The sexual market functions much like free-market capitalism, with opportunities concentrated among the top 1% while everyone else competes for the crumbles.The study was published by Cambridge University Press, so it's going to be difficult for the copers to dismiss it outright.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/toward-individualistic-reproduction-solving-the-fertility-crisis-could-require-a-further-marginalization-of-men/F26A4750B666344157278B72CFC5D223
Once again, many advocates concerned with inequality will simply ignore this study because it highlights a form of inequality they are unwilling to take seriously. Yet the study itself notes that sexual deprivation can have substantial negative consequences for men's mental health.
>>537041152communism doesn't work
>>537041949I agree with you. Free-market hoe-pitalism doesn't work either. That's why I'm a hoe-cialist.
>>537042059inequality works very well, commie
>>537041152>32th
>>537041170Probably because to reach thosecmumbers, you'd need to fuck women who are substantionally sub-par. People who feel like they need that probably already have some scars on their hart and use sex as a coping meganism
>>537042059Lol.
>>537041152A relatively small number of men buy the services of prostitutes on the regular. Assuming they start at age 25 and go to the brother once per month, then they reach a body count of 300 at age 50.Please switch on your brain before posting, retard.
>>537047107Even more importantly are legitimate nymphomaniacs and promiscuous homosexuals. They wildly skew the top percentile.It's not "chad" and the sexual marketplace as the op suggests. It is mental illness and extreme lifestyles
means mean very littlethe distribution is actually more skewed than even that
>>537041152I assess male sexual success not by body count in itself but quality of the women he slept with. Sleeping with multiple 10/10s is far better than two dozen ogres
>>537041152Huh? So the usury of Rothschild purposely made goyium women, whores in order for nuclear family, to not work against them. Got you, glowie.
Good, wonderfull. Accelerate, and let the globe be illuminated by the nuclear warheads exploding above the ground,
>>537041933We therefore come to the conclusion that we need to roll back womens rights to fix this
Could you stop posting this while being completely mathematically illiterate and making a retarded statement based off of your retarded interpretation of the data?
>>537041152It's over.
>>537041152WOW THIS THREAD AGAIN!!!! MUH SEX CHART WOWEEE!!!!!
Good. Ugly fucking manoids might finally just rope for once and evolution will come back.
>>537041152why are indians concerened with this (us stastics). A white chud in india pulls 5-7 pajettas, easily, jbw.
>>537041152I bet most of the men on top echelons of the chart are just hooker fuckers
>>537050347You forgot your sage, faggot>>537041152picrel
>>537050335It's indeed over for Western men
>>537041152So the people who have the most sex... have the most sex
>>537042059based
>>537051134this paper spits some truth tho, but comes to evil conlusions. They want to "free" women even more, giving them a free social and finanancial pass to get pregnant by their most favourable mate (i.e. they just fuck and get gibs). Marginalized man on the other hand, ve to wait for new technologies (art. wombs etc.), to gain sexual equality.
>>537041152The top 1% can also marry 287 women because I ain't doin' it. You drink out of a bottle in the store, you're paying for it or no one is. Never want to hear from tradcucks or hags that I need to "man up!"
>>537051893Artificial wombs are dumb. Why does sexless and landless goycattle want kids? Are you out of your fucking minds? Chads do all the fucking, they can do all the breeding and marrying and can pick up the bills with the women. Regular men should just chillmaxx.
>>537053027But think about the economy, chuddy! Just man up and marry a 35-year-old who's suddenly "ready to settle down." Then enjoy spending the rest of your life competing with the memories of her former partners. Great deal, trust me.
>>537053248>.jpgI'm not reading that crap. Sex is for teens and early twenties. I'm 28 and got it out of my system by fapping, fucking (whores) and contemplating just how dumb the whole thing is. That's sex, and what is marriage? Some outdated moral framework of where and how sex should happen. See the issue? If a man has been single and mostly sexless up to the beginning of middle age (30 if we're honest), then he should stay so until death. It's a losing game to deal with women at that point, if it isn't at the younger ages too. There's not much to discuss here.
>>537050335. All right, back to the other thing. For a guy like that, he's going out with a woman he could technically not have penisary contact with her Volvo?
>>537041152https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yev-wvWg9nMIncels will inherit the earth
>>537049824Bingo.The dudes willing to fuck fat and ugly chicks will have a higher body count than the biggest, baddest college Chads who have a roster. If you envy high bodycount men, simply start asking out hags. They'll put out, and you'll likely get diseases since they're usually fucked by black men, but at least you'll get laid... right? 20% of men fuck 80% of women. This is still true. The white pill in all of this is it doesn't take much to be in the top 20 percent of SMV these days. More than half of men 18-30 live with their parents, which is a major turn off for women because they want to make noise. More than half of men are fat, which signals to women they can't fuck because they'll run out of energy. But less than 10 percent of men have visible abs. Society isnt going to change so dramatically that suddenly more than 10 or 15 percent of men have abs, so If you're a virgin or a wizard or simply someone who isnt satisfied with their current sex life, theres still hope for you on an individal level. Get abs and grind Uber and UberEats and other gigshit on top of your regular job to afford having your own space; then and only then start asking out 6s and 7s. It takes effort, and it sucks. But the men willing to put the effort in will get the results, and the men coping and seething will stay gooning.
>>537054321>just take debts/rent and jestermaxx for pussyI get the drive but never could rationalize it for more than a day or two. Just fuck whores and let the world burn.
>>537054473But mostly fap of course.
Notch counting is so fucking stupid. >Fuck burn victims>Fuck fatties>Fuck bar sluts>Fuck desperate single moms>Fuck homeless chicks>Go to Africa and fuck niggers>Go to SEA and fuck jungle monkeys>Fuck prostitutes>Donate your cum to lesbians that want kidsThere. Now you're chad. You're welcome.
>>537053122>Why does sexless and landless goycattle want kidsYour approach leads to landless ultra-controllable dumb goycattle tho. 99.9% of chad wont question the status quo.
>>537041152287 is insane holy shit.
>>537054088Welp, maybe being an incel isn't so bad after all
>>537054589Thas true! I have ~70 because whoremongering makes it easy and it cost nothing in comparison to paying rent (which I don't) would if I were trying to get a relationshit. Now the number of sex acts... that's a different story. See >>537050335.>>537054727>Your approach leads to landless ultra-controllable dumb goycattle thoHow are they more controllable than the immobile debtoid cattle with a hundred worries? And even if it was true, how long can that last, being that the subchad men won't breed? Soon the elites stop being the elite minority and become big fish in a small pond, which is a lot less powerful than big fish in a big pond.
