Climate change isn't r-ACK
>>537756307this is just another graph depicting temperature data that is widely understood to be rigged and tampered withhttps://noaacrappy.substack.com/p/fudge-factors-revealed
>>537756307Funny how every single historical temperature record "adjustment" changed the data to make the recent past hotter and the distant past cooler, perfectly aligning with the climate scam narrative.What are the odds?
>>537756307Americans are manipulating the weather together with the Chinese
We’re literally in an ice age you fucking nigger. No matter how much you cry about humans accelerating it, the earth was always going to get hotter
>>537756307It's real.
>>537756557Why do you believe this person over the other persons who say it's not?
>>537756557>>>/x/
>>537756307Show moar.Like, the past 1000 years.
I love how retarded /pol/ is.
>>537756769That one is saying I don't need to pay more taxes.
>>537756747>the earth was always going to get hotterCorrect, the point is that we're ACCELERATING the rate of change which may mean bio adaptation cannot keep up leading to ecosystem destruction/change that has large effects on human's ability to survive.
Even in 10 years when we're all suffering horribly the same retards will be spouting the same old shit.
Earth needs to get way hotter though. Europe is cold in winter and I don't like it
>>537756307Now go back 1,000,000 years.
>>537756769>Why do you believe this person over the other persons who say it's not?genuinely don't understand your questionnoaa publishes two temperature records. raw and adjustedif you compare the two, you can extract the adjustment graph by yearso for some reason, noaa says that temperature readings from 1903 need to be adjusted downward by over 0.8Cwhile temperature readings from 2019 need to be adjusted up by over 0.5Cthis isn't a question of belief. it's a question of why did noaa screw around with the raw temperature data to make it look like it's warming and then tell everyone it's warming?
>>537756307Such pretty color!
>>537756854You can accept the data and objective reality while rejecting communist solutions. To reject obviously correct data because "muh taxes" makes you look retarded, like the tail is wagging the dog, and destroys your credibility and therefore your ability to effect change.
>>537756816I don't, the average conservative actually believes conspiracy theories about why climate change isn't real, despite overwhelming evidence that it is. Even conservative parties nowadays admit climate change is real, they just refuse to concede that it's man made. They've moved the goalposts to admit the phenomenon is really happening, just to avoid taking responsibility. But the average conservative voter is still too dumb to admit what the parties they support are now happy to admit
>>537756866good, acceleratehuman suffering brings me divine joy
>>537756792does comparing charts seem like some aztec shape shifting reptile stuff to you?or are you just pretending to think that because for some reason you don't want people to look closely at the temperature data
>>537756965>obviously correct dataFUCK OFF FAGGOT
>>537757012Sure why not on both accounts.>>>/x/
>>537756929>for some reason, noaa says that temperature readings from 1903 need to be adjusted downward by over 0.8Cwhile temperature readings from 2019 need to be adjusted up by over 0.5CI bet you lots of money you can read the justification for those practices (if they're even real) in the scientific papers rather than just be bewildered forever based on some fags blog.
I hope the sun nukes the earth, so all these retards die and shut the fuck up about their dumb bullshit. I hate human beings so much now it's unreal. This entire planet needs to die. The sun needs to end the whole show. Fuck all of humanity. Worthless sex-addled retards that whine and bitch and get fat and do nothing good for the universe at large.
>>537757088>you can read the justification for those practicesi prefer to thinkyou can think, too. what reasons come to your mind that might justify it?
>>537757005Agree, I don't care it's accelerating, I think we can deal with it. But it is happening, that's why insurance rates of beach front properties in places like Florida are skyrocketing.
>>537756979>broooo look at this cherry picked data, we need to import infinite thirdies and pay infinite taxes to jews!!
IT'S OVERhttps://rumble.com/vlrjqq-beyond-thunderborg.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_v
>>537757139I'd literally have to read them, why would I speculate? Link some studies that show these adjustments and we can take a look.
>>537756307Why is climate change bad? What makes you think the climate shouldn't change?
