>The left claims that the success of children from wealthy families always comes down to their parents’ money.>A natural experiment put that idea to the test: a major lottery held in 1832 in the state of Georgia, USA.>Results:>"Sons of winners have no better adult outcomes (wealth, income, literacy) than the sons of non-winners, and winners’ grandchildren do not have higher literacy or school attendance than non-winners’ grandchildren.">Another defeat for blanks latism.https://x.com/johnthenoticer/status/2070179003764261028
>>537813178Rich dad poor dad
>>537813244
Hey, Pigface
>>537813302Toilet canon
https://x.com/whyvert/status/1301012672138285059
The idea that some individuals may be more intelligent and harder working than others is anathema to most liberals. Even worse is the idea that some of these properties may be innate across demographics.The blank slate is a critical piece of the oppression hierarchy because it removes any possibility of virtue from the successful, leaving only the poor little agency-less victims of society as the only morally good people.
>>537813178>1832 in the state of Georgia, USA.retard time in a retard statefake and gay
>>537814935>liberals hate hard work, intelligence, and meritRightoids think skin color is merit
>>537813178Dude, you're looking solely at lottery winners. They're all from the same category of people- the ones dumb enough to play the lottery. Of course the family will go back to broke after a few generations if they're lucky. Usually the people who win the lottery blow their winnings on hookers & blow within a few years.
>>537815126Thanks for your contribution.
>>537813178Well lottery tickets is a tax on stupid people so you're not comparing wealthy people with the average joe that hits a windfall, you're comparing wealthy people with stupid people that got lucky
>>537813178>The left claims that the success of children from wealthy families always comes down to their parents’ money.Oy vey that is VERY antisemitic
Ok broBy your logic we should confiscate billionaire money every time they hit a billionthey will just make another billion dollar business and recreate their wealth in a few years right?think of how good that would be for the economy lel
>>537815282Color coding is just for simple and quick identification, while it's not 100% it is fairly reliable in predicting the danger of something. It's why Hazmat uses various symbols to quickly identify hazards, animals in the wild also have devoloped colors to warn others they are dangerous, humanoids also have colors to show how savage they are and how much of a threat they are to more civilized humans. Some pale humans even adopt bright hair colors to show they are dangerous to be around or interact with.
>>537815290>in which nearly every adult white male in Georgia took part>>537815865It was a land lottery.
>>537815282>>537815282The fuck are you talking?Literally the slogan for lefties is diversity is our strength (and even call a basketball team with only negroes as extremely diverse)People are hired on diversity policies by their skin color (and yes you can even get rejected because of it). If you are black you basically get a free pass to college and job even if you are 70ile
>>537816152Dumb post.
>>537813178also dont forget, white children from poor families perform better than black children of rich families.and the twin studies that had twins split between poor and rich families, who performed the same.and also studies of white kids adopted by black parents performed better than black kids adopted by white parents.
>>537816373this is actually proven to be true.rich people have often lost everything, then rebuilt it from the ground up.the only people struggling for money are cogs or useless people. I have not met a single good intelligent person truly struggling. it is only trash.
>>537815282i mean, black people are far more dangerous than any other color of person.so nature seems to found a way to warn us.
>>537815282>Rightoids think skin color is meritWhat would you call it then? Does history not matter? All above as is below? Retard.
>>537814935Plenty of people recognize that some people are smarter and work harder. The point is that that isn’t directly correlated with wealth. I know plenty of smart people who are broke and plenty of hard workers that can barely make ends meet. The truth is that sociopathic tendencies combined with hard workers or intelligence determine success.
What they refuse to say:>Merit may be lost via poor breeding choices.
>>537819225>this is actually proven to be true.actually its notthey even tried that "airdrop a billionaire with 1 dollar" experiment and it failed miserablyyou stupid migger
>>537819225Don't worry, they will meat you soon enough.
>>537813178Doesn't that just prove the kids of successful people are fucking retarded despite having more success? >>537813244The Richest man in Babylon rewritten for actual fucking idiots.
>>537813178>money>experience>connectionsYou need all three of these to have a good head start
>>537815282No one ever said merit was fair.
>>537819887Intelligence is the most important factor.
>>537817504"Diversity" is just a code word for anti-white.It literally doesn't mean anything else.
>>537820079Not always. You could be an average IQ and succeed because of good connections, money, and experience. You may be 200 IQ and fail because you lack experience, money, or connections.
>>537819514>I know plenty of smart people who are brokeYou don't actually. You know a lot of midwits who are broke, and you're stupid or also a midwit yourself, and can't recognize it.Actually smart people quickly become financially comfortable AT WORST.Taleb already proved that poverty correlates with stupidity, rather than the similar but incorrect "wealth correlates with intelligence."
