Would Jesus have supported trans people
>>537189964Jesus is not a real person.
>>537189964>(47) Jesus said, "It is impossible for a man to mount two horses or to stretch two bows. And it is impossible for a servant to serve two masters; otherwise, he will honor the one and treat the other contemptuously. No man drinks old wine and immediately desires to drink new wine. And new wine is not put into old wineskins, lest they burst; nor is old wine put into a new wineskin, lest it spoil it. An old patch is not sewn onto a new garment, because a tear would result."Gospel of Thomas
>>537190584Gospel of Thomas isn't canon lol
Also>(53) His disciples said to him, "Is circumcision beneficial or not?"He said to them, "If it were beneficial, their father would beget them already circumcised from their mother. Rather, the true circumcision in spirit has become completely profitable."
>>537190648Many Jews say this.
>>537190584Women and men with free will are satan.In the Kingdom Come I will live here only with my God Jesus Christ and his new human slaves that only he controls as corporal vessels.
>>537189964I am an atheist and I do not support faggots.
No he wouldn't.You are an affront to God, abominations.
>>537189964They mock your faith, until it's time to use it against them.I don't care what Jesus would have supported- I'd gladly bash a tranny's skull in with a hammer and laugh while I did it, Jesus can sort me out after I send another dozen or so to Hell where faggots belong.
>>537190100Neither are trannies, though.
>>537190648it isnt canon because you are all cucks of satan.
>>537189964why do they just say stuff like this with absolutely zero explanation? why is everything they believe something they just arbitrarily decided is true without proof? how do they expect to ever be taken seriously when they're intentionally antagonistic
>>537190100jesus is accepted to have historically existed, the dispute is on his authority and divinity. >>537191042jewish style propaganda. they will say something emotional, have dumb emotional people support it, and then if they have less power will lie and try to make it seem like something else is actually what theyre saying, ie theyll say youre doing violence against trans people so people will equate bashing their skulls in with not validating their sinful lifestyle, then when they have power they just rely on people around you not wanting to be punished shushing you for them. there is no logical substance as it is actually a hinderance to them to engage with you logically where they will lose.
>>537189964of course he would have, he's jewish
>>537190835>cucks of satan.I'm agnostic but I've been more interested in Buddhism lately.Non Judaic aryan religion
>>537189964He would support them the same way he supported prostitutes
Jesus would not have supported AGP fetishists who try to force other people in public to roleplay with them for their sexual thrills. In general, Jesus had a very 'do unto others' attitude, and AGP fetishists are not behaving in accordance with that. Reminder: there is NO such thing as a 'transexual', changing your gender is impossible. 99% of these people are doing it for sexual fulfillment and being seen as/tricking people into/coercing them into treating them as opposite gender, gives them a sexual thrill. That's what it's about. "Validation" means sexual validation.
>>537189964Yes he would but not the same way as the LGBT community demands. He would support in the sense to heal them, not to condemn them. The reason why faggots behave the way they behave is because they are alienated by society. Jesus welcoming the trans in his church is to save them.
>>537189964Support is different from acceptance.
>>537189964Well, yea. He was a jewish commie
>>537189964>Jesus I’m going to cut my cock off and dress like a girl>wtf lolThat’s probably what would happen
>>537191280>jesus is accepted to have historically existed, the dispute is on his authority and divinity. The Torah is a forgery and theres no evidence it even existed 200 years before Jesus supposedly did. >>537189964In the gospels, jesus respected eunuchs but hated gooners.
>>537190715Gospel of Thomas is absolutely not canon kike. Its very much gnostic.
>>537189964jeyosheuea was trans
>>537192168>The Torah is a forgery and theres no evidence it even existed 200 years before Jesus supposedly did.Lol do you actually think this?In the Gospels DRESSING as a woman is forbidden.
>>537192269Which means what? Both men and women wore tunics (dresses) back then
>>537189964Pride get out poo poo eating demons
He would have sat them down and told them to repent for their sins
>>537190763St Paul is very clear about it. Jesus would look on them with love, pity, and mercy, but he would not condone their lifestyle.
>>537192451Im not an expert on first century fashion standards of the Levant. They could tell the difference and forbid it.
>>537190584>citing non-canonanon... no.also, that verse wouldn't be relevant anyway.
>>537190584What does any of this have to do with sodomites?
>>537191280>jesus is accepted to have historically existed, the dispute is on his authority and divinity.By who's standards? You can easily argue both ways. There were a lot of prophets back then, and he could be either of them, or an amalgamation.
>>537192634This :Colossians 3:2-5 (KJV) Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth.For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory.Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry:
None of you fake faggot Christians read your Bibles. You are all unironically going to hell. Jesus Christ, The Son of God, whom died on The Cross to pay for your sins said the following: "For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it."~Matthew 19:12/thread
>>537192269>In the Gospels DRESSING as a woman is forbidden.Yet since second wave feminism women dress as men as standard.
