What do you think is the most high-tech thing they're working on these days?
>>537162044Penis inversion to vagina surgery machine
>>537162044Implantable wombs so that trannys can give birth to live anal babies
>>537162100Please let this be real
>>537162044vr robot soldiers controlled by humans as elite ops squads, its why spacex starlink was allowed.
>>537162044
>>537162044data mining thread!!
>>537162100
babysitting the diversity
DELETE THIS
stink bomb droneskiller pepe le pew robots
>>537162188
>>537162044Secondary asshole tech so they can dual wield piss out of ass.
>>537162044Long range holograms
>>537162100Mr Anderson would like to have a word with you, agent.
>>537162044some shitty drone.they went downhill a decade ago.china overtook them and they will never catch up.
>>537162100Men truly are the GOAT. I love them.
>>537162044Hardware? "loyal wingmen"/nrtworked drone swarms/starshield. Software? TIA sigint/data modeling and individually curated narrative shaping chatbots/algorithims.
>>537162044A new microwave that cooks tendies and pizza rolls in like 20 seconds.
>>537162044They created a time machine to go back to the dawn of the human era and released a bio-weapon into Africa known as Negroid Florensis.
>>537162044probably nothing or nothing of value. all the old school doing real work engineers have long since retired in the mid 2010s. the new hires are more concerned about tranny porn and fag rights than engineering work. they're still piggybacking on late 1990s/2000s designs. Even the "new" 6th gen fighters has been in concept since Bush jr. These new age diversity faggot hires ain't doing shit. the higher ups just hope one day AI will get good enough to carry out the research from the 2000s. yea hope AI will continue the work from 20 years ago. that's literally the hope. fucking faggots haven't done shit since.
>>537162044Hey there, non bot user here.To answer your question seriously, I think they are putting most of thier research into AI systems.
a ufo that sucks you off for fuel
Honestly we're nearing / at a point where the amount of money and effort you'd have to put in to push aircraft engineering farther than it already is (hypersonic / sub-orbital bombers?) would be better spent on developing better missiles and drones. The F-47 for example is less intended to be some kind of UFO-tier step change in aircraft design than basically "an F-35, but faster / stealthier / longer range and that can manage a squad of drones"
>>537163592At this point it seems like space to earth weaponry would be a better investment
