>>537566018I don't see any problem broThis perfectly reflects reality
>>537566018
>>537566018tl;dr something=jews
>>537566105> F(l)ag> weak troll
Look, a lot of so called info-graphics on this site reek of falsehoods. Claims easily debunked, but this is right here, right now, anyone anywhere can verify the following claim:> white women with childrenwill display predominantly white women with non-white children, whereas> black women with childrenwill show predominantly black women with black children.And I dare you to try your own variations. The bias is real, now, and easy to prove.>>537566209This isn't a drill.
Maybe they just wanted to be realistic, I mean that's basically average German style from 2015 onward. Boomers want welfare lmao
>>537566018well in Google's defense you're not going to mention she's a white woman unless she has a black childa white woman with a white child is just "a mother and child"
>>537566018>Something is really wrongYes grug, a lot of things have been wrong for a very long time. Welcome to Earth.
>>537566018lolololololol