regarded as a sort of clown. People laugh at him, they do not take him seriously. Socrates was a clown who succeeded in making men take him seriously: what then was the matter?
>>
>>536939677
dambu is earth, old growth, buru is brightness, new growth, springs, things they consider intriguing like shiny rocks
>>
File: 1662560106890465.png (618 KB, 616x676)
618 KB PNG
>>536930738
Fpbp.
>>
>>536937300
has anyone ever actually read through one of these collections
>>
>>536939677
What color was the sky for them
>>
File: ib1.jpg (2.41 MB, 3200x7191)
2.41 MB JPG
>>536940649
>has anyone
I have read most of these or at least reviewed kek
.
.
INFORMATION BLOBS
http://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13gNcyzC7QvfTbXcVSqorj1pZmFb-csP6
google drive easy to use interface
>>
File: linkedin ceos.jpg (221 KB, 1280x675)
221 KB JPG
>>536930212
>>
>>536941037
They usually say white, if they use a color to describe it at all.
>>
>>536937775
brown hands typed this because only brown hands would save disgusting images of people holding animal dung like that
>>
>>536930212
>The act that made the homosexual distinct from the ordinary man who is attracted to women is sodomy.

but not every gay is a sodomite and not every straight is a non-sodomite.
>>
>>536939677
lmao
>>
>>536930212
language is a virus
if you can inject specific language into a culture and make it the norm, you can effectively steer that culture any way you wish
>>
>>536930212
Because they do not want to "solve" problems, they want problems to be swept under the rug. By changing definitions they can claim to "solve" something while only furthering the reach of evil.
>>
>>536935549
This is absurd creation science bullshit, which is really funny coming from the left given how they like to portray themselves as intelligent and educated.
>>
>>536939677
The Sumerians thought Lapus Lazuli was the most precious rock because of it's blue color. Are you saying this is only because they have a word for blue? Before language the world was black and white? How boring. Kinda like that movie Pleasantville.
>>
>>536941090
is there a marxism one
>>
Because the leftoid worldview is so contrary to reality they have to literally change the meaning of words to try and come up with a reason why they are correct.
>>
>>536930212
Leftists definitionally don't care about truth since large scale "stateless, classless societies" are incredibly obviously impossible. Leftist theory therefore revolves around two primary objectives: obtaining power for leftists and their allies while pretending to be advancing leftist goals; and signaling intelligence and erudition via wordcelling.

The broader constellation of leftist-adjacent ideology like the race and gender stuff follows a similar pattern, though the unreality there is the equality of the sexes/races, rather than the possibility of the political utopia.
>>
>>536930212
Language is power. If you can't even begin to formulate a thought without the leftist jews' fucked up verbiage and manipulations, then you've already lost the debate against them before you even opened your stupid goyish mouth.
The liberal world order strongly depends on this. IMO nobody has ever done as much damage to this as the retarded zoomers who made it a sport to abuse and make language as annoying as possible for the sake of memes. The chaos exposes the hypocritical nature of language and the maliciously inserted manipulations in it keep sticking out of it like thorns.
>>
>>536946651
One of the most important things about it is Bakunin. Everyone heard about Marx, but nobody about Bakunin. Did you know, that Marx and Bakunin were the forefathers of the First International, and the Bakunin being expelled from it caused its demise?
>>
>>536930212
That is what USSR have been doing. It is called propaganda.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.