>>537041152Thats not how it works retard. You have to multiply the number of people in each category with the respective number holy shit this board is full of retards.How about thinking before you post you dumb faggot
>>537041152Why don’t these highly desirable people settle down and have lots of offspring? Why remain Peter Pan forever? Why not continue the civilization you inherited?
>>537055026Exactly this. Chadbros... looks like you gotta marry all the bitches you fucked. Betagoy Eugene ain't gonna pick up your bags.
>>537041152>>537041170>>537041933>>537042059>>537051049>>537053248>>537054929Saar I am incel Saar because I am Indian man Saar, vill h1b make beautiful Vhite vomen have sex vid me Saar?
>>537055019Here is how the actual thing would look like if OP wasnt a dumb retard
>>537054473Fucking literal whores is out of the question for most men because they don't want to wear a condom. Condom sex with a 10 is worse than nutting inside a 6. Men also tend to prefer the status of having a gf and the albeit low potential of starting a family.Not judging BTW. Feel free to fuck whores. I assume most men don't want to die alone, and these men should take active steps to avoid it.
>>537055678I don't mind condom sex somehow and wouldn't want to bang any foid without it regardless. Vaginas are unattractive to me and I did catch an awful smell once, and fuck pregnancy risk. Also can easily get raw bjs, which isn't as risky as it sounds, although it's not without risk either. Not goycattle so the status flexing shit never dawns on me. Starting a family is something I'd only even consider if I were rich enough to make it worthwhile instead of another pack of goycattle that will eat shit all life long.
>turn dating into a marketplace>distributions follow the same pattern as money/wealthwho would have guessed
>>537055678Also, it's better to not need than to satisfy that need at a great cost. Men should learn to be alone. Having good friends should be enough. I assume most ringcucks are so isolated they conflated their loneliness with the sex drive and got a ball and chain instead of male friends. Horniness is an easy fix, especially with age.
>>537041152Women are going to lose their rights when this all collapses
>>537047700Agreed. My brother is a serial fucker like that. To me he's just a deviant with low inhibitions and there's nothing desirable about that behavior, he's like a heterosexual turbo-fag. He's unimpressive/unremarkable in other respects, so that serves as a form of validation for him. I never comment on things like that, whatever floats his boat. True "desirable/top percentile" people I've met either have a stable, long-term relationship, mostly marriage or they prioritize other things entirely.
>>537054321> More than half of men 18-30 live with their parents, which is a major turn off for women because they want to make noise.This is something the average chud fails to acknowledge, women flock to STATUS if you dont have a social circle and a crib you are dead.There is a reason average dudes living on rent who party every weekend pump and dump, thats how easy women are, you dont need to be rich to fuck the average bitch, the LOWEST status in society for a man is NEETdom, which is just tied to homeless lol.As a NEET most i can score is sub6 chubby girls with daddy issues and i still need to grind my way into their rotten hearts.If i upgrade from NEET to wagie i get bitches with body counts of 12+>>537055438Bloody rape you i am brahmin from upper pradesh apni maa ko maar dalo
>>537056573>upgrade from NEET to wagieDoes not compute. You're sacrificing 8 hours a day to pay for privacy which you use to drag home dumb cunts in a horny frenzy, after which you drive them out because Post Nut Clarity hits like a truck. If it were good, everyone would be doing it non-stop, but most people graduate away from it. You're better off just fucking whores to get to the same end-point without wasting gorillions of dollars in rent/debtbuxx and your braincells on booze and normie lifestyle.
>>537041152Top 1% here, I just fuck chicks one night stand style cause I have no capacity for a human relationship. I just happen to be good looking and chatty.
>>537041152To make it viable for single moms to exist governments must provide.If 99% of men are demotivated and NEET because there's no point anymore, who will the government tax?No tax revenue, no gibs for single moms. There's a reason why monogamy used to be enforced: men won't work for zero pussy.
>>537059176They'll just import more migrants. >Don't want to breed? Fine. Then enjoy having Muhammad and Pajeet as your neighbors!
>>537059176>men won't work for zero pussy.I will, but I won't work for strange employers who will only pay me to survive and I won't pay taxes for bastard children of hoes.
>>537041152>sexual marketWhores.Nothing but a bunch of whores.https://youtu.be/z-L1tPdKnGU
>>537059633I agree, my goal is to have my own small business and pay zero tax.I don't want to slave away to feed millions of whore bastards
>>537041152I'm 22, 6'2 blonde broad shoulders strong chin and physically active. I've only ever had one light sexual interaction with another person while on a date (it was a dude)I have had a large amount of women and men attempt to win me over or fuck me and I just don't really have interest. Am I supposed to be fucking people? I could've fucked like 20 people by now
>>537041152God/יהוה is a child raping kikethere is no omnipotencejesus christ/YEHSHUA/YOESHUA/JOSHUA/יהוה is a liar and we WERE all AFAMILY NOT ANYMOREwho the fuck would worship a shit on the floor.
>>537059633>>537059725So you will still work for (((their))) fiat currency even though it's a rigged system, meaning you still pay taxes one way or another.Good goy.
>>537041152God/יהוה is a child raping kikethere is no omnipotencejesus christ/YEHSHUA/YOESHUA/JOSHUA/יהוה is a liar and we WERE all AFAMILY NOT ANYMOREwho the fuck would worship a shit on the floor.FUCK GOD FUCK JESUS FUCK THE HOLY SPIRIT I CURSE THE EARTH MAY ALL NORMIES AND OTHER TRASH SUFFER
This confirms that women only have sex with 20% of men and then get traumatized by them.
>>537059892>I'm 22, 6'2 blonde broad shoulders strong chin and physically active>I had a sexual interaction with a dudewell at least you tell half the truth
>>537041949We are national socialist not communist.
>>537041152No that's completely wrong. Those are male whores, they are addicted to cooming.
>>537060199I'd post my cute face but it's /pol/ :3
>>537060098No one stops you or me from transforming fiat into hard assets, you know?
>>537041152So why are none of you committing acts to undermine and destabilize this system?
>>537056573>>537054321>>537056573>uhm here’s why it’s your faultFuck off.It’s not ‘our’ fault everything is getting worse.We are owed a relatively easy life, like what our parents had.If we do not receive such a life then we are justified in ruining the lives of everyone else.Don’t want your family to get shot?Give me your virgin daughter.That is how it will work in the future. There’s 50 of us for every one of you.
