What’s your opinion on communism
Meh, socialism is okay but not fully on communism I love Stalin though, not because communism, because he was great leader Haters would say what they want but Stalin was great leader
>>537549188Great Leader? He needed the US to bail out his failing military.
>>537549105Equal to Capitalism, same result, different time lines and tactics.Socialism is 100,000,000,000x better. But it has to be exclusive to your nation and each nation does it their own way.>>537549188It's not a sliding scare, socialism is fundamentally different from communism.
>>537549105It's a sensible idea in principle.>put profits towards higher goals than solid gold toilet bowls for billionairesBut since humans are literal apes it is very difficult to make work in practice.Even baby's first entry level shit like capitalism or democracy doesn't work, which means it's pointless to worry about anything more advanced.If it was to be achieved it must be done in various roundabout ways, like a brutal global dictatorship murdering all its enemies and then getting bored so they're like uuuh let's do a communism then shrug.
>>537549537>exclusive to your nationYou do realise "nations" are an invention, a spook? You won't get anywhere close to communism building on a psyop foundation.And no, this doesn't mean there's just one race, the human race, it just means that nations are a bullshit divide and conquer system by definition.>whose interests does the nation serve?>it's citizens of course heheLiterally never happened and is unlikely to ever happen. A nation serves the one who controls it, and the system of nations serves the leadership elite in general.>which is why suffering millions of cattle military casualties is ok, but touching the enemy's leadership is notIt's a matter of class solidarity and power dynamics, meaning the system of nations also is hierarchical.>well gee seems like your nation will have to die for Israel because they've got a higher rank
>>537552102It's a matter of identity.What does the label on your passport actually say about you? Is it a valid reason for, say Germans, French and British to murder each other in the millions?>b-but their passport was different!Additionally, if nationality was authentic it would be resilient and not destroyed so easily.>invent nationalism>convince cattle the nation is their identity they must fight for>kill them by the millions>then abolish nationalism by importing millions of brownoids and handing them a passport>thereby obliterating the people's identity you tricked them into, turning them into a horde of interchangeable slave nobodiesLike bro, get a better identity.But in real terms this is easier said than done.>we are cultural Germans/Europeans, we are workers, we are CaucasiansRace unironically is the least shaky of these, and it IS pretty damn shaky.>one interracial cumshot or perfectly integrated negro away from falling apart>we must preserve "racial homogeneity" because.. dude white skin so azn pussy is okay hurrrr Probably a good idea to build it on something like a shared creed, characteristics, outlook or goals, and maybe a fact based caste system lite, if necessary (when you have a mix of significantly different people living in your region). Nigger caste is okay, they'd love it, just don't intensify the divisions beyond necessity, because this will accomplish nothing positive.>niggers don't count as human heheThere's simply no need for that crap - they're simply niggers and that's alright, with their own strengths and weaknesses.>what strengthsUuh, they can run fast and some are good long distance runners too? Also muh basketball.>so they can have the footwork heavy jobs and minstrel showsCan even produce nigger music, just don't encourage cultural transfers.There's no reason identity would need to be bound by location or even origin. People can change if they want to change. Force or bureaucracy is less helpful.
>>537549105sounds nicein practice its shooting kids in a basement
>>537554017I mean not normally, but anybody who isn't a kid (and has a face Stalin doesn't like).Still it's debatable how bad this really is. If you want to establish an universal system - whichever it is or whatever it implies - but have people fighting against that.. you'll have to get rid of those in some way. People have a choice to be less unreasonable too, and it's evident enough even in modern judeo-democracy.>do le hecking antisemitism wrongthink>get kicked out of societyOr even more basically: anybody who doesn't agree with judeo-democracy has even less of a pretend-voice than the NPCs.>it's the perfect system>therefore you are insane if you don't like itDo they shoot people? Not normally, but their system doesn't have any merits either.>let's voot to pay more taxes to billionaires hoorayOpposing that isn't something shooting people is effective or sensible for.>you will continue to look at the judeo-clown and serve the judeo-clown
>>537554766How did I manage to write so much when it could be summed up in one sentence?>a system eliminating its opponents is normal, but whether this act is good or bad hinges on the system's merits; entirely excusable if the system was good, while being extra inexcusable when the system is a shit-show
>>537549188It's my understanding that socialism is basically the process of becoming communist, rather than a separate "in-between" system? (not to be confused with social democracy)
>>537549188This is quite unusual coming from an Israel flag. Your ancestors were committed communists?>>537557492Certainly, but is there a set transition point where it has finally evolved into Communism?So it may be better to say Communism is a highly advanced form of Socialism, and presumably rabbi-kun simply doesn't want certain (potential) aspects of it getting too extreme.
