>women have it better than me-
>>537308842>let's demolish the sexual structure which gave life to modern civilisation by incentivising all the worker ants AND bees>what could go wrong>why are the men being haunted by missed love??>of course i can take plan b and dog cock>you're a threat to society if you want to buy legal speedshould i keep going?
>>537308987>modern civilisationnot the post modern one
>>537308842It's just nature mate. Nothing you can do about it
>bogan discovers the wall
>>537308842...But men will happily give women of all ages and incomes a shot if they are nice to be around.We are not the same
>>537309095Women are programmed to be selective because the average man can kill them.
>>537308842so the wall is officially at 25 years old for womentop kek
>>537308842Noting that pre-menopause dip.>a last hurrah
Also they should quite the brainwashing, conditioning and censorship, and allow to pick any age.>suddenly it's 12-15 across the boardlmaorip
>>537308842that graph is not based one what women really think. it was based on questions asked, when women give answers that are socially acceptable. women lie.https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2416984122
>>537308842The social acceptability bias is stronger on women.IRL you see millions of women gushing over teenager singers
>>537308842Women deserve it for being soulless and retarded.
>>537310592No one wants to fuck 15 year olds, quit your projection.
>>537312408Heterosexuals do, so it's not your concern or something within your comprehension because you're fag.
>>537312408literally everyone wants to fuck 15 year olds or we wouldn't need laws to prevent it.
>>537308842>women are looking for resources>men are looking for beautydeep thoughts, from /pol/
>>537312574It's legal here and only a fringe minority of dudes actually does it.
>>537312800For no reason obviously.>they just randomly decided to not do it
>>537312506Faggots are sexual deviants like you, so I think you'd get along quite well, actually. But whatever helps you to cope lol.>>537312574>if no one wants to fuck 10 year olds, why is it illegal?!Yeah, great logic, bro. You got me there. Sorry, but anyone who thinks the AOC should be lower than 16 genuinely needs to be shot, and that's already pushing it.
>>537313399>if no one wants to fuck 10 year olds, why is it illegal?!Where's the flaw in that though?It's a little funny because you reworded it in a way that makes perfect sense.>if nobody wanted to do it there'd be no need to ban itCorrect, which means some people want to do it, and that's definitely not good.But beyond puberty it becomes kinda arbitrary. I've seen 20+ year olds less mature than 15 year olds, of either gender (no homo), so it's mainly a question of when you let people make their own decisions - and it's not wise to set this below 14-16 or whatever. Children are very unreasonable.But it's also not like you can always tell if they're lying about their age.
