Why is this a thing?
>>537323857AI end goal is a copyHuman end goal is learning
>>537323857Basically, the News fear porn'd AI to the 20-30% of liberal news cultists who have a similar psychology to religious zealots. At those levels of acceptance, the idea must be considered by the remaining 70-80% of the population.
>>537324210kill your family retarded kid
>>537324285I am tired of fucking retarded kids I them all to die
when I was a kid was wasnt that retarded and I recognized all my peers as absolute retards
>>537324296No>>537324342So how come you are still alive? Hypocrite much?
>>537324210No, both end goal is money.Computer is just faster
>>537324490>both end goal is moneyfalse
>>537323857Ignore the toxic shit heads who use this platform to spread negativity. Many of them are socially withdrawn and have Skitlesfrenziea. >They look like this
>>537323857.Copying AI means AI does stuff for you.You copying the drawing means you actually did effort, and you did it yourself.
>>537324210I love Russia, BTWHi Incel, you're fundamentally mistaking the nature of Learning Machines. The goal is to make a learning machine that can perceive the world and function artificially as an intelligence. Eventually, the technology will become indistinguishable from Human and Animal intelligence, but without blood lust or greed, for example.
>>537324756So when we need to do multiple calculations, should we stick to paper and pen instead of a calculator? It's doing more effort, so it's better?
>>537325107We need real mathematicians with real human errors, to keep life exciting and painful for nerds.
>>537324756Effort is meaningless, you childYou think Musk is the most hard-working man in the world?
>>537323857I don't like AI, it gives me a feeling inside that it's NWO adjacent. As in it's bad
>>537323857ai just copies, human learns and create something new.gen ai will never create anything, it can only take what other humans have created and regurgitate. It's evil and stagnant
>>537324968>indistinguishableTherein lies the problem. It won't but if it somehow did, there are major flaws with that due to the nature of being human. Imagine for a moment a serial killer or manipulator, that has an almost 0% chance of falling for the traps humans lay for it.
>>537324579>>537324968So, the main difference between Costa Rico and Russia is an access to the flat monitors?
>>537326479>ai just copiesHumans just copy too. Whether it is nature or other humans>human learns and create something new.So can AI.
>>537326402>a feelingThat's just good observation. It doesn't take a genius to see how this mirrors crap like the Patriot Act or feelgood socialist trappings, that end up being for-profit at citizen expense.
>>537323857The entire point of art is human expression. There's nothing impressive about a computer shitting out an image.If you don't get it, you're probably brown.
>>537328183Written words are human expression. An AI image also has human expression as longbas it was prompted by a human. Your arguments don't hold...
>>537328514>MexicoLike I said, you just don't get it.
>>537324490In some circumstances yeah totally. Code faster, write copy faster(it's slop to begin with)For artistic purposes it lacks the ability to compose full ideas that have meaning. It's a shallow imitation.
