>Does the UK have a blind spot on UFO sightings?https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3929kk7gdjo>Eight arrested during anti-immigration marchhttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwydpj0k31no>Boy, 14, among murder suspects after man killedhttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1eylxlyznwo>Jarvis says Labour must 'meet the moment' on defence spendinghttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gyx962pepo>Rugby star Sinfield and authors Blackman and Donaldson lead honours listhttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gyx4dnr21o
Hope French cunt dies this year.
>>537032667But I'm not French, I only live in France..Seethe Sunday.F
The aliens are busy buying up fireworks.
Tommeh detainedhttps://archive.is/V77Ov
>>537034201Corr. Thanks French cunt.Not like this wasn't known yesterday.Thick cunt.Just fuck off.You're a boring old twat and your desperate attempts to fit in are incredibly cringe.
>>537034201Got to get his publicity somehow.
They don't care >>blimey, Charles would you look at that>>at what, Mortimer?>>up there, above the poppin hutch >>is it worth while>>well of course it's "worth while", otherwise I wouldn't have mentioned it>>well, perhaps I should take a look then>>Oh yes, if you would..I think it might be going away >>right, right. Let me finish my tea>>never mind the tea, just turn around >>well goodness, you'd think the queen was passing by >>Charles, I'm really not trying to make a big deal out of it, but it would be nice if, for once, you'd pay attention >>I do pay attention, you just tend to be a bit bossy>>bossy? What does being bossy have anything to do with it?>>well, just last Sunday you ordered me to try your plumb pudding >>ordered? I never ordered. I asked of you would like some>>well yes, but you had that tone>>what tone?>>"that" tone. The one you're doing right now>>I'm not doing a tone>>that's right, keep denying it>>I'm not denying anything. I just don't have a tone>>Oh, you don't do you? Even your sister says you do>>leave Margo out of it>>she said you were the bossiest person she knew>>I said leave it. I'll box your ears>>oh? With what, your little chicken hands?>>I do not have chicken hands>>whatever you say, chicken hands>>what does that even mean? Chickens don't have hands >>well they would if they had to listen to you. Grow fingers and bits to plug their ears >>now you're just being rude>>you're right. I humbly apologize. >>fine, accepted. Now will you put down your tea and look?>>alright, alright. What am I supposed to be looking at anyways?>>that right over there>>what?>>that...oh dear..it seams to have buggered off>>right. Now can I please finish my tea?>very well. Would you pour me a cup >>what for? Can't grab the handle with your little chicken hands?
>>537034659The thought crime stop and detain at the airport routine is widespread. They even did it to Callum of inoffensive travel blogs on YouTube fame. Tommy, however, gets free publicity thanks to the Guardian. A bit suspicious, although I suppose it plays into their Tommy the criminal thug narrative.
Indians and Africans are not human. "Full stop." You have to put your foot down there, or else you leave yourself vulnerable to this kind of rhetoric that appeals to "human dignity," "human rights," etcNo. Indians are not human. Africans are not human. They are separate, distinct life forms from us and they occupy a lower tier of moral worth. That is the truth and we have to be honest and insist on it and stand by it or we will never be able to deal with them as an existential problem (3.5 billion of these life forms, btw)Even most "racists" don't actually "get" racism. "Racism" is not a utilitarian calculation along the lines of: "blacks and Indians produce lower economic output and are culturally different from us, therefore they're undesirable." Racism is: blacks and Indians are intrinsically, biologically 'Not Us,' and so they're inferior and hostile insofar as they pose a threat to us and our interestsYou have to Actually Be Racist. There's no shortcut or way to squeamishly avoid it. There are 3.5 billion of these things (and that's *only* subcons and blacks) and their numbers increase every day.
gonna be single the rest of my life because 99% of women in my age range are suddenly disfigured
Neither I nor you owe our votes to Reform.They either earn it or they don't deserve it.
alri la
>>537036520um sweatiehow on earth would a political party that isn't in power earn your vote? except through making promises?have you not learned anything in the last 100 years of modern day politicsand fundamentally, you don't earn through words you earn through actions so your entire point is ontologically inconsistent and you're putting the cart before the horse in a big way
my anglo brothers
good morning lads
>>537036770good morning my anglo brother
>>537032504>>Boy, 14, among murder suspects after man killed
>>537036604Alright laaaa.How's your mum?
bogdan been doing his blend-in britlarp to cover the fact he was larping about his 90k job and pretend he's not here is it
>>537036645>except through making promises?By making the right promises, at the right time.By not failing to do what they said they would do at the local level.By not disavowing and turning against the people that had supported them.
>>537037150no political party has ever done that thoughthey deliver the bare minimum so they can argue they did something while actively fucking everyone over in every single other way and driving a wedge between each subsection of societyreform will be no different, in fact they'll be even worsesame with restoremost people don't even realise they're all center-left either, even restorewhich should be obvious after the recent prioritisation of women's safety and the feminisation of the party before its even taken off>making society a safe space for women instead of incentivising them to return to the home and be housewivesthis is the only wayany party that doesn't promote this or incentivise this through policy is left wing
>>537036917Ey-up lad
>>537037332morning la
ok so am gonna say it for everyone who doesn't get it, I'm gonna sum it up nice n simpleif you do not explicitly and structurally incentivise the return to the home and the restoration of the traditional family model through hard economic and social policy, you are structurally left-wingit really is that simple
>>537036434Can't you just go outside your age range?