>>537192269yes, and that's all that transvestites are: literally crossdressers. the surgeries and hormones don't change that fact. They merely pretend to be the opposite sex. there is no such thing as gender. there are only two sexes. it is not possible to change one's sex.
>>537192269You mean the quote about weaving a cloth out of two fabrics?That chapter refers to racemixing. It's not about men wearing dresses and women wearing pants.Everyone wore robes, clothing was unisex.
>>537189964https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljzVylo7YfY
>Would Jesus have supported trans peopleIt's Jesus. When Jesus looks at someone, He sees into like other dimensions and shit. That motherfucker can read your mind from the house next door while taking a piss, and that's at like minimal power. Anyway step into the Twilight Zone where Jesus is a documented figure and everyone attested to his miracles. Jesus thought highly of Roman officers that he just met and thought lowly of merchants of his own people. Jesus cares about your character and not your social status. Why? Jesus, who is like a Son of Man, can conjure food and water. The usual plan of showing off or flexing money doesn't work on him.I imagine there are righteous trannies but lots of evidence seems to indicate the contrary. There's so many people that asking judgement a whole group related in only one aspect is a null question.>are left-handed people morally good????This is such an odd planet. People live for 120 years instead of a more natural 30. How do you live for 120 years without pissing anyone off badly enough to end you? You must be a righteous person indeed. Gods make fools out of each other, using humans like pieces on a playing board.
>>537189964He would had cured their dicklesness like he did sight for the blind and told them that they are made in the image of God... except the foreskin which they have to cut off again now
>>537192795Trannies commit a form of soft suicide.That's why calling them by their birth names is considered "deadnaming".Let me paraphrase it to make the modern context clearer.It's impossible for a man to be of two genders, or stretch two bows, and it's impossible to be a servant of two masters (the self and the group): otherwise he'll honour the one (the group) and treat the other (self) contemptuously.No man consumes a new ideology in old frameworks, and no man pours new identities in old bodies lest the body burst (the 42%), nor is an old identity poured into a new body lest the illusion be broken and the 42% happens.Tell me how the soft suicide by means of "transitioning" has nothing to do with the quote.And go quote this paraphrase too if you want.The last thing Christians need right now is an old body (church) pouring them old wine (catholicism/prottism) into their new winesacks (post-lockdown redpilled awareness of the Jew).
>>537192792>wouldn't be relevant anywayIt may be considered foolish to confuse your own perception of fog for evidence of darkness.You might miss the light.
>>537192909Feminists explicitly rejected christian standards? >>537193120Theres multiple quotes about it. It lays it out pretty clear.
>>537189964Jesus still will support them, in REPENTING of their abominable sin.
>>537189964NO BECAUSE JESUS WASNT A FUCKING FAGGOT
>>537189964He would forgive them once they accept their gender and repent their transgressions.
>>537193570NT?I'm not acutely aware of any specific verses, maybe a chapter could come to mind.
>>537193642His forgiveness won't heal a thing.They must learn to forgive themselves for their transgressions, that's what Jesus would tell them to do.Without it, his forgiveness would go over their heads.And with it, they'll realise they never needed his forgiveness in the first place, because that power of love comes from the God Within (that bit of God in each of us).
>>537193576Yes, you have to give yourself to Jesus or you go into the lake of fire. Most lbgt are not Christian and are going into the lake.
>>537189964No, he would have supported detransitioning. You can't love God unless you also love truth, and trannies by definition set themselves up as being opposed to truth.
>>537189964lfmao noGod smites faggots, even a man dressing as a woman is a sin.And jesus would tell them to repent and de-troon.
>>537192269Yes, I believe that. But I could respect the beliefs of a Christian who believes in jewish messianism solely because they believe in Christ. But to believe that Jesus existed, but may not have been the messiah is extremely kiked. When I am certain Jesus was invented to fulfill the role of a messiah. If Jesus were not the messiah, a white man would have no reason to believe or respect jewish messianism. As for Jesus supporting transgenderism, I would not believe it. On the one hand, he approved of eunuchs, on the other hand he was anti-gooner. So maybe Jesus would be sympathetic to those Thai ladyboys who get raped by tourists, but not the autogynephiliac perverts more common in the west.
>Matthew 19: 11-12>11 But Jesus said to them, “Not all men are able to do this, but only those to whom it has been given. 12 For there are some men who from birth will never be able to have children. There are some men who have been made so by men. There are some men who have had themselves made that way because of the holy nation of heaven. The one who is able to do this, let him do it.”If only Jesus was around, we could interrogate him endlessly about these words. Surely he wouldn't tire of that.
>>537189964No. And fornicators go to hell too. People still don't understand that only a very small % of humans will go to heaven. Most 'christians' won't make it either.
>>537194214So the dead sea scrolls were just a fabrication? Jesus was accepted by white gentiles in spite of the fact that he fulfilled Jewish messiahism. I dont think you know much about that time period, and are just filling in the blanks with shit you want to be true.
