Swiss bros where you at?No threads on the upcoming referendum in Switzerland to cap their population at 10 million (it's at 9.1 million now). What are the prospects of the referendum passing? Could Switzerland be leading the way for other countries to pass laws capping the population? Is this the way to a post growth economics that doesn't depend on constant immigration, or will low fertility rates render it ineffective as a means to stop replacement immigration?https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/what-is-swiss-population-cap-proposal-what-would-it-mean-europe-2026-06-12/
>>536940199That is an excellent idea.
>>536940251i think so too. apparently the vote is too close to call
>>536940199we are too busy watching soccy bro
>>536940199>or will low fertility rates render it ineffective as a means to stop replacement immigration?it's a start, not the end
>>536940382good thing you're playing tomorrow and not sunday. hopefully you don't get too drunk to vote...>>536940437yup. let's hope it passes
>>536940199They will probably restrict Europeans and let the shitskins in, just like the UK did.
>>536940199BASED
Good to abandon line-must-go-up economic theology. Any country with NEETs shouldn't be importing labor.
>>536940607It seems like there's more direct democracy in Switzerland, and the vote is being spearheaded by the populist Swiss People’s Party (SVP)
>>536940199only retards vote yes to this
>>536940199my favorite is the outrider, rumbler and huntsman
>>536941442why? you have a low fertility rate, you aren't growing your population unless you bring in migrants. do you want to be replaced anon?
>>536941442which is 80%?
>>536941674projected 45-50%>>536941591it's a random arbitrary number to bait the country into leaving the EU deals. I down to limit darkies into the country but I don't want brainless brexit shit
>>536941998how else are you going to limit darkies coming in? you've got to pick some number given how low your fertility rate is. no way you're getting enough migration from euro countries
Boomers are retiring or about to, the economy will try to fill those positions back up. When they eventually die off, the numbers should stabilise. It's a retarded referendum, like most of the time.
>>536942817>the numbers should stabilisewhat numbers? when the boomers die your population will decline, and it will keep declining unless you bring in replacement migration
>>536943192Old people dying are not an issue for an economy, it's a relief.
>>536942292no, picking a number is limiting growth. The swiss use more subtle ways, such as giving priority to citizens when looking for a job or renting.Immigration cannot solve the demographics krash that's coming anyway, this is a question of trade, race wars, and growth
>>536943326I still don't understand what you're saying. what will stabilize when boomers die? >>536943536>limiting growthbud your fertility rate is like 1.29. if you want a growing population you're going to be accepting lots of migrants, and those migrants will be coming from southeast asia and Africa, because that's where there's "surplus" population.
>>536941591Whites can easily just have more kids. Not shocked a MAID addicted cucked leaf wants to help kill off Whites.This will NOT help Europeans.They'll just demands Swiss to not have kids as more niggers get imported.Voting for this is a death blow to Switzerland.Start banning antiwhiteism in Europe, start promoting White wellbeing and you'll see White births sky rocket.Already seeing it in america FFS because Trump is actually doing some good things for Whites and opening the door for discussions on White positivity.Stop falling for antiwhite kike lies.
>>536943192>>536942292>kike hiding behind a leaf flag>oy vey Whites can't breedKill yourself rabbi.It's due to antiwhite kikes like (you) that Whites have suffered self loathing thus low birth rates.We purge you and your evil antiwhiteism and White erasure the issue is fixed.
>>536944117Nobody here is talking about race. We like green spaces and if we keep hiking the population density we won't have a lot of green spaces any longer. Simple as
>>536944264your anger feels really organic mate. getting that fertility rate up is possible, but it will take a while, and even if it doesn't capping numbers wouldn't do anything to harm it. It's not like the cap would apply if somehow the Swiss started making a shit ton of babies.
>>536940199why dont they do a referendum on capping the population of non-swiss browns in the country?
>>536944567try being more realistic. as soon as you make it explicitly racist it gets defeated.
Yes ban white people from reproducing thats so based !!!Oh yeah and tourists , refugees and 'temporary' immigrants don't count for the cap :)
>>536944666>>536944562>...n..no you can't stop the heckin browns from coming in or breeding...!>Whites just can't breed...they'll take 50 years to figure it out...!Kike.Pure antiwhite kikeryDo not vote for this shit Swissbros.
>>536944705clearly the cap would not mean restricting births. right now switzerland has a very low fertility rate. the point is to restrict immigration>>536944840you're an idiot or a shill. this is about slowing immigration, not reducing fertility rates.
>>536940199Doesn't matter because birth rates are below replacement levels. In order to keep it at that cap, they will still import browns.
>>536940199>>capping populationIf only they sided with Germany in WW2, this wouldn't be a problem...
>>536940199cap that population and offer maid. teach those filthy euroaches a lesson in death cult worship
>>536945601are you retarded? switzerland was the money launder and broker for the nazis, you rural village white farmer
>>536945129>the point is to restrict immigrationNo that's not the point because migrants don't count towards population neither do tourists, refugees , temp workers etc
>>536940199Nice less whites more pajeets, based
>>536940199I hope it passes. Voted YES today.
>>536944531That's the genius of this vote, it solves both racial problems and cementification, without making greens aware of the first part of the deal.
>>536940199>year later>"uhm dark-skinned immigrants are not following the limit, they are at 8 kids per woman">"just make whites have 0 kids *hand rubbing*"
>>536940199>What are the prospects of the referendum passing?It's not that clear but trends are towards no, I think.> Is this the way to a post growth economics that doesn't depend on constant immigrationbaby boomers of course didn't plan this way for their retirement and so on
>>536945828the usual bullshit way to say the allies were trading with the axis via switzerland, a fully surrounded country and by far the most coerced to do this of all the parties directly involved here
>>536948082it's what people think it solves, people like to project their view on ethnicity on the initiative. however to increase the helvetic birth rate while decreasing foreigner passport-holding birth rate is another issue and might only be affected slightly by the intiative. brainwashing and goyphone tiktok shit is a bigger issue IMO which can't be solved solely by political means either. reject globalism and bring back regional culture
also read the initiative text. government will not be given some magical powers. it says government shall act within the boundaries of their competence. it's not the governments competence to interfere with or influence the breeding of the population.
>>536949193right so it's not a complete solution, but buys time for getting the swiss birth rate up>>536948082that's what i'm saying. most greens are racist anyway they just can't admit it to themselves or anyone else. framing the referendum in this way allows them to vote yes while saving face