>>537036434Go younger, NOT TOO YOUNG THOUGH!
ZOG is gonna scan everything you got on your phone for jews
>>537037514you bang on like you know anything in the world but in reality you are a homeless middleaged virgin on retard bennies sponging off the gov because you cannot actually do anything in the world- because you are a low iq retarded homeless virgin.You have spent 6 months of 2026 posting on here and all you have achieved is losing a home. It really is that simpleLMFAO
>>537037229>just expect to get fucked in the assNo, I don't think I will thank you.You are as much a part of the problem as the leftie tards that want to hand the country over to browns.
>>537037821Every country is going to this. "Big tech" aren't opposed to it. It's just another pathetic little game of fabricated consent.When it is introduced here, it will be because "we" wanted it when we gave Keir Starmer a divine 5-year mandate to do whatever he wants, and then "our" government will force tech companies to do it against their good and noble wishes. So sad. They didn't want to spy on us and make us digital slaves. Poor them.
Which side are you on?
>>537037994Neither, especially after this:https://archive.is/yvWShThey're all charlatans and people falling for Lowe are exceptionally gullible.
>>537038211First time following a political campaign?
>>537038314If it was, I would be sucking Lowe's cock.
>>537038211I'm not anti islam, as long as they don't get mosques, there is no call to pray and they aren't allowed in the government.Just like I'm a Zionist, in the sense that I'm totally for them having a homeland because otherwise we have nowhere to deport them to.
>>537038211There is no upper limit to the number of murders and rapes before der boomer finally stops and thinks, "hang on, maybe these people aren't like us".
>>537038403Lowe has been harder on that shit than practically every other politician we've had.
>>537037957no arguments? just ad homs?I accept your concession
>>537038550I made the argument, you ignored it.Saying you are part of the problem isn't a ad hom, it's a fact.But ok, let's argue from your side, Restore's bare minimum is much better than anyone else bare minimum.And with that you point is null and void.
>>537038493Not interested until he publicly commits to total nigger death and launches an enquiry into Jews and their lies.
>>537038719Based
>>537038719>>537038732Retards.
>>537038550you are part of the problemhe has done you and you cannot refute that factLMAOKEK
>>537038746I don't "get" jokes either.
>>537038746
>>537038871It doesn't work as a joke when idiots on here will say and mean that unironically.
>>537037994easy
OK, Tommy, how are the protests doing ? How long did they even endure ?Did anything happen even yesterday or was it already over ?Knife Crime doesn't stop over the Weekend thought.
Did all authoritarian police states become so in order to babysit endless third world parasites or is this new to the modern West?
>>537036434Ha so true. I akshually get offended when some hag gives me the eye down the pub.Also not gay.
>>537039155To an extent it happened to Rome after Christianisation.Rome was flooded by biological detritus from the Levant and persecuted pagans for adhering to the old ways.
>>537037994Is this their canvassing leaflets? Because dangerously based if so. There is hope for this country.
>>537038686firstlynosaying I'm part of the problem without diagnosing the problem is ad hom. there's no substance behind your point because you have to quality the point with a diagnosis of what the problem is that you're referring to. without that, you have no argument. so your point becomes ad hom by default because thats all it can besecondly>Restore's bare minimum is much better than anyone else bare minimum.>this version of neoliberalism / center-leftism is preferable to the other versionsthats all you're sayingyou're not addressing the issue, you're playing favourites and choosing lesser evilsand you say I'm part of the problem because I refuse to choose any of them? top kek
>>537039155I don't necessarily think it was part of the plan, but the endless friction of modern life are an accumulation policies to control our low trust brown friends. Need multiple forms of ID for everything? Thank jeet scammers. Can't even buy a kitchen knife in Tesco's and have to take the cardboard one to show a grown up? Thank niggers. Invasive and unpleasant airport security? Thank exploding Muslims etc.
>naaah bruv, you man are mocking it, give it to the black guy he'll score, allow it senpai
why was there a redcoat in the confederate lines
>>537039155It's fairly normal for the final days, during a civilisation's fall.Wealth collects in a few hands. The upper classes wind up lazy, decadent, and inbred. Out of fear and hate for the plebs, they start cracking down on them.Eventually they grow so paranoid, that even when they look at their own guards all they can see are plebs and peasants, so they replace them with something completely alien looking.
>>537039272One policy, protecting women, does not make a party center left, anymore than a leftie party embracing a single right wing policy makes them center right.Change takes time, it took the leftie traitors over 70 years to reach this point. Expecting it to be overturned over night is the mindset of a fool.You remain part of the problem.
>>537039600It's about control. With brain chips they have near absolute control. But, the question remains, is this enough control?
