China lies about it's statistics all the time. They get away with it because they are a communist country which makes fact checking practically impossible
India and China are two completely different societies with unequal backgrounds that make it more or less impossible for both countries to develop the same way. China's unity (both in concept and in practice) dates thousands of years back to the absolute genius of Qin Shi Huang, who practically founded China as a unified civilization. Since then, China could afford to fall apart and then back together after a few decades only to form a new dynasty within the framework of the same civilization, - what they had been doing for the last couple thousands of years. India, on the other hand, never had this, it has always been a decentralized mass of different kingdoms with competing religions and to a lesser extent cultures. A unified India, unlike China, is more or less an artificial construct, in a way similar to the EU. Thus, unlike China, it struggles to find actual unity and to develop in a coherent way. Not to mention that the two countries have significantly different cultural differences, which translate to everything, including governing practices, decentralization, work ethnics and concepts of power legitimacy. Just because two countries have a lot of people, does not mean they will develop in a similar manner.
>>537608712One has an IQ like other humans and the other are walking fecal matter.
>>537609224Nobody asked you mehmet
>>537609069>China liesNo, it really is just difference in DNA.When your colleagues all has 70 IQ, your department just tend to be less capable.70 is below gorilla.
>>537609221Good analysis. I think the jeets deserve credit for successfully revolting and writing their own constitution. Every other asian country had their legal system installed by foreigners. Indian people are poorer and the country is rundown, but they are definitely happier and more hopefult. just spent 3 months each in India and China
>>537609069
>>537610184>hopefulWas that really your conclusion after seeing transportation becoming unaffordable in india and Pajeets turning gas stations into bar fights?-
>>537610333
>>537609221>differences in concepts of power legitimacyThis is also super important.When the British held their whip over the pajeets it became obvious to the Brits the Pajeet fears the larger juggernaut,The pajeet obeys might makes right, and when a pajeet rise in power he will think "might makes right" is a virtue and abuse the ever living fuck out of it.This is why the Korean steel company got destroyed by PajeetsThe president of india wanted bribes.The president's cabinet each wanted bribes.The india supreme court trolled them until they got their bribes.The head of state wanted his bribe.Head of state's enture cabinet wanted each their own bribes.Even the local state courts trolled them until they got their bribes.Even the town mayor wanted his bribes.Even the city hall workers wanted their bribes.Even the local town police wanted their bribes.Even the neighbours to the project wanted bribes.Even the fucking random elephants blocking the road wanted their bananas to let the truck pass (if you think I'm making this shit up, you can actually search for incidents of this)
>>537610184India has incredible history, my post was in no way designed to discard it as a failed civilization. It may be in a sorry state right now, but that does not invalidate the sheer weight of culture it had managed to develop and the amount of influence it has had on almost every single Asian country and even beyond. It’s fashionable to go hard on India here and to give it a cold shoulder for the obvious shortcomings it is experiencing now, but its plain ignorance to deny the cultural footprint it has left across the world. I believe that in a few decades it will manage to get itself together economically and politically and then we will be seeing a far different kind of power. Probably not of China's scale, but it’s going to play a very different role in world affairs.
>>537608712China basically destroyed a lot it's old cultural practices in the Cultural Revolution allowing themselves to effectively reorient their Society toward Communistic and later quasi Capitalist mass production without the baggage of old social practices.India post colonization inherited the British's toothless bureaucratic structures where you need a permit to do anything, this plus Hindu caste backwardness actively thwarts any attempt at modernization. China succeeded in social modernization, India didn't to the same extent. Human Capital is an important resource and things compound over time.AuthorizA pretty good article detailing it.https://substack.com/home/post/p-200363170
>>537611117>It’s fashionable to go hard on India here and to give it a cold shoulder for the obvious shortcomings it is experiencing now, but its plain ignorance to deny the cultural footprint it has left across the world.Seeing is believing. What positive cultural footprint has india put on Africa?
>>537611262>British's toothless bureaucratic structures where you need a permit to do anything,Yuuuppppp, this.This is what killed Posco's project.But in reality it wasn't true bureaucracy, it was just corruption, and every chain from top to bottom wanted bribe money (aka permit).But it's actually even worse, they had a sinister ulterior motive to seize that 12 billion dollar steel plant after ensuring the Koreans wrote off that investment.
