When did this psyop that the “occupy movement” wasn’t “woke” or “leftist” came from?This is why I love 4plebs, because you can clearly see that most of /pol/ just clowned on them once it fizzled out
>>537052940It wasnt woke or leftist in its inception. "Woke" was literally spun up by American feds to subvert and crash the movement, which was a grassroots, non-partisan rebellion against collusion and corruption in government and finance. So you can say "it was woke by the time the government had dealt a death blow to the movement by way of subversion." You encountered people saying it wasn't leftist woke shit, referring to its origins. That wasn't a psyop.
holy zoomer thread
>>537053602I don't get how every influx of young newfags managed to learn the memes, history, and board culture, from Gen X to Millennials, to the people born around 2000, then we have these late zoomers who are like boomers who don't understand a single fucking thing, like they're demented.
>>537053333>>537053822>>537053602This is my favorite interaction from then
>>537053333Why do people believe this and why are you trying to gaslight us? Woke was already a thing in tons of college towns in the 90s. It just took social media to take off. It was already taking off before occupy.
>finger snapping to establish consensusThey were always goofball lefties
>>537052940The people who have strange thoughts on the occupy movement were all young children when it happened. They are only basing it off second hand information and what they think the world was like. The fact is that the legacy media (TV, print news) latched onto the crazies as a way to do D&C after it started to pick up traction. That was the tactic and it did work to discredit and splinter the organization.I know at the time it was lefty bollocks but that focus on the 1% is something that the powers that be didn't like. So there obviously was a need to divide up the opposition and get them fighting among each other. The thing is that, you can be too young to have been at the occupy protests, but still recognize the same technique was done at other protests.
>>537053915>From then >2014Fucking zoomers
>>537053932>Woke was already a thing in tons of college towns in the 90s. It just took social media to take off. It was already taking off before occupy.That's a disjointed misinterpretation of what was going on before the 2010's. From the perspective of what a normie was likely to actually encounter, radical leftist social justice shit was something mostly confined to the echo chambers of humanities departments at colleges and universities, and this goes back further than the 90's. Otherwise, this was the culture of terroristic gay, lesbian, socialist, and jewish organizations that most people never heard about outside of headlines like Barrack Obama's mentor Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground bombing police stations, and the gays terrorizing the APA's conferences, in the 70's. These activities were always influenced and managed by jews and federal agents and guided towards achieving their objectives. When the Occupy movement kicked off, the establishment was blindsided, and afraid. They posted snipers on rooftops. They deployed new facial scanning, recognition, and cataloguing tech to make sense of and archive who was going to the protests. Then, they ultimately had their controlled community organizers send blacks and far leftist stooges into the protests with marching orders to fuck it all up by shouting over and forcing out any natural leadership by imposing a "progressive stack" that marginalized and outcast straight, white males in the movement. >why are you trying to gaslight us?Makes me think you're just a shill here to astroturf the government's old fake and gay forced narrative here, but perhaps what I've posted will benefit you, and if not, it will surely benefit someone you are trying to fool.
>>537053932>It just took social media to take off.We had "political correctness" in the 90's. Then, in the 2000's we had a backlash and rebound effect against political correctness, and we got a bunch of edgy boundary-pushing media and popular culture, and the only people who would cry about your racist jokes about blacks or the mentally retarded were uptight schoolmarm types and real hypersensitive weird fat girls. In middle school, I could crack retard jokes with my teacher and it was fine as long as the fat girl in class didn't hear and march her fat ass to the principal's office to cry about it. We got social media around 2005 with myspace, and faceberg and twitter around 2008. We did not have a mass social contagion of SJW breaking containment. Even in the early days of the occupy movement, even towards the middle and the death of the movement, people did not know what that was. 2010-2011, young people did not know about SJWs, unless they were here on /pol/. The "die cis scum" video came out, I mentioned it to roommates who did not go to 4chan regularly, they had no idea what the fuck it was or what it meant. It didn't even permeate popular culture until after the point that it had been employed to dismantle OWS, when the establishment realized "we can't have the population uniting in opposition to us again. We need to divide the population on the basis of identity politics." Not long after that, we get BLM, racial and homosexual agitation in entertainment media, and so on.
>>537052940I too like to occupy lands. Some call it colonization. I call it owning.
