[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1756744913939305.jpg (975 KB, 1891x1918)
975 KB JPG
Hitler's art was good, and I'm tired of hearing pseudo-artists on the internet say it's bad. Most people here can't paint as well as Hitler.
>>
>>537664666
It's not bad, it's just mid
>>
I can. I studied at a fine arts academy too. His painting was mid at best even for his style. It’s also bland and uninspired. His obsession with buildings actually suggests that he wasn’t made for fine art painting but rather something more technical. It’s the difference between someone obsessed with writing poetry and someone obsessed with reading history. The former is inspired by the muse. The latter is a product of a sterilized civilization with a practical brain. Hitler was meant for the pulpit, not the studio.
>>
>>537664666
They wanted new blood and new ideas at the time. Not traditionalist paintings.
>>
>>537664666
they are very nice postcards, but not really artistic
>>
>>537664666
Needs jews and diversity
>>
>>537664666
maximum mid. his chosen subjects and styles did not match his skill. if he had done pure architecture subject or more abstracted style he would have been better
>>
>>537664666
>Most people here can't paint as well
have you tried? like, have you actually ever tried painting? or using a drawing tablet?
it isn't as hard as it may look, at least the buildings where it's just straight lines and simple 1 or 2 point perspective. watch a tutorial on how perspective for background art works and in 3 months, with enough practice, you should be able to make something just as good, if not better. this means, of course, that it wasn't good at all
>>
>>537664929
This. With formal training he could have been a low-tier great artist for his time, but the Vienna Academy was a horrible choice to apply anyway. It was fully infested with jewish modernism anyway. Sadly, he wasn't fully woke on jews yet when he applied...

Honestly I can't even think of a proper Academy he COULD have applied to at that time. I think they were all pozzed by 1900.
>>
>>537665169
Even then a fine art academy is not really the place for an architectural painter to hone their skills and there was just no commercial demand for them outside of architectural drafts anyway. It’s not like he wasn’t talented for a young man. He had skills. His skills were just not THAT good and not appropriate for a fine art academy regardless.
>>
>>537664666
nice post satan. as in every thread on this shit, art like this in the day of the photographic camara is obsolete.

Artists had to find a way to pretend to provide value. They have the same problem today with AI.
>>
>>537664954
Yeah well that's the whole point of going to art school, tardo, to become an actual artist. Hitler was an amateur and you expected him to paint like a master painter before he even got into art school?
Also, yes he was obsessed with buildings because architecture was his real passion, and in fact the jew art school dean who rejected him told him he should consider becoming an architect instead of an artist, which actually was good advice coming from a literal kike.
>>537665023
You'd be right but only if by new ideas you actually meant kike degeneracy
>>
>>537665294
I think if he had done more fantastical architecture it could have been alright. Things like castles, based on real designs to carry that historical heritage value but scaled up in size and complexity into something almost absurdist. Architect meets artist, dunno if he had that kind of creativity though or if he could only replicate what he saw
>>
>>537664666
It only looks good because modern art is so shit. You have to remember that tons of people in Vienna could paint like that back then.
>>
>>537664666

wow he fucking sucks at capturing shadows
>>
File: sttng.png (457 KB, 768x768)
457 KB PNG
>>537665220
i have tried painting, and no, it is not easy. there is so much more than just straight lines and perspective. with painting there is color selection, making enough of a certain color so that it stays consistent, shading, brush strokes, adding fine details, etc. the art in OP is better than most people could do.

