/pol/ is being raided, right? I mean it must be since low quality, off-topic, flooding, spamming and trolling is stated board rule-breaking and a b&….
YOU WILL NEVER BE A REAL WOMEN JUST A STINKY DICKLESS MAN
tall whites outthicc whites in
>>536958875>/pol/ is being raided, right?since 2015the trannys just can't seem to get enough of us.
>>536959056Kardeiashians
Now will you all agree that we need more censorship on 4/pol/?!
>>536958875>/pol/ is being raided, right? I mean it must be since low quality, off-topic, flooding, spamming and trolling is stated board rule-breaking and a b&….
>>536958875It's your fault for bumping stupid threads and have nothing interesting to post
The real question is, what's going on here?
>>536958875>trolling is stated board rule-breaking and a b&….technically "racism" is allowed nowhere on the site but /b/they're just not dumb enough to enforce that here, lo
((((SPIELBERG))) marketing
>>536959379There's this obscure rule on /pol/ that I've seen enforced once>You are free to speak your mind, but do not attack other users. You may challenge one another, but keep it civil!When has a /pol/fag ever been civil?Funny thing is, you can't report others for hurting your feelings, so you must need to personally piss off a janny in order to get banned for this
>>536959253No, fuck off. I want only censorship of bbc spam.
When is /pol/ not being raided Its just regular traffic at this point
>>536959412If this is an ad then I wonder what other threads could be ads...
>>536959659>When has a /pol/fag ever been civil?I'm always civil even when it's unwarrantedespecially when it's unwarrantedit really bothers the shit out of self identified "trolls"
