https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/starmer-resign-britain-9.7243980>British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to resign, will stay on until successor chosen this summerFive PMs in five years means there is no political solution, not even with a super-majority in the House of Commons. It's time for a coup and a military junta. Thankfully you can actually abolish the monarchy this time. If you think you're voting your way out of this then you're just a dumb cunt. Enlist, join the Roundheads, and make Britain a republic again.Foundational Change: The transition would involve the formal end of the monarchy and the suspension of existing parliamentary structures to establish a new governing authority.Territorial Restructuring: The plan involves significant geopolitical shifts, such as the transfer of Northern Ireland to the Irish Republic and the divestment of various overseas territories to consolidate regional focus.Legal and Social Reform: A shift toward strict nationalistic policies, including changes to citizenship status and the implementation of a new legal framework governed by centralized authorities.Economic and International Reintegration: The final stages center on aligning Britain’s economy with the European Union, leading to a formal rejoining of the intergovernmental organization to secure long-term financial stability.
That's not even a honey-pot, that's a shit-pot.Only one letter away from shitpost so uh props for that I guess.
>>537578519>Britain needs a coup>posts The Most Raped ParliamentslaveAre you Indian? Because that's exactly how Indians are picked as CEOs. Just the most service individual who will follow every order of the Board of Directors
There won't be any cool style or revolution style events in the west until food security is impacted or electrical security
>>537578519>Thankfully you can actually abolish the monarchy this timeI really like the idea of a monarchy but it's indeed very difficult to argue that the Brittish royal family deserves to exist.
>>537578519>Cromwell>the guy who let the jews back into Britain
>>537578519Another one down. lolzWhen was the UK last a serious country? Was it Thatcher's era? Personally I think it was Macmillan in 1963.It all started going sideways after then.
>>537578869>>537578891Cromwell was a based traditionalist autocrat. Which is exactly what Britain needs
>>537578805This.Also Cromwell did NOT re-admit the jews, Charles II brought some with him when he was restored though it remained illegal until the 1890s where asylum laws were changed due to pogroms in Eastern Europe. Jewish journalists at the time tried to convince xenophobic Englishman to be open to it by lying and stating Cromwell was supportive of the jews; and the myth stuck since then despite it being complete lies.Monarchy as an institution can be great but its incarnation in Britain is the worst of all options. Charles III, like the two Charles who came before; is a traitor to the nation and should be removed.
>>537578519>Britain needs a coupLiterally posts an individual entirely funded and supported by Jews out of Amsterdam. Invites the Jews on mass into England and lays the foundation for a Jewish owned central bank dooming the world.
>>537578519Why does the UK have these problems? Because there are a number of unresolved and unresolvable dilemmas at the core of UK politics and the state in general.Open borders while also wanting a wildly generous infinitely growing welfare state.Open borders while also wanting higher wages for even basic workers.Open borders while also wanting a high trust society.Open borders while wanting better availability and lower cost housing and land in general.Open borders while wanting safe, clean, affordable public transport.If only there was 1 simple way to cut some of these gordian knot problems eh?
>>537578990When they tried to teach us about Cromwell in school I could never get my head around exactly what the King had done wrong.
>>537579063People need to shift the question to "when did we agree to this?"
>>537578990Literally is not what happened.Cromwell had an English army that fought against French, Irish and Bavarian mercenaries under Charles I.Charles II brought jews back with him when he was restored. Parliament and the merchants guild of London demanded these jews be removed in keeping with English law, which proves it was not changed by Cromwell; but the king ignored them.These monarchs are the enemies of the English people but argued they could not be traitors because they were the head of state. Literally Charles I was saying he is not a traitor because he IS England; and Cromwell was saying he was a traitor because he brought over foreign armies to kill the English people, and that the English people ARE England.They went round and round on this until they just chopped his head off.
>>537579067>I could never get my head around exactly what the King had done wrong.Just so you know Cromwell purged the house of commons to ram through a trail against. When the rigged vote passed no lawyer in the entire of the UK would bring charges against Charles I because they all knew he wasn't guilty of any crime. A lawyer from Jew controlled Netherlands was shipped in to do the rigged trial. His "crime" was not allowing Jews to take over the monetary system like they had done in the Netherlands after being expelled from spain. This is an actual letter from OC to some Jew in the Netherlands. 16th June, 1647.>From O.C. (i.e. Oliver Cromwell), by Ebenezer Pratt.>In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England: This however impossible while Charles living.>Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.
>>537578971When was your monarchy ever great. You bongs are licking boots so long you started to like taste of leather.If I am to search for a "good" king in UK it would be Alfred. Anything post normans has been a disaster.
>>537579067Imagine Charles III comes out and says England is a muslim country from now on. Then riots occur and English nationalists take over. Charles flees because its a bit dangerous with these angry mobs around.He then returns a year later with an army of Turks, Arabs and Africans. They attack and kill thousands of English people. The English then defeat them and capture king Charles III.Charles claims he is not a traitor because he is the head of state. He says he cannot be a traitor because he IS England, and he cannot betray himself. We say he is a traitor because he brought foreign armies over and killed English people. He disagrees. We disagree. This goes on for 3 days.Then eventually we get sick of it all and chop his head off.That is almost exactly what happened with Cromwell and Charles I.
>>537579385I agree. I like Edward the Elder best. Monarchy is stable and is probably the best political system long term; but it has to a monarch of the same tribe and religion as the people.
>>537579393Okay sure, and I agree that the current heads of state should also be beheaded right now, but then why did Cromwell let the Jews back in?