>>537041152>https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/toward-individualistic-reproduction-solving-the-fertility-crisis-could-require-a-further-marginalization-of-men/F26A4750B666344157278B72CFC5D223ur welcome-
>>537060633>i buy stuff with muh shekels>even though i paid taxes on every transaction i "transformed fiat into hard assets", therefore i wonnice mental gymnastics, goy.Mr Shekelberg and all the single mother whores appreciate your sacrifice
>>537060737Impossible at this point. The digital infrastructure is too controlled and heavily monitored, the masses are too sedated to take meaningful action, and the system is already designed to redirect popular frustration into harmless channels. At this point, our best hope is is to be replaced by Muslims who will establish sharia.
>>537061075Gold isn't taxable here, and you do gotta eat man.
>>537060098nigger tongue my anus
>>537041152>10 men say they've totally fr fr had sex with like 500 women brah>schizoid on 4channel gets activatedOkay
>>537041152>this is a fake stat>at some point>you stop counting
>>537041170>single men suffer more than womendoubt, women cant stand independent men while men do well all on their own.
>>537061330
>>537061330I hope the men who can't be single all die by suicide. They're the reason why women have power.
>>537041152This is just propaganda to get normal people thinking of other people as poker chips lol. You guys need to realize, those top 1% are not good people, they're druggies and degens. Vote against social services and gibs if you want to hurt fornicators.
>>537061191Silence, bugchasing fruitcake. I will not partake in your degenerate homosexual fecaloid fetish.
Feel like "muh quantity" is a shit metric. What's more important in your opinion:Quantity of sexual partners.Quality of sex.Quality of the opposite partner. I would argue literally anything is better than "muh quantity". 1000 bareback craempies with a single big titty pale White women is better than fucking 1000 ugly poos or niggers with condoms.
>>537061526Not gonna lie I read this in a Monty Python ass voice and it made me cackle. Keep it up anon
>>537061377Daily reminder that men with female brains (jews, niggers, and anglo kikes) and sluts can't make good use of their liberty
>>537050335>in one study the top 1% had more sex than the bottom 50%And in this study its the top 1% has more sex than the bottom 70%>33% at average of one>67% at average of sevenWelcome to the death of society. >>537051893If they dont say that they will never get the work published. Just like all the climate papers which destroyed global warming all had sections say:>global warming is bad and man madeEven when all the papers evidence said otherwise. Getting the data out is the most important job of the scientists.
>>537041933>to improve fertility we should make all the incels pay child support for chad through taxes or he will wear a rubber
>>537060994Systematizing social interaction is categorically propaganda.
>>537041152same post weekly, kys juden freak.
>>537056361>>537059657>>537054559>>537041170>The entire liberal worldview hinges upon people having a selfish survival instinct
>>537061770I'm glad he reposted it, it was an interesting read
>>537061724Western social scientists are retarded. Their ideas will simply usher in a new era of warlords, with incels forming fraternities and taking women by force. Restricting the sexual marketplace, restoring norms of monogamy instead of their stupid hookup culture, and/or removing women's rights are obviously the solution.
>>537041933The solution is to get fornicators & (((free thinkers))) to take the liabilities of their nihilistic worldviewshttps://youtu.be/hYvoWeSKwkk?list=PL63895829E18B3222
>>537050335Try to figure out how to stop caring about sex like it is some end all be all achievement. That is slave mentality, and being slave to something as pointless as pussy. You can consciously assign your own meaning and worth, not one that everyone else takes on.
>>537061377Damn, that's a good rejoinder to that roastie who is mad at that recliner. Fucking nailed that sow.
>>537061991>transparent png>outer glow around textwtf is wrong with you? like a 12 yo first photoshop experiment.
>>537062464>different typefaces of wholly different sizes & colorsthx for the quote anyway though-
>>537061724>>537062122Anyway, Western social "scientists" aren't really scientists, they're paid activists. The solutions are obvious, but they deliberately avoid them and instead propose dystopian alternatives.
>>537041152I haven’t had sex for over six years
>>537041170>sexual deprivation can have substantial negative consequences for men's mental health.Having a shitty gf or wife is worse for your mental health than not having sex. Source: been there
>>537061125I posted an example of a (1) meaningful action and (2) not a gov-approved harmless channel because they are passing laws to regulate and eventually ban companion dolls and robowaifus
>>537041152URLs:https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/toward-individualistic-reproduction-solving-the-fertility-crisis-could-require-a-further-marginalization-of-men/F26A4750B666344157278B72CFC5D223https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02412698.pdfhttps://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02443328.pdfhttps://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02436529.pdfhttps://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00880664.pdfThese sources point toward a civic order in which female-centered outcomes are increasingly treated as public goods, while male reciprocity becomes optional. The Cambridge article states that “many men’s utility to ‘free women’ has been so diminished” that solving fertility through pair-bonding may be “unfeasible,” and proposes giving women the “economic and social resources” to conclude that solo motherhood is preferable to childlessness. It then admits that “such financial transfers” would “further reduce men’s utility to women” and would likely worsen “male marginalization,” while adding that the fertility crisis could justify “such drastic measures.” ([cambridge.org][1]) That is the core indictment: the paper does not merely observe male exclusion; it entertains policy experiments that knowingly deepen it.
>>537062756The sharpest Cambridge passage is even more explicit: “More generous government support to women wanting to solo parent would thus further reduce some men’s utility to women,” which “could lead to even more men being excluded from intimacy, love, fatherhood, and family life.” The authors connect that exclusion to “withdraw[al] further from social life,” reduced striving, and worsening mental health. ([cambridge.org][1]) In political terms, that is not a minor side effect. It is a state-subsidized reorganization of family formation in which men remain taxpayers and legal subjects while becoming less necessary as husbands, fathers, and household partners.The article’s own policy language confirms the redistributive structure: “Women must feel economically secure,” and the authors say “experiments should begin soon” to determine what “economic resource transfers” are needed for enough women to have children alone. They also concede the objection that this means “a socialization of reproduction,” answering: “That is correct; we propose an increasing socialization of the costs of reproduction but an individualization of the choice of having children.” ([cambridge.org][1]) Critically stated: the costs are collectivized, the choice is individualized, and men’s role is diminished even as their obligation to fund the system remains.
