no, its stupid. guns pretty much made people functionally equal
>>537416146They are in places. You can go there and do it legal. I think in texas if you both agree to it you can duke it out and its all good.
>>537416203>no, its stupid.Guns made intelligent people stronger than stupid ones. It’s the opposite of stupid.
>>537416317>Guns made intelligent people stronger than stupid oneshow?
I don't think they account for suicidal unemployed guys that would have spent all day at the gun range and challenged everyone that pissed them off to a duel.
>>537416146It was made illegal because it was used as an excuse to kill people without facing charges. For example, you would say an enemy of yours had slept with your wife, so you would challenge him to a duel and kill him, but later it would turn out there were deeper reasons for committing the homicide.
>>537416203make it something different, what would be modern equivelent...drones? Drones are pretty modern.Duel but you both have drones with c4, who flies in first wins, but also you can go for the drone and then meele the opponent.
>>537416317Its pretty easy to operate a gun bro
>>537416146Yes, but barehands and you don't stop until the other is dead.
>>537416387How does an unemployed guy afford to train like that
>>537416317>Guns made intelligent people stronger than stupid ones.Then the intelligent people sold guns to the stupid people. Maybe the intelligent people weren't so intelligent after all. Where's the unintelligent Swede to tell us about the Trivium?
>>537416474That gives Samoans an unfair advantage.
>>537416369You think some dumb idiot came up with gun powder?And it doesn’t stop there, nerds built the most sophisticated killing machines.You think your strength gives you power over others, but why shouldn’t others use their intelligence and just blow you up with their satellite?
>>537416465That’s not what i meant retard.>>537416550>Maybe the intelligent people weren't so intelligent after all.Cope.
>>537416146>Should duels be legal?Depends. Lethal ones, no.There are non-lethal ones already legalized. Boxing, fencing, bunch of other martial arts (krav maga, karate, jio jitsu).Society have invested a lot time, money and other resources to grow one adult. To allow them to kill each other without punishment, it would be waste of taxpayer money.
>>537416672anyone can buy a gun now
>>537416838So? The intelligent people won.
>>537416146>>537416203>>537416298>>537416317>>537416369>>537416403>>537416892>>537416838>>537416769>>537416738How would you stop disabled people from using this as a loophole for euthanasia?A Quadriplegic could challenge someone to a dual and get shot since they aren't allowed to suicide normally.
>>537416973Why should you? People should be allowed to die if they want to.
>>537417020So you're against forcedfeeding? So many disabled people like Quadriplegics, Lock In Syndrome, or ALS would intentionally starve themselves if we couldn't forcedfeed them.I had a family member who was paralyzed in a ski accident. He kept screaming "KILL ME, STOP FEEDING ME I DONT WANT TO LIVE ANYMORE I CANT EVEN DRINK WATER AT NIGHT WHEN IM THIRSTY I DONT WANT TO LIVE LIKE THIS ANYMORE AHHHHHHH".Under your system he'd be dead right now.
>>537416146They were made illegal because it just meant jews got a free pass to kill anyone that challenged them.And as it's usually seething highborn failures that do that a few too many nobles had their mouthy progemy smoked at said progeny's insistence.
>>537416973Obviously the duel should be fairSure you can always lose on purpose, but If you can suicide by duel you can commit suicide by other means
>>537416387Isn't this essentially the entire thing that got "berserkers" and duels outlawed in 1100s Iceland
>>537417177>but If you can suicide by duel you can commit suicide by other meansLol how? That makes no sense. You won't die if nobody shoots you.
>>537416298Fists only, no hitting below the belt, and it must be sanctioned by a justice of the peace or a magistrate.
>>537416973How much disabled people do you know? And how much of them are suicidal?It is not as widespread as people sometimes tend to think. Even among cancer patients, who have very intense pain, even those usually try to cling to the life.
>>537417216>kindergarten-tier reading comprehensionIf you're fit enough for a duel, you're fit enough to jump off a bridgeA fair duel means both parties are equally capable of killing each otherShooting a paralyzed vegetable would be murder, yes
>>537417340A Quadriplegic cannot do that.
>>537416298It's called mutual combat and it's up to the asshole police to make that determination.
>have duel>suffer terrifying yet survivable would>insurance definitely definitely tells you to fuck off>in debt and pain forever
>>537416146it wouldn't matter at all.the average man nowdays is a coward.most negroes would neglect the duel entirely in favor of stabbing you in the back.they already do this culturally already, what makes you think they are going to change in favor of a duel?most whites have become so apathetic and undergrad that refusal of a duel and being called a coward means nothing. nor do they lose any business by refusing a duel since they have literally no standing in polite society anyways.if you're going to bring back duels, you need to be able to punish people for their refusal of a duel.if we could post pictures in town saying to Tyrone Jackson Lemar>Thee and thine are a pack of yellow bellied dogs, Tyrone in particular is a weak effeminate negro who has a soft penis and takes it up the ass by his fellow associatesI think we could make negroes lose enough street cred that they would happily accept the duel in typical monkey fashion.However it's basically illegal in polite society to call such a person a weak nigger as facebook and other such communities would just ban you.
>>537416403No it was made illegal when a politician was killed in about 1870 but that's exactly what thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr the VP did to get rid of Alexander hamilton. Andrew jackson who took down the federal reserve also killed a lot of people in dueling. Fact is though if you use dueling as an excuse to murder or it's perceived as murder someone else will do it to you so that's a logical fallacy and people aren't forced to duel either you don't think a woman's gonna duel if you challenger do you? No you'd just look dumb and then someone else would challenge and kill you for that. An armed society is a polite society
>>537416146yes, no weapons or any tools though, state leaders 1v1 only, until one of them is deadeverything your body by itself can do is allowed inside the dome, and the event will be livestreamed in 4k
>>537417128Yeah? They're fit to make their own decisions. Who are you to decide you understand their psyche better than they do?
>>537419574You gotta keep them alive, their life has value the research even says so. My mom even asked the doctors (regarding my paralyzed cousin) if they could just cut off his communication machine so he couldn't bitch. whine or moan, so he couldn't try and convince anyone to kill him. She even said "let him watch barney 24/7 in his shit filled diapers for all i care, just don't let him die"
>>537416146Duels were never legal anyway.
>>537420236True, I saw Barrie Lyndon too. He still got in trouble for it.
>>537420274Ah I see you are a man of culture as well
>>537416146>>537416203>>5374162982 guns were brought to a sword fight
>>537416146you should be able to roll your own and smoke inside while you speak to the Congress like Paul Volker
>>537416146Yes, or at the very least mutual combat. Some mother fuckers need to get their asses kicked.
>>537420356You bet
>>537418301The United States wasn't the only country where duels took place. In Spain, for example, if another man insulted your wife, you would challenge him to a sword duel. The problem was that if you killed him, it was considered that insulting someone wasn't an offense that justified murder. Many times, it was an excuse to kill a political enemy or someone you were at odds with. This was very common even in ancient Greece, so laws started to be enforced to ban duels without the mediation of a trial.
>>537416146Yes, but not with guns, outcomes are harder to control than with swords, takes less skill and allows for mutual destruction way easier. Even now any retard can pull a gun and shoot someone, doing so with a sword is way harder.
>>537416973Why would anyone accept a duel from a literal cripple that can't fight back? Why would you put full effort in? If you are not some retarded subhuman you would do the bare minimum to win.
>>537420138Wow, that is fucking cruel. Your mom should be poisoned for that shit.
>>537416146At least in Britain, they were never actually legal. A lot of duellists were actually just let off by sympathetic juries if proper etiquette had been followed by both parties.