>>537549105it's a good system for hive insectsit's a most vile and unsurprisingly jewish abomination otherwise
pretty shit. modern communism just revolves around hating white people, loving islam and black people. I genuinely can't remember the last time I saw a commie talk about anything else. they are all on the palestine and antifa bandwagon now days. it's ironic really, if they saw us eye to eye on the demographic problems, within a decade their other policies would probably seem realistic. too late now
>>537559152>system for hive insectsIs this supposed to be an 0wn? Because the vast majority of the northern hemisphere's native population seems to be drones, and individualism seems to work in favour of only psychopaths and degenerates.In regards to jewish, that's a question of who runs your system, not any particular aspect of the system.>besides Judaism maybe
>>537560962>individualismyou're mistaking that for egotismindividualism is doing things by yourselfegotism is doing things for yourselfthose notions are orthogonaland most people are like that because they've been drugged and made addicted to neotrotskyism (see below)>that's a question of who runs your system, not any particular aspect of the systemcompletely retardedand moot, since jews and their pawns (freemasons and jesuits) run our system to start withwhich isn't individualism at all, but neotrotskyism=neosocdemism=neocohenism, out of the long march through the institutions that blossomed in the 60'sand trotskyism, whichever the form is communismas shown well enough by such states as the "French" one stealing about 60-65% of the full income of the average householdwhen you have much less than you're forced to give, you're well into communism, de facto
>>537562173>they run our system to start withI mean that was the main implication. Capitalism? Social Democracy? Communism? Even the kings were manipulated by them to a degree.And I admit it's not quite right in technical terms either. The idea of capital concentration is pretty jewish in general.It's kinda bizarre how the Frankfurt School managed to take over in some respects. Part of the problem may be that short term thinking is so prevalent, even among jews, but some groups are playing a long game. Very long. The competition in the realm of "social engineering over 50 year timespans" is pretty limited. Not many actually engage in that, and so there's also limited opposition as the frog is slowly boiled.And individualism I'd say is just about being yourself, a sovereign individual, instead of a totally manipulated pawn or nobody. The prominent people exhibiting such individualism tend to exploit the less individual masses, while to others it's distasteful or abhorrent.
>>537549105Infested with Despots and Tyrants in every branch.Stalin was one of the early Monkey-Men experimenters
>>537549105>What’s your opinion on communismIt's like homosexualityOnly brain damaged retards engage in it.It spreads filth and disease.It's disgusting.It's Jewish.
>>537564573That's precisely, almost word for word, the same opinion Stalin had of a whole bunch of things.
>>537549105It's good.... in theory.
>>537564493>Infested with Despots and Tyrants in every branch.This is the product of a particular systemic flaw in the way communist party hierarchy worked until recently.A superior had virtually absolute power over their immediate inferiors, who consequently were shit scared to do anything that might displease the guy, and so sucked up massively, conformed to anything, were afraid to take initiative without orders, and often gave overoptimistic reports, which then repeated with his own inferiors.
>>537549105Should be embraced in order to end humanity
>>537565651>StalinWasn't a communist/socialist. He was Stalin. Pragmatic and nihilistic opportunist. He wormed into power and liked wielding power, even if he had to get along with the Jewish Socialist elite.
It's retarded and impossible.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzHA3KLL7Hohttps://menghu.substack.com/p/how-economic-freedom-mitigates-crisis?utm_source=publication-searchhttps://www.weforum.org/stories/2019/05/why-chinas-state-owned-companies-still-have-a-key-role-to-play/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sekk5wUU8is
>>537559431>modern communism just revolves around hating white peopleStalinism was based though
>>537549105Socialism is good. People should not hoard money or material things — everything should be shared equally and fairly among the population.The existence of millionaires and, even more so, billionaires is simply disgusting.Since many humans tend to be selfish and evil, true socialism cannot be implemented peacefully, but only through force.Marxist socialism is anti-religious, and as Marx himself stated in the Communist Manifesto, "communism is materialistic." As a Catholic, this is incompatible with my religious views.Marx and Engels’ vision of “true communism” is simply utopian. The idea that a socialist phase would prepare the state and the people for a period of time, only to later abolish the state itself so that the peoples of the world could self-govern in a fair and equal society, is simply not possible.
