>>537725603My wife is rich and I am not. Cope.
bump
>>537725516The same people will cry if a man has a surrogate or if he goes for a younger woman. I am leaving
That's a whole lot of words to just say "the muslims won"
>>537725516It's funny how studies consistently validate what MGTOW and incels have been saying for what, 15 / 20 years now? You're doing god's work, fascinating that they have to recognize it in scientific terms. Have bump good sir.
>>537728944Kill yourself
>>537729122
>>537725516
>>537729172No u
>>537729216
>>537729089This is exactly why they should have stabbed the cunts who were handing out white feathers.
>>537728944Incels won
>>537725516>>537729536>>537729447
>>537725516Funny how they almost ended up connecting the dots but instead doubled down on their retarded ideas.
>>537725516Aristophanes and every failed civilisation on earth just simultaeously turned in their graves.
>>537729920You are the problem.
>>537729920Don’t forget that academics are pusswhipped basedboys. They can’t frame anything as inherently harmful.
>>537726189>feminism risks becoming one of humanity’s gravest mistakes: a noble project of emancipation that unwittingly dooms history’s most advanced civilization to demographic extinctionKEK>>537728114Also this
>>537729661This. The only issue I have in the paper is the repeated use of the term "High-value" . The men they end up with are not high value by any meaningful definition of the term. they even let it slip in one of the paragraphs and instead of using low value they used least "Sought - after">>537725889Sought-after doe snot equal high value and "attractiveness" which changes over time, does not mean good genes. This is a fatal error even the "scientists" in this study make over and over again. To determine "good genes" You need a solid objective definition of what good genes are (presumably health, lack of disease, intelligence and strength) you need a battery of blood tests and genetic disease screening. Good genes is more than a low body fat % and a jawline. In other words, they keep trying to make it as though women have some kind of "good gene" radar. They don't. Fisherman runaway is a real phenomena. They get with criminals and drug addicts. They fuck short and fat guys who have access to drugs and parties. High- value really means popular and extroverted.There are many men with objectively better genes (less aggression-which they identify as being positive for growth of the human population here >>537725771higher IQ, more impulse control, height to some extent, less so in the age of the gun, hygiene, temperament, less disease, more resources) who are excluded from mating due to not being extroverted or popular and what is considered popular, desired, or "sought-after" is programmed. Female choice IS NOT EUGENIC. It is dysgenic at best and they even let it slip when they talked about how arranged marriages led to more optimal genetic outcomes >>537726233
>>537725695lmao, more incels raised by single moms and more criminals. Great solution. Holy fuck just take womens rights away ffs. They dont deserve them in the first place now we see the fruits of the experiment
>>537725516Only artificial wombs can save us at this point.
It's impossible to enslave all men. It is however, very easy to enslave women and we have done this for thousands of years with extraordinary results. It's almost as if enslaving women is the natural and optimal way to maximize human reproduction.
>>537731262That's what half of this study argues in favour of. Anything to avoid saying women's rights are the problem.
>>537731616Oh, but they're indirectly saying it see >>537726189>feminism risks becoming one of humanity’s gravest mistakes: a noble project of emancipation that unwittingly dooms history’s most advanced civilization to demographic extinctionSo it’s more about trying every dystopian measure possible without ever resorting to revoking women’s rights.>spoilerIt won’t work. Muslims will outbreed you and establish their views as the norm.
Yea all of this is horseshit that will become irrelevant when sexbots and artificial wombs become reality. Those two techs will plunge female smv into the abyss, they’ll try to ban it but wont for long.
>>537725516>almost all woman still want to reproduce No duh its their biology but its been repressed by woman's suffrage, feminism, birth control and hoeflation. Marginalized men anymore and they'll flip the table ans reset the game
Women need to be enslaved, or 99.9% of the human population wiped out at random to completely fix thisThe hypergamy females have built upon the west is the complete and utter annihilation of humanity. Women need to be brought to their knees
>>537732575No animal in the world wants to reproduce, it's something hat just happens incidentally due to sex. Humans are the only animal that knows that creampies lead to pregnancies.