>>537039272retard copeyou can't function without the benefit system, you would be dead without it.you should be dead but the faulty system prevents that-that is the problem, the problem you are a part of.Keep ignoring it, it will make your worthless life pass by easier
>>537037549they're all disfigured too
ever fallen in love
goblin means victory
>>537039600Burnhams plan is to find more things to tax, that's the entire revival plan for Labour. more money for foreigners it would seem, we haven't reached far enough up the laffer curve to scare off the plebs and peasants, so we'll shit up Makerfield so that instead of anyone getting what they want, they have to choose between higher taxes or kicking the niggers out of the country a bit quicker.
>>537039605>One policy, protecting women, does not make a party center leftfirstly, nobody mentioned a single policyso that was a bad faith effort on your partI'm talking about general ideological direction, not policyrestore proposes neoliberal ideology (social welfare through extra policing and surveillence and other things, essentially, state husbandry) as the primary means to re-establish british society as safe and secure (particularly for women) as opposed to re-establishing the importance of the nuclear family which is really the only thing that will ever make any sort of difference to anything nationally speakingthis makes it fundamentally neoliberal and center-leftist, and a fundamentally entropic force in regards to family valies which the loss of, is the main issue as to why we're in the mess we're in todayso its not a matter of a single policy, its the entire policy framework which again is based on neoliberal state husbandry ideology which only further atomises everyone and weakens the general population, making them more and more reliant on the state for day to day safety>Change takes time, it took the leftie traitors over 70 years to reach this point.you're thinking way too linearly, this isn't a case of, lefties taking 70 years to do what they wanted to do and then the right taking another 70 years to reverse the changes. its always been push and pull between the two poles and two steps forward one step back. every new "far right" party that enters the fray after a new subsequent neoliberal iteration becomes more neoliberal than the previous "far" right party because it has to, in order to meet the status quo and not be completely ostracised
Andy Burnham is a sausage.
Morning spakkersDon’t eat cheese n onion crips before bed
>>537032504>>537032667Did the Brit’s in NI finally started official anti immigrant paramilitary or his it just riot again and again ?
>>537039707There will never be enough because they don't actually have a vision of a world they want to build.
Alek yerbury is a sosij
>>537039800Yeah. I was a teenager. We broke up. She's married and pregnant with someone else. I fantasize about dying. It's rough I wouldn't recommend
>>537039972>social welfare through extra policing and surveillance and other things, essentially, state husbandryOh really?Getting people off benefits fits that?Repealing the internet surveillance that was brought in under the Tories fits that?Having our women being protected from brown subhumans is not a lib policy, the very idea of it is outside of their mindset.At this point I have to think you are just being disingenuous.>every new "far right" party that enters the fray after a new subsequent neoliberal iteration becomes more neoliberal than the previous "far" right party because it has to, in order to meet the status quo and not be completely ostracisedSo, assuming the last "far right" party was the BNP, what substantially is different?
Picrel is what we need to do to our politicians. Also a reminder to be vigilant around turdies.
>>537040226The kid will be a spakker and you’ll laughhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyHr-4SeILI
How is this latest daily mail smear legal?
>>537040284>6 people arrestedDoes that include everyone recording?So many watching and yet no-one noticed the rope.Ultimate bystander effect?
>>537040288If whatever they've been paid minus cost of a libel suit is a positive number, they print it.
>>537040242>Getting people off benefits fits that?won't happenwelfare expenditure is going to continue to skyrocket and there is nothing the state can do about it because the reasons for it being so high is entirely down to global market conditions which not even the markets can do anything about because its where we're at in the capitalistic life cycle. all you'll get more punitive measures and more hoops to jump through for the bennymongs and lots of stories of people being booted off bennies to keep people happy in the short term then you'll get a big reveal later on that actually welfare expenditure skyrocketed despite that, which is the loop we've seen for the last few decades>Repealing the internet surveillance that was brought in under the Tories fits that?won't happen, it'll be reconstituted and retrofitted into whatever apparatus they need to be able to push for mass deportations>Having our women being protected from brown subhumans is not a lib policy, the very idea of it is outside of their mindset.it is when you rely on the state to do it for you by increasing police presence, increasing surveillence and other similar policies>At this point I have to think you are just being disingenuous.lmao how? tell me exactly how. you won't>So, assuming the last "far right" party was the BNP, what substantially is different?they were an exception to the rule, there is always an exception to the rulebut the rule has been proven even in regards to the bnp because what happened to them and where are they now?
>>537040226but if you start a commotion you run the risk of losing her and that's worse
>>537039600Thay also create what they fear. During the french revolution the aristocracy were shit scared of plots by "secret societies" which didnt exist. They kvetched that much people started looking for these societies to join, couldnt find them, so they started some.Like the govt screaming about the far right now.
>>537040359You would have thought she would have noticed. Brazil though. Probably all high as kites.
>>537040434>won't happen>welfare expenditure is going to continue to skyrocket and there is nothing the state can do about itThat's what you think. I don't.>won't happenI disagree.>it'll be reconstituted and retrofitted into whatever apparatus they need to be able to push for mass deportationsentirely unnecessary. Native brits are against migration. >it is when you rely on the state to do it for you by increasing police presence, increasing surveillence and other similar policiesYou do know that a Restore policy is to get rid of the laws that discourage self defence, right?>lmao how? tell me exactly how. you won'tBecause you ignore stuff that goes against your agenda.>they were an exception to the rule, there is always an exception to the ruleSo that would make Restore also an exception to the rule. In fact, it would make them MORE of an exception, as they are saying the same stuff, decades later.This is another example of you being disingenuous.
