Did you know your taxes go to Jewish banking families as interest payments on the loans they make to your government through the central bank? Lol. Did you know the interest payments spiral into infinity and have been going on since the 1700s? Yeah that's real that's a real thing. Nah the bank nationalisation didn't mean anything because it didn't change the function of issuing debt instruments to these same investment groups controlled by banking families who aren't on any Forbes richest people list. Oh and Elon Musk isn't the richest man in the world. Lol. Guess who stopped that system for a short time? Haha. You won't believe it. He's German if you didn't know. An Austrian painter to be exact. LMAO.
>The Rothschildsnot long meant for this earth.
>>537373481>The RothschiIds are good at hiding their wealth like all banking dynastiesWas this meant to be a rebuttal? LMAO
>>537373110Yes. I am aware. What exactly am I supposed to do about it?
Yes, we all know about "the bankers".What no one knows is how we can corral the masses of low IQ retards against the bankers and what system supplants it that allows for a more fair and equitable exchange of time for fiat that doesn't result in a life debt, or what is happening now, a multigenerational life debt that you pass down.This bullshit of compiling images and circle jerking and pointing fingers - basically trying to a/b test memes to make them palatable before they go to more mainstream places - this is all fun and all, but cmon. We've been fighting this fight for >500 years of recorded history now and we keep fucking losing.How about we reframe this nonsense as a means to take practical steps forward with actual discussion, ac..
>>537376217>>537376728Seething glowniggers scum. First of all, I have better genetics than everyone in your worthless shabbos goy sycophant family, let's get that out of the way. When you talk about "masses of low IQ retards", that's how I view you - writhing idiots pursuing traitorous life strategies to enrich the parasitic cyst like an autoimmune disease. Second of all you've made it abundantly clear you are stalking my threads. And thirdly, the noticing of the financial parasite you desperately desire to deflect from will continue, suit will be brought crashing down and you along with it. Seethe harder
Most people, when polled, believe that the government is in charge of the money supply. The reality is that money is in fact created out of nothing by a central bank, and the majority of it is not even printed, but is merely credit on balance sheets and never leaves the banking system.Central Banks perform a parasitic role in the ecology of the Western state. Essentially they are usurious, meaning their money creation is built around debt, and it is loaned mostly for non productive purposes. 87% of the loans by the big 5 British Banks are for financial instrument purchases and never touch the real economy of agriculture, mining, service or manufacturing. But why, and how is the money based on debt? How can I be in debt if I never borrowed any money myself? Most importantly, who is the creditor the debt is owed to?"Let the goyim deal in the real world" - [Jeffery Epstein], Epstein Files"As you probably know, I represent the [RothschiIds]" - [Jeffery Epstein] to Peter Thiel, Epstein FilesThe truth lies in the mechanism by how the Central Bank is structured, how it functions and how it produces money for the government.Firstly, Central Banks are not part of the government. They are not nationalised. They were created as privately owned entities with private shareholders comprising large often ethnically [REDACTED] or English banking families and are functionally still privately owned today. The Banking families children inherit the shares of their parents, making them truly Dynastic in their position on these institutions. People will tell you this is a conspiracy theory, and that they are organs of the government, but this is a half-truth I will address later. The story of how Western countries got their Central Banks is also dark and shady, but can be explained in detail later. For now, keep in mind that Central Banks have private shareholders they are beholden to and who reap the dividends on their profits.
Here's where things really get scary. When you pay taxes to the government, you are not contributing to a closed loop where your tax money enters into some national budget Exchequer / piggy bank, which then comes out and is used for government spending for schools roads police and infrastructure. No, the Central Bank is involved. The government does not wait for taxes to fund itself, it immediately takes out a loan, or rather sells a "bond" (an I.O.U.) to the Central Bank or rather it's shareholders in exchange for money the Bank makes out of nothing, and now that the shareholders of the bank own the bond, they are privileged to be paid back the money awarded to the government at interest - this is sort of a reverse loan.So the government has money, and debt to the bond. How does it pay the bond back? With people's taxes. Taxes aren't going into a budget, they pay off loans to the shareholders of the central bank. And since almost all government expenditure is non productive, meaning it doesn't create any new wealth after getting the money from these loans, debt henceforth skyrockets into infinity. This leads to infinite inflation, increasing taxes and cost of living, increased difficulty running businesses or affording houses, outsourcing to cheap 3rd world sweatshops and the absolute obliteration of financial freedom and quality of life. It is a modern form of state-entrenched private ruled Usury.