Warning to all lurkers:Piping hot anti-womanic rage is a natural, and justified response to the article. But! Do not take the false path, the path of least resistance offered by MGTOW/wizards/homosexuals (all intrinsically linked (don't ask how I know))Woman is the other half of the divine creation. You MUST not amputate her like a gangrenous member. Struggle. Channel the male character, that of the builder, the shepherd, and help her climb down from the ledge and rejoin the great fight against entropy, material and spiritual.
OP intentionally left out the ending of the study which outright said if women don't start breeding them feminism is the worst mistake in the history of the world, and future women will not have any rights because it has proven destructive on a global scale.
This paper almost feels like it was written by a deep undercover chud trying to subtly sabotage feminism/liberalism
>>537725731Rome had a bachelor tax
It wouldn't help anyway. Women would just take the new income extracted out of men and go travel and buy more shit. Most still aren't going to want to raise children, especially on their own.I do appreciate the paper's recognition that populations from Africa and the Middle East are going to roll back feminism once they demographically replace everyone in the West.
>>537725695>post-automation futurelol, "AI will solve fertility"lmaohow? by making 50% of the population unemployed?
>>537732390Perfect body type
>>537733893This existence of a marital tax break already implies there's a bachelor's tax by default.
Fucks sake. JUST LET THE POPULATION GO DOWN. If people aren't breeding, that's fine. We can let the population go down to half or a quarter of what it is now.
>>537725731>womb technologyFUCKING LOLIt's a fucking checklist of every pipe dream technocratic solution to the fertility problem. First "AI will solve the economy" now "we will have artificial wombs so women won't have to get pregnant".Even if artificial wombs were ready for reproduction TODAY it wouldn't solve the demographic collapse that is coming
>>537730822There is NO, and again I repeat NO:>GREATER MALE HEIGHT HYPOTHESIS Nature, The Lord God, NEVER EVER SELECTED for greater male height. It never happened. Nature Selects Little Men.Satanists FEEEL (ideologically) that they know better than The Lord God, and defer to the female gaze as the supreme truth. At the same time as you say that female preference is purely the tesult of propaganda. Still, you think Giants are more deserving of Love than Little Boys and Men. Why? Because of MURDER AND CANNIBALISM AND INFANTICIDE is justified through the self same:Moral Relativism, Service To Self Materialist Hierarchicalism, and Soicalized Darwinianisms.All of history is Little Men DESTROYING the hybrid Giants that Women tried to cuck THE LORD GOD by. But you want more of your body that dies and the soiciet organized pyramidally by stature idolatry and psychopathy violence bluffing, becauase these are what are the height of the expression of Logos, right. This is what you are arguing by merely stating that short is toxic in the same manner that the fat are literally toxic. Good luck, idolaters!
Historically, 28% of men have reproduced, while 89% of women have.Today, we got that up to like 65% of men. But that's like a huge abberration in historic terms. Realistically that 28% of fit men is your breeding stock males. The rest are just for war or work or something
>>537734505ok. it will go down to 0%.
>>537725516>Implement laws which destroy the meaning of marriage and turn it into a laughable contract that destroys the lives of men to make Jewish law firms rich.>Encourage women to be sluts for a century.>Create dating apps that capitalize on people being single by matching women with pump and dump males>Remove economic opportunities and advancement for young men.>Import infinity shit skins making it economically impossible to make a family....>We need more laws against men being single!These people can't run a society in any meaningful way.You made laws and economic policies which made family planning and marriage into a game of money grabbing Jewish losers.And your solution? Remove the destructive policies? NOOOOO. We need to make it even worse by adding more laws while not reversing the previous damages!I'm convinced that all societies end in retarded laws that are never undone that end up becoming so corrosive to society that people stop giving a fuck and end up in a civil war.
Women's flagrant chadsexuality has permanently destroyed gender relations. There's no coming back from this. It's over.
>>537734511Artificial wombs will allow men to have children without needing a woman. They can marry a robot instead.
>>537734457What the paper puts forward is not just the Rome-style bachelor tax though, the suggestion here to to fund a massive income pool for all women, even ones who don't have any kids. Their theory is that all women (even ones who are childless) collectively having access to all of men's income would make them more willing to individually reproduce, and also to provide them enough income if need to be to allow them the option of being a full-time single mother and not have to work if they don't want to (and provide socialized "it takes a tribe" services to ones who do want to work).