>>537040602She wouldn't have noticed. She's a woman on holiday.
>>537040284Even if they noticed, that bungie looks like itll snap
>Checks Daily MailIs it really that hard not to be caught on cam throwing romans and sperg posting?>It is always a 1488 sperg ruining it for everyone.You know you should really be thrown out of Restore for the good of the movement.
>>537040689>she'll have more impact on the world than you will ever have you chud
>>537040656Kek.>>537040689The whole setup looks a bit dodgy tbf.
>>537040689> to infinity and beyond
>>537040627>That's what you think. I don't.its not what I think, its what the trends show. thats been the loop for the last few decades and the trend + loop has been downstream of global economic conditions. which are only going to proliferate further>I disagree.no argument?>entirely unnecessary. Native brits are against migration.no its entirely necessary because how are you going to differentiate between legal and illegal migrants without surveillence apparatus? especially when you have "lefty traitors" as you call them that are completely against remigration and will do all they can to resist it including helping hide their illegal migrant friends. and there are countless other scenarios like that which will pop up that will make a surveillence state absolutely necessaryyou have this vision in your head of restore getting in and suddenly there being this wave of nationalistic fervor and people suddenly coming out in their droves to push out every forrun they don't like but they is not how its going to play out whatsoever. you're vastly overstating the public's potential support of remigration policies>You do know that a Restore policy is to get rid of the laws that discourage self defence, right?thats besides the point. while a good thing, it does nothing to address the critical issue of the dissolution of the family unit leading to state husbandry (requiring a state presence to proactively protect your local community)>Because you ignore stuff that goes against your agenda.like what?>So that would make Restore also an exception to the rule. In fact, it would make them MORE of an exception, as they are saying the same stuff, decades later.no, it wouldn't, because the bnp and specifically nick griffin himself were abjectly right wing and rejected neoliberal values almost entirely. restore does not. restore tries to find a middle ground and adapt to the status quo while adding a traditional right wing twist to their platform
>>537040926Your id says FUD
>>537034201Jews are finished with him now? Back in the rapebox?
>>537040584>the far right>>537036770rabbit what have you been doing with yourself, scrolling through twitter?
>>537040926
are the riots still going on?
>>537040922Hilarious lad.Wish I could throw you off a bridge tbqhwy.
>>537040964son of fudd
>>537041041>there can be only one
>>537041041>>537041089he's a good lad
>>537032504The funniest man in America for realhttps://youtu.be/DPIoje1nfCQ
>>537041061You couldn’t tho, cos you would need to turn up
>>537041083
this is problematic..
>>537035037>They even did it to Callum of inoffensive travel blogs on YouTube fame.It's the first thing I think of. Why the fuck are we detaining actual British citizens at airports and taking all their devices just on a whim? "oooh but terrorism" the terrorism ... of daring to go outside the UK?we're heading more and more towards being a communist shithole where there's no free speech and you can't even leave the damn country or move anywhere else. We have a weaker passport than fucking BRAZIL
>>537041179guy on the right looks like rEnoch
>>537041179he's /ourguy/
>>537041258
>>537040689similar situation
>>537039800I was when I was young, then some older woman came onto me online and (unknowingly, I ended up lying about my age afterwards) groomed me and I felt terrible for betraying my girlfriend and that was the most depressed I've ever beennever really felt it since then. had a girl some time after but I just couldn't keep up with the burden of her mental health being dumped on me.
>>537041277Thought he were going to go straight through the net. Some wile e coyote shit
>>537039220They're being handed out in Makerfield.
>>537041172
>>537041277oof
>>537034201you reckon he gets triple time pay from mi5 while "locked up"
Livefeed of protest - no idead whylive Crowborough says NO!!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aszEiXbdZoc
>>537041501MI5? Mossad you mean
>>537036434come to thailand la
>>537041518Tf is that shite music?
>>537041571it looks sad
>>537041422Ffs, dunno why but the calendar on the wall makes me laugh n reminds me of cauldy
>>537040926>its not what I think, its what the trends show. thats been the loop for the last few decades and the trend + loop has been downstream of global economic conditions. which are only going to proliferate furtherThere is nothing stopping us from retooling the country to make use of the labour of native brits.The current situation is an aberration, where an unlimited workforce from abroad has been imported.You can literally do something as simple as toss out all the foreigners and make producing enough food to keep the country afloat a priority and you've 90% fixed the problem.Your issue is that you are thinking within the globalist mindset.>no argument?My argument is directly beneath you twat.>no its entirely necessary because how are you going to differentiate between legal and illegal migrantsYou do not need to have internet surveillance for that.Illegal migrants as well as working class people in general do not do work related things through the public internet, it's generally done through private intranets.>you have this vision in your head of restore getting in and suddenly there being this wave of nationalistic fervourThere has always been an undercurrent of nationalism in this country, it's well deserved.The governments since 97, and even before then, have had to actively attempt to suppress that inclination.>thats besides the pointIt is not besides the point.Takeaway the active discouragement of people to protect themselves, family/friends, their kin and their property and things change immensely.Add in the fact that Restore will almost certainly at some point remove the triple lock on pensions and a lot of the issues with the family unit will dissolve. >like what?Fuck off, I've already gave examples.Every time you've stated "this will happen".>almost entirelySo you are saying they can be right wing and NOT reject every left wing position.Oh, it's almost like I already said that.
