[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1781383006634971.png (154 KB, 862x758)
154 KB PNG
AROUND FOIDS, NEVER RELAX
>>
Absurd premise. All barbers just want to cut as much off as possible, regardless of the genders involved.
It has nothing to do with "intrasexual competition" but with practicality and in minor part zeal+creativity.
>>
>>537043853
Women hate other women more than men do.
They don't have friends, they have frienemies.
>>
I have long hair but am a male, I am free.
>>
>>537043853
>women tended to recommend cutting the most hair off clients they perceived to be as attractive as themselves
This is what is really interesting. Naively, you would think women would try to harm the attractiveness of women that are more attractive than them the most, but this is not what is happening.
If they would tell more attractive women to cut off more of their hair, these more attractive women would now be closer to their own level of attractiveness, and thus compete for the same men.
So instead, they tell the women that are as attractive as themselves to cut off the most hair, so to harm their competition.

Evolution is really ingenious.
>>
>>537043995
You did not read the study.
>>537043853
OP, please provide the link.
>>
>>537043853
>All authors are women too

Kek, what the fuck is this paper?
>>
lets see the author
>>
File: retarded.jpg (129 KB, 676x906)
129 KB JPG
>>537044383
Did you? Because it's complete bunk, with so many assumptions and variable the tenuous (to be generous) statistically correlations they found are essentially meaningless

What I am actually impressed by is that these sort of worthless schizo studies get funded in Academia
>>
>>537044060
>Women hate other women more than men do.
wait a second, more than me?
>>
>>537044239
>I have long hair but am a male, I am free.
so let me guess. you enjoy a BBC ramming down your faggot throat. am i right, anon?
>>
>>537043853
I think some women look good with short hair, really depends.
>>
>>537045814
They always look better with it long though
>>
>>537044060
This is true.
>>
>>537045814
those women look good despite the short hair not because of it
>>
File: lesbians.jpg (156 KB, 1000x1000)
156 KB JPG
>>537045701
>>
>>537043853
More troubling than the result of this study is the fact that seven women larping as scientists were paid to conduct this study. These women go to cocktail parties and brag about being research scientists, and people look upon them with awe of their intellect. This research funding could have gone to men working on quantum gravity or cold fusion, but instead science has been institutionalized by women to be a status marker. I hate this feminized clown world.
>>
>>537043853
No hair, wouldn't dare, good way to avoid sexualism.
>>
>>537046288
Fence sus
>>
>>537043853
Jokes on them, I'm attracted to women with shorter hair cause they seem more fun. Especially if they're in shape that really gets my monkey brain going.
>>
>>537045765
>projecting this hard



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.