The Parthenon is merely 500 years old, artificially made to look older. The Byzantine emperor Leo the Wise (ca. 9th century) "rediscovered" and promoted knowledge of "Plato" and his "followers." Romans were Dacian refugees and their might greatly overstated. You worship a lie.
>>537818784Wrong, it was made in the 70s
You left out the argument part You have the claim, now argue for it. Why is this true?
>>537818784The ancient Greeks were all black and they made the advanced technology from Atlantis.
>>537818869The internet provides the sources and where it does not, it is self-evident.
>>537818784Nigga it's 2458 years old. Get mental help
pyramids were built in 1900 for tourism purposes. there is evidence it is simply modern poured concrete.read the works of Anatoly Fomenko and Huang Heqing.
>>537818929Yeah, nah.
>>537819007>it's not pristine new, that means it's one hundred billion years old!Retard. There are accounts of it being hit with heavy artillery in countless wars. It's not even a third of that number.
>>537818784>The Parthenon is merely 500 years oldlol no, it's less than 100 years old, it was constructed by an english """archeologist""".
>>537818844>Wrong, it was made in the 70s
>>537819018>fomenkoKek, forgot about that retard. Thanks for the laugh
>>537819168>a third of that numberYou talk about numbers like someone who really struggles with math broYou could definitely just say like "it's not even 800" or whatever, it's not a very abstract thing
>>537819320>leaf
>>537818784>EUROPE's CLASSICAL PAST IS A LIEWho cares. it was 500 - 2000 years ago.
>>537819316no it's all true, it's all over Weibo.
You are so retarded it hurts
>>537818784It’s actually entirely plausible that the Romans’ very early origins were from the area to become Dacia. However, they could not have BEEN “Dacian”. They would have been whatever pre-paleobalkan language group existed there before the 9th century BC. That’s almost 3000 years ago. Anyway, their homeland was overun later on by the paleobalkan clade, which originally belonged in Ukraine but came southeast during a time of great crisis.
>>537818929This is the dumbest idiom i have ever heardThat is like saying "the internet will prove me rightz and if they dont, you are gay and i am right"
>>537818784Did your Chinese professor tell you that?
>>537819518>They would have been whatever pre-paleobalkan language group existed there before the 9th century BC. That’s almost 3000 years agoImagine believing mainstream chronology.
>>537819569He is demonstrably gay though. There are multiple sources showing OP is a fag
>>537819506>drawn = trueYou do know propaganda existed before the internet, do you not?
>>537818784You're not Portuguese.
>>537819788That is obvious and i do not need further info on the matter. I am just angry how fucking stupid this thread is and jannies should hang
>>537819831YesThat isnt rome fyi
>>537819506>>537819316>appeal to authority>appeal to majority
>>537819924I know. As I also know that Rome as you have it never existed, and is a product of renaissance-era fraud.
The Lateran Obelisk in Rome is a fake.The real ancient artifact is hidden inside of OP's rectum.
>>537820249Prove it retard
Why do Americans get so butthurt on behalf of Rome? Do they actually believe their well documented country's founding and traditions are a continuation of an phantom empire and attacking the latter means putting their into question? Very imprudent if so.
>>537820428Naturally a geographical or chronological continuation is out of the question, but what of a spiritual one? Have the Americans been deliberately mass indoctrinated by the astutely designed Roman myth?The primordial American deep state saw in the phantom empire which we call Rome incredible potential. They saw a country which held "superior" values to its barbarian neighbors, and in expanding over them it didn't harm but "elevated" them, maintaining a peace of sorts that advocated for military service in exchange for the "good" of conquest. "Everyone" benefited, but Rome overwhelmingly so.The parallels are evident. The US designed a system of global oppression, based on concepts such as "meritocracy," "democracy" and glorification of militarism, to establish a "Pax Americana" (notice the borrowing of the latin for "Peace") that would serve as a front for the enrichment of America at the expense of the world. In the process, everyone was "elevated" through oppression masked as democracy and basic freedoms, all for measly blood and resources of the invaded nations.The usage of "Roman" symbology is no coincidence (see pic related). America designed the system for world oppression, and retrofitted history in a way that would lend credence and legitimacy to their goals, and subsequently poured these worldviews into the minds of its young, and created the Roman myth out of a phantom of an "empire."That's why Americans take attacks on Rome personally, it's putting into question the legitimacy of their conquests.
>>537818784It was literally blown up in the 1600s. The Ottomans used it as an ammo storage and the Venetian soldiers fire on it igniting the powder and blowing into pieces.
>>537818784there is a /his/ forum you know
>>537818844Fpbp Picture Quality checks out for around 70s. 500 years is an absurd claim
>>537821564We still to day see manifestations of the American-Roman complex in social media, often associated with id-pol accounts specifically created to foster hatred of immigration, also taken as a "notable cause for the Fall of the Roman (phantom) Empire," because this is tantamount to helping anti-immigration parties get votes, and these are notoriously instruments of the US to destroy Europe in the unfortunate conjunction we find ourselves in. So it's an ideology that still pays dividends, and unfortunately won't change anytime soon because proles are more interest in the "cool" factor than in the scientific merit of history. Alas, this is also a deliberate consequence of the infantilization of the populace through subliminal appeal to mass consumption and the cult of faceless violence, i e good guy kills bad guys and gets the happy ending, to hell with nuance. Chronology skepticism is a means to fight the good fight, to eliminate destructive prejudice and to shine a mirror in the face of the ugly Lie. This is why I had this thread, and why all dissidents (excpet mindless consensus-drones) are welcome to disagree with me.>>537821768They're too obtuse over there. I prefer to talk to a more open minded crowd.
>>537821564Amerimutts hated him because he spoke the truth
>>537819770No u
>>537821564Why are you mad we roman af?
>>537818784The Parthenon was there before the Romans conquered Greece for one thing because the Romans installed a new roof using terracotta tiles and dedicated it to the emperor Nero, when he lost the plot they erased any mention of him. The Romans kept meticulous records of things.
>>537822900>The Romans kept meticulous records of things.>t. some Renaissance con artist selling his "findings"
>>537821564>>537822514i hate both of you because you're brown
>>537823432Cope.
>>537818784>Romans were Dacian refugeesFrom their wars against Romans?
>>537819231do they have to do that with every historical buildingdoesnt take a genius to figure out that obviously did not stand with those columns like that for 2000 yearstourists were born yest4erday
>>537818784so i guess Aristotle is made up as well? Plato had a cult. you're going to have to produce quite a mountain of evidence to begin refuting all historical evidence referencing him.
>>537818784> A black woman invented the telescope. You might disagree. You might even have some evidence to the contrary. But you have to ask yourself: is this really worth losing my job over? A black woman invented the telescope.Everyone knows it was built by refugees from Wakanda.