>>537578519>make Britain a republic again.Retard.>the transfer of Northern Ireland to the Irish RepublicRetard.
>>537579526You're arguing with a LLM. Another letting by OC btw.>12th July, 1647. To O.C. by E. Pratt.>Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to escape: His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences.
>>537579526He didn't. He considered it and then dropped the legislation after it sparked a pamphlet war that was decisivsly won by Puritan MP William Prynne who argued the jews are the assassins of Christ, the historic enemies of the English, and that the eternal edict of Canute the Great and the Edict of Expulsion of Edward I must be upheld; that the jews must never be allowed to live among us.His pamphlet is called: "a short demurrer ...". It should come up on google, if not I can share it. It was a huge deal back then.
>>537578519Does anyone actually even want to run the UK at this point? I'd say the king, in theory. But he's usually fucked off to go wander the hills. Tony Blair probably jacks off in front of a mirror every day thinking about how he ruined that country.
>>537579695The King supports what is happening here (because he's not actually English). It's easy for a foreign imposter to allow this.
>>537578519Genuine questionBoth Canada and Britain are intensely vulnerable at the moment, which will break first?Canada’s advantage is the US will never allow it to fully collapse for the sake of it’s own security, also Carney is fairly competent even if he has barely any solid support, he is more stable and secure than any British PM for the past decade.
>>537578519You know things are bad if the two polar opposites, both the right and left, see the country as a dystopia that can be fixed only by force and it's a trend since 70s.
>>537579845Here. You're already seeing the government lose control. People aren't listening to them.
>>537579845Quite a lot of the population have correctly figured out that either 1) The elected government doesnt control anything or 2) If they do, they are actively against the interest of the people.So people are just ignoring them. A government minister or PM telling you to do something or not to do something has no impact on a lot of the population now. I'm not just talking about Justice Minister saying "hey pakis plz no rape OK?". I mean the normal, native, white British population do not listen to the government. Because they do not award them any legitimacy.Likewise quite mild mannered middle class white british people now figured out the police are a mixture of useless or actively their enemy. If a policeman is trying to arrest someone, be they a street wog/iphone snatcher, or a white person... nobody is helping that policeman now. They are just leaving him to it.When you get 6 years for pushing an empty wheelie bin at police dressed as robots, and Abdul gets a £46 pound fine for gang rape and no prison time, that's what happens.I cant wait for the summer to really come on, it's going to be great TV.Even the RICU nudge unit 77th glowies are publicly ridiculed on social media daily (hello glowies). Dont look back in anger!
>>537578519Dear President Trump,Please send U.S. troops to support our dentally challenged cousins across the pond in a military coup.Signed, an American citizen.
>>537579385>When was your monarchy ever great.Henry II
>>537580352Having more immigration under 14 years of so-called conservatives finally woke a lot of people up>but I thought conservatives were supposed to stop immigration?...>... and we voted brexit because we wanted less immigration yet there's more coming now than ever before...>*rusty cogs start turning*
>>537578519What it means is that the prime minister is irrelevant to the power brokerage in the country.
>>537580352Even my mum said that she would never help the police after what happened to Henry Nowak and she was one of those who had the utmost respect for our police.
>>537578928Cromwell was a cuck who contributed to the subjugation of the Executive (the Crown) to the worst, most corrupted, most impotent, most dysfunctional, most useless branch of government: the Legislature. Which in turn perfectly explains the sad state of modern Britain
>>537579629He might not have (honestly Cromwell was so busy fighting wars and uprising he never really did much) but the Glorious Revolution sponsored by Parliamentarians after he died against Charles II certainly did.
>>537580720My own mother wouldnt help them. She regards them as either terminally thick or useless. Her local MP (chancellor at the time) whom she has met in person several times professionally, she described as "a berk".
>>537579845The leafs will be blown away with the coming winds
>>537580936Yeah, but that is a completely different kettle of fish. There was an over correction from Cromwell-ian Puritanism that resulted in the worst sort of degenerates and cowards coming to power.Cromwell himself was an honourable and noble warlord that was exceptionally talented at command and should be regarded as a hero of the English.The issue with the jews is concerning but also massively misunderstood. First of all Cromwell did not re-admit the jews or introduce any legislation to that effect. In fact when it became clear Parliament was opposed to the jews after the pamphlet war Cromwell completely dropped the issue and it wasn't heard of again until jewish journalists in the 1890s misrepresented the events in an attempt to change xenophobic English attitudes for the purposes of changing asylum laws for those jews who were being pogrommed in Eastern Europe.If Cromwell did accept the terms of Dutch jewish financiers; and as far as I have seen we have no evidence of that, we have Dutch jews writing to him but not the reverse; but if he did, it was clearly him seeking funds for his war that was for the sake of the English people who were being killed by Charles and his foreign papist armies. It was not Cromwell being a pawn of the jews as some try to make out.The main point that needs to be hammered home though is that Cromwell did not re-admit the jews. It did not happen. Immediately after Cromwell, Charles II was restored and brought jewish friends with him; and we have records demanding they be removed by Parliament and the merchants guild of London, which the king ignored. That is clear proof that Cromwell did not change the law; however its also true that the jews tried to play all sides. It does not mean anyone was actually subservient to jews however; they had their own objectives and jews tried to get concessions in return for finances. Do not twist that into a master-pawn relationship.
Britain will never coup.
>>537578519shut up nerd.
>>537578519cant the people of england hold a constitutional convention? what are they gonna do, shoot you all?
>>537579385>flag kekonce upon a time before they got mongralized anglos fucked french in the ass. hard.