Do the Rothschilds, Kuhns, Loebs, Schiffs etc. own the Bank of England?Bank of England Ownership has always been heavily jewish.https://samisdat.in/en/books/early-jewish-holders-of-bank-of-england-stock-1694-1725-1966These were mostly Sephardic jews based in Holland and London between 1694 and 1725. The Rothschilds were Askenazi jews based in Frankfurt who only became really rich after the French revolution.William I, Elector of Hesse gave Meyer Amshel Rothschild his money to look after and keep safe from Napoleon.In todays money taking account of inflation his savings were about 120 million dollars.Rothschild invested this money for Wilhelm and made a fortune.The official company that owns the Bank of England is BANK OF ENGLAND NOMINEES LIMITED.This company is very special as it is protected by the official secrets act, it has Royal Charter status and is exempt from the normal disclosure requirements that other companies have to comply with to meet section 27 of the Companies Act 1976.The Central Bank of Ireland for serves the same function as the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve in America.We can guess that it is owned by some of the same shareholders as the Bank of England.A freedom of information request was made asking where did the Central Bank of Ireland keep its gold?The answer was the Bank of England holds the Irish gold. This is funny because Ireland is supposed to be independent of England, and the Irish government tries to persuade everyone that the central bank is a government institution.Recently the Central Bank of Ireland unveiled a modern art sculpture outside its headquarters.Who was the artist?Eva Rothschild.She has alleged she was no relationship to the famous Rothschilds but she admitted her ancestors came from the Frankfurt ghetto where the famous Rothschilds come from.The magic money machine - Eustace Mullinshttps://youtu.be/Er3xPXb7aQw
>>537378131That's a lot of words to say you won't do shit.
The "nationalisation" of the Bank of England in 1946 is a half-truth fundamentally misleading. While the bank's shares were indeed transferred to the Treasury, making it ostensibly state-owned, this move didn't sever ties with private banking dynasties.Here's what actually happened: The British government bought out the bank for £11.3 million (approximately £430 million today) and issued new stock directly to HM Treasury. However, this transaction did not eliminate private influence; it merely shifted control from overtly private hands to a hybrid model where government oversight coexisted with deep-rooted elite interests.The key point missed by apologists for "public ownership" is that nationalization did not change the bank's operational structure or its role as a debt-issuer. The BoE still acts as a central bank issuing currency backed by government debt meaning every pound printed comes with an implied lien against future tax revenues and economic output. This system inherently benefits those who hold the debt (creditors) at the expense of those who don't (the general population).In practice, this means global financial institutions like Rothschild & Sons, Schroders, and other City of London Investment group players continue to exert influence through their roles in managing government bond issues, advising on monetary policy, and sitting on regulatory bodies like the Financial Stability Oversight Board. These entities profit from both sides of transactions, buying up distressed assets cheaply during crises they helped create while collecting interest on public debt they facilitated through their central banking arm."Debt implies a creditor" So when people say "it was nationalized," you should hear *reorganized*, a cosmetic shift masking continued oligarchic control over Britain's monetary policy via proxy institutions and shadow networks operating beyond parliamentary oversight. The US Federal Reserve's Nominee system functions similarly.
>>537378315Yawn. Get better material parasite. Oh and for the record, again, I'm smarter than you.>>537378306>B-but the Bank of England Nominees Limited was dissolved! Conspiracy theorist!Bank of England Nominees Limited (BOENL) is the smoking gun proving the Bank of England's "nationalization" was a farce.BOENL held a Royal Charter, granting it extraordinary secrecy powers under the Official Secrets Act. This meant its activities were legally classified, preventing parliamentary scrutiny or FOIA requests. Exemption from Companies Act 1976 Section 27 requires companies to disclose beneficial ownership and financials. BOENL was explicitly exempted, ensuring private interests could hide their identities and transactions. BOENL acted as a custodian for gilt holdings on behalf of undisclosed clients effectively laundering ownership through the Bank of England's balance sheet.In 2016, BOENL was dissolved in favor of a new entity: HM Treasury Corporate Finance Unit (HMT CFU). The rebranding maintained secrecy while shifting nominal control to HM Treasury. This maintained private bankers' grip on UK monetary policy while pretending public oversight exists. By shielding true beneficiaries behind state-sanctioned secrecy, the BoE ensures that private creditors continue to profit.