>>537041152I have an autistic nitpick off the get go- men go off the market. They get married and some even stay married. Hell some dont even cheat! Ik! Shocking. Not as common as it was before but I doubt its become exactly rare. They need to make sure these men are all the same age and account for those that marry/dont, stay married/get back out there, cheat /dont cheat.Even formerly prestigious universities are kinda of pathetic jokes when it comes to studies these days. Unless they accounted for these factors and some others I wont mention, this study is of little value.I hit the higher percentiles, but I quit the game at 25. What were the ages and numbers of marriages of the top 1%? Lifetime number of pussies isnt as useful a metric as advertised- how many times with each gash? Average twats penatrated per year? Theres so many other stats that will be relevant to differnt people.As to your point, no shit? Stratification is increasing, its been designed to, and of course thats going to follow to pussy.
>>537062792Helen Andrews’s article supplies the legal-institutional critique. She writes that modern feminization prioritizes “empathy over rationality, safety over risk, cohesion over competition,” and then says, bluntly, “the rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female.” Her legal concern is that rule-of-law culture requires following rules even when sympathy points the other way. ([Compact][2]) She uses Title IX as the model: proceedings that were formally rule-governed but “lacked many of the safeguards” associated with law, including confrontation, notice, and objective guilt standards, because institutional sympathies aligned with female accusers against mostly male accused. ([Compact][2])Placed beside the EFTA Mother’s Army files, this becomes more than abstract theory. Epstein’s April 2009 origin pitch told Sarah to “start Mothers army,” “give out badges or hats,” “charge 5 dollars,” “enlist on the web,” recruit “colonel positions” including “mlichele obama , types.. early fionrina. governor of michigan. catie couric,” and form it “as a public vehicle„ but with military terms.. chairman„ general-- board of directors - joint chiefs, etc.” Jeffrey Epstein to Sarah, “Re:,” Apr. 6, 2009, EFTA02412698–EFTA02412699, at EFTA02412698–EFTA02412699. The Mother’s Army project thus took motherhood, a morally protected category, and explicitly converted it into a militarized public vehicle.
>>537062276reminder: women & jews are natural allies, jews are perverts & women love dirty sex. all women want to lure you back into the matrix, they are instinctively the agents of the system & cant stand free white men just as the jews want to enslave everyone. the lesser sex & the subhuman jews need their host for survival but at the same time they want to be the kings of the world. denying them our lifeforce makes them furious & exposes their worthlessness.“Unburdened by any ethical qualms, the Hebrew man openly displays his desire, thereby arousing kindred feelings in the opposite sex [non-jewish female]. The nature of woman is adaptable; she involuntarily and unconsciously adopts the way of thinking and feeling of the man with whom she comes into close contact and for whom she feels sympathy. In the presence of a man of noble sentiment, a woman will retain all her inner majesty and refinement, but she is equally in danger of sinking to baseness in the presence of a lecherous man.”F. Roderich-Stoltheim: "The Riddle of Jewish Success," 4th ed.found in: Theodor Fritsch, The Handbook of the Jewish Question (29th ed.), 1923—german original:„Durch keinerlei ethische Bedenken beeinträchtigt, trägt der Hebräer seine Begier offen zur Schau und entfacht dadurch im anderen Geschlecht verwandte Gefühle. Das Naturell des Weibes ist anpassungsfähig; es nimmt unwillkürlich und unbewußt die Denk- und Empfindungsweise des Mannes an, mit dem es in nähere Berührung kommt und für den es Sympathie empfindet. In der Nähe eines edel empfindenden Mannes wird auch das Weib seine ganze innere Hoheit und Vornehmiheit bewahren, aber ebenso ist es in Gefahr, in der Nähe des niedrigen Lüstlings zur Gemeinheit herab zu sinken.“F. Roderich-Stoltheim: „Das Rätsel des jüdischen Erfolges“, 4. Aufl.gefunden in: Theodor Fritsch, Handbuch der Judenfrage (29. Aufl.), 1923
>>537062827The next damning EFTA layer is that the “cause” and the “commercial arm” were separate. Sarah wrote that Jean Oelwang/Virgin Unite was handling “the cause related side,” while Epstein’s side was “the set up of the business and commercial arm.” Sarah to Jeffrey Epstein, “Re: where did you disappear to,” June 2009, EFTA02443223, at EFTA02443223. Epstein then told Sarah it was “imperative” to say she had “already formed a co„ called the mothers army,” to “enlist” supporters, and to give out “ribbon,” a “commerative badge or medal.” Jeffrey Epstein to Sarah, “Re: Fw: Mothers’ Army Planning Session,” June 8, 2009, EFTA02443328, at EFTA02443328. That is the architecture: moral front, commercial backend, military branding.The corporate control evidence is worse. David Stern’s “F Update” proposed: “Use Mothers Army brand (MA) in all activities,” then “Mothers Army Inc or Ltd,” and an equity split of “49% F equity / 51% JEE.” David Stern to Jeffrey Epstein, “F Update,” Sept. 10, 2009, EFTA02436529–EFTA02436530, at EFTA02436529–EFTA02436530. In plain terms, the public sees mothers, empowerment, philanthropy, and community; the paperwork contemplates an Epstein-majority structure.
>>537062877Finally, Epstein’s September 2009 blueprint makes the gendered power symbolism unmistakable: a “website to enlist,” “campaign badge,” “medal,” “Training manuals,” “boot camp,” “corporals,” “sargents,” “special forces,” “the pink berets,” “officers,” “uniforms,” and “army chic.” Jeffrey Epstein to Sarah or associated recipient, “Re:,” Sept. 8, 2009, EFTA00880664, at EFTA00880664. Read together, Cambridge supplies the demographic-policy endpoint, Andrews supplies the legal-cultural mechanism, and EFTA supplies the elite-network example: a female/maternal moral category elevated into public power while men’s reciprocal place becomes less secure. The conclusion is that this is not simply equality expanding. It is an observable pattern of female-centered institutional power being proposed, defended, branded, and funded even where the foreseeable result is further male marginalization.
>>537061677always has been. story as old as time, adam & eve warns of this.