>>537052940They were libtards but Bush era, early Obama years libtards were very different then the libtards of today. They didn't care about trannies, they laughed at achmed the dead terrorist skits and deporting illegals was considered common sense and they were primarily focused on curbing the power of jewcorp.
>>537053959>post-subversion activities>"they were always"Like a jew saying "THEY SEND US DA ROCKETS!" and omitting how they dropped bombs, bulldozed their homes, and poisoned their wells.
If the people from this thread https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/31308303/#31308303 were brought into this one in 2026, most wouldn’t believe it
>>537055847Shit, I had kind of forgotten how much more intelligent, disciplined, and resourceful with information and sources anons were on average back then. The overton window has moved but we have zoomers and a board culture like a wounded animal now.
>>537053333Flippity bippity
>>537052940>>537053333>>537054819>>537055548>"occupy movement"It wasn't a 'movement'.Occupy *Wall Street* was a specific demonstration that occurred in Zuccotti Park. For its first 3 weeks it was successful in scaring the living shit out of its primary target—global investment banks (*across the street* from the demonstration)—and corporate mass media that was scrambling what to make of it.Then about a month in, local nationwide "clone" protests started appearing across the United States, and later across the west. Zuccotti Park demonstration was *infiltrated by* what's called the progressive stack, and later this principle of *Intersectionality* aka racial heirarchy was implemented across the establishment Left in the west; there was quite a lot of debate among Left academics and lobbyists/activists during the 2012—2015 period, on this specific topic (shift away from any sort of class consciousness to Race-based 'heirarchy of oppression'). By 2017, when Trump had arrived 'woke' was officially born. And in summer 2020 the Woke Nuclear Device was unleashed in tandem with the covid lockdown mass formation, for maximum psychological-brainwashing control effect.
>>537056550Addendum: when you see the 1 single word 'occupy' <--used alone by itself, that's not the original 3-week New York City demonstration named Occupy *Wall Street*. Nor were the later 2011—2012 spinoff "occupy" demonstrations (with the exception of a bare minority few that kept the *core principal focus* of the original demonstration's intent: investment banks aka Wall Street, and by extension central banks that run every government all 160 of them on planet Earth).TL/DR when you see the 1-word 'occupy' being thrown around, that is a *dilution* and misrepresentation of what the original protest's specific objective aim and target is.
RIP>>537056550
>>537056550Legendary redpill, that infographic. Really frames and ties everything together well, even or especially for people who watched it all play out.
>>537052940Woke was the hemertic-agnostic concept coopted out of envy by the Left Witches and then the black nationalists to describe their pride in their radical inversions.Speaking Intersectionality as a vibe religion for the infertile along with all the funding, free jobs for any woman or brown over every white man, USAID wasn't a top down in your face policy until after 2012.
>>537056550Do you think they did the same here on 4chan?
>>537053333checkedi just see it as a broken watch being correct twice a dayit was narratively correct but the result was nothing.OWS wasn't effective. it didn't change any of the shit that it wanted to, it didn't result in any reform, it didn't result in accountability. it did synthesize into movement though. that last one was the most important aspect of OWS, because everyone knew that is what interests the political machine most. movement. they were interested not afraid.if you think OWS ever got close to a target of value you'd be wrong, that's wishful thinking, nostalgia, narcissism.the transformation of the left after that into the modern left accelerated though, because if you can form a movement, there's energy there. so they cultivated the crop and the result has been the most destructive and self-destructive peoples movement since bolshevism laid waste to europe. worse than boomers' junky perverts movement (that they dressed up as with noble intent in their narcissism).what characterizes all of these movements is narcissism. if you are propaganda aware enough, and have the stomach to really engage with the workers cultivating the crops (You), and what they are doing, the methodology, you will notice them even here. the same psychologist glowniggers that spin up school shooters that are conspicuously absent from the narrative and suspicion of malfeasance is never notable in the investigation. psychologists themselves are something of a crop too, a crop of farmers to cultivate mind viruses. what if you overproduce them and make certain that they would only ever cultivate bad crops?they need work, so they're in a lot more than just therapy professions, they're all over schools marketing corporate and government too. gotta pay that mortgage and those student loans.narcissism is deadly. its the first thing you need to be able to guard yourself from in propaganda world. if you don't, you'll pay for it.