>>537757127Unironically this. Vast majority of people are so fucking braindead there is no saving things. "The panda that won't fuck to save its species" is a very apt description, as cringe as it may be.
>>537756747This is true. Historically, ice caps on the planet are less common than not having ice caps. Them melting is a return to the average. And them melting means the earth warming is also expected.The real issue is that humanity grew in this cycle during this ice age. Meaning areas where populations have boomed beyond their ability to sustain themselves exist. And if anything disrupts the ability for those populations to be fed will create another wave of starving hoards like the bronze age collapse did.But our governments exist to distract from these facts and to extract wealth and to attempt to create isolated areas which the kikes and shadows that control the world can hopefully hold out in.
>>537757213>Link some studies that show these adjustmentsspoken like a true braindead leftyif you can't read the post i linked, i have no confidence you could read anything else
>>537757316Holy shit. Read something other than people who agree with you.RATE. RATE. RATE OF CHANGE.
>>537757152Oh, an expert in ecofaggotry. Why dont you fuck off back to your youtube channel?
>>537756557but everyone old enough remembers when things were cooler, more snow on the ground, etc
>1pbtid faggot OPWhy is OP even alive?Is this not evidence the god of abraham is a no-show?
>>537757353I see no papers linked in your blog. Only some rando analyzing raw data he knows little about.>Braindead leftyLol, Heil Hitler fuck the kikes and niggers and I denounce the talmud.
>>537757423sure. but like everyone points out, getting warmer is good for humansabout nine times as many people die from cold each year as heatmost of earth's history was spent at vastly higher co2 levels and temperaturei mean, it's obviously true to say that the climate is changing. that's why they settled on "climate change"what i want to fight about is the notion that anything unprecedented is happening. it's notthere's nothing remarkable going on with the climate in any waypeople can only think otherwise by ignoring most of earth's history
>>537757328I want people to live in terror. I want them to face the obliteration of the earth. I want them to know that they're about to get nuked and there's nowhere to run or hide. No escape, just guaranteed hellfire. The sun would be the most BASED GOD if it did this in my lifetime. Kill them all, and make them absolutely terrified there's no escape, and only death is coming. NUKE US ALL. BLESS US WITH YOUR HOLY HYDROGEN AND HELIUM!
>>537757365All truly white men appreciate nature and thrive innawoods.
>>537757539>Only some rando analyzing raw datarandos analyzing raw data with open source is the actual gold standard for science
>>537757587Holy shit it really is you? Okay I admit some stuff on your channel is pretty good. Keep going
>>537757356What makes you think humans can't adapt to the rate of change?
>>537756578They interpolate temperature data for spots they have no readings for by picking known hot spots like cities and inserting averaged values. Knowing well that rural regions are mostly cooler than urban regions.All climate charlatans deserve to be tarred and feathered!
>>537756307We are still in a cooling if you look at the whole weather map. But you need to be smart to know this
>>537756307Zoom out faggot
>>537757557>climate change isn't real>actually it is real but it's not a big dealwhy does this line of argument sound so familiar
>>537756307The climate IS change. The medieval ages had both a medieval warm period and a little ice age
>>537756965>obviously correct dataKek. Good shit
>>537756307It's currently 64F todayLast year today it was 105F
>>537756307These liars just can't help themselves I guess. 1930's were hottest on record
>>537756307Why is there still tons of records from early days of temperature record keeping that are 50+ years old then
>>537756866> we're ACCELERATING the rate of changeThere is no proof for this.Try to formulate your theory in such manner that it become falsifiable or else it's nothing but unscientific rubbish like astrology.
>>537758353it's trivially true to say that the climate is changingeverything is always changingnobody can point to anything that isn't changingso the question is, how harmful is a bit of warming for humans?answer: it's mostly helpfulbut that answer doesn't work for grifters who want to scam a bunch of money based on a "crisis" that only they are able to detect
>>537756307Wasn't there literally a mass death event from how much fucking cold and blizzards we got earlier this year? Weather =/= climate kiketard
>>537757571>words words wordstrannys can't meme
>>537758517I hate those fucks with a passion and want them raped and murdered.
