what is wrong with the UK?
>>537143993This is actually based but they are doing it for the wrong reasons. There are very few things that fuck up the mind of a person than social media and it's specially mindfucking to the mind of a kid.Kids shouldn't be on social media.
The whole point was to use "for the children" to create a government registration system for internet access. They're not even hiding it.
How do you expect the UK's internet police to arrest you if you don't give them your ID when you sign online?
>>537143993They are right. Kids should be outside, playing and interacting with others and definitely not get booked up on goynet and ending up on this board till the day they die
>>537143993Bluesky is unbanned and UK wants digital ID tied to all internet activity. fuck policing internet fuck the left
Social media offers valuable support for emotionally vulnerable groups and subcultures.Think about every hobby you have... could you easily talk to people at school about it? If the answer is "no" then you can see the problem.Why is the United Kingdom suddenly becoming a shithole?
>>537143993Kier Starmer did something right the wrong way by accident. But yes the idea of banning social media for kids is good.
>>537143993Australia did itwe did ityou are going to do itstop pretending that jews are only fucking over nations that aren't yours.
>>537144139It will be illegal to access internet in UK without digital ID tied to your activity
>>537144193>becomingCome again ?
>>537144127>>537144139no shit sherlockThis has nothing to do with banning underage kids (who have a smartphone that their parents gave them), it's a blatant statist land grab by a torpedoed governmentIf the tech companies had a spine they'd just cut the UK off entirely, let the useless penpusher seethe for a while, then enter dialogue with the next government (likely led by 'are Nige)
>>537143993this is a good move but only as long as it is up to the parents to prevent the kids from using these apps/sites, not any kind of online identity verification.just like it falls on the parents to make sure their kids don't have access to alcohol or the car keys.knowing UK this will be used as an excuse to push online identity verification tho.>also nice source URL, i just trust you're not lying out of your ass here.
>>537143993Have to protect kikes and the invaders. It's definitely not about your children.
>>537143993tried resisting globohomo they'll think twice now, when posting something against migration will require providing id "to be sure theyr're not kids"
>>537143993authoritarianism
>>537144376Government said the ban does not include Bluesky
It'll be a good way to protect the kids from wrongthink. No more Jew jokes and other mean stuff.
>>537144327>NigeNige " I love jeets " Farage? Yup definitely UK will be in good hands
>>537144232If this comes to pass, I vow to leave my basement and burn down the infrastructure. Can't have digital ID if there is no internet or electricity anymore. All here in the UK must vow the same. We could make real changes. A few thousand autists with angle grinders could make a mess of the infrastructure.
>>537143993I say BASED.. Suicidal media ruined the internet.
>>537144530Well contrary to anons here I see British people fighting back hard
all social media should be banned. i don't care anymore about your freedumbs, this shit is too harmful to stupid people which is the majority of normgroids
Damn no more dancing insta girlsGrim
Pretty based, now those young 16 year old boys can't use twitter and will have to have fun looting and burning.
Am i the only one who actually thinks is pretty based to permanently fuck up the internet and make it significantly less appealing? maybe now you'll put down the phone and go outside or do literally anything else
>>537143993It's a dystopian third world shithole, innit it?
>>537144807The USA is introducing similar censorship. Porn is already requires ID in many states. Land of da free innit?
>>537143993Basically everything.There’s a good reason why generations left that island, even if they often thought they were sailing to their deaths and falling off the edge of the world and no way back. Somehow, even that option seemed better to them than staying on that cursed island any longer.
>>537144200>the idea of banning social media for kids is goodNo, it's not, because there's no way to do it without massive collateral damage and privacy infringements for everybody else. Keeping kids offline should be the responsibility of their parents and nobody else. The good news is that Nige and Lowe have both said they'll kill the online safety act when they get into power, so this shit will only exist for a few more years at most.
>>537143993UK actually doing something based for once.
>>537143993They saw the Australian example and thought, "We can extort those platforms!"