>>537813178That's always been a crock of shit because wealthy kids are neglected by their families who are chasing the bag. If they're lucky they hire someone to parent but most of the time the kids are fucked especially since they get locked out of after school programs since their parents make too much money.
>>537819514>I know plenty ofSee, this is how I know you’re retarded. Your anecdotal experience doesn’t mean anything.
>>537820471>Not always. >You couldI was speaking in generality. You can find exceptions to every rule.
>>537813178The value of what they won(a piece of land) is about $30k in today’s dollars. And they couldn’t even occupy the land upon winning it. This is such a stupid example I’m surprised they bothered with it.
>>537819225generational wealth usually disappears in a matter of a handful of generations
>>537813178>>The left claims that the success of children from wealthy families always comes down to their parents’ money.It does, because if their families were smart/disciplined/driven enough to get wealthy, they likely instilled those traits in their children too.That experiment entirely, and likely intentionally misses this point.
>>537821613What the children are inheriting are the genetics responsible for a high IQhttps://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1782439399396034.webm
>>537813178Disproven by Japan 1953
>>537821925Genetics is one factor.It doesn't resume entirely to genetics, nor are they absolutely necessary. They help, that's it.There's family tradition, education, skill, mentality, culture, knowledge, discipline, determination, incentive, etc.The more if these you have, the easier it is, with the most critical being knowledge and experience. Can't do fuck all if you don't even know where to start.
>>537820079do you think intelligence is the only factor? what else do you think plays a role?
>>537822263I said it's the most important factor.
>>537820928False. It’s actually enough to not be retarded to succeed with connections, money, and experience. Being smart alone won’t get you much in life.
>>537813178The nurture genome and mirror neurons is why women refer to their rapists as “my rapist”. It’s why they defend murderers. It’s why they don’t possess second order analysis; children require preeminent care. Consequences aren’t considered. It’s why you need a father, also
>>537822259genetics is 0.8 of the problem. the other 0.2 you can chalk up to a mix of environment(the part you over-focus on) and chance. we've known this since the 1970s. quit playing ignorant
>>537813178How retard do you need to be to realize sudden wealth won't insta magically turn you into a different person? It has nothing to do with the money you suddenly have, but with what money you *had* allowed you to grow into and pass on.
>>537813178Most family wealth doesn't last beyond three generations.
>>537815282Skin colour is literally merit. Of you are white in Australia you have superior anti cancer genes
>>537820079you and the leftists are both wrong. higher mammals have the longest neotonous periods -- not just a period of extended physical development, but also one for the transfer of useful knowledge. this is why zoos struggle to return their animals to the wild. when the inter-generational knowledge transfer has been broken, subsequent generations released into the wild are doomed.reducing it entirely to IQ is an error, and an extremely jewish one at that (given that they are the origin of that particular psychometric). this is an area where nature and nurture are inextricably intertwined. the genetics to not be a nigger, raise your children, and pass valuable life skills on to the next generation are exceedingly more valuable than land, money, or even an above-average IQ.
>>537813178Wealth comes down more to parents connections than their wealth.
>>537813178>singular "natural" experimentJohn the Stupid Fucking Nigger who never went to college
Children od wealthy are more sucessful always. How you may ask? First and foremost nepotism. Their parents want to prolong their line and for their offspring to carry on the wealth. They give them best positions in their ompanies so when the father dies, they inherit the ownership and they have good sense of how business works. Just one example. Another is if family owns a bunch of real estate which they rent out. When they pass away their kids inherit it all and get that rent money without having to do anything really. Anyway you get the point. Now lets look at the life of average poor Joe whos dad left him and left him with psychotic mother. Joe grows up being psychologically mindfucked by his mother and never becomes fully a normal adult human male. He starts to work at a warehouse so he can get away from his mother. He is barely able to rent out an apartment and to eat. He is trying to find some progress in his life but there is nowhere to go. Other than just luck nothing will make his life better. Every market is oversaturated. Joe becomes burned out from work and worrying about future, he becomes chronically depressed snd anhedonic and cant feel good by doing anything. He fully becomes a drone that works, pays bills and ests shit food. Joe cant save up for anything anyways and cant progress so no point really in anything and Joe offs himself. No wealthy person went through this life.
Faggots here refuse to realise that capitalism was completely corrupted and as such has lead to creation of permanent slave class. Those 50s stories of boomers? Nothing like that will ever be possible for the slave class, neither today or future. And by slave class I mean, me, everyone here and the majority of world. You used to own things you bought atleast but now you will be on a subscription plan for everything.
>>537814935And where does nepotism fit into this?
>>537813178black households had dangerous levels of racist asbestos.
>>537815282That is so fucking reductive you obviously know you’re being intellectually disingenuous.
>>537813302I read that book. Absolutely worthless slop.