>>537734856Artificial wombs do not exist, and there is no sign of them coming into existence in the foreseeable future. Demographic collapse is already in motion. If this tech ever gets off the ground (which I doubt) it will arrive too late.
>>537734505If population go down then infinite growth stop though :(
>>537734713Hypergamy was always a thing. The invention of the smart phone and social media basically turned the local chad in her neighborhood to being part of a chad harem globally. This completely unleashed a caustic set of destruction on society like nothing else alone with birth control.Will they reverse this? NOOOOO we want to make it even worse by taking away money from men who aren't global chad.
>>537725516What a shit thread
>>537734958We can have some shrinkage.
>>537734505There are really not that many real incarnated people. Bugs are bugs. If they move like bugs, they are a bugs. Again, there really are not that many real individuals because the world is perhaps the greatest little g god trap ever designed. Ye are Elohim. You're an incarnate god with a body that dies, and it needs to be longer for you to be socially viable. Is it IRRATIONAL for a god to choose to be a Little Man? To women it is! To demoralized Men, it is! What would an actual body-hopping baby eating Satanist think about Stature Idolatry as the principle organizing factor of her life? Lol. Lay Satanist MOST BELOVED PERFORMANCE is framing Stature Idolatry as Misandrist Heightism as Natural. When the record bears no such conclusion but the opposite. Where are all the CLAIRVOYANT MURDEROUS CANNIBAL GIANTS that are so naturally superior as the predator of Man? HUH? DID INDIOS LITERALLY ERASE THE NEPHILIM SIZED HYBRIDS?You think they might be a little salty about losing?
>>537726322>23 pbtidor you could've greentexted a few paragraphs and posted link newfag
>>537730638More like they know their paper will never be published if they don't wring their hands and demand the enslavement of men rather than roll back women's rights.
>>537725516great work
>>537734907Its an aytempt of having your cake and eat it too. They want the insane female consumer habits while somehow increasing the birth rate. Both are incompatible. You can't have mega consumption with proper families.But its not just feminism and contraception which is aiding this crisis, it is welfare. Cut off welfare, remove contraception, remove rights of women and make society as it was (Male provides, female nurtures) you got the problem solved.Its just the unholy obsession with unlimited economic growth has us as a crossroad. Or at least those in power.
>>537734994I find the paper fascinating.It's amusing to see liberal academics acknowledge that where we have put things is civilizationally suicidal and that if it continues on its current course then that means that third world cultures that marginalize women will rise up and undo all their beloved progress. And suggest these batshit technocratic solutions that will obviously never work.
>>537725516Women need to be stripped of their rights for the survival of human civilization.
>>537725516they already incentivize women to be single moms instead of childless. It's called welfare.
>>537734969 Women only saw the 100 men in their tribe their whole lives, for all of history.
>>537735324The paper is the absolute limit of what a liberal can admit to, because it leads to, as they put it, "uncomfortable places". Which is why they talk about artificial wombs and "post-automation society" as solutions to the problem. It's desperation. The even mention how "marginalized men" are a destabilizing social force and will only worsen over time if nothing is done to address their concerns.
>>537735052But think of the poor shareholders! How are they supposed to keep flying out to a Mossad agent island to sleep with minors and get blackmailed there? Have you thought of the poor shareholders?
>>537735324They do agree that the existing structure that gives women endless freedoms is completely destructive to a functional society.But their solution instead of removing the problem is to enslave men because for some reason we need to be fine with women being complete retards spreading their legs endlessly each weekend, being creampied by random males, using social media to flaunt their sexual status and in general having zero regard for the future of their country.Somehow that's supposed to be a solution. Think about how retarded that is for one moment, and we can see why they want to cut off our access to the Internet. They'd rather the world burn for their ideology than embrace reality.
The only thing that will happen if there's a bachelor tax or if men are even further marginilized is it will push people who already have nothing to lose to some kind of action. There's no good outcome here either way. Either birth rates continue to fall or you further destabilize society in a different way.
>>537733487And what about animals that reproduce without sex?