>>537041518Now if only we could turn that road into a checkpoint, stop cars and arrest anyone delivering wogslop, no insurance or license and speaking urdu or on their way to a mosque.
>>537041543po-tay-teo po-tah-toe
>>537041797How did you know I'm Irish?
>>537041665What are they saying no to, something specific? I didnt watch any of it cos of the shit music.Restore needs to deport anyone involved with rap "music"
>>537041696>There is nothing stopping us from retooling the country to make use of the labour of native brits.ok and how do you propose we do that? migrants make up an absolutely massive portion of the workforce. if you're going to remigrate millions of people you would have to fast-track natives into the positions the migrants held and / or take over businesses those same migrants controlledthen you would need to account for the loss of revenue in the mean time while you trained people up and went through all the paperwork of getting them in those positionsand you'd need systems in order to do this which would likely not be devised for over a decade like with UC which only just finalised and was way behind scheduleand I could add a million other points of contention alongside those tooyou can't just retool the nation in accordance with the wants and needs of the global economy when you plan on remigrating millions of people back to their countries of origin. you're not thinking logistically you're thinking ideally>Your issue is that you are thinking within the globalist mindset.no my issue is I'm thinking pragmatically and I'm considerng all sides of the argument instead of ideallistically thinking "I want this" and focusing on that while ignoring everything that contradicts my preferred view which is what you're doing, which you've just proven because you've shown you're not thinking logistically>Illegal migrants as well as working class people in general do not do work related things through the public internet, it's generally done through private intranets.and how do you track what goes on through private intranets? through a surveillence state lmao. in fact your point makes a surveillence state even more necessary beacuse you're showing that people can hide if they want to, currently. so we would need to create a nationwide panopticon, essentially
>>537041861https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c39wppxd40woArmy camp being used to house BAMEs
>>537041857kek
How convenient. Right after those defence minister resignations
Absolute cringe. No booing while this happend either.
>>537041885>I'm thinking pragmaticallyYou could enter the data into any AI and have it tell you how the country can still function after mass deportations, but you won't do that, will you?
>>537041696>There has always been an undercurrent of nationalism in this country, it's well deserved.yes but currently in the UK nationalism is nothing more than a commodity for the absolute majority. nationalism is nothing more than "how can the country serve me currently" and the second it stops, people look towards something else, usually something more global>The governments since 97, and even before then, have had to actively attempt to suppress that inclinationthey also had to actively suppress communist revolutionary sentiment too. they had to actively suppress anything that threatened their stranglehold and monopoly on force. thats just what the state does. this doesn't mean that there's a secret nationalist movement just waiting for the right moment to pounce. especially not now after everything has been commoditised. even communism is a product now, just like british nationalism is. its a brand, nothing more, and people look at britain nationalistically as they look at the rebel alliance or the empire in star wars, they resonate with it but do they actually care about it? not really, unless it servers their immediate interests>Takeaway the active discouragement of people to protect themselves, family/friends, their kin and their property and things change immensely.you're conflating two things, immediate in the moment protection of one's property and person. and proactive communal security. and you call me disingenuous?>So you are saying they can be right wing and NOT reject every left wing position.yes I've never disputed that, the point is when it gets to a certain level of overlap you cease to be right wing and become centrist or center-left regardless of how you present
>>537041979I thought exactly the same when I saw the news alert about it.>>537042013>No booing while this happend either.By the looks of it there was no fucker there anyway.
>>537041089yerbunny owns you
>>537042035>can still functionis a very generic and vague claim and I've never disputed that anywaya man with no legs can still get around, just poorly and not without struggle and hardshipnice try though
>>537041179Didn't even get a photo on the cover.
>>537042013That is only aimed at one group of people.
Just realised Brit/pol/ is the same 5 unemployed wasters posting nonsense at each other all day every day
>>537041885>migrants make up an absolutely massive portion of the workforceLol, no, proportionally to their numbers, they actually make up quite a small portion of the work force.That's actually one of the major issues with having them here, they are massive freeloaders.>if you're going to remigrate millions of people you would have to fast-track natives into the positions the migrants held and / or take over businesses those same migrants controlledThe positions will fill up naturally, some wil close as they become unneeded. The majority of brown owned businesses could drop into the abyss tomorrow and it wouldn't notably affect the lives of natives.>loss of revenue in the mean time while you trained people upAgain, the majority of jobs that migrants hold are low skilled.It's the kind of job you can learn in an afternoon or two.>you can't just retool the nation in accordance with the wants and needs of the global economyWe should be retooling the economy to serve the native population.>and how do you track what goes on through private intranets?Not through internet surveillance you retard.It's like saying you are going to track it through monitoring notepad files ffs.