Climate change is real, and it's anthropogenic, but it's not from "carbon emissions" or whatever.It's from weaponized weather warfare. There are unnatural weather patterns all over the world because at the very least the US, Russia, and China are actively involved in manipulating weather patterns to gain advantage over one another.>gee I wonder why all these countries have massive high atmospheric plasma heating arrays and why the weather is getting hotter>wow I wonder why the US Air Force published materials claiming they will have full control over global weather patterns by 2020 at the latest>guess I should pay that carbon tax for Mr. Shekelstein!The public climate change shit is literally just to cover up for mass scale weather manipulation on the part of great powers, and pass the buck onto the average wagie so governments can put in stronger economic controls.The climate is YOUR FAULT, poor people! It's hot outside and YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD ABOUT YOURSELVES! Now get in the cuckshed and eat the bugs, wagie!
>>537756307shouldnt there be a record low and high for each year? wtf is this graph?
>>537756979> Programme of the European UnionI rather see the raw data and the documentation of how it was collected than some fancy bar chart colored like a fire for the dramatic impression.
>>537756307NooooooO!!!!!! it's the sUn!!11!!!!!!!1 it's a conspiracy to make us pay more taxes!1!!!!!
>>537756307According to the GloBULL Warmists, we should already be dead.
>>537759020Ok? The data is all available for you to look at. Your taxes paid for it after all: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/datasets/reanalysis-era5-single-levels?tab=download
>>537758955The bar chart is probably supposed to show the deviation from a calculated mean. It could be as low as fractions of one degree. We can't tell without caption and scale.
>>537756866abloobloobloo
>>537757615It's absolutely not. You're confusing the idea that anyone can make a scientific observation with adequate justification and experimental rigor with....random retards charting data points with no underlying understanding of the raw data and it's limitations.
>>537757747I have no idea who you're talking about.
>>537756979WOW 1.5C we literally gonna meltwhere can i pay more taxes to change the weather, boss?
>>537756307But I don’t own the planet why do I care?
>>537758044>Can't adaptNothing, I think we can, I'm saying that's where the concern and alarm is coming from and that it is a legitimate concern that I believe we can adapt to. It's just dumb to deny the facts because it harms your ability to be in power and enact the appropriate solutions, which are not "decarbonization" nor "degrowth".
>>537759396The point is that its speeding up you dumb shit. And every degree of warming has serious implications for sea levels, temperature extremes in summer, natural disaster frequency, atmospheric CO2 levels all of which make the planet increasingly hostile to human life. Fucks sake the average conservative is not smart
>>537758502So what exactly will slow the warming down until it stops being "beneficial"?
>>537759310blah blah blah, word saladhow'd you get so well-trained to avoid using your own mind?turn your own brain back on and then get enough of a dick (courage) to actually use it
>>537759396you can't BUT you and millions of others can die in order to fix it. the core problem is there is too many fucking people on the planet. the Earth will abide and cleanse itself eventually.
>>537759459>sea levelshe's an idiot>increasingly hostile to human lifehe's a super-idiot>>537759470look at the real history of temperature on this planet. we know about 500M years of itthe temperature changes all the time with no regard for what's good for humans
>>537759459There's no reason to believe it's speeding up rather than finding an equilibrium, if it's even real if you consider the fudge packing factors.
>>537758496>>537758496You're free to look at all the published data that shows the acceleration, it's readily available. I'm not gonna do it for you.A concern about what may come to pass and to advocate a conservative approach to climate change (reducing fossil fuel use) is a logical option. I think it's a bad option, but in the face of uncertainty it is logical to consider.
We all agree there was an ice age 11,000 years ago, and for some reason the earth naturally got warmer. So how much natural warming and cooling of the earth is going to happen without humans being a factor at all? Quite a lot if we can move out of an ice age before any suvs or plastic factories existing anywhere on earth, surely.
>>537759309Totally.
>>537757332Where are these isolated areas? I guess Greenland and Siberia? The Soviet Jewish oblast that was promised to them 6 gorillion years ago?