>>537735358It's not that. There's something else going on. Hunter-gatherers tend to be relatively egalitarian, at least compared to something like 1950s America, let alone radical Islam, but the majority of their men still got to have sex.
u mean womenlolonce we can reproduceoh baby its ts fun 30 days a month
>>537725516The conclusions these retards make confirm the theory that we are under some sort of secret matriarchy that wants to enslave all men even more than before, but want to frame it as something that has to happen, or the only way it can happen. You can fix the birthrate issue with gov funded surrogates. Men that want to reproduce, but wont put up with a woman's bullshit can have kids and even the surrogates (women) would get paid. Women don't want children, and their choices prove that. Any woman that wants kids can get them now, with plenty of social services aid already. So it is men you have to look at that want to raise them alone, just like any woman could. Besides the men would be happy with a sexbot anyway.remember how South Korea was being run by a feminist-cult? its like that everywhere, only Trump somehow won when it was her turn. That might be what unironically saves the USA from feminist domination. It is like woman have some innate urge to undermine their society so a stronger one can take its place because they never had skin in the game. They just become the brides of the conquerers, and the low value women probably love that since they might improve their status.
>>537735576OK but also this is just how they are, this is how they've always been. So, can we really not come up with something better than "simply deny their nature?" I think we should let them go somewhere and starve eachother to death and build something masculine that actually makes sense elsewhere and just do a massive cull basically.
>>537735209>Its just the unholy obsession with unlimited economic growth has us as a crossroad. Or at least those in power.yes. the common people are caught between the greedy finance world and insane social engineers who would rather wreck civilization than put their failed experiment to an end.
>>537735875It's really funny if you go to the ask feminists subreddit's discussion of the paper because 90% of the comments just fixate on the title using the word "further" and don't even talk about the contents of the paper at all.
>>537733636Love your wives as Christ Loves His brideOr walk as paul and daniel both did, alone with God
>>537726189This is just desperate flailing. On an instinctual level women know how badly they've fucked up this time around; and the coming Muslim/Indian/Chinese demographic domination offers no place for them except as footstools.
>>537734398By forcing the mark of the beast, and when we get to the Kingdom of Jesus Christ in the aftermath of all that great tribulation, His kingdom is one of everlasting increase
social science is retarded everyone in that thread who pretend this is science is retarded >>537736173fuck off jonathan you insane retardJesus isn coming back
>>537736040They don't see it as marginalization. They think that 90% of men being sexless incel slaves for chad harems is the correct state of things, and anything else is evil and misogynistic.
>>537735742No it is that and we need to meme it into existence. There are no other solutions and time is running a bit short to naval gaze thinking up other ideas.
most girls are uglytake back white man moneyuglies have to be slavessimplekill all jew n boot orc too inc mik wophave king
>>537735971Well, much like the other myopic slop that is produced today by "Liberals", their solution always involves taking power for their selves, enslavement, censorship, and control.What we both know is that they will never change their adherence to their ideology and their complete destruction of the west. We know this because then they'd have to give up power that they fought tooth and nail to get.This is quite similar to Greece when Socrates was sentence to prison/death because of his teachings that didn't align with what the people in power wanted. Fundamentally there are people in this world that adhere to an ideology and are willing to kill for it when they have power in society.It seems the only realistic solution is total war with these people since they will not relinquish their power when faced with objective truths. War is the only language they truly understand.
is the solution Islam?
>>537736283There are likely no solutions, period. It's over. Take away women's rights and then what? 99% of men still don't want to be with a woman who isn't horny for him.
>>537736422No. >>537735742
>>537725516>in layman's termsIs /pol/ literally so dumb and illiterate you people can't read a scientific article?
>>537736634Why do all anons have to waste time reading a full paper when they can get notes from someone else that took snippets of excerpts? It's a waste of time if 1000 people need to read an entire book on something when 1 person can read a book and share the notes with 1000 people.
>>537725516>muh literal gender studies grievances published by cucked cambridge by raped nordic leftistsThat's nice, anon, but you gotta show flag.
>>537736422Islam will solve the birth rate crisis, but it won't solve the problem of marginalized men. It's the worst of both worlds for men and women. Women lose all their rights and freedoms and become domestic breeding stock for the most powerful men in society, the ones who own all the land and can afford to keep multiple wives and raise their many, many children.That means a lot of men are still deprived of sex or any opportunity to legally get it, or even to find relief in pornography or prostitution because such things are strictly policed in Islamic culture. Only the very rich get to flout those laws with impunity, and the way society is going, most people will be extremely poor and unemployed, and have few rights. This won't change under Islam.Think about it. Islamic cultures produce militant fundamentalist sects and terrorist groups like a garden grows weeds. Why? Because there's an abundance of frustrated young men with no purpose or direction in their society. It's easy for fundamentalist imams, Iran, or Mossad or whoever to recruit them into an ISIS or a Taliban or a Hezbollah or what have you. There's no shortage of men with no future and no prospects so there is an endless supply of willing jihadis. That's the future for America.