is it great? no. but its not like it is bad. and painting like that isn't exactly easy, so it is very easy to make bad paintings.
>>
File: 2091108.jpg (50 KB, 271x520)
50 KB JPG
imagine living during the peak of art deco and deciding to paint some boring irl buildings instead. very sad
>>
He would have been a great artillery observer. They have to do terrain sketches. Misallocation of resources in WW1, wasted as a runner in the infantry
>>
>>537665248
>With formal training
>Which he tried to get
>But was rejected
>Then kikes (you) say he needed formal training
>Which he tried to get
>But was rejected
>Then kikes (you) say he needed formal training
>Which he tried to get
>But was rejected
>>
File: nazi4.jpg (3.14 MB, 4150x6250)
3.14 MB JPG
>>537664666
slide show
clik file name opens new tab clik plus sign
>>
>>537665473
>you could make a living selling upscaled stamps
>freelance writers could make a living writing random pamphlet articles for random newspapers, even if it where miserable
Late 1800s and early 1900s must have been a buck wild time.
>>
>>537664666
Leftists do this with Burzum too. Best BM artist ever and they'll cry about it because hes a le evil nazi
>>
>>537664666
It’s too bad he didn’t do tits and ass stuff
>>
File: 1766423166539998.jpg (14 KB, 255x255)
14 KB JPG
>>537664666
It's alright but unimaginative. This is what I expect he was told.
>>
>>537664954
Post some of your art
>>
>>537664666
90% of people who bitch about/for Hitler’s art don’t understand how the art market actually works: it doesn’t matter how good you are if you don’t know how to tickle the client’s balls and play the role. Hitler couldn’t so he failed and found his true calling
>>
File: nazi5.jpg (3.27 MB, 4150x6250)
3.27 MB JPG
>>537667106
part 2
>>
>>537664666
The composition and color is 9/10, just has some objective perspective flaws which are the least interesting part of a painting anyway. This was legit my first Hitler redpill when I was like 12. I distinctly remember thinking his art was nice after hearing it was "terrible"
>>
>>537664666
It's fine but it's boring and generic. Also all he could draw was buildings. Vienna were justified in rejecting his application.
>>
>>537664666
Everyone at that time was drawing like that. We only give a shit because Hitler drew it not because it is spectacular beyond belief. That said it is art.

It is interesting how he always drew with a bright glowing esthetic. Very optimistic and grounded. On the flip side I can see why he was denied and told to become a draftsmen or architect. That style of art was essentially killed by photography and you were basically doomed if you pursued it.
>>
File: CA769.jpg (216 KB, 1024x1024)
216 KB JPG
>>537667816
>Post some of your art
>>
>>537664666
Its true I cant paint but that stuff is wonky. My eyes dont lie
>>
>>537667997
They told him to become an architect that's always the funny part that pokes holes in the argument.
>>
>>537666473
>With formal training
>Which he tried to get
>But was rejected
>Then kikes (you) say he needed formal training
He applied to the most prestigious and exclusive art institute in the world, got gently rejected then never tried anywhere else. imagine having second hand rage over some art fag from a century ago not getting into his preferred college.
>>
File: CA560.jpg (175 KB, 1024x1024)
175 KB JPG
>>537668002
Do you think he would have been a good AI artist?
>>
File: photo_2026-06-18_13-42-45.jpg (162 KB, 1280x1252)
162 KB JPG
>>537664954
>he wasn’t made for x, but y.
>he was meant for x, not y.
Die judaic technodemon, back to the gap between dimensions with you ChanGPT
>>
>>537664666
>666
fuck off, kike
>>
>>537664666
yes, but art school isn't for learning to make art, it's for sucking the dicks of the art professors that need to be sucked to get them to proclaim you The Next Big Thing so you can get 15 minutes of fame and get hired by some rich patron who will let you suck his dick for money until one of you dies
Hitler, like many aspies, didn't understand this, so when his art professor told him to get on his knees and smile like a donut, Hitler just punched him in the face and reported him, forcing the art school to discipline the professor, apologize to Hitler, and then find excuses to condemn every single work of art Hitler made until he gave up on being a painter
>>
File: WM7.jpg (208 KB, 1024x1024)
208 KB JPG
>>537668519
AI fixes this
>>
>>537664954
>blah blah blah
>>537667816
Come on now, lets see it
>>
File: WM3.jpg (198 KB, 1024x1024)
198 KB JPG
>>537668893
>Come on now, lets see it
He's scared to post. Guarantee he doesn't have this kind of creativity.
>>
>>537664666
lol it's all so awful. the retard didn't understand perspective or proportions at all. also the structures are either impossible or make no sense - just like the shit and worms he had in his head. like that building in center right is literally fifth-dimensional. Look at the arches. hahahahaha.