JEFFERSON’S OPINION ON THECONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE BANKFebruary 15, 1791(The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. by H. E. Bergh, Vol. III, p. 145 ff.)The bill for establishing a national bank, in 1791, undertakes, among otherthings,--1. To form the subscribers into a corporation. (1700s definition of a corporation is a nationally controlled institution for a specific and narrow purpose)2. To enable them, in their corporate capacities, to receive grants of lands;and, so far, is against the laws of mortmain.3. To make alien subscribers capable of holding lands; and so far is againstthe laws of alienage.4. To transmit these lands, on the death of a proprietor, to a certain line ofsuccessors; and so far, changes the course of descents.5. To put the lands out of the reach of forfeiture, or escheat; and so far, isagainst the laws of forfeiture and escheat.6. To transmit personal chattels to successors, in a certain line; and so far, isagainst the laws of distribution.7. To give them the sole and exclusive right of banking, under the nationalauthority; and, so far, is against the laws of monopoly.8. To communicate to them a power to make laws, paramount to the laws ofthe states; for so they must be construed, to protect the institution from thecontrol of the state legislatures; and so probably they will be construed.I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground--that allpowers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, norprohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states, or to the people (12thamend.). To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawnaround the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field ofpower, no longer susceptible of any definition.
>>537376217>>537376728>>537378315Holy glowniggers. Based thread op
>>537378218How was the fed even created? Why did the politicians let them?
>>537378500What's the plan then? Smart guy? Posting the same png's to a niche social media site that no one cares about?Genuinely answer the question: What actions do we take in the real world to better our situation?I bet you can't. I guarantee it.
>>537373110>Guess who stopped that system for a short time?Napoleon
>>537378724>What's the plan then? Smart guy?Pissing you off and kicking your ass in IQ tests for now. Both appear to be great successes!
>>537378956Be sincere and answer the question.
>>537373110that's nice but give me a name for your pictureshould i use gpt or grok?i'm too tired to figure out a good one right now
>>537379044i went with "jews banking financial system debt scam federal reserve landlords tenants niggers welfare exploitation white genocide taxpayers " but i'm missing something
>>537378978I don't negotiate with demonic bloedzuigers sorry
>>537379087Have fun posting your pictures like an old facebook boomer.
Some good book recommendations ECONOMY"Economics for Helen" by Hilaire Belloc which is probably the greatest economics primer ever writtenhttps://archive.org/details/economicsforhele0000bellThe Servile State by Hilaire Bellochttps://legiochristi.com/static/lit/H_Belloc_The_Servile_State.pdfManifesto for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest by Gottfried Feder https://archive.org/details/manifesto-for-abolition-enslavement-interest-on-money-gottfried-feder"Usury" by Calvin Elliott. https://archive.org/details/ElliottCalvinUsuryWhere does Money Come From by Richard Wernerhttps://professorwerner.org/pubs/where-does-money-come-from-a-guide-to-the-uk-monetary-and-banking-system/(can be found on Annas-archive)Princes of the Yen by Richard Wernerhttps://professorwerner.org/pubs/princes-of-the-yen-japans-central-bankers-and-the-transformation-of-the-economy/(can be found on Annas-archive)KILLING THE HOST: How Financial Parasites and Debt Bondage Destroy the Global Economy by Michael Hudsonhttp://digamo.free.fr/hudson15.pdfNATSOC - love or hate it, learn the TRUTH about itHitler's Revolution by Richard Tedorhttps://archive.org/details/hitlers-revolution-expanded-edition-richard-tedor_20230406_2240NATIONAL SOCIALISM NOW! by William Joycehttp://www.mourningtheancient.com/joyce2.pdfJEWSThe Biological Jew by Eustace Mullinshttps://www.eustacemullins.us/wp-content/works/Articles/Eustace%20Mullins%20-%20The%20Biological%20Jew.pdfThe Riddle of the Jews' Success by Theodor Fritschhttps://www.der-stuermer.org/english/Theodor%20Fritsch%20-%20The%20riddle%20of%20the%20jew's%20success.pdfThe Jews by Eugen Duhringhttps://archive.org/details/EugenDuhringOnTheJews/page/52/mode/1up
>>537374804>Was this meant to be a rebuttal? LMAONo, just a statement of fact. Can't you hear the music? it's buildingthe crescendo is buildingthen the finale and then a whole new world. Thank God almighty.