>>537759135> Terms of use> CC-BY licence> You must accept the terms before submitting this request.> Login/register to accept licencesThey are not making it particularly easy.I wonder what the terms of use may be.
THE CLIMATE HAS CHANGE FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS, AND THAT'S WHY IT'S NOT LONGER CALLED "GLOBAL WARMING">THE CLIMATE HAS CHANGE FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS, AND THAT'S WHY IT'S NOT LONGER CALLED "GLOBAL WARMING"THE CLIMATE HAS CHANGE FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS, AND THAT'S WHY IT'S NOT LONGER CALLED "GLOBAL WARMING">THE CLIMATE HAS CHANGE FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS, AND THAT'S WHY IT'S NOT LONGER CALLED "GLOBAL WARMING"THE CLIMATE HAS CHANGE FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS, AND THAT'S WHY IT'S NOT LONGER CALLED "GLOBAL WARMING">THE CLIMATE HAS CHANGE FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS, AND THAT'S WHY IT'S NOT LONGER CALLED "GLOBAL WARMING"
>>537758044>adjust to le ebin rate of changeit's literally just pressing the "temp down" button on my AC unit's remote control lol
>>537759471You get a stream of raw data with little context and poor background understanding and you think you can use it to learn something? I smell an arrogant retard.
>>537756307Fake and gay.They measured the temperature during the day, but during night it's cooler.
>>537759661braindead lefty thinks there's special context needed to compare raw temperature data and an altered copy of that data
>>537759354Kek alrighty boss. Just be more careful next time if this makes you nervous. It was just a wild guess anyway, nothing deep
>>537758208Actually, they adjust areas that were "citified" downward, because they know buildings and pavement generate more heat than rural houses and nature and it would misrepresent heat rises in certain areas that were citified/industrialized near weather stations. Even says so in the very article you responded to that he didn't post a link to. I'll give you the link the other guy omitted because he's a headline reading faggot who doesn't actually read articleshttps://abcnews.com/US/noaa-adjusts-historical-weather-data/story?id=118987611
>>537759765>Actually, they adjust areas that were "citified" downwardwhat's actually the correct thing to do with temperature data from a measurement site that's clearly experiencing urban heat island effect?it's simply to omit that station.that's what would be done if there was no agendainstead, they include it and then do closed-source adjustments that allegedly compensateit's ridiculous
>>537759459>lefty grifters suddenly care about human life when it helps them extract more taxeshmm
>>537759758If the raw data was collected in specifically warm areas created by cities and concrete, would that be relevant? Would that change your interpretation of the raw data? Yes. Ok, what other myriad circumstances other than that might matter? A lot? Oh. Fuck. Well I guess the raw data isn't enough and you need some expertise to even know what to look for.
>>537759764Can I link it, Id like to watch.
>>537759903you cant polish a turd. if you got shit data in the beginning then your results will be shit. no matter how much "adjusting" you do lolbut hey, at least there's grant money and sweet over-taxation in it
>>537759607>CC-BYPretty much the most permissive license that exists. You got your raw data, now shut the fuck up
>>537759869No. You'd cross it against other weather stations in the area to find what effect urbanization had on the heat and then downwardly adjust it from there. These weather stations aren't 150mi apart. They're 15mi apart. You aren't getting a drastic temperature difference in a situation like that unless you're along a coast with a microclimate.Regardless, the point stands that they actually adjust this data DOWNWARD instead of using to say "omg global warming guis"
>>537756307>its hot in europe in summer>AIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE GLOBAL WARMING EAT THE BUGSIt's been very pleasant in the midwest this June, the coolest it's been in a long time.
>>537759550> data that shows the accelerationHow does it prove the causality of:> we're ACCELERATING?It could be nature as it had been in the past.It's not plausible to assume that nature stopped causing climate change just because of human activity.So how much % is nature and how much is human activity?"Man-made" means 100% human which is absolutely ludicrous.
