And I'm tired of being told that I'm some bourgeois scumbag for doing so. These companies are good for the world are they not?
>>537180810Which ones are profitable?
>>537180810Don't worry anon, with jews you always lose eventually.
>>537180810Twitter, or X, wasn't included in the starlink stock, its Elons private Chan, that I'm still banned from, so no $8 a month for Elon from me.
>>537180810>I own SpaceX, xAI, X, and Starlink Elon that you?
>>537180810I have a bunghole.
>>537180925None at the moment but they will be one day.>>537180938Nope, he brought them in under Starlink.>>537180982No, not Elon.
>>537180810No. Why would the world be happy about people punching holes through its atmosphere?
>>537181057>None at the momentHow do you think that you become the richest man in the world by creating companies that have never turned a profit?Do you think that a situation like that is good for the world?
>>537181057>Nope, he brought them in under Starlink.Cool, you own stock in Twitter too, You better really hope that AI part of the portfolio really turns out to be worth 28 trillion dollars. Because everyone is now making competing LEO Internet services, and even China can now land and reuse rocket boosters.
>>537181422>CatalogBecause the market believes they one day will be profitable.Amazon was unprofitable for over a decade, the market still bid up the stock knowing it one day would. Nothing wrong with that. Nothing wrong with people buying a company and bidding it up because they believe in its future.>>537181480Yeah that's what I said, I own "X", I included that in my OP
>>537181422>Do you think that a situation like that is good for the world?What don't you understand, BYD will never be able to compete with Insane government tariffs in the USA, and EU.So only shithole countries will be able to have affordable, fast charging electric cars with the new Chinese Sodium Ion batteries.Also Samsungs silver battery patent is DOA now, silver not ending the FED, its going right back to $30.
>>537180810SpaceX is expensive way to unkeep communications phone/internet. It will be newer profitable and when infrastucture at ground deveplops it getting obsolate.
>>537180810They are being used to build the panopticon, so no, they are not. Please die.
>>537180938>>537180810>Twitter, or X, wasn't included in the starlink stockIt's worse than that. The SpaceX stock IPO only included 5% of the company at a huge markup, the shares that the public got access to was only 2% of the amount of the company Elon got the remainder, public shares get 1 vote while his shares get 10 votes. Further you need 5% of the stock to gain voting rights in the first place so it is impossible for anyone, public or private, to actually vote or propose anything. The shares also include a stipulation of arbitration so if you, or any of your index funds own a single shares of SpaceX you can't sue SpaceX. No meaningful control of any kind. And it gets worse.The space launch part of SpaceX has never and will never make a profit, that's why it's bundled with Starlink which does and why SpaceX is legally defined as a "tech and or service industry" company and not aerospace. But wait, there's more: SpaceX was then bundled with xAI so that 85% of the valuation of SpaceX stock comes promise contracts to build AI data centers that haven't even been constructed. Elon simply promised to build a bunch of data centers 2-5 years from now. That's 85% of the stocks worth, that 2-5 years from now SpaceX is going to be making 27.5 trillion dollars a years in profits thanks to the data centers that haven't been built yet, using AIs that haven't been created yet, selling to people who don't pay for AI right now.Read the IPO prospectus it's 20 pages pictures of rocket launches before a paragraph that says "future profitability requires global AI adoption to increase 8000%"Fucking idiots. Whole thing is a scam. And the worst part is that SpaceX+Starlink would have been a perfectly fine, PROFITABLE, non-scam, space company. But he had to slap on AI because that's the bubble right now.
>>537181062>>No. Why would the world be happy about people punching holes through its atmosphere?That's Freemason Science BS Anon. They're complicated money laundering genociders.
>>537181057It's missing Tesla which is the only way he gets real trillion in revenue -- Optimus. Tesla acquisition comes later.
>>537181694>SpaceX is expensive way to unkeep communications phone/internet. It will be newer profitable and when infrastucture at ground deveplops it getting obsolate.Dunno, I'm out in the boonies, I have Starlink, but my brother recently got Fiber service, problem now i his fiber service is shoddy, even though when its working its superior for gaming. but on random hours and days there's just no connection. So we've ran CAT5E cable between our two houses, so that now we always have internet access, or when his connection gets toruble free I'll ditch the $50 payments to Elon and just slurp on his $50 fiber plan.
>>537181694nah. they're talking about cell phone plan prices for starlink access. there are still plenty of spots in canada and the US where you cant get cell service nevermind the rest of the world which is decades behind.
>>537180810Name one useful thing made by these corpos besides overpriced Internet with high latency, and a chatbot trained by scraping 4chan.
>>537181787>it is impossible for anyone, public or private, to actually vote or propose anythinggood
>>537181674>Amazon was unprofitable for over a decadeSpaceX is 24. Do you think the market understands rocket science and can accurately predict the value of opportunities in space? Let's face it, you're really just gambling.How is gambling good for society?
>>537181787>It's worse than that.Yes, I am subscribed to Patrick Boyle, I love his dry witty humor, but have seen the video where he went over it last month.
You're a dork, Elon.The whole world read the files you were corresponding with Epstein in and you're so much of a fucking sperg, you weren't allowed to the island for the cook outs, Mr. Girls FTW. Once you floated in the air behind Trump, it was over.Just buy all the major film studios and free their IPs from bondage, start your own and fucking make a good Star Wars film.
>>537181690>SpaceXWhat are you even talking about? Last time I checked, Tesla is not profitable either.
>>537181977The market is the best bet for the value of probability of anything.If there was any individual who is better, they can arbitrage the market with their superior knowledge.>>537182012I'm not Elon
>>537182056> contributes nothing of value> gift to the world, because "cool"You are a part of the problem.
>>537181872>BehindI can get 10 Gigabits speed to my optic fiber today but no point yet because rest of internet still working 20-50 Megabits speed.
>>537181057>they will be one daySure, Pajeet.
>>537182187yeah, obviously im on about the less developed world, not places where you there is super high speed infrastructure already installed. even in north america there are lots of lots of people living rural where theres not much choice and is expensive if there is. starlink is competitive, which is why i see their antennas on half the houses around here.
>>537182032>What are you even talking about? Last time I checked, Tesla is not profitable either.I'm just saying their car and battery business is probably doomed, or at the least going to be relegated stubbornly to the U.S., as the EU will certainly cave on it's aggressive Tariffs.>TLDR>Before Tesla survived on government subsidy>Now it survives on Tariffs keeping competition out.
If you don't like rockets you are a nigger.
>>537182417Elon Musk is basically an e-celeb funded by tax dollars and people are actually "investing" in that, making him the richest person in the world, like it's a good thing. It just makes them NPCs.
