Did anybody on this board even read this study before freaking out? The conclusion blatantly states that if currently childless Western women don't choose single motherhood right this second, feminism will be the worst disaster in the history of the world, and that all future women will be enslaved, because Western nations will be obliterated by nations that subordinate women. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/toward-individualistic-reproduction-solving-the-fertility-crisis-could-require-a-further-marginalization-of-men/Conclusion:>One way of looking at this challenge is that our nations have completed only the first part of modernity’s feminist project. Because no cultural change that sabotages reproduction can endure, the most crucial part remains: finding a way to combine having free women with sufficient reproduction. This is obligatory if we are to secure the future of our gender-equal communities. If we fail, feminism risks becoming one of humanity’s gravest mistakes: a noble project of emancipation that unwittingly dooms history’s most advanced civilization to demographic extinction.You guys need to actually read the things you get angry about rather than just getting angry at a headline. This whole thing squarely blames women for everything: Their unrealistic expectations, and holding out for top-tier mates they won't get.
>expects women to do anything except blame men.No Neo, the time will come when you wont need too.
>>537716001>If we fail, feminism risks becoming one of humanity’s gravest mistakes: a noble project of emancipation that unwittingly dooms history’s most advanced civilization to demographic extinction.>admits feminism caused the decline of civilization. >but we can still save it.>by introducing Single Mom Feminism and Feminism 2.Anon, nobody is going to read that.
>>537716147You're missing the point. /pol/ read the headline and screeched. The actual study absolutely paints women in a bad light. They're choosing the top 10% of men, and those top 10% are NOT choosing them. Therefore, women are childless and single due to their own unrealistic expectations. The entire point of the article is to push White fertility, regardless of the who, what, when, where, and why. The reason being is obvious: Feminism is a disaster and will be deleted in short order unless women start making babies no matter what. /pol/ read this as a pro-feminism article when in fact it's outlining precisely why feminism is doomed, and why individual choice by females for mates is going to go away if women don't start having babies at all costs.
>>537716001Interdsting but /pol/ shills will derail thisHowever, the answer is 4chan withdrawal prevention center, formerly known as the psyops sommelier society. Certified & Designated by the Anons' Pattern Recognition Lab, Est. 2026. If you're getting tired of talking to same-shit-spam agitprop algo bots, you should just start building your own breakaway communities or if cba you can joinhttps://smp17.simplex.im/g#cM4KI1_rV4wtq3NywfJodpj4I_IRvuuhnqQy4ATe6Cg https://simplex.chat/downloads/It’s only going to get worse if you didn't know already. If you want actual coherent exchange of discussion - talk about conspiracy theories, history & geopolitics, esoteric metaphysics, high-finance, 'insider here' posts and some banters and shitpost memes allowed, places like here and img boards are no longer an isolated layer where you can laugh at normiefags. You're not watching them. You are being watched. Discord & Telegram are namefag apps and privacy nightmare. SimepleX has incognito mode, multi-profile mode that doens't require your phone number needed to join. Beware : this chat is post-populist : that means you agree to disagee-it was normal for people to have different opinion. Idpol is welcomed, but you can still joke. This is not advertisement. It's for people who would already be complaining about the board constantly so here I'm making your job easier jannies. Ad is for randoms just browsing by.
>>537716001Also the link doesn't work ; Page not found
>>537716001Feminism will wipe out Asia, Latin America and vast parts of Africa too. We are looking at a future of deflation, recession, famine, catastrophic failure of institutions. Hopefully at some point people have disclosure about ayylmaos and consciousness, so we can choose to become allies of benevolent ayys instead of this current slavery arrangement.
>>537716404Here try this one: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/toward-individualistic-reproduction-solving-the-fertility-crisis-could-require-a-further-marginalization-of-men/F26A4750B666344157278B72CFC5D223>>537716428Feminism is destroying whole nations. That's what the point of the article was. It's pushing an unsavory solution: Single motherhood. But it's doing so because the alternative is the total extinction of all advanced societies and their replacement by barbarian foreign ones. So, either women make babies right now, or they're destined to be enslaved. That's the choice they have to make. Ferrari Chad is not coming to the rescue, and billionaire stud factory owner is not going to sweep them off their feet. Their choice is an average guy or enslavement by savages.
>>537716553Now, would you, personally, rather shack up with a self-entitled, post-walled, insufferable, vapid, nagging, ran-through roastie? Or would you rather watch wahmyn be held accountable for their choices and drown in SSRIs, loneliness and despair?
>>537716776I'd rather have kids. If she has a non-White kid, that's a dealbreaker.
>>537716553>enslavement by savagesIf left at the choice of the population you know what it will be ...The choice that requires no action.
>>537716428>FamineI doubt that, the plan is to lower the amount of people, keep the docile workers for physical production and genetic stock, continue to maintain the old families and have AI do the thinking. Do you really think we need Pablo or Tyrone who do shit work, if at all, then come home to drinking, wife beating and having the cops called on them for the third time in a week?
artificial wombs when?we already have the tech to do homosexual reproduction.i can't wait for women to become obsolete.
>>537716001Study ecology and EROI collapse. We are in overshoot globally and beyond planetary carrying capacity. Large populations are being turned into mouse utopia on purpose. They want a cap on the population at 500 million. They do not need infinite growth with that population and robots. The world worked just fine with only 2 billion people in it and that wasn't that long ago either. That's the mean projection I give to what the population will be before humanity eventually builds the correct amount of logistics capacity for more. You should be more worried about having competent offspring or not at all.
>>537720507Why not just create a virus for india
>>537716001>Western nations will be obliterated by nations that subordinate women."Boo-hoo nigga, I DON'T CARE!"-Western women
>>537718964The real question is - are rich people okay with becoming poorer?And the answer is no.
>>537721517The total carrying capacity for the planet is around 2 Billion people. Complexity demands a high maintenance cost as a dissipative system. We do not have the easy energy or resources to prop it up. It is known as a Seneca cliff.