>>537042142no it's literally just josh who is every persona here
>>537040689I think this is the thing they were meant to attach rather than that noodly bit of rope. Not much better though
>>537041861based
>>537042188Yes a small volume of posts come from gchq too
>>537041179>some LARPcel photobombs Rupo>this is a grave problem
>>537042174>Lol, no, proportionally to their numbers, they actually make up quite a small portion of the work force.you're being disingenuous againthey might be a minority work force but thats still absolutely massive in the context of workforce disruption e.g. if you have a warehouse that stores all the food for a local constituency and it employs 100 forruns and you deport them all and don't train up their replacements or account for the gap between their expatriation and replacement you end up with a food shortage in that constituency which for some, especially the poor can be absolutely catastrophic. now apply that same principle across the entire country. even the loss of just one migrant worker in critical infrastructure can slow down productivity or drive it to a halt depending on what role they filled which has a knock on effect for all of the other workers in said workplace which then obviously impacts overall productivity and output. do this nationwide without a plan and without advanced logistical preparation and you have massive pol pot style production and distrubution chain issues and whatever else. you clearly haven't though this through whatsoever. you need a long-term plan before you even think of doing anything like thisyou are however correct, in the context of those on welfare. but not those who are working whether legally or illegally>The positions will fill up naturally, some wil close as they become unneeded. The majority of brown owned businesses could drop into the abyss tomorrow and it wouldn't notably affect the lives of natives.not the case whatsoever in poor northern areas who depend on the likes of foreign owned off licenses, corner shops and the like. again, you would need a plan or you would face shortages, even if you had larger chains in those areas they would find themselves short of produce and fast. think the bog roll panic but with food and x100
>>537042078>yes but currently in the UK nationalism is nothing more than a commodity for the absolute majority. nationalism is nothing more than "how can the country serve me currently" and the second it stops, people look towards something else, usually something more globalThey really don't.You stop maniuplating things, and people will naturally gravitate towards being proud of their country. Look at all the browns that do nothing but fellatiate their dogshit country.>they also had to actively suppress communist revolutionary sentiment tooLmao.Are you actually serious?I'm fast losing interest with you.>you're conflating two things, immediate in the moment protection of one's property and person. and proactive communal security. and you call me disingenuous?Everything I mentioned can be applied in the moment.>yes I've never disputed thatYou actively did when you said that Restore having protecting women as a policy made them left wing.
>>537042013>enjoy the matcheat the slop you pigs
>>537041059They shut the internet down in NI.
Say hello to your new neighbors
>>537042399you're losing interest with a namebame?why not hurry that process along and shut the fuck up altogether
>>537038211>didn't bother to check his own archive linkNewfag spastic glownigger.
>>537042396strange bloke
Why is Nigel dressing like Rupert now?
>>537042174>Again, the majority of jobs that migrants hold are low skilled.low skilled but high volume. low skilled jobs are still important and require pre-plannning if you're going to replace vast swathes of workers>It's the kind of job you can learn in an afternoon or two.and who is going to train them up? are you going to remove the entirety of the forrun workforce including supervisors and bring in new superviros and then have them train up the assumed bennymongs who you brought in to take on the roles? who does all the paperwork when the forrun gets deported who was the manager for the corner shop? again, you need a plan. you can't just remove them all and hope for the best. thats how supply chain issues occur which leads to crisis. you either need to do it slow and iteratively or you need to pre-plan and already have replacements ready to go on the day they're removed>Not through internet surveillance you retard.>It's like saying you are going to track it through monitoring notepad files ffs.oh my sweet summer child
Another live feedLIVE Crowborough Training Camp Protesthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4zEjHElAJA
>AGordon2023, UK, 9m ago>Restore supporting ideas your grandfather went to war to stop. Think about that.Total Boomer Death.
>>537034201The state is still harassing the guy that brought the rape gangs to the public consciousness.They jailed him just for reporting on a rape gang verdict.They slander him as "far-right" when the milk-toast Tories are more right wing than he is - he is the stereotypical face of working-class Labour voters.They always bring up his jewish-sounding name because they hate jews.They misuse the anti-terrorism laws so they can stop him every time he enters the country so they can seize his devices and snoop on his messages.(They do that to independent reporters who film and do interviews at Trump rallies too. It is HEAVILY misused).All because he helped cut off their supply of underaged girls.We are ruled by evil fascist monsters.
>>537042454I don't know why archive.is links are failing now.https://www.thetimes.com/article/0bd7f33f-b886-4d1b-88c7-361ab543fcee is the actual article. I tried to Pastebin it but it seems that's broken as well.
>>537042502Looks too family friendly, like a middle class picnic
>>537034201It's just a way for his handlers to bring him in and de-brief him on what he's been up to. It also strengthens his image with his thick followers.
>>537042513*milquetoast
>>537042380>you're being disingenuous againNo I am not.You remove them, and all the freeloaders, the load on the state goes down and even the load on the private sector goes down.>if you have a warehouse that stores all the food for a local constituency and it employs 100 forruns and you deport them all and don't train up their replacementsIt's literally an afternoon of training.I've done warehousing, it is not hard in the slightest.I'm just going to ignore the rest of your hyperbole.>not the case whatsoever in poor northern areas who depend on the likes of foreign owned off licensesNo one is dependant on them.They might have to go farther afield but this isn't "walking 20 miles to the nearest watering hole" tier.]Unironically, are you brown perhaps?>even if you had larger chains in those areas they would find themselves short of produce and fastConsidering that the majority of migrants are leeches, demand at shops would actually drop at a lower rate than those being employed in places.And frankly, even if every singe thing you've said until now on the issue was true (it's not), short term disruption is preferable to eternal term being replaced in our homeland.