>>537144774>go outside>its all niggers and jeets with a tiny amount of elderly whites sprinkled in>get begged for money everywhere i go >have to fend off multiple scam attempts per day>go weeks without seeing another young white person, months without seeing an attractive oneboomers destroyed "outside"fuck you faggot
so if a under 16 is doing the Khan academy on youtube......now it's banned
>>537143993Good! Should be a normalized, commonly adopted law throughout the west. Rural area of SE Kentucky we live in didnt get internet speeds above dial up until 2023, didn't get cell towers close enough to get a signal til 2021, so we've only had tge ability to access social media til relatively recently unless you had satellite internet. Only have social media now to stay in contact with my immediate family. Wife still refuses to start social media accounts and bitches at me when she sees me using it.It's a cancer on society with little redeeming value, me saying that as a reluctant user myself. My niece and sister both have FB accounts they only post animal memes and occasional family pictures on, which I'm told is all it was basically used for when it first started.
>>537144152True but it should be up to parents to ensure that. The internet itself should be completely unregulated, like it used to be in the 90's.
I wonder what British youth will do without brainrot Tik Tok and pedo trannies grooming them
>>537145354lol when did whites become so fucking pathetic like this? how did a race that conquered the world reduce its self to burying its head instead of realizing their will to powerthe outside isnt le bad because heckin boomers, its bad because you are a cowardly worm
>Anglokikes clapping like seals for the technology that'll be used to arrest themWhat causes this?
>>537143993The conservatives/right wing were making political gains all over the world and one of the right wing central complaint was that crime was rampant. So the left wing parties decided to make a police state so they can arrest more people.This is exactly what people posted that they wanted for in the last 3 years atleast. That is if it was real and it was just a psyop by NATO using botnets.
>>537144117bluesky is not banned for 16 years old, they just want to funnel teens the only ones who still fall for the propaganda into groomersky where they control the moderation and the algorythm
>>537145567That already happened, what do you mean? I don't see the relevance
>>537145600>The conservatives/right wing were making political gains all over the worldNo they didn't, what world do you live in?
>>537145540White people didn't do anything. They just sort of showed up and disease killed off the competition. Whites are too cowardly and weak.
>>537143993well this is one thing i do agree on with the bongs. except ban it for everyone and deleted everyone who created these retarded platforms. the ones highest up in priority are tiktok, instagram, x and all it's clones. then the rest. OF should be gone and anyone who used it should be shot and killed and all the females who ever registered on it should be raped to death
>>537143993This not going to help!!!Brain root started with Fakebook rest just added fuel into fire!One Would need return Status of internet before Fakebook!Means ban all socnets!Not going to happen!!!Other level is ...Israeli &USA spyware in those networks!USA wage war against EU and GB since 2014 UA Maidan!As Usual Zombies in EU parliament have no still single clue about this fact!!!
>>537143993one step closer to Afganistan, but not yet that halal
>>537143993>heres a better questionWhy does anyone even care? The UK is a 3rd world shithole with a lower GDP than our poorest, most nigger infested state. You know how fucking bad that is? I've been to Mississippi (briefly thank god). I couldn't believe I was still in America it was so shitty. And the UK is broker and more irrelevant than that. If England didn't have its colonial past, it would be just as irrelevant as any other 3rd world country. All the productive Whites left and moved to America. Nothing but genetic trash and dune coons there now. Sad.
>>537145936Trump won everything in the U.S. and many other countries were shifting to conservatives. I know you're a shill for the police state, and know this one thing, your birth rates will crash because if your ass policies, you will rule a pile of nothing.
In any other situation I would have to agree this is the right move (I am old enough to have lived my entire childhood without internet) but it's clear this is to prevent the young from being exposed to things the state wants to hide. 4chan is going to become very popular.
>>537146682NATO psyop operators should learn to take a bit of accountability for the mess they cause.
>>537146696they want to control every sensation, they program the childs brain. and then they reach voting age and the programming cant be reversed, they will already be married and pregnant with niggers, they cant be unplugged from the jews matrix
I actually approve of this. Fuck those Jew social media cunts.
>>537143993Daily reminder every British IP still posting here is an Amerimutt glownigger
>>537143993The greatest sin in the world is seeing a girl under 16 naked that's why.There is nothing the woman in charge or on the council of whatever fears more than you seeing her daughter or someone else's daughter naked, no crime as unforgivable and reprehensible.
>>537146696I can only guess that the 4chan ban is close.
>>537143993They have to be under the ccp because it's what they have. Fuck communist
>>537144152People that use social media arent antisocial aspies
>>537143993they're saving who's left of their kids from internetslop
>>537145540Whites didnt conquer shit, a minority of aristocratic sociopaths did
>>537143993I don't know cause I don't notice any difference compared to any other time
They've also banned smoking for people born past a certain date.They're all fucking manchildren.