>>537729138Men build civilization, women destroy it
>>537725516So men become the breeding stumps? ZAMN
>>537736422It's not so much a "solution" as it is just an end state. The paper is 100% correct that if things continue in their current order then the fertility belt (which it defines as the 3rd world regions like Africa and the Middle East that actually have positive birth rates due to marginalizing women and having old world systems of reproduction like arranged marriage) will overtake western civilization, roll back women's rights, and will define feminism/female choice as a huge mistake that caused our downfall in their history books.
>>537736914The future outlined by this paper is half utopian pipe dream and half feminist power fantasy. It refuses to acknowledge the far more likely alternatives of incel uprisings or hostile cultures overtaking the native feminist culture of the US after demographic collapse sets in.
>>537736988If there's an incel uprising then it will be for state paid cosmetic surgery for those who are below average looking.
>>537725516How are they going to transfer resources from men who have absolutely no reason to gather resources? No women, men reluctantly go Nintendo. No Nintendo? Men go innawoods or innanoose assuming they don't an hero. It's funny how all these big ideas rest on trying to extract blood from a stone.
>>537736988Incel uprising is insanely unlikely. Your latter option is nearly a certainty. It's just Rome and the Germanics all over again.
>>537737107>"If you don't work to support chad's harem, you'll have no house, no healthcare, and you'll starve to death."
>>537737107>How are they going to transfer resources from men>
kingteen girl slaves n castlesjew n orc gone inc mik wop
I have always been willing to fuck women and if I had a woman I would support her, but no women want to fuck me so I wont support any women. If they intend to tax me to support women who refuse to fuck me then I'm just not going to pay taxes anymore. Those bitches don't deserve anything from me because they rejected me and now I hate them and I would rather die than give them a penny.
>>537737288You know what I meant.Even if it's not written history, they will just basically say that the evil degenerate West fell because they let their women get uppity.
>>537729447I'll be happy to do so if they do it again, they want me to go die I'll take a few with me before I die.
>>537737107Even if you made money in cash, they will just print it and give it to single women raising ogres thereby making life even worse.
>>537737055>>537737214I'm using Incel here as a shorter way of referring to what the paper calls "marginalized men", which is a much, much broader category than bitter, terminally online spegs who worship looksmaxing influencers. Currently there's not enough reason for marginalized men to rebel, but it's actively getting worse, and more and more men are slipping into that marginalized status. I don't believe our leaders are going to do absolutely nothing as we slide into demographic collapse. They're going to try SOMETHING. And that something is virtually guaranteed to marginalize even more men, and to make the lives of marginalized men even worse. There is already simmering resentment about the current social order, what happens when you turn up the heat on that already simmering anger? It boils over. Currently, it's just the occasional mass shooter. 99.99% of incels are harmless, distracted by their porn and video games. What happens when incels can't even afford video games anymore due to chip shortages and inflation making the hobby unaffordable to most of them? When pornography is restricted by online IDs? When unemployment becomes the norm for marginalized men, yet they are made financially responsible for the Brave New World of universal welfare for women? Mark my words, if even a fraction of the proposed ideas in this paper are enacted there will be violence, as more and more men reach that point where it's not worth it to keep going along with the system. I myself am barely above that threshold, I can skate by right now. It would only take a couple more things to make me start investing my remaining personal wealth into weapons and planning who I take with me.
It's really funny that society thinks we owe them anything after they've systematically fucked us for our entire lives. Maybe I'm just not interested in keeping your shitty society functional anymore since I never benefitted from it.
>>537725516>continue doing the thing we’re already doing>and maybe the results will changeWomen will literally forfeit all of western civilization if they have the slightest chance at not being held accountable for their choices.
>>537729447That actually sort of happened once. Some white feather feminist decided to hand a feather to a veteran who'd spent a year on the front and he had a PTSD freakout and beat her half to death. After this, the British government had to push a law through discouraging public random white featherings.