Money is an aphrodisiac.
https://www.getsinglefile.com/
If I had a true chad brain to match my looks and height I’d fuck every single girl on the street. But I’m weirded out by how they admire you and react instantly even in front of their men. Staring, obvious hair flips and other ticks. It’s enough to prefer being single. Instead I’m shy and keep to myself. If people like me weren’t shy and humble we were definitely slaughtered by ugly chuds in the past if not under some royal protection or something
>>537041152>A woman with a mate value in the 60th percentile may desperately long for a partner, but if the biochemical algorithm that governs her mating strategies—in response to her materially abundant environment—will not release love-inducing hormones unless a potential partner scores above the 90th percentile, pair-bonding becomes less likely. absolutely based
just do findom
Bump
>>537041152Dear Op, i am 40yo, as a massive whore i can atest that while the partners of 1% are many, the quality is proportional to the average society.I have had some 40 partners and frankly would rather have had less as it taught me little in real life. I hot good at sex thanks to maybe 4 encounters and frankly reading and porn gave me more tools than not.But the point is even someone w 200 partners will sleep with random people.I have slept with fat, thin, ugly, beautiful, femdom, calm, partygirls, old, young. The more willing you are to just go with it the more partners you'll get. Again- quantity =/=quality.I would easily exchange all that to 4 to 5 quality girls in my life at most. You should have one girl for first experience, one for loving sex, one for rough sex (bdsm, femdom or alike), one for hippie nature sex, one who is successful, and one who is like your bro friend. At the end youll fall for one type. But you really have to be open. One of my best encounters that lasted 3 years was with a fat girl, way out of my preference, but we found so much fun stuff to do, art, travel, we almost married. So just try, dont put people down and youll find your sex partners.Develop yourself if you feel inadequate. From muscle to brain. I happen to be jack of all trades - i love studies and mental gymnastics, and i lift weights and have good sense of humor. Not great at either but the package was enough to find a great cool girl to wife.>if you are interested i fell for a petite tomboy country girl.
>>537041152Just like with wealth, the top 10% have so much more than the rest that the average person can barely understand it, while the top 10% have so much more that their lives are utterly unimaginable to the average person.Brutal.>>537053248>Just man up and marry a 35-year-old who's suddenly "ready to settle down."Presuming that those foids would even want to settle down with the sexless guys who think that they could be the ones to settle down with.
>>537062847Thank you, anon.
>>537053122>Artificial wombs are dumb. Why does sexless and landless goycattle want kids?So I have my gang of 3-4 people instead of this 1 random white guy vs a brown family + police in UK.Your kids are supposed to be your own little clan. Check out how isolated white men are vs any group in a large crowd fight breakout or conflict.
>muh 1%When will retards realize they are chasing a ghost?Even in income inequality, Economists and Sociologists are realizing it's not a good measurement.They are starting to converge at looking at 95th, or even better, 90th percentile to get actual reads.That 1% of survey respondents is textbook 4chan troll puts gorillion sexual partners.Straight up "body count" meme.No human brains don't work that way, they do not keep accurate track of body count, and hence it's a logarithmic scale where the 1st digit matters.Yes men will still likely overinflate their numbers to an extent (systemic bias rather than one troll outlier).Yes, some extremely degenerate homosexuals are taking miles of cock in their asshole that they lose track, hence they spread aids.>but it says female partners!When you are dealing with the 1% outliers you're looking at trolls and people who made a mistake on the survey (e.g. a gigafaggot who misread the question).So the data shows the "elite gigachad" has around 20 females since age 18.
>>537041152Direct effect of capitalism, everything is profit motivated including human relationships. Love no longer a factor, low roi. Pay $2000 for tinder platinum or whatever the fuck if you want pussy, goy. Capitalism is poison to humanity. Used to be medicine, but the dose is too high now.
>>537062756>This system is not feasible>Normal person: guess we gotta get rid of the system>"scientist":We have to obliterate all of nature, society, and reality so we can keep the system going. Anything to keep it going, the idea of it not going is not scientific! I will rape 1000 children per microsecond to keep the system going.The fuck is it with these people? I wonder if there are many intelligent people who, under their intellect, are utterly insane wackjobs.
>>537042059If we're going to force something artificial, why not give the best women to the ugliest and poorest men? That's better for me. Your plan keeps me an incel.
bump
>>537063387I actually do reverse findom>woman wants money from me>"ughhh i basically caaaan't i have to save it feels so fucking good">watch my savings and portfolio growTurns me on.
>>537070116>Kills rats and mice by the millions just for an answer to a question we never needed in the first placePfft, I wonder.
>>537041152tf can even keep track? i don't know what my body count is but i guess it would be around 50. there's no way guys crushing it with ~300 are keeping score. plus the 99th percentile are probably creepy fucks and probably fucking low-tier pussy.
Do whores count in this?
>>537041152the top 99,99% of sexhavers are working hard to pay me my well deserved sexual reparations. Problem sexhavers? >>537059176>men won't work for zero pussy.i cant believe i found a wise gentleman in this gay retarded website
>>537072488Dude, if you visit brothels your count would be 100+ in a year
>>537041152Im in the 98-99 percentile with 112 partners and zero prostitutes since age 16 to age 33 . I got married at 33 .
>>537061724It says "perhaps men should NOT have to pay child support". Which wouldn't ever really happen without zog going away since even if they did it in name they'd just tax you more/borrow more and it would be more governmental assistance.Jews really are just banking on a combination of having actual AI and gmo-Asians as their preferred slave class, they've even stated the later a couple times in a few documents one by the WEF and another by some other jew group.
>>537041152how many of them are married
>>537072813most men cant casually spend 10k per year on prostitutes. Even me as a sexualreparationsclaimer cant afford it. I could maybe afford 2-3 sessions per month if i ate less meat and went for less incelrides with my bmw that burns fuel like crazy.
>>537061330That sort of lifestyle is borne out of depression. That isn't thriving. Men and women are both miserable at the same time because they have been set against each other for generations at this point. Every bit of media women consume poisons their minds with pure fiction but they take these stories where they see "real" people having "real" emotions and want that in their lives - completely forgetting it's FICTION. I've seen this phenomenon my whole life and most men just roll over and let the screeching retarded harpy get her way otherwise she will make him even more miserable than when he was single. But when he was single he was miserable because he wanted to be with somebody. Men tend to be the true romantics, women tend to be empty husks who follow trends.
>>537068602It's a direct effect of judaism you evil money-grubbing kike.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXeHnvImcMk
Whatever you do, DO NOT RESEARCH gay promiscuity. The amount of sex some gay men have is astonishing.
>>537061330That tweet is pure projection lmaoMen need almost nothing to feel alive. Women can't feel alive even if they have everything.
>>537041152The reporting is heavily skewed by faggots though.
>>537047700> It's not "chad" and the sexual marketplace as the op suggests. It is mental illness and extreme lifestyles So true, almost every promiscuous man I know who has slept with hundreds of women look like this. Most sluts look like the female version of this or typical "bar gals".