>>537144222>Australia did itkek you give our government way to much credit mate. The fuckwits who run our country literally think they can write something on a piece of paper and it magically happens. Our government said they did it, they say a lot of things, but they are completely divorced from reality and in reality it literally did not happen.Just like when they banned us from 4chan years ago, just like when they made memes illegal a decade ago. It was real in their mind meanwhile everyone just said yeah nah.Our government is hilariously innefectual, embarissingly incompetent, technologically incapable and it's fucking beautiful.
>>537147519The third one?
>>537145504Name one widespread problem that was solved by people suddenly changing their ways
>>537149458open defecation
>>537149933WRONGTry again
>>537143993should just ban mobile networks from accessing social media and porn, easy solution without gay ids
>>537143993Good.Kids shouldn't be on the internet. It's an adult space.
>>537143993Social media companies and phone makers just need to remember this one simple truth: There is absolutely NOTHING the British State can do to force you. They can't shut you down, they can't fine you, and if you aren't in the country then they can't arrest you.Just ignore them, like 4chan did.
>>537143993>Just give Mark Zuckerberg, Reddit, X and TikTok your credit card/digital ID goy. We definitely won't be using that as blackmail against you. You can trust us!Don't forget to change your IP as well before they force you to hand over your ID. If you posted anything naughty on any of the big social media applications, you're permanently fucked and will be on a Mossad/Palantir tranny list.
>>537143993Does that include YouTube?
>>537152855I've been online since I was 8 and I loved every second of it, incluiding the porn.I didn't become a tranny either.
>>537153198yeah, but are you a functional sexually active man or do you masturbate to pokemon and powerpuff girls
>>537153159Yah. YouTube said they'd use AI to "determine" if you're over 18, but knowing Jews they want to remove anonymity.They could just check if the account is over 18 years old, which many are, but you know even that won't work because they want a simple system to track everything we do so that they have blackmail on everyone that they can use against us later.That's the whole purpose of it. It's a Jewish blackmail operation.
>>537143993Now if a kid wants to figure out a math equation he can't go onto YouTube for a tutorial.All to stop antisemitic memes
>>537144127Nothing is happening. People are just imagining a group of old people are telling them what to do, and gay tranny muslim cops will beat them up and arrest them. Get tough. Stand up for your neighbors.
>>537153316Good point. I have cummed many times to cartoons.
>>537153198Just because you're one of the lucky ones doesn't mean the unwashed retarded masses should be able tod o it.
>>537154342Yes it does. We need to throw more support to people like us, not the pussy dogface beta soiboys that loves the government.
>>537144200The problem is they're only doing it so they can implement Tony Blair's digital ID bullshit.
>>537154654If you're smart enough to be on the internet, you're smart enough to figure out a VPN.It's self-selecting.
>>537145418And now you are under the digital panopticon too.
>>537148062articles like that are just to make weak minded people think "oh well we tried without identity verification and it didn't work, no wonder we need identity verification". banning anti-social media for young people is a huge shift in policy and won't happen (reach 90% success or so) within 6 months or even 12.
>>537155851>It won't happenIt's literally fucking happening right now.All the big platforms are actively doing it in this moment.
>>537143993Nothing you see will be organicEverything will be approvedEverything will be authorized and regulated
>>537156019i meant it ('it' being parents making sure young people don't use anti-social media) won't happen in that short time.the image in >>537148062 isn't enforcing it with strict identity verification, it's unreasonable to think a reasonable restriction (meaning no identity verification) is achievable in only 6 months when kids grow up with anti-social media and is addicted to it.the correct way to go about it is to wait several years and let the problem heal over time, not to further enforce it with actual identity verification.
>>537143993not sure how they're gonna enforce that effectively, even with ID logins etc.if i had kids i'd support it 100% though, social media is ruining everyone. they should just ban it full stop.
>>537143993what a dying tyrannical civilization does when it's gone completely beyond the paleshift to AUTHORITARIANMAXXXXXXING then rapidly destabilizeunfortunately I don't see "rapidly destabilize" being anything good for the natives,quite frankly
>>537143993Reddit? Really? What the fuck do they have, Myspace?
>>537156391it's important that parents do not allow platforms to ID ones kid. because then your kid grows up thinking it is normal to tie your real identity to your online activity. That normalization is what they want, the ID laws is more for future generations than current ones.
