Andy wins with a higher vote share than Reform and Restore combined. Righties seething.
>>537376907What does this mean for the social media ban and digital ID?
>>537376907More terrorist attacks against curry stands and bitching online incoming
https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/andy-burnhams-steadfast-relationship-with-the-jewish-community/
>>537376907Based fuck Rupert Lowe the Jew loving Zionist.
>>537376907THE FUCK IS THAT THING ON THE RIGHT???
>>537376907I feel a little sorry for Queer Stammerer. He always looks like he's about to start crying
>>537377097Goofy joke candidates in British elections happen literally every time
>>537377106That's because of those 2 Ukrainian rent boys ramming their cocks up his ass. But I'm not allowed to talk about that, otherwise I get some arson attacks too.
>>537376907Was it rigged?
>>537377258What (s)election isn't?
>>537377140Wtf moment, no wonder colonialism happened. People just gotta move out of their home countries if they get that weird.
>>537376907Oh joy another unelected leader with no mandate to lead the country. Labour are already toast at the next election. Starmer should just say no for the next 3 years to spite all those stabbing him in the back. He's got nothing to lose. The country already wants him to die. Burnham will be just as bad.
>>537377383>Starmer should just say noTo what? There has to be a leadership election if enough Labour MPs trigger the ballot (which they will because they're as sick of him as the rest of the country). If he loses, he ceases to be leader of the Labour party and therefore PM. He can't just refuse to go, although the thought of coppers dragging him from Downing Street is very funny.
>>537377853You are correct but I don't think coppers would get involved, as it's not against the law to say no it's just against party governance. Not sure what would happen actually.
>>537376907Fox.T
>>537378303The leader of the largest party has the mandate to govern. If Burnham wins the Labour leadership, Charlie would invite him to form a government and at that point if Starmer refused to step down he'd basically be committing treason. Labour could hold a vote to kick him out of the party (like with Corbyn and others) so he wouldn't even be a Labour MP any more and would be a solo independent attempting to remain PM with zero MPs. There's no realistic way he holds on.
>>537377383>Labour are toast at the next electionYou overestimate voters. Most of them are evidently fucking idiots
>>537376907He looks like another Keir-tier faggot, the perfect punchable face for White Britins to rally against and then guillotine in the public square.Best of luck, gentlemen!
>>537376907Starmer and Burnham are both Neoliberal Zionists. Austerity and Israel worship will continue under Burnham.>>537378379what did he mean by this
>>537378629*Britons Sorry, a pajeet coded my autocorrect (you should have never taught them to speak English).
>>537376907People still believe in democracy?
>>537376907What was his vote share? 54%? Nearly half don't want him to lead them locally, never mind nationally and he thinks that's okay?
Anyway, I've seem a lot of cope on the right. "It was a safe seat anyway", "it won't make any difference" but the fact is, Reform got their shit kicked in and Restore only barely kept their deposit. It's a pretty shocking result for Reform to be completely honest, given the seat they were contesting is basically their core demographic - aging, white working class. If Reform can't win there, there isn't really anywhere else they can reliably win.
>>537378727Athenian democracy is an ideal worth contemplating. How to put it into practice is the question needing an answer. What malthusian bobbleheads call "Our Democracy™" is a bastardized mutation.>>537378777>If Reform can't win there, there isn't really anywhere else they can reliably win.What did Kek mean by this?
>>537376944Nothing. He's the same cardboard cutout as Keir but a quick refresh of leaders will keep the plebs quiet for another six months.
>>537378769Anon, most MPs are elected with like 35-45% of the vote, that's how FPTP works. Farage won his seat with 46%, Starmer with 49%. 55% is a resounding victory.
>>537378523I was thinking more if the current leader somehow stops the leadership contest to begin with, so it would stay as an internal party matter. But agree it would never happen.
>>537378669There's a fox on his left.
>>537378777>core demographicdo you think having a commonwealth flag means your opinion is automatically correct?they're fucking northerners and that seat has been labour since its inceptionreducing it to white is fucking moronic, did you miss the part where the whitest places tend to also vote for lefties since they haven't been snapped back into reality?
>>537377258>the most popular Labour politician>one of Labour's safest seats>extremely high chance he'll quickly replace the hated Starmer as PM>up against an absolute dunce of a Reform candidate with far too much baggage and ran a terrible campaign>right-wing vote further split by another new ziononce grifter partyIt didn't need rigging. He won't deliver anything good, of course, but he got the hopium vote.
>Starmer still saying he won't stand down and will run in any leadership electionlol, kino incoming.
>>537376907A shame. I was hoping for a Binface sweep.
>>537381400>Babe wake up they're selling £5 for £4
>>537376907Just another gimp to fuck up the Labour party. Anyone who thinks anything in this country is fixable at this point is mentally challenged.
More like next Buckingham Palace lap dog....Yawwwwwwwwwwwwn...ROYALS hate anons.
>>537376907>commie flanked by a furry and a man dressed as a dustbin wins stitch-up electionYaaaay! Isn't dumbocracy great? Everybody sing with me...>THINGS...CAN ONLY GET BETTER...
>>537377058>tweet is 7 years oldMeanwhile this was from last week, Tariq.
