Why? Too much antisemitism/racism online?
Good. Teens on the internet will just end up like pic related
>>537131884No it's literally to get everybody's ID So it's easier to track people online and charge them for virtual crimes like being a big meanie
>>537131884China already did it back in 2021. Western governments saw that and went "oh huh, we don't have to be democratic and liberal? we'll take that."China also did the "It's for the kids!" thing, and made sure to take down some child groomers from their social networks to "prove it".Eventually they've also used their 24/7 chat surveillance to get rid of couples sending nudes to each other, and it's also the tool they've used to catch anybody who criticizes the CCP. Another case was a guy who vlogged with wheelchair grannies to prove that the welfare system was being exploited in some way. That was seen as indirectly criticizing the CCP's policies, and he was jailed for his video series.So there you go. Let's all enjoy our mass surveillance, since protecting kids is a bipartisan issue.
>>537132301This nigga gets it
>>537131884Everyone has to provide identification to prove their age and set up an account, it’s removing anonymity under the guise of “muh children”
>>537131884>demand a mandatory digital ID across the internet to protect the children>ban all children from the internet (((for their own good)))>still demand that digital ID to protect the kids even though they're not allowed anymoreThe fuckin' chutzpah.
Good. Fuck them kids. Ban internet from them, too.
>>537132096Too soon.
Btw it's only nigger starmer who's pushing this (and the people who bribed him / have a gun to his head), and it's 100% a police state action.MP's have already voted against it, it went "under review" for months and was determined to do nothing, they were advised not to do it because of this, they did it anyway because like flock cameras some company and the military gave out bribes / intimidation.Just assume that it's the military, the police state, and some private company trying to sell this shit, because that's what it is every time.
>>537132362I know it because all of a sudden, after also doing the Chat Control stunt and announcing a ban for under-16s where I live, and initially saying "We must protect people from Putin's troll-army!" they've all of a sudden brought in a new law proposal to "combat harrassment of elected officials."
>>537132520THIS
>>537132301>Since protecting kids is a bipartisan issueall the MP's voted against it and their advisory board also told them not to do it after their scientific review of how effective it would be, nobody is actually voting for or supporting this.This is the thing where they pretend everyone wants it but actually literally nobody does.
>>537132796>>537132939Doesn't matter at all. No one wants it but it'll still go through with only some token resistance all so they can say "oh that's too bad, maybe you should vote harder next time :)", same as always.
>>537132301Other anons touched on it more obliquely, but you've said it the most straightforward. The only horrifying difference is that China at least wasn't averse to publicly punishing "criminals" (whether they actually were or not) to obtain some crumb of public trust. The UK, on the other hand, will happily look away from brown child rapists running roughshod over their country, because their reign has continued for centuries mostly unopposed, and they need cheaper retarded workers more than they need loyal and patriotic native peoples. So it's "fuck you, working stiff!" and the dumpster fire just keeps growing.
