What's wrong with the whole world having a single government? There would be no more wars.
Yeah cuz that's how that's always worked out before
>>537520453/pol/ is 18+ sweetie.>British "education"Yikes.
>>537520453Maybe after WW3 we will get one led by Chinese.
>>537520453I call superwme president of everything for infinity
>>537520558>Yeah cuz that's how that's always worked out beforeWhen did we have a global government?
>>537520453worked out well for yugoslavia
>>537520797There have been various large empires before that were more or less secure against external threats and the only thing that could bring them down was internal strife. Spoiler alert
>>537520453Have listened to the language these wanna be world leaders and oligarchs are using? Yeah maybe if there would be some benevolent leader, or this kind trait would radiate from those people who scheme for single world government, things would be different. But now we have scheming people that are part of the Epstein circles. Sounds more like nightmare.
>>537521034The greater the empire the greater the centrifugal forces that eventually tear it apart.
The closest to world dominion, only through peak territorial expanse. It didn't work out very well. British Empire 35.5 million km2 Mongol Empire 24.0 million km2 Spanish Empire 13.7 million km2Umayyad Caliphate 11.1 million km2Achaemenid Empire 5.5 million km2Roman Empire 5.0 million km2
>>537520453Because third worlders like you shouldn't have a say in how actual men live their lives.
>>537520453We both know that's not true, children think like that. BTW you must be 18 to post here
