[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: img_340958730.png (1.71 MB, 1412x1374)
1.71 MB PNG
The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously sided with a man who was prosecuted for possessing a gun while being a regular consumer of marijuana, ruling that the government’s actions violate the Second Amendment.

The opinion authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch is narrow in scope and does not entirely strike down the federal law known as 922(g)(3) that prohibits people who illegally consume controlled substances from possessing or purchasing firearms.

But it does say that as applied to the man in the current case, Ali Danial Hemani, it is unconstitutional to automatically bar people from lawful gun ownership just because they happen to use marijuana occasionally.

It also says that the broad ban and the government’s effort to defend it are “at odds with” the Trump administration’s move to federally reschedule cannabis.

The government “asks us to conclude that anyone who regularly uses marijuana is categorically violent and dangerous without any further showing,” the opinion says. “All based on little more than its current say-so, one at odds with its own regulatory actions. And affording the government that kind of ‘broad power to designate any group as dangerous and thereby disqualify its members from having a gun’ would risk allowing it to ‘quickly swallow’ the Second Amendment.”

The court’s opinion details recent large-scale federal policy changes concerning marijuana, and how they undermine the broad statute seeking to strip cannabis consumers of their Second Amendment rights.

>https://www.marijuanamoment.net/supreme-court-says-prosecution-of-marijuana-user-for-possessing-gun-violates-second-amendment/
>>
>>537487753
i mean, yaaaaaay but i'd bet two bucks fag states like california come back and say it is a big no no and it's banned state wide again
>>
>>537487936
>fag states like california
CA ignores the supreme court and faces no consequences for this.
>>
>>537487936
People who consume alcohol should not be allowed to own firearms.
>>
File: 1761534670408207.jpg (75 KB, 883x864)
75 KB JPG
>>537487753
Some states made you waive your gun rights to have a medical marijuana card. Or require the licensed growers to have a brown owner. Both are kiked policies.
>>
Nice narrative.
Doesn't mention he's a Paki Terrorist.
Here's the real story:
>Ali Hemani is a dual citizen of the United States and Pakistan who was
born in Texas. He has spent most of his life living in the Dallas area
with his parents and working a stable job.
>Suspecting Mr. Hemani
and his family members of terrorism-related activities.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1234_g2bh.pdf
>>
>>537488089
yes
>>537488228
probably
>>
>>537487753
Pretty sure this is the same law that got Hunter Biden, only it was crack cocaine rather than pot
>>
>>537488228
Founding text had that drunkards, what we call today alcoholics who are severely addicted such that they are generally incompetent, and in medical need of alcohol to avoid life-threatening withdrawal, that class could be disarmed.
State's argument was that regular cannabis use is analogous to being the worst alcoholic in town.
>>
>>537488228
shall not be infringed
>>
can FPSRussia appeal? or no
>>
>>537487753
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8TCxtl1qwE
Potential domestic terrorists exist among us at this very moment. There are deranged individuals screaming on the Internet they are going to "fucking snap" and "commit a mass shooting right now". The FBI knows these people exist and refuses to prosecute them. Is it because the FBI doesn't want to protect us? Does the FBI want these sick people follow through with their terroristic threats? None of this makes any sense.
>>
>>537489265
Weed niggers are in Fact analogous to the worst alcoholic in town.
>>
I don't see why this doesn't imply federal legalization or support thereof kek. DEA should be dissolved or absorbed into ICE.
>>
>>537487753
So, Trump is coming for your guns.
>>
>>537488927
Ridiculous law. A little crack in your system helps steady your nerves. If anything, they should ban gun owners who don't smoke crack.
>>
>>537487753
>California protecting rights of niggers
Can we just nuke California already?
>>
>>537489976
until we can get them reclassified as wildlife, their rights are our rights and vice versa
>>
>>537489721
>>lets make everyone notice even harder and go full 1488

Im for it. It just wont work out how these jew pedophile swines think.
>>
File: goatweed.jpg (12 KB, 196x257)
12 KB JPG
>>537487753
didn't some of your founding father smoked and grew weed and shot the brits?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.