>>537373110cool it with the AntiSemitism bro
>>537379118I will, have fun being a misanthropic Jewish financial parasite/ shabbos niggerslave. The fun won't last.>>537379188ContinuedNew History of the Jews by Eustace Mullinshttp://www.eustacemullins.us/wp-content/works/Books_/Eustace%20Mullins%20-%20New%20History%20of%20the%20Jews%20-%201968.pdfDen of Thieves by James B. StewartThe Jewish Strategy by Revilo OliverCulture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald(Use Odysee.com or annas-archive and look em up, can't find easy links for these)ECONOMY CONTINUEDThe New Unhappy Lords by A. K. Chestertonhttps://ia803109.us.archive.org/13/items/TheNewUnhappyLords1965/1965%20-%20New%20Unhappy%20Lords%20-%20A.%20K.%20Chesterton.pdfThe Free Press by Hilaire Bellochttps://www.gutenberg.org/files/18018/18018-h/18018-h.htmEssay on Public Credit by David Humehttps://archive.org/details/essaysmoralpoli00hume/page/355/mode/1up?A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind by Steven M. Goodsonhttps://files.catbox.moe/r3y9h1.pdf"The Outline of Sanity" by G. K. Chestertonhttps://dn790008.ca.archive.org/0/items/outlineofsanity0000ches/outlineofsanity0000ches.pdfTowards the Restoration of Property by Hilaire Belloc(Search Annas-archive.gd)“Barren Metal” by E. Michael Jones.“Usury in Christendom” by Michael Hoffman.Usury: The Scourge of Nations By James Harvey. https://archive.org/details/usuryscourgeofna609harv
>>537373110Hitler was right
We see a state of affairs in which a people has built, through its own efforts, a great empire, whose ships trade with far-off lands, whose armies are invincible. This people is strong, self-confident, and aware of their virtues. Why should they fear a few shabby, furtive aliens who have drifted in from unknown places, and who establish themselves in the heart of the city so unobtrusively that it seems they have always been there?These aliens are willing to do anything, they perform any sort of distasteful task which the natives feel is beneath them. The aliens traffic in the bodies of girls, set up gambling dens, clear in stolen goods, lend money, establish houses in which one can perform every imaginable type of sexual degeneracy, and provide assassins for hire.In a short time, the aliens know every secret of the peoples’ leaders, and they have established holds over them. The colony of aliens multiplies rapidly, and soon a once healthy people finds itself helpless, because their native virtues of strength, courage and honor, which have made them great, are of no avail against the newcomers.The host does not understand the parasite, which is like a creature from another planet, because they do not have the same goals, nor do they respond to the same stimuli, as the host people. They even seem to have different nerve patterns.As the pernicious influence grows, the army is demoralized, the native leaders are murdered or exiled, and the wealth of the nation swiftly passes into the hands of the aliens. The people are plundered of everything, and most of all of their self-respect. No member of a host people is allowed to preserve his self-respect or his privacy, once the parasite has taken command.One morning, the ships of a rival nation appear in the harbor. In exchange for certain guarantees, the parasites welcome them. The host people does not resist, an empire is gone.- Eustace Mullins "THE BIOLOGICAL JEW"
>>537379711The great Egyptianscholar, C. J . Gadd, noted in his book, The Fall of Nineveh,London, 1923,"Habiru (Hebrew) is written with an ideogram. . . sa-gaz. . . signifying'cut-throats'".One of the great sources of the history of this period is theTell El Amarna Letters, written by the governor of an outlyingprovince. The discovery and translation of these letters openedan entire new era of Egyptology. It also revealed the destructiveeffect of the Jews. These letters are filled with pleas for help andaddressed to a seemingly deaf Pharaoh. They describe the raidsof the Habiru and the impossibility of defending the border townsany longer. Perhaps the Pharaoh never received the letters; per-haps he was too busy listening to his Jewish Prime Minister, whowas interpreting his dreams for him. We do not know exactlywhat happened, but we do know that the empire fell.This, in Letter No. 76, the governor says, "Behold, he (Abdi-Ashirta, aHabiru bandit chieftain), has now mustered all amelut gazThe governor meant that a great alliance of bandits and cut-throats was menacing the empire. Amelut gaz was synonymousin ancient Egyptian with amu and sa-gaz, and amu was the wordby which the Egyptians often referred to the Hebrews. Amelutgaz meant, 'the Jewish bandits'. Sayce tells us that "the Egyp-tian equivalent of Hebrew is amu."
