[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: El2OSwvXYAAnowP.jpg (156 KB, 1200x1096)
156 KB JPG
>Any organization not explicitly right-wing will eventually become left wing.
Any thoughts on why this is or how to counteract it?
O'Sullivan claimed it results from "people who staff such bodies tend to be the sort who don't like private profit, business, making money, the current organization of society, and, by extension, the Western world," but he only analyzed nonprofits in formulating his law. It's hard to reconcile his reason with the left-wing capture of much of corporate America.
There does seem to be some natural, longstanding affinity for leftism—primarily social leftism, but economic as well—among the bourgeoisie and intellectual/artistic elites. The modern US left, despite its pretensions to represent the interests of working-class minorities, is mostly oriented toward the self-actualization of college-educated, upper-middle-class professionals.
https://web.archive.org/web/20100715191034/http://old.nationalreview.com/flashback/flashback-jos062603.asp
>>
>>537010643
Indian man's burden to save fatmericans from electing a pedophile it seems. All those are indian professions.
>>
File: 1773080944252909.png (166 KB, 774x896)
166 KB PNG
>>
>>537010746
Low-IQ response, as expected.
>>
black man's burden to save fatmericans from electing a pedophile it seems. All those are victims.
>>
Yeah but those studies are being conducted within a zog plantation. Simple tautological error
>>
>>537010643
This is overwhelmingly due to civil rights law which punishes/outlaws certain kinds of right-wing speech and encourages striver ascension via left-wing virtue signalling. 100 years ago elite "liberals" were eugenicist and laissez-faire.
>>
>leave your podunk shithole town to go to college
>leave college to go work in the city
>wow all these blacks, gays and mexicans are mighty different to what the internets told me
>>
Capitalism is just an infinite money hack for bankers, giving them control over our nation and money. It is the other choice we are presented that is mildly better than communism, which is full totalitarian control.
>>
>>537010643
Right leaning people treat others fairly, left leaning people select their own. Any organization will eventually get a left-leaning person in a recruitment position and from then on no more right-leaning people will be hired.
>>
>>537011371
Laissez-faire economics was a left-wing idea when it first started. Many progressives embraced eugenics as well. And there were plenty of communist-sympathizing elites long before civil rights.
>I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative. I believe that is so obviously and universally admitted a principle that I hardly think any gentleman will deny it.
-John Stuart Mill
>>
>>537011764
This goes towards Hanania's contention that leftists are just more ideologically driven than rightists.
https://www.richardhanania.com/p/why-is-everything-liberal
>>
>>537011371
And since I've already mentioned Hanania, he also lays the blame on civil rights. But I'm persuaded by Cofnas that woke leftism preceded the Civil Rights Act and its implementation.
https://ncofnas.com/p/why-we-need-to-talk-about-the-rights
>>
>>537011864
>Laissez-faire economics was a left-wing idea when it first started.
Not really, but even if so it demonstrates that left vs right is a terrible rubric because what underlies those positions changes all the time. The real law is that ambitious power/money/status-hungry individuals will adopt prevailing political and social attitudes as much as necessary to achieve their goals.
>>
>>537011928
>just more ideologically driven
Really buttered up way to say “parasitic” like jeets and heebs
“anti-merit” works, too
>>
>>537010643
right wing doesn't tolerate kikes
kikes subvert everything else
everything else can me moved left wing

even after the collapse of the soviet union with russians there is endless cope about their relationship with jews.
>they were working for the germans
>we sent the bad ones to the gulags
>the purges solved the problem

now they're fighting a brother war that is led by jews and their brother slavs say they are led by jews.
you are both correct
>>
right wing jews being a thing is interesting because seeing how they will deal with kikes is something of paradox
>>
>>537010643
Imagine believing in the fake and gay jewish left/right false dichotomy in current year. NGMI
>>
>>537013142
There are tons of right wing Jews, they're called Zionists. Zionists love the military, the love Israel, they hate Muslims, and they tolerate goyim only insofar as they find them useful. Those are the people that run Israel, and they live in their own psychotic bubble where Trump not following Israel into hell and letting the Iranians bomb them to smithereens like we've been doing is the lying perfidous goyim stabbing THEM in the back. Same disease as you people.
>>
>>537013311
jew



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.