WTF?
>>537042629you don't need to persuade or affirm your views to a glownigger namebame, just stop it
>>537042454Political arguments are rarely to persuade the opposition but instead to persuade the fence sitters.Once the opposition gets to the point of making obviously stupid points, the value of arguing diminishes.
>>537042648why do you think our schoolgirls now have to take axes to school to defend themselves?
>>537042629You're replying to one of the biggest cancers in this general you daft cunt.
>>537039155>Did all authoritarian police states become so in order to babysit endless third world parasites or is this new to the modern West?Lets say there is a choice.You can be a middle manager in a free and prosperous state, or you can be Great Leader and earn 10% more but the state becomes a ruinous North Korean shithole where nothing works.Many politicians *spit* will chose the latter option.They'd rather rule a vast ruin than be a supermarket manager.
>>537042648Set the Ridgeback loose.
>>537042556I can't see this kicking off - they're playing Abba
>>537037994They should drop the death penalty stuff imo, it brings an air of darkness into the campaign. I'd hang millions personally but don't think it's good for the party atm.
Why is the weather doing a complete 180 every 5 minutes? I'm getting tired of the weather psyop.
>>537042648It's a subversion of Islam. Muslim women who serve in the police force are in and around normal free people all day everyday and slowly begin to give up on their shitty oppressive religion. Islam can only thrive in isolation.
>>537042496>low skilled but high volume. low skilled jobs are still important and require pre-plannningOf course they are important, but they are not difficult to replace.>and who is going to train them up?Just for a moment, I'll entertain your delusion that the majority of warehouse jobs are nothing but migrants currently.Why do you seem to think mass deportations are going to happen overnight?And if a company is employing nothing but browns, the job really can't be that complicated. Also fuck them.>who does all the paperwork when the forrun gets deported who was the manager for the corner shop?Why do you say this like filing a job form is some esoteric ritual?Have you really never had to set up some organisation for paperwork before?I'll ask again, are you actually brown? things make a lot more sense if you are.>oh my sweet summer childLook who isn't making arguments now.
>>537042629>You remove them, and all the freeloaders, the load on the state goes down and even the load on the private sector goes down.this isn't an argument, this is a statement. we're currently debating the logistics of this. so I'm not sure why you keep making generic statements like this>It's literally an afternoon of training.its not though, its preparation, its paperwork, its finding the replacements, its inductions, its setting up payrolls, its ensuring all of this is timed so there's no interruption in the supply chain across the entire nation>>537042629>They might have to go farther afieldwhen you take one store out of the supply chain that means there is twice as much demand for the next store's produce. twice as many customers, twice as much demand, half the supply>Considering that the majority of migrants are leeches, demand at shops would actually drop at a lower rate than those being employed in places.can you pull the stats for me? because the stats I just saw say otherwise>And frankly, even if every singe thing you've said until now on the issue was true (it's not), short term disruption is preferable to eternal term being replaced in our homeland.the english aren't having kids, you're not being replaced because abdul got a job at the local co-op you're being replaced because you're not having kids because of neoliberal feminist ideology which encourages women to work and not have kids ahahahayou're so out of touch with reality its insane
>>537042484he's always tried to lean into the clarkson farmer tier look.
>>537042825Has to be a pledge or it's easier to challenge.This is the last chance to accomplish this politically and there's no time left to be cowards about it.
>>537042484because he's an empty masonic husk of a bloke
>>537042978YOU DID IT!!YOU WON THE ARGUMENTGO AND TELL YOUR MUM!!
>>537042784the isle of liverpoo
when you die your ballbag inflates and you float up to heaven. Don't die indoors cos you just get stuck on your living room ceiling like a helium birthday balloon until you deflate
>>537043070Yes but thos specific style of shirt lools lile a copy of RupertIt's like Meghan Markle copying Kate Middleton, weird insecure narcissism
>>537042978>Of course they are important, but they are not difficult to replace.and I haven't argued that they are. the difficulty isn't in replacement its in logistical preparation. its like you have this weird basic video game tier understanding, that you can just replace person a with person b in an afternoon but there's a fuck ton of logistical preparation that is required behind the scenes for that, especially on a large scale basis in regards to supply chains that often employ large amounts of migrant workers>Just for a moment, I'll entertain your delusion that the majority of warehouse jobs are nothing but migrants currently.I didn't say this, I've never made this claim>And if a company is employing nothing but browns, the job really can't be that complicated. Also fuck them.it has nothing to do with whether or not a job is complicated. thats not the argument here. you're completely giazing over the logistical argument and hyperfocusing on the complexity of the individual jobs. this is a cope. you can't argue against my argument so you're trying to box me in to something I'm not even arguing>Why do you say this like filing a job form is some esoteric ritual?I'm not, I'm highlighting the point that removing workers and replacing them en masse in critical infrastructure like supply chains is a complex logistical issue which you refuse to acknowledge
>>537042825There's also the argument about what the death penalty would be used for: would it just be rapists and murderers? Or would it devolve into anyone who goes against Restore's beliefs?