>>537061330>doubt, women cant stand independent men while men do well all on their ownthis is total projection, men benefit much more from being in relationships with women because they can't manage themselves properly and feel entitled to having a woman to do things for them, and then they go whine about women and the "male loneliness epidemic"
>>537041152As in a group of 100 faggots each have 99 partners, so it looks like they have more partners than the 1000 monogamous straight couples they are compared to, but that falls apart when you see it's the same 99 faggots for each of the 100.
>>537075559that's because they're men. straight men would be the same way, but if it's two men then it's easier
>>537075998>men benefit much more from being in relationships with women because they can't manage themselves properly and feel entitled to having a woman to do things for them, and then they go whine about women and the "male loneliness epidemic"this is total projection too doe
>>537075926Most sluts I know look like picrel or the female version of that. Bar sluts and Tinder sluts look like picrel, festival sluts look like the previous dude but female. Yes, the average woman is sleeping around more, but it's still extremely rare for an average woman to sleep with a large number of men.
>>537076075men are socialized to expect women to emotionally manage them, baby them, cook, cleanup after, take care of things like children or household tasks, etc meanwhile 2 in 3 couples have both partners workingit's unequal and lines up with studies saying mens wellbeing improves more than womens from being a relationship, and today men report wanting marriage and children more than women do
>>537041152If this isn’t the motivation to buy a van and rape bitches, then nothing is. Kill yourselves. Rape van Chads stay ahead of clear rates and jumped up holes.
>>537076394>men are socialized to expect...socialized over all known history and likely for hundreds of thousands of years prior. or maybe, it's just the natural expectation bred into us over a million years due to the natural physical differences between men and women?the socialization was in women entering the workforce at the same rate as men and not just rare exceptions, as evidenced by the fact that there are people alive today who remember a time when that was not the case.
>>537041170>Research suggests that men suffer more adverse effects than women from lacking a partnerMen BTFO.
>>537042059>I agree with you. Free-market hoe-pitalism doesn't work either. That's why I'm a hoe-cialist.The three-way.
>>537051049what is this
>>537077312>it's just the natural expectation bred into us over a million yearsif men are so rational and better, then why is the excuse always that they're incapable of controlling themselves?>due to the natural physical differenceswhat physical differences actually necessarily imply patriarchy or inherent male dominance/female servitude, or is this just a mythology constructed to justify currently existing roles? prior to the transition to agricultural, settled society social organization was typically much more egalitarian on gender, and during that transition men monopolized power contingent on how social/economic life was evolving. some differences in division of labor doesn't make male dominance natural or necessary
>>537078751i never said men are so rational and better. how about you argue against the points i actually made? and whats this talk about men being incapable of controlling themselves? most men don't even have a woman in their life and most women don't cook anymore anyways, so what are you talking about? >what physical differences actually necessarily imply patriarchy or inherent male dominance/female servitude, we're bigger and stronger obviously. hollywood isn't real life, women are not as strong as men. office jobs did not exist until recently, prior to that most jobs were in factories operating heavy machinery, and prior to that most work was farming that again requires physical strength, and prior to that hunting, again, physical strength. difference number two: WOMEN MAKE BABIES duh, and you have to feed the babies with your breast milk, and before birth control women had a lot of babies, that's not conductive to the hunt, plowing the field, or working the factory. these are the obvious physical differences, this is not socialized via propaganda.or is this just a mythology constructed to justify currently existing roles?
>>537080072>or is this just a mythology constructed to justify currently existing roles?no, it's physical reality. men are stronger. most work for a hundred thousand years required physical strength. and women were required to have a baby at their tit for half their life. so men did the jobs and the work and women managed the home and thats just the natural result of those physical differences and not some recent patriarchal propaganda. we live in a world where men are actively discriminated against and society bends over backwards to replace women with men, which is inherently unstable and cannot continue indefinitely due to below replacement birth rates that have been the result, and yet toxic feminists are still whining about patriarchy.
>>537041170>sexual deprivation can have substantial negative consequences for men's mental health.Except no one gives a damn about that and it impacts no one in any negative way whatsoever, so it can be safely ignored
>>537080072>how about you argue against the points i actually made?Lmao @ you for expecting a foid to do that.
>>537080352>society bends over backwards to replace women with meni mean replace men with womenas evidenced by pic related >>537077312
>>537041152I’m a short NEET and I’m in the 95-98th percentile and didn’t start on a roll until I was older.
>>537080397it impacts the majority of menthat isn't "no one"if you think pic related can be ignored forever, you are delusional. these should have been the men motivated to build and maintain civilization, instead they have become neets. we can only imagine how much better life would be if they were motivated to improve it for their children
>>537080704>these should have been the men motivated to build and maintain civilization, instead they have become neets. we can only imagine how much better life would be if they were motivated to improve it for their childrenNo one gives a shit and no they wouldn't, they are weak, mediocre and pathetic, and in the past society tried to use force to make women stay with these people. This is no longer needed and no one gives a fuck, the chickens have come home to roost that worthless fucks do not deserve anything
>>537041152Just glad I'm in the 80th-89th penisile
>>537080623Slag
>>537080840>This is no longer needed and no one gives a fuckwhy is mass media up in arms about birth rates and workforce participation then? could it be that this artificially induced imbalance threatens the entire corrupt system we live in today?
>>537041152going to hookers count?I ve been to more than 40 hookers in my life.I dont know the exact number, but at some pointed i counted the girls that licked my ass, and it was 20+.INB4 stds, i have doxycycline at hand for bacterial STDS (most of STDs) and theres also a prphilactic anti HIV drug that you can take after sex.
>>537081049Just calling for eventual pogroms for the cattle that I mentioned, they are uppity and soon will be turned into fertilizer, those pieces of trash realize their asses are on the line and soon will no longer exist
>>537041152Like I always say. Women love eugenics
>>537080840society didn't have to force anything. birth control didn't exist and chad didn't have the resources to provide for a hundred kids from the 300 women he's fucked. there was no major welfare system, and women needed to secure a man to help provide for her children. monogamy was the result. it wasn't maliciously enforced through constant manipulation and propaganda across tens of thousands of years in every single country on earth, it's just the natural result of physical differences.meanwhile lets examine the eugenics of it for a moment in pic related. the result is people getting dumber and more violent, because dumber violent men with mental disorders are preferred by women.
>>537056573>women flock to STATUS if you dont have a social circle and a crib you are deadwhy do I get pussy then? I have a bicycle, jobless, flatshare with my landlord and no friends?
>>537081167You won't do shit, roastie.
>>537081167congrats on matching the delusion level of the most unhinged incels out there, really well done
>>537041152If having more sexual partners than 99% of the population is a product you are trying to sell, I am not buying. Seems disgusting. Probably all Grindr faggots buttfucking kids in public restrooms.