If they impose a bachelor tax I'll just identify as a good, checkmate atheists
>>537725516Again with this fucking thread? And what's the memeflag for, you're that Norwegayian yeah?
>>537737625Even goodlooking and rich men in Germany have become resentful of women
>>537737625Someday we'll be warlords, marching across the wasteland of the former USA, raping women and killing minorities. A grand rape/purge from coast to coast. They can't oppress us forever. Eventually we'll break free and take the war brides and the throats of our enemies. Like ravenous wolves we'll feast.
I idea of communes for single moms is astoundingly stupid. Sure there won't be rampant gangs, drugs, and pedophilia. We already have a great example of this: the fucking black projects in the usa.
>>537733754ThisOP is a memeflag kike. What a coincidence!
>>537736988https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mads-Larsen-14no shit it was written by a "Dr in Philosophy" sociology is a retarded domain modern sociology is just finding a way to get the conclusion you want
>>537735430The women back then also didn't get to sleep with double digits of them either, the local chad/chads of the tribe didn't fuck all lf the women of the tribe because they were kept busy with their own responsibilities, and the tribe actively policed that shit so the tribe didn't fracture
>>537725603This statement is kind of misogynist, is it not? But misogyny and truth aren't often far from each other.As once quoth Good Charlotte:>girls don't like boys, girls like cars and money
>>537726322I hope they implement this system. I've always wondered what it's like to finally just go off to live in a barrel and throw my feces at people.
>>537736089>>537736173>jewbook gobbeldygookFuck off with your jewish schizobabble, I've heard enough hebrew nonsense for one day
Thank goodness
>>537737825I almost wish the cultural reset would happen in my time even though it would be a hellish experience. Just because I'd love to see the expression on all the faces of the smug cunts who thought they could have everything and never face any consequences for their actions. I believe that if it happens (because I still see this as less likely than replacement migration causing the US to turn into a third world tribal confederation instead) it won't happen until after I'm dead or too old to enjoy it properly.
>>537738287you're going to look like brazil in under 2 generation that's basically the plan the exact sdame will happen too it's how they elect Zorhan for example they're south american for the vast majority who support communism even if they're fleeing it Thiel didn move to Argentina for no reason Patagonia wasn burned for no reasonThey're finishing the plan no matter what it take. The US is going to become openly communist (the coup is almost finished) before the end of that decade.
>>537725516>>537732339The entire thing reads like the feminist version of what communists say - "that wasn't real feminism, real feminism has never been tried". Their solution to the problems that female emancipation has caused (and they even admit, several times, that female emancipation IS the cause), is to have even MORE female emancipation, to the point where it's no longer about gender equality, it's enforced gender supremacy, but for women instead of men.God FORBID you admit that female emancipation doesn't work and we should undo it all, as all of the experiments and statistics and studies show. It's yet another example of modern "scientists" completely reversing the proper use of the scientific method - establish the conclusion you WANT to see, and then if your hypotheses keep not panning out, double down and make new ones. Modern, politicized science does not allow for negative experimental conclusions - no money for grants in those.
>>537736171Given the sexual fantasies of women, they might relish being foot stools. Notice how Muslim women so staunchly defend their way of life. It's because that way of life is more in sync with the true nature of women.
>>537733893And most Roman men refused to pay it. Or they checked out of society and became NEETs, to the point that, when the Vandals and Gauls came from the north to sack Rome, very few men lifted a hand or a sword to stop them.Ironically, we have tax breaks for married couples which functions almost identically to a bachelor tax in practice. As it turns out, there are essentially ZERO men who seek to get married just for a small tax relief. Saving a few thousand a year is not sufficient to induce men to shackle themselves and their entire fortunes to the whims of a woman. Who could have guessed.
>>537729089In the old days (like, the OLD old days) war was a way to get status and women. That is, you'd make war on a nation to take their material wealth and women as spoils. Not so anymore. The only reward is death. Therefore, the fight must be at home, that's where the spoils are.
>>537738897Your intuition is right. Western social "scientists" aren't really scientists, they're paid activists. The solutions are obvious, but they deliberately avoid them and instead propose dystopian alternatives. Anyway, at this point, the West deserves to collapse, it feels like a joke that’s gone on for far too long.