>>537549105It sucks.
>>537549105Communism only works if you have a closed society with a strong leader (ie: Stalinist Russia, North Korea) or raw capitalism guided by a communist party (ie: post-Deng China). When you have a society like Russia after Stalin that was actively competing with the West, but clinging to impractical ideals, that is a losing game.
>>5375491056/10
Created by jews for jews to enslave the goyim. Its literally just left wing zog.
>>537566791This.
>>537549105I like it
>>537549105Well, same shit as any other religion sect.
>>537566697Radical equality doesn't really have any connection to Marxism, and indeed only the most profound of retards ever even entertain this idea.Rather it's about:>from each according to his ability, to each according to his needYou do more or better work, or more valuable work, you get better pay, simple as that, while everyone who works has their needs met in proportion,meaning before ultragigaworkerchad gets a Lamborghini every other worker can have at least a compact car.In fact the main concern is avoiding.. I'm gonna call it profiteering, because that fits well.>I and 3 bank jews have founded the company so we're entitled to the pay of 100000 workers forever, duh, even though we have done fuckall since then>in fact lets pay the workers fuckall and make that 200000
>>537549105All men are not equal.Forcing them to be equal is retarded.
With each passing day it's looking like the better option. Distributism or mutualism could also be good alternatives but less face it there's no real support for those things out there and their decentralization is prone to kill these movements. I'll give it to the soviets they did manage to take a backwards, serf ridden shithole like tsarist Russia and transform it into a military superpower in a matter of decades. This proves that the resources were already there and the only thing missing was political will to enact these changes. You look at the rest of the world and no one can afford rent, no one can afford healthcare, every government is pulling hyper austerity to remove all sorts of benefits and effectively transform you into the perfect goyim. I don't like Stalin though, he bureaucratized the USSR. Getting rid of the nasty kikes there was based but in the end his decisions shrunk the lifespan of the USSR by decades, and allowed bureaucrats to completely kill the whole idea of democratically managing the factories, which ironically nowadays in a capitalist society is very possible and achievable with all the technology advances. Also I don't like the materialistic take since I'm spiritual but I do get where Marx was going when he was denouncing religion back then.
>>537549105
>>537549105Most "Communism" is Upper Middle Class social status insecurity manifesting as hatred and envy of the upper classes. Often exacerbated by familial relations and wasted time in ideologically driven higher learning. If this strata of failson communists weren't such immoral fuckups and spoke honestly they would say things like:"I'm well off but find my much wealthier relatives make me feel small, and my accomplishments insignificant. We need to overthrow the government to fix this. When the revolution comes Uncle Jim will need to come to me to learn how to survive. His second sailboat won't help him then.""Holding this ideology makes me feel smart - at least I have that over them. Even if I don't fully understand Marx, I know he was a much of an envy and hate driven wasteoid as I am and would probably agree with me.""Poor people are disgusting, violent and stupid. They need to be the armed vanguard because there are so many of them, and a revolution might fix how fucked up and gross they are, and make them more productive, socially acceptable, and worthy of actual sympathy from me, rather than detached empathy I afford them as an abstract concept. I will hold my tongue until that time.""I know voting Democrat won't actually change anything, but there are no real entryist movements, all the socialist movements are run by detestable autists, and I just feel like hating God, religion, religious people and the natural order because I am not admired or respected by the people I want it from and have little hope of upward mobility, unless my inheritance comes through or my Uncle Jim hires me. I support abortion, gay sex and minority crime rates because I want the whole world to burn down. I hate life and fantasize about using politics to take it all out on humanity. Vote blue no matter who."
>>537569860>t. peak dunning Kruger
they really love building ugly buildings. except Stalin. he built nice buildings.
>>537566748It literally doesn't work. It's a system so bad even the most well bred, well educated human stock on earth could not make it work. It's a totally broken, ineffectual system from the mind of an rhetoratician from the 1800s
>>537549105opiate for the ignorant masses.
>>537549105its cool, but cartoonish in how it manifests. something about communism gives off a very strange vibe. It's almost like an elixir or religion of some sort.
