[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: gekyumefanaccountig.jpg (1.24 MB, 828x1672)
1.24 MB JPG
Should it be illegal to routinely post young children online, on the basis that you're opening up children to be victims of predators?

So many gen alphas have had their entire lives documented online, and many of these accounts documenting them have tens of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of followers. How the FUCK is this safe for the child? Pedos are watching.
>>
>>537107911
Children are far more likely to be abused by their own family than by random strangers.
>>
pearl clutching faggot
>>
>>537107958
Sure but you're basically waving your children out like bait for pedophiles when you document their lives online.
>>
>>537107958
posting someone else's picture online without consent is abuse, doesn't matter if it's your child, in fact it's worse if it's your child, parents today are just sick fucks, that's all
>>
>>537107958
your dad is a stranger to you
>>
>>537107911
fuck niglets
>>
Yes.

It should be illegal for parents to post their children or others online period. Especially videos.

Children should enjoy childhood without exploitation in age of technology and earning from clips and ads.

That being said, making wholesome family adds is OK. Preferably AI rendered children, again, to avoid exploitation.

Children should never be permitted to star in movies or shows until 18 anymore now that we have AI. And frankly ever, because of exploitation.

Children should be protected more by society in general.
>>
>>537108033
That, but also generally they should have a normal life not a public life.

I've always condemned people who post their children on social media, anywhere and especially those in video public format.

I refuse to watch the clips. I think it's exploitation.

If you reproduce, you should raise them properly and humanly. And those who can't do that should be fined, punished, children removed if reeducation fails... and, sterilized.

Governments need to make it mandatory for any publisher and including social media to verify the child is AI only and for appropriate use. No minors should be posted ever.
>>
>>537108128
Gekyume isn't Black. His father was mixed Black and his mother is a white Hispanic.
>>
>>537107911
I agree with this, but you dont even need to envoke pedos, ultimately its an invasion of privacy they cant consent to.
If you post your children on the internet you are a bad parent. Simple as
>>
>>537107911
The pedo taboo does more damage (especially psychological damage) to kids than pedos actually do.

Kids will willingly take pictures of themselves naked and send them to people. They have no problem with that. The problem is when those people then reveal themselves as black mailers and then because the taboo has reinforced that this is the ultimate worst thing to ever happen even worse then being hitler it causes that much more pain and anguish.

It the taboo was broken, then the black mailer would have less leverage and the kid would feel less pain and shame for breaking the taboo.

Fucking anti pedos. They are the real child abusers indoctrinating kids into suffering extreme psychic damage for being naked.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.