>>537379738A considerable portion of Egyptian literature deals with thesocial distress of this period, when the Jews were underminingthe greatest civilization known to man until that time. Thus, wehave "Admonitions of an Egyptian Sage from a Hieratic Papyrusin Leiden," translated and published by Alan H . Gardiner in1909. Gardiner translates:"Egypt was i n distress; the social system had become dis-organized; violence filled the land. Invaders preyed upon the de-fenseless population; the rich were stripped of everything andslept in the open, and the poor took their possessions. It is nomerely local disturbance that is here described, but a great andoverwhelming national disaster. The Pharaoh was strangely in-active."Another source, the famous Ipuwer Papyrus, says, "The townsare destroyed. . . years of noise. There is no end to noise. Thefish i n the lakes and rivers die, and worms, insects and reptilesbreed prolifically."What a strange occurrence! No battles are described; the empire was not attacked from withoutBABYLONNebuchadnezzar, the might-iest ruler of the ancient world, had received many complaintsabout the Jewish bandits operating in Palestine that he marchedagainst them. The Babylonian armies pursued the Jews relent-lessly into the deserts and wildernesses until they had killed orcaptured all of them. This took place in the year 586 B.C. Aswas customary at that time, Nebuchadnezzar took the survivorshome with him as slaves. These 30,000 Jewish captives were set-tled in the Babylonian Empire and they were allowed to formtheir own settlements. The Jewish historian Gerson Cohen,writes that "Many a locality in Babylon had an exclusively Jew-ish population."Within less than five decades, Babylon was no more.
>>537379786Despitethe freedom they enjoyed, the Jews began to plot the overthrowof the empire. At that time, Cyrus, leader of the Persians, wishedto attack Babylon and seize its riches, but he knew that his armywas not strong enough. Jewish emissaries came to him and de-clared that they were willing to open the gates for him. At first,Cyrus suspected a trap, and he is said to have put the first suchJewish messenger to death, but the Jews later convinced himthat they were sincere. They asked in return that he restoreto them their land in Palestine.In the year 539 B.C., the army of Cyrus appeared beforeBabylon. On page 65, The History of the Jews, Kastein says,"The conquest of Babylon was achieved without difficulty; thecity fell without a fight." What a coincidence! That is exactlywhat Manetho wrote about the fall of Egypt to the Hyksos in-vaders. There was no battle.Although ancient history is filledwith accounts of long and desperate battles between nations andsieges of cities which lasted for many years, when a city had asignificant Jewish community, these battles did not seem to takeplace."The Jews welcomed Cyrus with open arms." Here is anothertheme which is repeated throughout the history of the Jews. Inevery nation which falls without a struggle, the Jews rush out towelcome the invaders. Kastein tells us that Cyrus allowed theJews to return to their own country, but many of them preferredto remain in Babylon. Under the protection of Cyrus, the Jewswere allowed to despoil the natives of Babylon, and what richesCyrus did not carry off to Persia became the property of theJews.
Jews formed a wealthy and powerful ruling class in Babylon, and they devoted their time and money to formulating a Jewish ethic, which was written down as the Babylonian Talmud. In the English edition, published in London in 1935 as the Soncino Talmud, Rabbi Hertz says, page XXI ,"When we come to the Babylonian Gemara, we are dealingwith what most people understand when they speak or write ofthe Talmud. Its birthplace, Babylonia, was an autonomous Jew-ish centre for a longer period than any other land; namely, fromsoon after 586 before the Christian era to the year 1040 after theChristian era — 1626 years."- Eustace Mullins, "New History of the Jews"SPAINThe Moor invasion of Visigothic Spain was a joint effort by the jews and muslims, the jews even invited them in when the Visigoths were weak because the jews were mad of not getting high positions they think they "deserve" in the Visigoth kingdoms. They opened gates to toledo and cordoba amongst others from the inside and delivered information about christian troop movements to their muslim brothers and when the invasions came they joined the invaders. Prior to these invasions the Gothic aristocracy had a series of mysterious deaths that were likely assassinations, and the last Visigothic kings, like Wittiza, were mongrels who were degenerate shabbos goyim and completely in the hands of the Jews. He even sent out an order to destroy Visigothic Spain's weapon stores. This all happened over 100 years after the last time a Visigothic king had tried to forcibly convert the Jews, nobody had even been alive for it but it was justification for the Jews to destroy Visigothic Civilisation.>"They continued in the secrecy of their homes to practice Jewish ritual, and to teach their children to curse the Goths."For the Jews help they were rewarded with high positions in the new muslim kingdoms. The degenerate shabbos mongel King Wittizas sons fought for the Moors, giving us a good clue to his true allegiance.
