*AND TEMPORARY VISA JEETS!
How long until retroactive repeal of Hart-Celler act?
>>537697342The US is so fucked and the republicans just arent taking their job seriously. Honestly what's the chance it rightfully gets abolished?
5-2 with Thomas and Alito dissenting, keep coping
>>537697342How does this work? Is it any babies born after that date or can they backdate it?What will happen, are they just given their parents' nationality?
>>537697342promise to kill yourself if it is not retroactive?
>>537697342Good but what's needed is to kill all bronws
>>537697342Could be as soon as Thursday. Even if the SCotUS doesn't overturn it, it's just another battle in a war we WILL win.
>>537702097They do such a great job killing themselves, tho.
>>537697342imagine being fuckin stupid enough to fall for this shit
monomaniac retard OP has even stopped replying in his spam threads, now it's just 1pbtid. probably figures the thread will get purged soon.
Is there any indication that it will actually pass? Everything I keep hearing is that even if Trump's lawyers make a really good argument the prevailing reading is just so set in the minds of the justices that it's not gonna be enough
>>537697971ZERO.the justices have already made it clear they will not render a judgment that will cause any instability. Status quo is all "right wing" judges are capable of
>>537705755GOOOD MORNING, SAAAARRR!!!!
>>537702209Could be as soon as Thursday or as late as June 30th, 2027The only thing that is for certain is that if they don't make a ruling by the end of July then it gets pushed into the next session and they have to rehear the oral arguments all over again.
>>537705755>"Overturning birthright citizenship would cause instability."Your employers also said nuking the voting rights act would cause the country to collapse.
>>537706841And Roe v. WadeIn fact, their employer even leaked the decision on Roe v. Wade months in advance in their delusion that the response to the news from the public would convince the justices to change their ruling - it didn't work.
Question: did the Senate actually pass a law to end it?
>>537707059>senatewhat does the Senate have to do with any of this?
>>537707059That is not how American law works. The Supreme Court can declare a law unconstitutional. This renders the law null and void. In essence they can tell you what laws to ignore if they think a law is not align with the Constitution.
>>537707059Yes, it's called the constitution when it was originally ratified which says that only landowning white men can vote. We gave rights to women and slaves and even, god help us, the unlanded serfs, but we never gave rights to random indians who give birth at the airport.
>>537697342I am ICE MANworld is a fuckdeport em all58,435,663 sends em back.jpg