>>537192888This doesn't suddenly undo the commandments and the prohibition of homosexuality is repeated in the Epistles.1 Corinthians 6:9-11 (KJV) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.
>>537189964>Would JesusWould Jesus support experimentation on human embryos?
>>537189964"Salvation is for those who protect the oppressed and poor"-Jesus Christ
>>537195322Being rebuked for your wickedness is not oppression.
>>537189964Probably as long as they weren’t gentiles
>>537189964>>537190584Yes.
>>537195322So we agree he would not have supported one of the biggest anti-human cults of modernity.
>>537189964Die, communist demon.
>>537189964He would tell them to stop being trannies.>>537196145That has nothing to do with trannies.
>>537196167frieren is top teir.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMluEj4R1Vo
>>537196490>That has nothing to do with trannies.It does if you believe that trannies are born that way. Liberal mothers have a magical sixth sense that allows them to detect when a baby is actually a tranny. Plenty of celebrities have also acquired this magical gift.
>>537189964Whatever you do to the least of My brothers, that you do unto Me. Love each other as I have loved youLove thy neighbor Love thy enemy
>>537190763All have fallen short of the glory of God. If trannies can’t know Jesus because they are sinners, no one can Catholic literally means universal.
>>537190778You are sick.
>>537189964It's "what's wrong with troons" day on the Discord server.Go ahead, check the catalog. They're in lockstep.
>>537196836I hadn't watched it but understood the plot and the message.Demons use words to trick humans into thinking they, the demons, value the same things as the humans.Exactly what the left and communists do.
>>537189964Of course he would. In fact, he likely did. He pulled demons out of people, remember?
>>537196145>Sin doesn't matter, bro. Identify as a murderer because you're free to do so!
>>537189964Jesus would have healed trans people
>>537189964>Does Jesus support trans peopleOf course not.
>>53719768399% of your ancestors are that kind of "sick".You're the anomaly.
>>537189964Jesus would have placed his hand on their heads and brought them back to humanity
>>537190100Jeets aren't Korean but that didn't stop you.
>>537197683Well, he does have a pointHomo sodomites aren’t really people
You idiotic faggots can't even tell when you're being raided.
He would heal them by casting out the demons causing their mental illness
>>537200250What would trannies do if He healed them and suddenly they had a cock again?
>>537189964Love is love and Jesus would have supported love in all forms.Sodomy is not love, it is lust, and Jesus would not have supported sodomy.
>>537200777>He would heal them by casting out the demons causing their mental illnessCHECKED
>>537200950They would make Caucasian babies with fertile Caucasian women
>>537189964Somebody that never existed can’t support anybody
God wants everyone to repent and turn to him. Trannies are just sinful fools like the rest of us.
>>537189964Jesus would support the tranny but not the doctor who made it into one, for the tranny is decieved but the doctor knows "best"
>>537189964If trannys looked at jesus IRL theyd immediatelly convert and stop being faggots all their rebellion comes from not knowing whether god exists which then gets them devoured by nihilism postmodernism and materialism
>>537189964Jesus hung out with hookers and snitches.
>>537196145Sorry, city bumpkin, I'm going to need a lot moreCONTEXTONTEXT
>>537190584this doesn't sound like something Jesus would sayt. knower of Him
>>537201796>hookers and snitchesfalse.No hookers.And the one "snitch", Judas, he called out directly. The snitch killed himself, and that is right for snitches to do, according to God.
voluntary castration and suicide are unforgivable sins which permanently bar you from heaven, since both are irreversible
>>537189964Why not? He supported lepers when nobody else would.
>>537201695No.>>537201418Every man you ever met is a faggot who doesn't control his daughters.
>>537201972>He supported lepers when nobody else would.He didn't support leprosy, you fucking retard
>>537201972>why notAre you a little girl, this isn't a blue board, you have to have a full set of adult teeth to be here.
>>537201950>unforgivable sinsonly blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is unpardonable.
>>537202143da holy spirit be a gay ass bitch nigga ong bruh
>>537202139No this
>>537202238If you want to actually guarantee you go to hell, join judaism.
>>537189964one must simply ask>would a jewish rabbi support this?and then you'll reach your conclusion
>>537201841The verse states that God does not have a preference, you can be rich, poor, a man, a woman, all are equally as able to get into his kingdom. It has nothing to do with troons, and it definitely doesn't state ''everyone is the same so you can chop off your penis for fetish fullfillment''
>>537202571i'm not worried about that any more than i am other methods of goy control. every folk religion pre-christianity had some version of "you go to be your ancestors/gods" rather than "venerate the jew on a stick or youll be charbroiled forever". the only question that remains is who to listen to, desert jew rats or my ancestors. tough choice...
>>537190584That about monogamy. Stop being a faggot trying to troll the gays, you dont know shit. Read some ephesians.
>>537202987Did you think I was talking TO you? filch!
>>537189964He would have supported the ones who were trying to get better. He believed in forgiveness for sinners, not tolerance for sin.