>>537050274it's simply not feasible in a democracy, so they can't outright say that's the other solution. the main contributor to female infertility is education, so the discussion should rather be how we can work around that in a democracy.
>>537081309We are already doing shit, and you aren't doing nothing at all, you just cope and seethe while you are a worthless nobody with nothing that nobody will remember, lol
>>537041152Just imagine how many alpha widow bpd girls this 1% are creating. >unfollow your rapist from social media? >woman crumbles and cries out in pain as she strikes you
>>537081313>t. future fertilizer created via drone strikeLOL
>>537041152a) there is no sexual market excluuding prostitution. Women are traded within and between friend groups.b) there is no sexual competition in the human species. there is SELECTION which precludes competition. Men do not compete for women, they display themselves and the women select them based on pre-programmed criteria that often changes.
>>537041152For those people sex is their #1 hobby. The top 1% of golfers probably play more golf than the rest of the 99% combined too.
>>537081364exactly. this idea that we have two impossible and radical extremes extremes to choose from is useless. the reality is womens rights is not a cat that can (or should imo) but put back in the box. at the same time the way we are doing it now simply isn't sustainable. but instead of a rational discussion about the changes that need to be made we have two extremes: the toxic feminists who want to not only continue down this destructive path but to make things even worse, or those who think the only answer is we magically strip women of all rights somehow.women should not be forced by financial circumstances into working. one man working should be able to support a family. women should not be encouraged by propaganda into working and going to school, they should be encouraged into motherhood. employers should not be forced to hire women or create lazy girl jobs just to meet esg and dei gender quotas, such quotas should be illegal, force women on to an equal playing field with men.practical answers that don't involve repealing womens rights. but the radical extremists on both sides dont want to be practical.
>>537081372>We are already doing shit,Oh, my mistake! Carry on then.
>>537041152I've never had sex, never been in love or happy, never had friends, and also gay. My life is bottom-of-the-barrel.
>>537041152Kek that one graph is not even referenced in the article, why didn't they have a ref to citation in the article?
Just enslave women?
>>537081818>magically strip women of all rightsYes.>somehowWith a backhand and an ass whooping, you fucking pussy.
>>537041152>incels complain about whoredom because they wish they were whores themselves
>>537082189You can choose not to be gay though.
as a guy in his 30s with 2 gfs in total and many failed dates, i can safely say that sex is not what i thought it was going to be and at this point i don't think it's worth it. i don't really feel i have what it takes to be in a relationship. im not likeable and i don't know how to be. both the girls i was disliked me more and more with each passing day. in a way im satisfied with the progress i made to improve myself. but i dont know how to advance. im perplexed. i smell really good.
>>537041152If you're a prostitute guy you could have hundreds of girls you've been with but never gave regular sex, it's always rare. But if you married 1 woman you'd be having way more sex than the aforementioned guy. Quantity of bodies doesn't correlate with quantity of sex
>>537080704that just means that men are not comitting or forming harems. I've had multiple girlfriends simultaneously and they were jealous of course and wanted to be #1, sharing me in of itself wasn't the issue.
>>537041152Now show us the woman one
>>537082580'Tis not a choice, friend ;).
thats not based on looks that data is just based on who is a degernate manwhore that will fuck disgusting easy disease ridded whores
It's not like money where more bodies means more gooder. What do you get from having a higher bodycount?
>>537081818I'm in agreement. My suggestion is to stagger education, so that we incentivize childbirth in their early 20s instead of becoming even less likely to have children because of university. averages also make it sound as though women are having babies evenly spread out but its not the way it works, it's absolute as in having or not having a child. the women who do have children tend to also have more, in addition women who interact with children are also more likely to have them, so we need to socialize women back into maternity groups and such. if you were to tie welfare, university attendance, loans and such benefits to having a child to some degree or another while socializing the issue then we could start seeing real effects. the question you just can't get around is how to convince them to vote for parties that want to implement solutions that doesn't involve throwing money at the women (never works). our christian democrats have proposals that once again just revolves around spending money on women (and just barely restricting abortion) but even they are told they are oppressors. Unless we get a whole new class of politicians who take mens issues seriously I'm starting to wonder if we aren't going to have to rely on religion (only fertile group outside of the poor who we can't afford to pay for soon) or artificial wombs.
well well welloldest thread in the catalog is a lonely disappointed surplus male pajeet threadand now the redeem
all "birth rate" conversation is an excuse to justify immigrants. do you think the tech bros and kalergi bankers are going to wait 18 years for your human capital to grow up? they don't even want to educate or train the native population
birth-rate, age-of-consent and race-mix shills don't want to talk about their vast population of excess males, damning evidence of a backward culture and suggestive of your daughters' fate if their infestations are not controlled in your country
>>537083829those are very practical suggestions. in regards to governance the issue is: it's all fake. you ask how we can vote in a party that will fix it, when the deep state controls who we can vote for anyways. ultimately then we are powerless if we continue to pretend we can ever vote our way out of this.in the end either the practical changes we suggested or something like it gets implemented, or modern civilization will collapse because the toxic feminism path is not sustainable, and women will lose their rights. i'd rather not collapse.
learn to recognize pajeet threads. learn to stop giving (You)s, which end up as rupees, to the wrong posters. jews pay pajeets to spam this board en masse with the same agendas that you're still associating with only jews. since 2023 you are much more likely to see jew noise posted by a pajeet. there are a hundred times as many pajeets as there are jews. if you want any part of the internet to survive, you must detect, reject and redeem pajeets everywhere you find them
>>537082471
>>537084672you call it the deep state but both you and I live in liberal democracies with the rule of law, it's written out quite clearly in our laws how you are selected as a political representative for parliament. yes, there are informal power structures that matter but let me try and say what I mean in a different way. in order for people to vote these solutions in their perceptions need to change on a mass scale. we aren't talking regime change, we are talking about policies. as for collapse, I mean we are already in it. it's just that it takes time feel it. that's why so many things are happening the way they are. AI, energy wars, robotic technology and so on. deglobalization already occured during covid, or even before arguably.
>>537041152>anon discovers sex addicts
>this sucks, bharat-head! we're never gonna score if they don't make younger dumber children legal to pursue sexually
>>537041152>>537041170You aren't owed sex.