>>537759903to compare two lists of numbers, you don't even need to know what the numbers areyou can see how the two lists are differentthat third list of numbers is the adjustmentsthen, looking at the adjustments, you can think about why those adjustments were allegedly necessarywhy do temperatures further in the past need to be cooled more? why do recent temperatures need to be warmed more? we can think about thatthose of us with working brains can think about it, i mean. not you>>537760077>they actually adjust this data DOWNWARD instead of using to say "omg global warming guis"they adjust the past downward and the present upwardthat is exactly how you would make it look like it was warming when it wasn't, or exaggerate warming
>>537759659Based.Although another concern is rapid climate change causes historical bread basket regions to dry up, causing famine mostly in equatorial areas populated by browns, which means they're gonna want to migrate to white areas and white women will want to let them in. They do that now and there's no real famine, it's going to require iron will and a strong hand to stop it when people are actually starving to death. I think we can do it, but it's not gonna be easy.
>>537756307They probably just started measuring the temperature differently.
>>537759924Sigh. I guess I was wrong then, I concede.
>>537759470It doesn't have momentum. It won't just keep going up to a billion degrees.
ITT 60 IQ retards who don't realise that climate change is going to cause jeets to flood the planet and thus any climate change denier is a Jeet flood advoctateKill. All. Jeetflooders. Total jeetflooder death. Roundhouse kick jeetflooders into the sun
>>537759970Germanon, I respect your people's history, but you're a moron. Grant money does not make researchers rich. If a scientist wants to make bank they work for a private company producing data that justifies whatever practice makes the corporations the most money, not NOAA where you get paid ass.
>>537760320Also ITT: 60iq retards who think 2 sensors replaced 20 years apart will provide the same data and you can just plug them in to replace them without historical normalisation. KekNeetbrains on full display
>>537759470eventually some major ocean currents will slow or even stop completely and this will likely cause the glaciers to come back, which will fix the issue. this isn't helpful at all to humans since many major cities will be uninhabitable. Earth will take care of itself one way or another.
>>537760161>why do temperatures further in the past need to be cooled more? why do recent temperatures need to be warmed more? we can think about thatGreat point. Where is that in your blog? Nowhere.Where does that info actually exist? In the papers scientists publish. You can read them, you don't have to read someone's blog. You'd have to learn a lot of technical jargon and mathematics to actually understand but you could do it. You're choosing not to, which is why you've linked a blog.
>>537760420>2 sensors replaced 20 years apart will provide the same data and you can just plug them in to replace them without historical normalisationah yes, the mysterious time dilation effects of thermometersthank you for reminding us that people of the past didn't know how to read a thermometeror maybe we weren't really sure what a degree F was a hundred years agoit's very similar to how people of the past couldn't read tide gauges and weren't sure how big an acre waspeople of the past being utter imbeciles is the basis for modern climate science
>537760320>537760420They're not sending their best!
>>537760256Yup, pls link tho. I'd like to watch. It's not potholer54 is it?
>>537760513Im not reading all that, you've clearly never worked with any sensors in any technical capacity, just put the groceries in the bag.
>>537760507how about you just explain like i'm five why it makes sense to cool temperature readings from the past and warm temperature readings from the present
>>537760320Implying jeets wont do that anyway? The solution is to close the borders, not bothering western nations with stupid eco bullshit when the majority of world pollution COMES FROM ASIA ANYWAY
>>537760513>mysterious time dilation effectsWhat kind of thermometers? Some degrade and need calibration regularly, some don't, which thermometers were used in your studies? Do you know?
>>537760626>you've clearly never worked with any sensors in any technical capacityplease explain the technical sensors that were taking temperature measurements across the US in the early 1900si'd like to hear how they were different from "thermometers"
>>537759903>>537759758We know that the data wasn't collected with the exact same reproducable methods from 1850 to date in all regions and spots.The methods were changed quite often due to technology advancing. This is rather comprehenisble.But no serious physicist would compare data that was collected with different methods and conclude anything from it.Only certain "climate researchers" do this charlatanry.