Never read a brit/pol/ post longer than a paragraph, i'm not going to lie.
>>537036747>You must not speak of us … as cousins, still less as brothers; we are neither. Neither must you think of us as Anglo-Saxons, for that term can no longer be rightly applied to the people of the United States … there are only two things which can establish and maintain closer relations between your country and mine: they are community of ideals and of interests. (President Wilson to King George V, 1981)
>>537043052>this isn't an argument, this is a statement.Correct.A factual statement actually.Foreigners are overwhelmingly leeches and removing them from the country would be an overall benefit.>its not though, its preparation, its paperwork, its finding the replacements, its inductions, its setting up payrolls, its ensuring all of this is timed so there's no interruption in the supply chain across the entire nationNone of this shit is hard.20 years ago you could fill out a job application and you'd be working that same day.You are trying to make something extremely simple seem esoteric and mystical.>when you take one store out of the supply chain that means there is twice as much demand for the next store's produce. twice as many customers, twice as much demand, half the supplyFixed within a day at most.Demand is dropping at a far faster pace then supply, as the majority of foreigners are leachers, as I keep reminding you.>can you pull the stats for me? because the stats I just saw say otherwiseThe stats you saw are wrong, the only groups that are a net benefit to the economy are white europeans and asians (as in actual asians, not fucking indians/pakis etc) I'm not spoonfeeding you.>the english aren't having kidsThere are more English now then at practically any point in history.A generation of decline in numbers isn't going to end us, it will balance out on it's own eventually.Getting replaced in our homeland eventually will.At this point I'm just going to assume you are brown.
>>537043311I always just filter the hostel nonce. Had to unfilter the frog to find brit/pol too ahah
>>537042744People often wilfully fail to understand an argument thus shutting down discussion.
I'm seeing a lot of of people on social media start to panic about how popular restore is. A lot of reform voters are screaming about voting tactically and splitting the vote lol
>>537043407
>>537043225>the logistical argumentIs being completely overblown by you.Shuffling paperwork is not hard.
>>537043357Sorry mate but you're as dumb a cunt as he is for prolonging this spastic discussion. You're obviously new here, that mong is notorious for being thick as shit and using this place as a substitute for a social life.
>>537043407Its the only argument they have.
>>537043407Can't get a bacon sarnie down their neck? Gone.
>>537042013A literal cult.
>>537042013Message is clear:>you're all equally worthless niggercattle to us
>>537042410>They shut the internet down in NI.Starlink is going to be very important when Labour go full North Korea on us.
Lowe is going to be a difficult character for the media to assassinate I reckon. I mean character assassinate, not literally murder.
>>537043357>Foreigners are overwhelmingly leeches and removing them from the country would be an overall benefit.incorrect, thats why you won't show me stats>None of this shit is hard.again, nobody is saying its hard. difficulty isn't the issue. the issue is disruption. and any change in the supply chain is a disruption, so you have to plan ahead and make preparations. especially with large scale changes with lots of legal ramifications regarding replacing migrants being deported>You are trying to make something extremely simple seem esoteric and mystical.not at all, all I'm doing is highlighting simple logistical realities. you want to dismiss them because you're an ideologue who is hyperfixated on removing forruns. you probably wouldn't even care if it caused crisis' as long as they were gone. which is part of the problem. you won't acknowledge anything that acts counter, ontologically speaking to your preferred outcome. even if it only means you have to take care in carrying out the function that will lead to that outcome. any responsible, intelligent person not ideologically posssessed would acknowledge my points as safeguarding issues for the nation, not dismiss them>20 years ago you could fill out a job application and you'd be working that same day.now you're conflating applying for a job with replacing vast swathes of migrant workers on a whim>Fixed within a day at most.only with preparation which will take years, especially when you take into consideration the level of administrative stagnancy this country has, which isn't going to go away anytime soon unless you instigate massive bureaucratic reform which in itself will take years>The stats you saw are wrong, the only groups that are a net benefit to the economy are white europeans and asians (as in actual asians, not fucking indians/pakis etc) I'm not spoonfeeding you.source?>There are more English now then at practically any point in history.we're below replacement rate m8
Just had a lovely poo
>>537043586The government will just activate their moslem sleepercell boatwogs if they gain too much traction.
>>537042513>We are ruled by evil fascist monstersMeanwhile their ground troops call everyone opposed to their depraved tyranny "fascists". Everything the woketards say is projection, whether they're aware of it or not.
>>537042577I learn something every day.I was wrong in the correct way.
>can stop an oil tanker>won't stop boatwogs
https://xcancel.com/RStatecraft/status/2065426392485859760#m>Section 622 of the intel bill, sponsored by Sen. Tom Cotton, would mandate intel sharing w/Israel in ways that make no sense, says intel veteran Paul Pillar. So the question is, why?"All according to plan"
>>537043669got stomach pains again, hope its not an ulcer and im shitting black diarrhea again for the next week
>>537042648>Brown extortion officers threaten British man for interfering with their extortion racket.https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15897321/Council-officers-sacked-threatening-man.html
