>Iranian victoryWhat are the implications of this?
>>537385911Says US won. go read it.
>>537385997Based schizo
>>537386096>>537385997>>537385911It depends on who views it, American IPs see it as an American victory, European IPs register it as an Iranian win
>>537385911>What are the implications of thisEnd of empire. This is Suez x10
>>537385911>What are the implications of this?wikipedia is run by salty biased faggots.always has been.
>>537386307No fucking way kek
Let's see the talk section
who's right?
>>537386307big if true
>>537386347>>537386509It's not true.
>>537385911Jew thread
>>537385911muzzrats were also saying palestine won in 2023
>>537386379>>537386409So it was a tie? Lets look at the deaths.US: 13Iran: over 6k.Yea im thinking the US won.
>>537385911Israel's victory condition was to obliterate IranIran's victory condition was to survive and drain USA's arsenalIran is still standing
>>537386613>numbersit's not a sportsgame, retardUS achieved none of their objectives
>>537386409>>537386379He’s a fucking moron and the typical smoothbrain “muh KDR” American. Wars are fought over objectives. America’s objective was to coup the leadership and destroy their military. Iran’s objective was to survive. Seeing as America failed to coup their government and destroy their military after 4 months, they sought for peace. Ergo Iran won.
>>537386409>muh Vietnam and Afghanistankek holy shit, wumao really have their bots everywhere huh? they drop that same exact bait in here.why are people pretending like this was a war with a ground invasion? clinton bombed iraq in 1998 and saddam and his regime endured, i guess the US was defeated and their empire crumbled then too? actually thats an unfair comparison, iraq at least got an air to air kill
>>537386613Ultimate migger cope activate
>>537385997>Disputed-discussThis is now a wikipeida fight so let’s laught at the faggot post.
Wikipedia war reporting is decent. It gets kinda retarded for parts of the Ukraine war where they take official UA government states and consensus forming Western sources as fact, but their timeline of battles etc. is accurate. Sudan, Lebanon, Iran war reporting is good.The talk page for deciding what to write as the outcome was pretty conclusive>list it as ongoingThe MoU declares the war finished and both sides have signed it, and marine traffic is normalized. If hostilities reignite it can be changed back as ongoing, but to keep it ongoing now is speculation.>inconclusiveThere is an MoU with terms. It's pretty conclusive.>US tactical, Iranian strategic or diplomatic victoryWars are entirely strategic. The large scale outcome matters, the rest is cope.>status quo ante bellumThe monetary concessions, recognition of missile and nuclear programs, ability to charge tolls, deserted GCC bases, depleted stockpiles etc. are not the same as ante bellum>iranian victoryThe consensus among basically every source reporting on the issue and self evident from the MoU. Not a single objective stated by the Americans was achieved. And even ignoring it all, for the defender, to win a war you just have to not lose.
>>537386613Mutts really learned nothing from Vietnam, huh
>>537386409>>537386776this guys entire history is basically shilling for shitskins too, go back far enough and he's shilling for Russia in Ukraine as wellthis whole rabbit hole is just the usual BRICS shitskin spam, they've taken over the internet and they dump their leftover garbage on here when they're finished. great fucking site management, RapeJeet!
>>537387377do you think this is like reddit where if you lose an argument you can just click on their post history and go "well, all your post history is about this topic, which means you're a le shill"