Women are genetic supremacists and consider 90% of men sexually repulsive. The vast majority of men are biologically locked out of ever inducing genuine sexual desire or sexual satisfaction in any woman ever. Humans are cuck monkeys.
for these excess male migrant populations, it's needlessly cruel when a human from the host culture takes one of their female counterparts out of circulation. they're in short supply! to keep one more of those thirsty bachelors out of the musical chairs, for what? because you can? to steal his "izzat"? that's going to look really smart when you curse a son or daughter to half your heritage and half they will want to hide
>>537061614Kek, yeah John Cleese as the army captains voice RIOGHHT! made it way funnier
>>537085339canada isn't a democracy, it's a scam. dominion voting machines at the party level ensure the deep state selected candidate wins. no matter who we vote for, nothing changes. illegal yes. but who is going to enforce it?
because pajeets arrive everywhere as generic cultural dilutant in the age of globalization, when all national identities are eroding and weakening, they have dubious claim to play any part in your country's unique character. they should never feel entitled to the status of inherent citizens whose roots are in the history of the land for more generations than the jewish agenda has run rampant
>>537081448I know a case like this, I have a cousin who is Chad (or chadlite at worse) and he was dating this girl. Both of them where j. Their mid 30s. They dated for a couple of years, it got to a point where she made a big scene in a wedding trying to get the bride bouquet. After a while he dumped her for some reason, and now she is literally stalking him and his new girl. She got a new "boyfriend " who turns out lives right next to where my cousin and his girl lives, she gets new phone numbers to call him, she got a gym subscription in the same gym and does scenes inside. She even waited outside the building garage for someone to open it, went inside and waited for hours until he came back just to try to talk to him. There is alpha widows from one night stands, but alpha widows when she actually thought she could lock in Chad is exponentially worse from her point of view. It is her existential fear, it makes them lose their minds.
here in The Great Satan, human life is created and destroyed with technology very neatly and discreetly in clinical settings. you would think we must have the highest mountain of dead babies here because we're so industrially efficient about it. europe probably goes all out trying to keep up, but nobody was really thinking about asia in this debate before. asia knows mountains. they have more mountains in asia than they will ever need, and also more people. asian people are so overstocked, they discard half their babies as soon as they're in plain sight, sampling the earth's atmosphere. their dead babies are bigger and their mountains are bigger. india, which you must have cognisance is part of asia, despite those abundant mountains telling you they crashed into the place... india wins the dead baby mountain contest
People that fuck a lot tend to have few children to show for it. The most fruitful people are religious zealots like the Mormons/Amish or orthodox Jews or hardcore Muslims. Promiscuity doesn't make you successful.
breeding numbers makes you a successful bug. there's another continent just for you
is the jeet schizo a bot, or just a regular retard?
this is a pajeet thread, it's getting redeemed. keep up or shut up
pajeets should be posting on bharatchan and living on the subcontinent
the majority of pajeets on /pol/ try to hide the fact that they're pajeets. in addition to "leaving that part out" they will proactively, persistently misrepresent their true form. pajeets are all about assuming other people's roles, from today's outsourcing and replacement migration all the way back to thuggee bandits lying to travelers about who they were. pajeets are devoid of their own identity, making them the ideal globalized goyim. they don't want a home where they belong. all that means to them is "compete in squalor." much better to go somewhere nicer, built by other people, and do their jobs for less pay and live slum-barracks life in their suburbs. pajeets don't want to be home. they also don't want to be pajeets. jews know exactly how to play their insecurities and dopey ambitions like the innocent rube fresh off the bus from the cornfield. this is their new golem to replace the ones that don't love them anymore
>>537075441You're close! It's Zionism, the religion of usury.
all pajeets are working for jews, including the ones who perform antisemitism and say all the things they learned to say on /pol/. they are also serving the jew agenda. how? by speaking english and living in everyone else's countries. spectre, multiculturalism, mass migration, kalergi plan. don't even bother acting like pajeets oppose jews in any way. they support jews simply by their nature, by crowding into every opening gatekeepers offer them to enter the human world and degrade it
>>537042059leader in hoeconomics
>self-reportedmy wiener is 30" long
when in doubt, try thisCLINICAL TEST QUESTION>are you descended from south asian subcontinental ancestry?any answer longer than "no" means yesnot answering means yeslying means yes
>>537087935are you descended from south asian subcontinental ancestry?
no.i'm here to help you descend more
movement on the floor now babethat's a turd of paradisecurry ice cream smilei suppose it's very nicewith a train to your left and a flick to the rightyou catch a reroll way out westyou reincarnate britishand you look like all the rest
>>537080397>it impacts no one in any negative way whatsoeverIt affects men (>>537080704) and it'll affect women when more guys lose it and lash out like Elliot Rodger.
>>537089768I think you're lying...
i stated my purpose. you'll see if i was lying after the thread expires
>>537087933>self-reported>my wiener is 30" longIs it actually only 11"??
>>537061991It hinges upon there being enough completely selfless individuals to enable their selfishness. When you see liberals signaling the most self-destructive sacrificial values it's not actually something they earnestly believe in, it's a gamble that enough individuals will fall for it to enable the liberal's bad behavior. This is why all attacks on the morality or rather immorality of a liberal individual are completely worthless as all you are doing is attacking a lure they set while concealing their true selfish beliefs.Why does the liberal defend the most heinous sexual behaviors?Because it enables his or her mating strategy.Why does the liberal defend limitless mass migration?Because it enables his or her debt financing.Why does the liberal defend higher taxes, expanded benefit programs, and strangling bureaucracy?Because they're pretty sure they already hold the station they need to make a grift out of it.The liberal lives by offloading the externalities of their behavior and life strategy on to others. They think you are too stupid to notice and for the most part they are right.
>>537090146ranjeet leave the window alone>shit the streets at home
>>537041152That statistic doesn't mean what you think it means, and you aren't actually as smart as you think you are.It's not a weird or unusual statistic for the top 1% of lots of things to have more or do more of the thing than the other 99%. Most things where any individual will have somewhere between 0 and infinity of a thing is likely to work out that way. It's why the people in the top 1% are in the top 1%. It doesn't mean they are having 99% of the sex, or monopolizing 99% of the people to have sex with. It just means that the people in the top 1%, the one person out of 100 who has the most sex partners, has more sex partners than the all the people who aren't in the top 1%. If this statistic makes you seethe or experience incel rage or jealousy, you are just a mathlet retard. Because when you read that statistic, you should really just think "yeah, no shit, the people who have the most sex have the most sex."
>hey, ghost sister, ain't that a twist>cause now my bros are lonely, leaving home>they can't arrange no wife, you know>hey, ghost sister>think i'm gonna live another single life too>tonight>>537083886