My absolute favorite painting of his though is the one with the side of the house with the staircase that then has a window that's not fully rectangular and instead is missing a triangular cut-out from the bottom right corner because of the staircase. what a fucking retard.
>>
>>537664666
artist here. When people say it's bad art they don't mean craftsmanship (even though some point out his failings on that front too). Like he's way beyond stick figures and whatnot if that's what you are confused about but artists who make boring illustrations are dime a dozen. You don't even know about 99.9% of them because they make a bunch of derivative art and then they disappear. If you are an artist then creating something important is what defines modern art and nobody will care if you do something that's been done a million times but does it in a very mid and unpersonal way.
>>
>>537664666
Wow. Yeah that’s actually pretty damn good.
>>
File: patch21.jpg (310 KB, 1024x1024)
310 KB JPG
>>537669521
>tists who make boring illustrations are dime a dozen. You don't even know about 99.9% of them because they make a bunch of derivative art and then they disappear. If you are an artist then creating something important is what defines modern art
So true
>>
>>537664929
Wait to see the art of the people who denied him entry to the art academy
>>
File: 1718975193434487.jpg (228 KB, 1024x1010)
228 KB JPG
>>537668193
It was for the best. I've seen the abomination that came out of that pozzed art school, I wouldn't wipe my ass with those "artworks"
>inb4 art is le subjective
No, it really isn't. There are things that are universally accepted as beautiful (cleanliness, aesthetic buildings, tall and fit people) and things universally accepted as ugly (shit and piss, niggers, you).
>>
>>537669336
I can tell from reading this you're a "Hitler killed white people" poster
>>
>>537664666
I hope he killed all the art teachers that rejected him.
>>
>>537664666
He doesn't know how to paint proper shadows or lighting.
>>
File: auyaks.jpg (81 KB, 500x761)
81 KB JPG
>>537664666
He had a destiny to fulfill
>>
>>537665023
These are studies, not necessarily the height of his artistic expression. He was likely demonstrating his technical skill awaiting an opportunity to express something more meaningful
>>
>>537670400
and i can tell you're a faggot
>>
>>537664666
well yeah, his art is good, everything hitler did was good.
>>
If he had lived today I wonder if he would have gone into furry art.
>>
The camera had been invented.
>>
>>537664666
Hitler was 18 when he applied the first time and 19 when he applied the second time. While his work was not outstanding, it was a solid foundation and an art education could have elevated his style a lot. However, the art education of this time would have probably being diametral to hitler’s skill and ambition and I can’t see him having flourished as an artist at that time.
Besides all that, these discussion are always gay as fuck with the only goal to downplay his character. It’s a big ad hominem but since hitler offers very little surface for attacks gay retards chose to make fun of him for being rejected by the jewish education complex when he was a teenager.
>>
>>537673696
Ty for not denying it. I knew I was right
>>
File: 1681427302900937.jpg (3.88 MB, 4000x3314)
3.88 MB JPG
>>537664666
He had a real possibility of becoming a great artist. The people who criticize his artwork often forget, or are willfully ignorant of the fact, that he's applying to an institution of learning. He could have always improved. Artists when given time will improve on their style.

Instead of catering to Hitler's autism, the kikes gave the world the single biggest redpilling event humanity had seen since the sacking of Carthage.
>>
>>537665392
>Yeah well that's the whole point of going to art school, tardo, to become an actual artist.
>I only know basic math and can't solve an equation, I can't believe I got rejected by MIT, isn't the whole point of an engineering school to become an engineer
The Academy of Fine Arts Vienna isn't a simple art school, it's one of the most prestigious art academies in the world
>>
File: 1593979425224.jpg (111 KB, 602x1003)
111 KB JPG
lol is OP for real
>>
>>537665336
Hmmm? Who behind this post?
>>
>>537664666
How much for one of his paintings?
>>
File: 1779649800355213.mp4 (1.81 MB, 812x624)
1.81 MB
1.81 MB MP4
>>537664666
Nice digits, satan
>>
>>537675940
So what
>>
>>537664666
>no Buc-ee’s or Chic-fil-A logos on the buildings
Empire my ass



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.