>>537734907This idea has been stated by retarded feminists before. "Bonobos have their societies organized like that! We should emulate the bonobos!"Just one problem: WE'RE NOT FUCKING BONOBOS. Human males ALWAYS get a say in how society is run, and human males are EXTREMELY territorial, especially over women. Unlike bonobo males.They also forget that, in bonobo troupes, the females fuck ALL of the males, so no one male is certain that the offspring are his, hence they all contribute to all the offspring. I highly doubt that women want to fuck ALL men just so they can get communal assistance in raising their offspring, even ignoring that we have the technology to PROVE who the father is.They want to have their cake and eat it too. Typically feminine thought process.
>>537726322What a stupid conclusion haha the authors must be women because hot damn is this a delusional take.
>>537729661This isnactually really sad to learn. Maybe women are afraid or intimidated by intelligent men? Maybe, since that's what they always say of men to women; it's projection.>>537737723Basado y rojopildora
>>537739308This is why the warlords of the future will have such an easy time recruiting soldiers. All I would have to do is promise my army of angry men, that they are allowed, no, encouraged, to rape.The USA has such a hard time recruiting because all a US soldier has to look forward to is getting his limbs blown off by a drone while his wife fucks several black dudes back home. But my army would be taking women and making new child soldiers at an alarming rate.
>>537739537Most male bonobos never reproduce.
>>537728007I just found out, how tf is surrogacy banned? Governments go to such great lengths to ensure non-chads can't pass on their genes.
>>537739683It won't work that way since most men only want horny enthusiastic consensual sex and see reluctant sex as humiliation. It's primal human instinct.
The one sure thing in all this is women are retarded and everything and anything they attempt to do will fail. So that's a nice white pill.
>>537733636Yep. Women are like a force of nature to be tamed.>>537734710Thus isn't a mistake, it's the end goal from the start. And it was targeted to the west because (((they))) (the Jews, in case it's not clear) have a longstanding belief that "whites" are "Amalek", who need to be eradicated so the Messianic Era can begin.To them, it is an absolute "us or them". So too must it be to us.
>>537739955>I just found out, how tf is surrogacy banned? Governments go to such great lengths to ensure non-chads can't pass on their genes.No idea, I am planning to go for mid eastern women because these places are less cucked. I am thinking Turkey or Morocco
>>537729213
>>537739993This is so stupid you must be a woman. Rape is the norm in history, not the exception. Whenever a city was consequered mass rape and enslavement of the population was always the first outcome.
>>537725516oooooo thank youI'm gonna save them all (the images)fuck modern woman
>>537740315they're already available in your discord
>>537739754Correct. But they get pity sex from the females after theyre already knocked up with BonoChad's nuggets, so at least the betas are getting something out of it. The females do this because to not do so would fracture their entire monkey "culture" of communal childcare.Human females are, let's call it "unlikely", to give pity sex to Fat Norman, so ol' Norman Normie has absolutely fuck-all reason to watch Stacey's kids for her.
>>537725516Chad will always have kids and incels can seethe about it but won't change it
>>537739993Anything that can be fetishized will be fetishized. The instinct for it will awaken within. It already has for women (see: all fem erotica). And those women who don't want to be raped will pair off with soldiers for protection. Foundationally, that's why such relationships formed to begin with.
>>537740433Not enough kids to matter apparently. Oh well, human extinction is probably a good idea because we've demonstrated that we're an evil species through and through.
>>537740167It's been common against enemy forces as a form of brutality and humiliation against them, not for sexual fulfillment. If you told a sexless incel to go out and rape the enemy, and then he did so, there would still be a hole in his heart that could only be filled by a woman enthusiastically creaming on his dick.
>>537740347>they're already available in your discordwhat the fuck does that mean pajeet?
>>537739683That was the historical standard for conquering armies, yes - loot, rape, pillage, and terrorize the enemy. Take their resources and their women and leave nothing but ashes in your wake.As nationalism became an idea in Europe though, and we needed a more unified idea to rally around, the idea of barbarism against your neighbors was disfavored. We made war more "civilized", more of a sport or a game between rulers. The idea of a German and a Frenchman having a blood feud for generations was not conducive to European unity.Non-Whites have no such compunctions against such behavior. Warlords in Africa get huge numbers of volunteers, not just because the alternative is death or starvation, but because being a soldier for a warlord means you get to rape and plunder all you like. I can't say that I favor your idea of letting armies off the leash and going full nigger, but I also can't deny that you would get a LOT of fresh, young, bloodthirsty, horny recruits.