>>537760671>We know that the data wasn't collected with the exact same reproducable methods from 1850 to date in all regions and spots.Duh>methods were changed quite often due to technology advancing. Obviously, technology advances> no serious physicist would compare data that was collected with different methods and conclude anything from it.Wrong, you can easily calibrate one method to another, and then you could check it with a 3rd method, say ice cores, and confirm your calibration adjustment.
not enough graphs in this thread
>>537760634Can any ody provide evidence to this claim that they're simply reducing past temperatures and increasing recent temperatures?Without normalisation how do you intend for sensors to deal with station/sensor relocation, instrumentation and technological changes (mercury replaced by electronic sensors), adjustments in observation time and the endless march of urbanisation building gigantic concrete heat sinks near weather stations. And that's before we even address the fact that well enough can still cause quality and data issues.It's patently obvious that there's very few people in this thread that have ever worked with any sensor, I hope you can provide an actual informed response
>>537760250They will say they "adjusted" for the change of the methods which is an euphemism for rigging the data.They cite data as "evidence" that they fabricated. This is no "science" this is quackery.
>>537760849>it's the sun, I swear it iswhere are the proofs niggers?
>>537756307These other website screenshots are getting lazy.
>>537760670What kind of thermometer? Thermocouple, thermistor, mercury, gas/liquid? Was the dissimilar metal of the thermometer rated for the temps it was measuring? Where is that documented? A thermometer is not a thermometer is not a thermometer.
>>537760849>>537760929>post the rest of the graph!you mean like this?
>>537760887>Can any ody provide evidence to this claim that they're simply reducing past temperatures and increasing recent temperatures?it's not a claim, it's a factjust go download the datahttps://noaacrappy.substack.com/p/starting-to-digpicrel is the year-based adjustments being done to the raw datain other words, the entire 1.5C of claimed warming is due to adjustments
>>537760849>>537760929>>537760996>the sea level isn't rising!
>>537761066the thread is now being flooded by a mega retard
>>537760849>>537760929>>537760996>>537761066>but why would anyone shill against climate science?
>>537760670I'm going to offer you a good faith answer but first I want to gauge whether you're talking out of your assSo before we discuss "sensor normalisation," can you explain which temperature sensors you believe were operating across the U.S. weather network in 1900? Were they platinum RTDs, thermistors, thermocouples, semiconductor junction sensors, or something else? "Thermometer" isn't going to cut it here
>>537761103i was looking forward to your response about the thermometers. you're doing just fine>it's just the urban heat island effect
>>537761021"Correlation, thus causation" is not a good argument
>>537761254the iq of the thread has gone negative. bailing
>>537757423Old guy here. No, it hasn't changed a bit. I've been experiencing high temperatures my entire life and it has been more or less the same. Pictures from the nineteenth century remind me of how exactly the same it is.
>look, I posted the same set of lies over and over and over again>maybe someone will believe me this timeNo one cares.
>>537761280>Refuses to answer any questions about the sensors>Leaves the second the questions ask for specificsKek. Collect your shekels from the donation plate on your way out
>>537760996I'm not buying it.
>>537756307What's funny about this heatwave is that we all have access to all the information and yet nobody is talking about the fact that gas from a coronal mass ejection hit the earth a few weeks ago and here people are confused and surprised it's so hot. It's the sun you fuckernauts. The Sun generates 99.7% in the solar system.
>>537757423There has been more and deeper snow in my neck of the woods on a yearly basis than was the norm when I was a kid in elementary school. A single snow day in a year was a rarity, usually it would be ever 2nd or 3rd year that you'd get one or two. In the last decade there's been enough snow to shut down schools for a week based on the old standards just about every single year. And despite all-time highs a few summers ago, on average our summers have been more mild than they were when I was a kid as well. Temps overall seem to be dropping slightly compared to what was the standard in decades past. You sound like a youngfag who never paid attention to shit and has had his idea of history fed to him by grifting shysters. You should really check the yearly highs and lows for the area you live in going back a few decades. You might be surprised to find what the yearly/decade standouts were in your grandparents' time and before.
>>537761434*99.7% of the energy ...
>>537761434no one is surprised. it was predicted months ago that the projected strong el nino would make this the hottest year ever. see >>537760849
>>537756307I believe in climate change, but I dont believe in graphs like this. Also, what can we do to stop it?
