why do the new Chinese carriers have kddy ramps?
>>537101538>add kiddy ramps onto your air craft carriers >win
>new carriersThose are the old ones, the new one is the 003, followed by the 004, which is still under construction.
>>537101538What works, works.It's irrelevant if you win.
>>537101538So the plane gets up into the sky without crashing into the ocean. It's a good design
because they didnt feel like spending a trillion dollars to copy and maintain the F35
>>537101994>poverty rampYou arent winning anything with the Soviet Union's sloppy seconds. NOT impressive.
All future ones dont have ramps. Also they are nuclear powered going forward
>>537101538because they know there's no point putting loads of money into a dead technology. same reason nobody expends any effort on mounted cavalry tactics in 2026.
>>537102102your potus literally bred with the soviet union's sloppy seconds, twice.
>>537101538I’ve tried and tried and I just can not for the life of me figure out how a ramp is anything but detrimental.
>>537101538an arc is longer than a chord. you get more runway that way. this is basic geometry
>>537103090It requires less flight crew and maintenanceIt’s literally safer than a catapult system.It is cheaper to manufacture overallIt is functionally similar to a catapult system with some compromises.But it is inferior in every other way to a catapult system.
>more and notorious potential points of failure and money in jewish execs pockets is good and based engineering actually
>>537101538Looks like they couldn't make the Liaoning's CATOBAR system work right.
>>537105060Wrong, it works fine the Gerald ford catobar doesn’t work
>>537104739>I’m not compensating! I swear!
>>537101538>New 16 years old Carriersliterally Fujian dropped in service
>>537105307
>>537101538>hehe im pretending to be retarded and lied>hehe discussWhy are Amerimutt bugmen so insecure about China?