>>537740677>mexican calling someone a pajeet the fuck is the difference between you and a pajeet? the amount of peoples you guys decapitate to protect your fentanyl market? fucking brown animal pretend he's white everyday to hate white women
>>537740654>enthusiastically creaming on his dickWomen's top sexual fantasy is being raped. Some crazy high number, like 60% of women, have this fantasy.If Irving Incel went out and raped a woman, she WOULD "enthusiastically cream on his dick". She wouldn't have a choice - it's biological and instinctual. Women were always raped when a city or tribe was conquered, historically speaking. The ones that resisted or refused to go along with the conquerors were enslaved or put to death immediately and didn't pass on those genes. Getting wet for the idea of being raped has been instinctively programmed into most women.I'm not joking. That most women are not raped and will never be raped in these modern times is an anomaly, not the historic norm. I'm not saying rape is good, I'm not moralizing this, I'm just telling you how this works.
>>537740777yeah right post your hand I bet is brown as hell
>>537740995>Women's top sexual fantasy is being raped.BY CHAD. They post their rape fantasies online, go read them and you'll see that it's always either some gigachad guy or, at the very least, some hulking "ugly bastard" type of character who's genetic elite in every way except facial aesthetics.
>>537726122>>537726162You always have to be prepared for the blowback to overall patterns but women are legitimately too stupid and worthless to understand, which is of course why they never should have been allowed to vote in the first place.
>>537741055sorry I don't have an inferiority complex that compel me to post on a dead site about how the women of another race should behave I'm more of a leave me alone kind of guy you know. Now that you want to talk about it, when is Mexico stopping it's child pornography production and tourism problem? Gringos pay big cash to rape your daughter and you brown filth don't say a fucking word about it because you're owned by jewery and mafiosi. You're so inflated with western countries you even think you belong to it. If you can judge white women I'm going to judge your women. Filthy fucking race of born criminals with no respect for life whatsoever that ruin everything it touch.
>>537741227The problem with your reduction is the significantly high reported orgasms by victims of rape.
I dont know how its gonna happen, but will be denigrated even harder then we are now. There are no brakes on this train
>>537729089This bitch cant even regulate her own body temperature
>>537725516Useless parasite men are real mad about being cut loose and not given handouts
>>537741429They don't even cum during rape as often as they cum during consensual sex, and when they do, it's probably because the rape is being committed by some chad.
>>537741515>Useless parasite menWomen let deadbeat unemployed chads live with them for free.
>>537741979Keep coping, parasite
>>537741227They would prefer Chad, yes. But their biology doesn't know the difference between Chad and an incel - all it knows is "penis in vagina feel good".And, in some ways, doesn't the incel rapist become Chad, in a manner of speaking? Chad takes what he wants, incel rapist is doing the exact same thing as Chad. What's the difference? You see smoking hot chicks with ugly-ass brutes all the time. Chad is not just aesthetics, Chad is a state of mind, an entire package of behaviors. Why do you think girls cream over twinky vampires, hairy, snarling werewolves, charming mummies (Anne Rice has several books about these), giant fucking minotaurs, etc.? It's not because they're monsters. It's not about the aesthetics, or it wouldn't be such a wide range of aesthetics. It's about the archetype, the Alpha, the conqueror, the beast, the brute. Incel rapist raping her is channeling that archetype.
>>537739955You just answered your own question.
>>537725516>to conclude that having children alone makes for a better lifewhy these dumb cunts think they are entitled to my sperm?
>>537725516>But in case of WWIII you will voluteer yourself, Anon?
>1960's>Sex, drugs, rock&roll strategy. Women slept with every man they saw to make sure they didn't vote against them. Drugs flowed like water. The music was enough to dance to and left an impression on men back then>2016'sRefusal for sex, fentanyl, and rap music strategy. The left became aggressive and threatening to force votes out of young men. Failed. Women teased virgin men and thought they could control them. Failed. Drugs are so strong that they kill people on contact. Leftists are the main victims. Rap music is so shit nobody likes it. Why did it all change?
