The true Aryans rise again!
I like Prag. He's a really nice kid, very genuine.
>>537274554It must be shit if the computers hadnt already figured it out since they can calculate every possible move and response.Its genuinely illogical to assume any human is inventing a new chess opening even if it was someone else with 500iq. The game is solved already.
>>537274795>Its genuinely illogical to assume any human is inventing a new chess openingNo, it happens all the time. Humans work with chess engines now.>The game is solved already.No lol. You don't even know what the world "solved" even means. What's your ELO and why do I get the feeling that, if we played, you would accused me of cheating if I en passant captured, or maybe even caslting?
>>537274932The game is solved by computers you retard.Theres a finite number of spaces, a finite number of moves and responses. If you think a game like that is unsolvable by computers you're a moron. At the highest levels a human still loses to a bot that isnt programmed to purposely make mistakes, the best a human can do is stalemate.Both yours and my ELOs are irrelevant because Magnus would lose against the computer.
>>537274795Maybe it's an anti-human opening for baiting human type responses
>>537274554>>537274932You're a moron. Chess is 100% solved and human vs human gameplay is only worthwhile at 3+ games, in a row. Game 1-2 is a feeling out process. From 3 on the winner is likely to continuously win. I've played more games in 3 years than that kid has played in his entire life. He didn't invent anything. He did a move so fucking stupid people purposely avoid it and didn't name it. The hardest opponent in chess is a computer. If you are "inventing" moves you are using a computer. There are very obvious reasons as to why you don't make certain moves, because they can result in an almost immediate loss. This indian kid psyop is retarded. I will absolutely obliterate this kid if you make him jump in a pool, change his clothes, and give him a new pair of glasses he never touched. There is a transmitter in his glasses.
>>537275163>>537275876Chess is not a solved game.
>>537274554Carlson invents new openings all the time. Its his hobby. He does it on chess.com multiple times a year.
>>537275876Watch one of hos games and I guarantee his move time increases based on the length of transmission, such as H8. His reaction time will scale with the board.
>>537274554Click bait>>537274744Nigger lover>>537274932Noob chess AI user>>537275849Reddit>>537275876Based
>>537275163>The game is solved by computersNo and again, you don't know what the word "solved" means. Stopped reading there.>>537275876>Chess is 100% solved Oh look, another retard self-identifies lmao. You know how I know you don't know the difference between engines and tablebase?
>>537275975Chess isn't solved but it doesn't mean chess programs of today are able to be beaten by a human player.
There are no "new" chess opening moves. There are only obscure moves no one plays because they are bad, not because they haven't been played before. Even the last Magnus opening headlines were just him effectively giving his opponent a handicap before going on to defeat them anyways. It was never some 200 IQ super secret move.
>>537274554anyone can create a new chess opening LMFAO
>>537274554>inventshere we go again
>>5372745542%
>>537276046I will beat you horribly like everybody else.
The chess meta is no longer memorizing the best moves and positions, but to find moves that are theoretically suboptimal, yet hard to counter unless you've studied up on them.
>>537276780Imagine even implying that every possible chess opening wasn't already invented by Yakub. Absolutely retarded white monkeys. I'd go outside and start stomping you if it didn't get in the way of me fucking your women.
>>537276971I very much doubt it if you're ignorant enough to think that chess is "solved".
>>537277462
>>537274554>new chess openingpoo on the chessboard?
>>537275163>>537275876Yes the space of all the possible states is finite however we don't have the computational power to explore it. Look into O notation and specifically what it means to be O(n!). Chess engines use heuristics which are far better than any human intuition BUT not a definitive optimal solution at all. again be curious, use your mind and learn about stuff little fags
>>537274744I hope he stays in india.
>>537274554>invents a (New) chess opening.That's not possible. There's one move per piece in an opening (the fist move) and a set number of pieces Pw, K, Q, R, B, each have available positions some none at all. Each opening (the first move each can make) has a name. The relabeling the one, or more moves as an "Opening" is most likely the case and what no seasoned player would do because it's probably dumb and why "Shocking".
MAGNUS SHOCKEDINDIA ROCKED
>>537274554Magnus has dropped down a caste
>>537274744He's a little chancer, Banchode
>>537279041Open Game (1.e4 e5)King's Pawn Openings (1.e4)Ruy López (Spanish)Italian GameGiuoco PianoGiuoco PianissimoEvans GambitScotch GameFour Knights GamePetroff Defense (after 1...e5 2.Nf3 Nf6) — often classed as a response but within 1.e4 familyKing's GambitBishop's OpeningVienna GameCenter GamePonziani OpeningLatvian Gambit (rare/Black reply)Napoleon/Wayward? (historical names and sub-variations/traps included above)A few, Semi-Open Games (1.e4 with Black not replying 1...e5)Sicilian Defence (1...c5) — many major variations:NajdorfDragonSemi-SlavCatalan OpeningLondon System
>>537279041And of course the Queens Gambit.
