If pic related never happened, do you think Islam would've ended up more mainstream in the US and its periphery? It seems like most anti-Muslims sentiment in the US can be traced to 9/11, otherwise, would it just be seen as another non-mainstream religion like the occasional Buddhist and Hindu temples are?
>>537330493lol no, the faith has always lived rent free in their minds
>>537330493Goat fucking brownoids from the third world have always been shunned and barred from the west, except in the last hundred years, and thats had disastrous consequences.
jews did that though
The left became rabidly pro muslims only after 9/11. Almost like they were glad we got attacked and wanted more.
>>537330497>Your mind on /pol/The left saw things for that they were: USA fucked around in the middle east, wanting to choke on some israeli dick, and found out when muslims weren't going to let Uncle Sam go off easily. They were less pro muslim, and more 'I told you so'.20 years later, USA learned nothing
>>537330493come on OP, it's just three more months to go until this is on-topic for /his/. you can make it.
>>537330494Always love a good trashing
>>537330493Less mainstream because we would have taken FAR less Muslim refugees/immigrants and so would Europe.
9/11 wasn't the first islamic terror attack in US history, let alone world history. There were earlier terror attacks on the US by muslims like the 1993 WTC van attack by Ramzi Yousef. And many more. Meanwhile, for all the jeet hate there is, there has never been a Buddhist or Hindu terror attack on American citizens. Ever. >>537330494>>537330495>>537330496>>537330497>>537330498
>>537331269Of course it is important to keep in mind the reality is these were false flag attacks staged via a combination of Sayanim, Zionists in the US government, arab patsies and Israeli intelligence, with the Israelis being the organizing force and the US government zionists primarily just handling the cover up.