>>537611117>>537609221This is a jeet, anyone who doesn't show hate ,contempt and abhorrence when talking about jeets and ok India is a jeet Fuck you rat !
>>537609069Show flag, Bhangi
>>537611458Look, I may be a 100% China enthusiast, but I am not going to just flat-out deny the cultural and religious impact India had on SEA, Korea, China, Japan etc. It would be ignorant to deny India's historical impact because of the current state of the country. It had always been a source of wisdom and spirituality for most Asian cultures, and they were never ashamed of admitting it. You would be falling into a fallacy should you insist Asian countries developed in a segregated environment instead of experiencing a wide cultural exchange. It would be foolish to deny reality because of the current trends.
>>537612556>religious impact India had on SEA, Korea, China, Japan90% of the mythos in China are developed from Chinese litterary traditions.They don't have a yellow emperor in the sky in Pajeet land.
>>537612556>but I am not going to just flat-out deny the cultural and religious impact India had on SEA, Korea, China, Japan etc.Stop reading right there, you are a jeet and this is final proof Webm of jeet baby eaten by dog is my counter argument ( I feel sad for the dog thou )
>>537612938Anon. If you haven't figure out already you are talking with a jeet. No human on this planet will look at a jeet and say it's kind had an impact on mankind's history.Are you tired or drunk? How haven't you figured out you were talking with a jeet in the first place ??!?!?
>>537613312I can try to reason with anything who appear to be reasonable.That's the nature of productive discourse.If his remark stray too far from boundaries of reason, you can reason it back into the boundary.That is civil discourse.
>>537612938I do not deny that China has had and will always have the greatest cultural impact on all of Asia. I firmly believe that Chinese civilization is superior to all others, including Indian one and it is not even close. But again, I am giving Indian credit where it is due - they did have a significant impact. Buddhism alone, although shaped greatly by China, originated there. Chinese "Journey to the West" is all about travelling to India.
>>537613448>I can try to reason with anything who appear to be reasonable.This is the first step towards damnation anon : to reason with the jeet is to consider lies !!!!As I will always say : In oder to defeat this pestilent spices, mankind needs to become the monster the jeet race portray us to be. There is no other option. You need not reason with it just hate it with unbreakable reason. Also always remember that no living creatures on this planet will have a positive or neutral opinion towards the jeets, only contempt
>>537613555>"Journey to the West" is all about travelling to India.The problem arrives with 99% of this book is written by a Chinese, but hundreds of years later some random pajeet gets credit for the book.Because....reasons...Do you see the problem from my point of view?It's the same thing in Japan. Susanoo and Amaterasu are 100% invented in Japan.
>>537613448>But again, I am giving Indian credit where it is due - they did have a significant impact. Buddhism alone, although shaped greatly by China, originated there. Chinese "Journey to the West" is all about travelling to India.Here you go, this jeet was tutored by Mossad Most probably by the way he is subverting you with his false claims. Look how he starts the sentences with a positive thing about china only to go back and lie on how India was the one that did it first
>>537613221poor dog probably died from diarrhea after that bad lunch
>>537613868True, but this dog is a martyr of mankind. It sacrificed it's beautiful life so one jeet can die with it.Sometimes mankind can learn a few things from the animal kingdom
>>537613730I brought the "Journey to the West" up because you posted a pic of it and because it kind of proves that India was an important place in Asian culture to the point of Tang Sanzang being tasked with a mission to go there and retrieve sacred texts. It does not mean that India can take credit for anything China did, but that it did play a role in the culture of East Asia.
>>537614057>The important role it played in shaping other cultures in question
>>537608712One is far browner than the other.
>>537614057>Tang Sanzang being tasked with a mission to go there and retrieve sacred texts.Do you know who tasked him? The person who tasked him is a figure also invented in China.Basically only the Buddha is originated from somewhere north of Pajeetland, outside of China.
>>537608712>> SRSLY?businesses moved their manufacturing jobs and plants to China whose licensing allows them to basically copy the patent. Did you think it was all because they eat dog