>>537143993Based, but like the Left's newfound "antisemitism" it's for the completely wrong reasons.
>>537156391>not sure how they're gonna enforce that effectively, even with ID logins etc.They make you log in via your bank/government service and remove previous options like regular log-in methods. It will be 2 factor + digital ID. It's not difficult for them to get the ball rolling, while outlawing competitors that can't afford to switch. They will even ban LLMs from people who want to make alternatives so you'll have to use World ID from Sam Altman.They're trying to get it on the OS level as well.
>>537143993Except Bluesky.Jack Dorsey gets to keep his free access to kids.
>>537143993They are tripping that shit ain't gonna work at all people are already deeply using that shit it's impossible to take it away from them now they will find a way to use it
>>537156285The root problem is the fact that online anonimity is currently and actively destroyed.And i doubt that any inch of control given to governments can be rolled back in any way.It's true that governments are deeply incompetent and dissociated by reality, but this power grab will be extremely damaging to all forms of protest.
>>537143993how can you possibly give a fuck about banning anything for minors unless you are one lol
>>537156879Because I don't wanna become the adult who grew up to hate teens and want them to have a worst time them us.
>>537143993UK govt is full of retards, this will just make them hate the govt when they become adultsmaybe thats even the point to further eradicate the natural citizens
>>537156879we will now have to input our faces/ID into any social media website, this is the core of the problem
>>537157013>to further eradicate the natural citizensI wonder how they are planning on doing that, since last i Checked most military personal come from the general population.
>>537156879>heh le minors!It has nothing to do with minors you stupid fucking mutt. This is all about getting blackmail on adults and controlling what people can say/think on the Internet. All of that to protect a Jewish empire that is collapsing in real time.
>>537143993UK faggots most cowardly cucked bitches in the world
Overwhelmingly popular with the public. Has been sort of successful in Australia as well.
>>537157454>this state backed poll that questioned labour voting areas says the state is always right
>>537157454That's the biggest problemIt's handpicked propaganda made with boomers that don't even know how to boot up a pcThe retard cattle eats up this shit like slop
>>537143993>ban sites that allow you to post all the niggers and jeets killing you without tracking you>allow the one site that is rife with jeets and niggers and jews trying to fuck children openlythe only good thing that will come from this is that Bluesky will get ultra-scrutinized, and the jews & golems using it to be pederasts will become emboldened and then handled. it also ensures anyone under 21 will be eternally pissed off and probably light the parliamentary HQ on fire, which is what they should've done from day one, but didn't because bongs are fucking stupid cucks.
>>537157135>I wonder how>planningWhat kind of retarded jedi mind trick shilling is this?>>537156988>have a worst time them us.Sending their best as usual.
>>537157795>boomers that don't even know how to boot up a pcLiterally the demo with the highest voter turnout by far. >>537157633>Labour areas Porn and internet bans are way more popular amongst old retired social conservatives youngun. Everyone I spoke to from the uk supports the ban. They hate social media
The amount of retards in this thread who don't understand this and think it's a good thing.
They forgot to ban bluesky and yet plenty of people there shout that they are fighting the establishment.
>>537144193Are you going to suffer severe cognitive dissonance or are you going to prove yourself to be what we've always known?My guess is the 2nd one.
>>537143993unironically the only good thing to come out of their recent dive into authoritarianism.>think>children>won't>please>etc
>>537158501Good thing as in take away bread and circuses?
>>537158501Part of the reason is to push more and more people generally off social media to stop them becoming ‘radicalised’ by Russian and American bots. Social media is wreaking havoc on mental health tbqh.
>>537144530Link up with the bladerunners and enact the Final Solution to government surveillance
>>537158654>just put the phone down>just turn the computer offRetards lacking self control is not the governments problem.Its not their problem that shithole countries are so lackluster that they've only got social media to spend all day on.
>>537158596The whole point is not to protect kids but curate the social media they are exposed to so that they only receive complete saturation with regime approved narratives.
>>537143993based. the days of troons, pedos and jeets trying to contact kids on discord and other social media are gone.
>>537158749By putting them on the site that hates Isreal?
>>537158641This will just turn into a modern form of life under the Warsaw Pact.You know, and so do your close people know, that the state is fucking with you, but a lot of your friends and relatives will develop a Stockholm syndrome, and suck up to the gibs from the state, like an automaton.
