Why doesnt the so called right wing create an environment where men can actually provide for women?
He wasn't allowed to make money because some hippy leftist prevented him from building to protect some flowers.
Kind of hard when the modern economy is based on every individual being an economic unit and a two-income household
I am not going to bloviate. Half the catholic priest hierarchy is homos, and the pope is secretly a homo. They are PURPOSEFULLY pushing homosexuality, female hypergamy, and race mixing as part of a conspiracy to get open homosexuality.And you trad cath retard cattle don't realise this
>>537164662Why do you kikes think this ugly cunt should be the face of white nationalism?
>>537164662>institute mandatory success programs for women>men pushed out of the high income/status jobs they need to be attractive to women, because it's illegal for woman to fail>problem compounded by women's infinitely scaling standards>girl boss roasties can't figure out where all the quadrillonaire olympian vampire CEO's are.Nothing can be done without ending mandatory success for women. Even then it doesn't matter because you now have several generations ruined by having no illusion about women/utterly deranged standards that can be met by any man on the planet
>>537164787Near impossible if we consider only people with minimum wage.Two decades ago it was viable for a man to provide for a nuclear family, now in some countries keeping just one person afloat with one minimum is not plausible.If you want the 'original' role of provider you need to make for two, both her and you, meaning the average joe is not able to keep a household if the wife is not working as well.And that means excluding potential partners from your dating pool ie christian girls lol
>>537164662the "right wing" in america only cares about getting gdp line-go-up dopamine hits. nothing else matters to them.
>>537164662From the ground up? Will they eat venison?
>>537165027based cat
>>537165027Women should have to pay for UBI, and by UBI I mean universal bachelor income.
>>537164662We'd have to remove women from the workplace for that