>>537761586Read the communist manifesto and cut your dick off.
>>537760848> easily calibrate one method to anotherYou are not critical enough. This optimism is fatal in science.Even two measurements with the exact same method within a short span of time in the same place often yield different results.Measurements are notoriously error-prone. Methods of the past were much less accurate. Reproducing methods of the past introduces another source of error. Calibrating introduces yet another. It never ends. The more you do with data, whatever it may be, the less accurate to reality the data will become.
>>537761586the only solution is less people. the Earth will kill us off eventually. no worries.
>>537759659At a certain point, this would stop working because the thermal capacity of the outside air would be too great allow the radiator to radiate heat away from the coolant, but this is a good short term solution.
>>537761763>too greatToo little
What you're experiencing is a deviation from the norm that comes every decade or so. This is when Jews push the climate change hysteria the most. The climate change bullshit is how they leverage social controls that make them richer.
>>537761763BuT WhAt If WE vEnT ThE Hot AIr InTo SpAcE
>>537759550>You're free to look at all the published dataThe people publishing this data have been caught lying constantly to push political agendas, and they openly hate me and try to trick me about everything. There's a massive reproducibility crisis across disciplines because the publishers aren't, themselves, scientists and are just in the business of deception. Can you point us to an argument we can read on our own time that explains a mechanism for how humanity controls the weather and defeats natural cycles to cause the planet to get warmer against its will? Or an article that at least explains how we're making it significantly faster? Because I've too often dropped hours on this subject only to learn that data is outright fabricated, or that the scientists involve testify that they were coerced into publishing findings they can't justify, or that someone else wrote a paragraph into their conclusions that isn't true. So is there one you'll stake your credibility on, or just "Trust me, but don't ask me to define specifically what you're trusting me on?" Fucking tripfags should be banned.
>>537761941All we need to do is figure out what causes heat bursts then make them happen in reverse. Just have to make sure we don't overdo it and end up in a Day After Tomorrow situation though.
>>537760320>climate change is going to cause jeets to flood the planetClimate change is not what gives jeets the ability to travel or enter our countries. Nor is it the impetus. Getting away from other Jeets is their motive.
>>537756307>scale purposely omitted so you can't tell it's only a 0.1 degree change over decadesFuck off
>>537756307Climate changes all the time.That graph doesnt have any numbers on it. Just shows 1970s started in an ice age or something, although we tecnically are still in one
>>537759526>>537760282>>537760430These all assume that humans will stop burning the trapped carbon and releasing it into the atmosphere. Reminder that plants and trees used to get buried and suck carbon out of the atmosphere.Now they get burned and recycled. How exactly will the warming stop if we keep releasing trapped gasses into the atmosphere? Put it another way, how will the carbon get trapped and buried if we're disrupting that process with no end in sight?
>>537756307wait that rectangle is ... BIGGER??? AND... AND BLACK-RED???? I MEAN FUCK YOU GOT ME, TAKE MY RIGHTS! NOW!
poltards willl be delusional, but it's obvious shit is heading south, and fast
>>537761586> Also, what can we do to stop it?We tar and feather the scammers that produce graphs like that.
>>537761021So, I looked into the specific adjustment issue because I noticed the sharp flare in the last few years as well as the 100+ years ago and this is what I found out.The algorithm they use to make adjustments looks at the nearest 20-40 stations and if you're an outlier consistenty, they make an adjustment.What they don't tell you is that 100+ years ago 20-40 stations were spread over 100-200 miles.Compared to today where it's 20 miles.They are using bad interpolation to weed out what they think is noise but is actually detail.
IT'S ANELNINOYEARFAGGOTSANDSUMMERIS HOT
>>537763025lol nice swap
Ah, I get it now. This is to distract from the fact that unusual earthquake activity and heatwave is happening at the same time. Grim
>>537763287>tar and feather the scammersHello German fren. You're being far too kind. They would just become another Don Lemon.>Execute them
>>537756307Please tell me how giving my money to jews will help them change the weather!