>>537145692why are murican posters against bluesky? ain't that shit decentralized and anonymous and allow you to post anything?
>>537158789As well as your online anonimity.Now, show your papers next time you post something.
>>537158732>Retards lacking self control is not the governments problemI mean it kind of is. It is the whole reason we have restrictions on drugs. Retards cannot do them sensibly and as a result drugs wreak havoc on society at large. A big part of political maturity is realising that vast swathes of the population are imbeciles and realising we need to deal with that.
>>537144358You know damned well this isn't about keeping kids safe.Kids have to prove their age in order to use social media.That means adults have to prove their age too.Every single user will be required to identify himself before being able to use the platform.
>>537158794It provides zero pushback to jews or israel or anti-white agenda, if they host a controlled opposition which screams at israel for being a white fascist outpost bullying brown people. They 1) have zero actual power to boycott israel and 2) still want to kill all white people. It's a relic from cold war where soviet union was against israel because they wanted to oppose usa, but it's still useful.
>Age Assurance Systems: Platforms must implement "highly effective age assurance" to verify users are over 16. This may involve facial age estimation using digital cameras, digital ID checks, or banking verification.Let them scan your face, link your bank, or give them your ID chud. Let them link your posting and browsing habits to your ID. That's a good goy "I can't give up social media its my life, here take my ID"
>>537159151if someone on bluesky posts a brown-on-white attack video or even some mild opinion, they will be banned in 3 minutes. the whole point of this digi id and ban is to prevent whitey (teens) from realizing they are under attack.
>>537143993Good, underage faggots should stay away from social media. Only grooming pedos would complain about this.
>>537159437didn't that shit advertised itself as a legit option with freedom of speech?so fucking tired of this bullshit astroturfed (((politics)))
>>537143993Norway isnt much better
>>537143993You don't think that this is a global initiative? If you aren't convinced, look at what your own government is planning.https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/norway-government-plans-social-media-ban-children-under-16-2026-04-24/
>>537159402It will not be restricted to slop like Instagram or Twitter.The scope is much bigger than that, any form of communication online will be ubder this.
>>537159557it's a literal commie pedophile paradise alternative to current twitter. it tells everything you need to know that once "right wing" owned twitter, they still allow lefties there any day of the week, but lefties still continue with kicking any "right wing" out.
>>537159678There's just no way any people met behind closed doors and then announced that they want nothing more than digi id by the end of 2026.
>>537159295i know that, but i also know kids would be better off if they were offline until 13 or even 15. however it should not be done by any authoritarian method such as online identification, it should just be up to the parents to make sure their kids are following the law. just like with alcohol. and just like with alcohol it shouldn't be considered a disaster if some kids sometimes cheat and drink a little. it's the 24/7 constant being online that hurts them.
>>537160053I think it's protectionism. China doing it back in 2021 gave them a head-start, soverignizing their internet, and cracking down on american spies. We haven't been able to do that as much because we didn't digitalize like they did.They'll to some extent try to justify it by saying there's an explosion in various internet crimes, and it's also an opportunity for law enforcement to actually clamp down on certain behaviors government hates. It's two bird with one stone, but I really think the primary reason is geopolitical protectionism, both because of Elon Musk trying to hard-rightize europe, Russian and Chinese spies not getting spotted, and more.An EU rep actually came out and said "It might be dangerous for ourselves to have all policymaking publically available." It already started back in 2024 when EU made a ban on Russian TV stations like Sputnik. They're both afraid that Russo propaganda will have an effect on young people, but they, IMHO, are also obviously afraid that the entire 2030 goals both socially and climate related are starting to gain dissent from people inside europe, UK or Australia.Just 1½ year ago we still had a Democratic Order, where things were all going in accordance with some 2030, 2040 and 2050 plans politicians had gotten voted in on, and justifying their powers for.Both the policies are going down the drain, and the risk of military conflict and foreign spies is high with the open internet that's feeding the Intel machine in the States. Also, Tulsi Gabbard is just openly a Russian asset IMO, and she got all of the intel we were sending to the US, and sending it directly to Putin I believe.So it really is protectionism.
>>537160303i hope you're right but i believe you're wrongunless we start to side with russia it will not be protectionism
>>537160303If it was protectionism, there would be other forms of policies, not yhis dystopian shit that is unfolding right in front of our eyes.This is more an authoritarian move than anything.
