Realistically how would a ban on porn even work? It's one thing to try and block porn sites but what about people that have porn download, have porn DVDs, magazines, etc?
>>537024201It wouldn't work.
they would need to ban women taking naked pictures of themselves in exchange for money. it's literally impossible.
>>537024291It's possible chudWe're going to fucking ban whoring around and make women accountable.
>>537024201LMAO, what year was this protest??Was double anal even a thing back then?
>>537024201>>537024361Don't care.Ban usury.
>>537024291They won't ban that. They will ban you watching it, not whores making it.If you are not a christian, you should know that the Bible says that to be ruled over by women and children is a punishment from God... I think we can all see now how true that is.
>>537024201Take away the emergency release valve (porn and masturbation) and the whole thing explodes... oh wait, thats exactly what they want.
>>537024201Instead of banning porn ban anyone that thinks they're not the sex that they are
The good way of doing this would be to ban commercialized porn and criminalize underground solicitation of porn labor. So major porn sites would become illegal and under the table paid porn shoots would be the same as prostitution.This would eliminate a massive chunk of porn from being available to people. Of course there would remain many terabytes of porn out there, and also on free websites (such as 4chan) and people would still post it for fun (because some people get off on it). You probably couldnt/shouldn't make it illegal to share videos for free (such as couples/friends/weirdo communities sharing content) as it's arguably free speech/freedom of expression, but you could remove the financial incentive, which in a capitalistic economy, effectively kills the industry. This would be a success and they definitely should do it.
>>537024201How did it work before, just do that again
>>537024201Realistically, largest porn sites are in Canada, and OnlyFans is in London. Are you going to mass protest Onlyfans to close it?? Canada I am sure also London has a saying in.>Headquarters London, Englandhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OnlyFans https://www.semrush.com/trending-websites/ca/adult
Its already worked in Australia, every good little goyim scans their face to get access to their dopamine hit.
>>537024201>Realistically how would a ban on child porn even work? It's one thing to try and block child porn sites but what about people that have child porn download, have porn DVDs, magazines, etc?(For retarded jannies and feds that need things spells out to avoid a ban or worse I'm saying child porn is banned it still obviously exists and appears, though far less frequently than if it wasn't. It being illegal doesn't stop it 100% but it cuts back on its availability immensely and people are far less likely to seek it out due to legal consequences, and that's how a porn ban would work.)
>>537024201Easy, ban businesses from making it and hosting it. 99.9% of it would disappear overnight.But no, instead they'll go after the end user and try to police behavior.
Banning porn will be the same as banning prostitution in all feminist hellhole. The producers (women and jews, and some times niggers) will be free to do as they please, while all the punishment and limitations will be aimed at the consumers. Women don't want porn to be banned, because they would mean they can no longer profit from their sexuality. They probably mean more along the lines of "ban hardcore and let us profit from our sexuality just for taking pictures in slutwear". It's the next logical step in the feminism arc where they continuously work on removing none chad men from any physical interaction with any woman.
>>537025587Yeah just make it illegal to sell/get paid for ads.Only other way is digital epstein scanning every photo on the internet