Nimrod's downfall reputedly came about when he began to build the Tower of Babel, a ziggurat,or temple tower, which was planned to rise up into the heavens. Because of this offense againstGod, Shem, the eldest son of Noah, pronounced judgment against Nimrod, and executed him.Josephus says that "Ham's black grandson, Nimrod, was beheaded by Shem." Other accountsadd that Shem then cut Nimrod's body into pieces and sent the pieces to the pagan temples ofBabylon, as a warning to the priests that their sex orgies and child sacrifices would result in asimilar judgment of execution. Instead of abandoning their hideous ceremonies because of thiswarning, the priests literally went underground. No longer did "their altars smoke with humanblood," as Kitto, the great Palestinian authority, described them. The priests took the pieces ofNimrod as relics to their secret meeting places, which were hidden in "groves" and "shrines."This was the origin of the secret Mystery cults, whose orgies could no longer be performed inpublic temples. Because of the power of Shem, the priests from that time on conducted theirforbidden orgies out of the light of day, in their secret hiding places. Their meetings werebounded with secret rites, which no one outside of their order was permitted to know, on pain ofdeath. This was the origin of the Gnostics, the Knowing Ones, who knew the secrets. It may befor this reason that Nimrod became known as the founder of Freemasonry, because itsfundamental rites were established and invoked after he was killed, in order to carry on his workof evil.- Eustace Mullins, "the curse of Canaan"
>>537378724>Posting the same png's to a niche social media site that no one cares about?LOLhave you seen any online space with any freedom of speech right nowwe have more than wonthe whole world follows usour little niche indeed
>>537380052>>53737971199.99% of people in human history didn't know the Talmuds existed. It's important for people to understand that when asking why Jews kept getting let back into Western countries after being kicked out. In fact they were rarely ever discriminated against for religious differences, because people didn't know what their religion actually was beyond just vague Moses centric Old Testament puritanism. European and Christian powers only caught wind of the Talmuds in the 1200s as Rabbis accidentally let slip it's existence trying to enlist their help against Maimonides. And it wasn't ever translated to a foreign language until Johannes Eisenmenger's Endeckten Judenthum, which was published just after Cromwell readmitted the Jews to England from the Dutch Stock exchange in Amsterdam. Eisenmenger wrote the book after infiltrating an Amsterdam Rabbinical school (yes, the same place of learning the Jews being let into England would have been instructed) and publishing his findings. Leopold I was then paid by the Jewish community to suppress the circulation of the book, but it became the bedrock of all modern anti semitism today. Judaism is like a Masonic cult, the original really. It appears nominally Christian adjacent, affable and acceptable on the outside, but as members become more initiated, become community leaders, they are exposed to the deep, evil teachings hidden from the outside world. People didn't have anti-semitic uprisings because they'd read the talmud, it's because they experienced in their lives first-hand the horror of the talmudic morality system without even being aware of it's existence.
>>537379321>Den of Thieves by James B. Stewart>>The Jewish Strategy by Revilo Oliver>>Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald>>(Use Odysee.com or annas-archive and look em up, can't find easy links for these)https://annas-archive.gl/search?q=Den+of+Thieves+James+B.+Stewarthttps://annas-archive.gl/search?q=The+Jewish+Strategy+Revilo+Oliverhttps://annas-archive.gl/search?q=Culture+of+Critique+Kevin+MacDonald
Holy fuck, this thread had more redpills and fed rage than any thread I've ever seen on /pol/. Kudos mysterious op
This shit gets slid every time it's posted so I must conclude it's something the shills really find threatening. Imagine, there's an entire ecosystem of paid shabbos shills who's livelihood relies on defending this parasitic financial system that destroys everyone's lives and is in the process of genociding White people. I can't imagine being so inhumanely evil, they are enemies of not only White people but all mankind.
The Talmud is literally demonic lol this is the religion of the most powerful financial families in wall street
Good bread
