Otherwise I have a problem
>>537879914Depends on what you mean by eugenics I guess. If killing babies is an essential part of eugenics to your mind then you should know that killing babies is very much against Catholic dogma.
>>537880047I don’t consider extremely disabled babies human. The Spanish Inquisition were as Catholic as it gets and did the same thing. They said that disabled babies, like deformed freaks, had no souls they were satanic
>>537880117Sounds like you're in favor of killing babies.You can call yourself a Catholic if you want; nobody will stop you, but the Pope would denounce you.
>>537880170I like the Popes that had people burned alive
>>537879914You can be a free grace christian and do whatever you want. You'll only lose rewards at the judgement seat of christ when you go to the rapture.
>>537880247Whatever makes you happy.BTW I wonder how many of these extremely disabled babies you think will reproduce. That is the point of eugenics after all.
>>537880371Even if they don’t they still suck up our tax dollars. And even if they relied on private charities that’s still a waste of resources
>>537880426Sounds like you're not totally clear on what eugenics means.
How is it eugenic to kill people that will never breed?
>>537880580The system of taxing the productive to feed the unproductive is dysgenic for two reasons. It encorages the reproduction of the unproductive and discourages the reproduction of the productive.
>>537880117>The Spanish Inquisition were as Catholic as it gets and did the same thing. They said that disabled babies, like deformed freaks, had no souls they were satanic[Citation needed]
>>537879914Sounds like your genetic/societal views are first and foremost, and religion is merely an aesthetic accessory for you to make yourself "feel" trad/based/etc. basically you're a fake & gay and have faggotry of the spirit
>>537880769You were born yet have been discouraged to reproduced, explain that
>>537880925It appears I made a slight mix up
>>537880769This is fair until productive does not necessarily mean good genes. For example, the World Economic Forum thinks the economically optimal human is Indian, can't digest meat and dies at the age of 75./pol/'s idea of good genes is European, blond, blue eyed, >6ft tall, >130 IQ.
>>537881229It's a malthusean economic argument, not eugenic. He can't tell the difference, most likely putting him in the 80% of a pareto model.
>>537881229WEF is unironcially right, they produce more output relative to their input
Can't you just blow your priest in a box about those things?
>>537880117Then you are not a Catholic by the church's own definition. You have denied its fundamental tenet that a devine immortal soul exists at the insant of conception.
>>537879914i believe the bigger issue is why do you need to believe in some "supreme being"? being a decent person is free anon
>>537879914Yes, dont have sex.
>>537881742You are australian, you are not decent.
>>537879914No. Eugenics are as bad as abortions. All human life is sacred.
>>537879914When has this stopped Protestants?
>>537881873I’m anti abortion for healthy boys and girls but support it for disabled babies who I view as subhuman
If it doesn’t inhale and exhale by itself at least once, it is not a human being.Why would I be against abortion if more non-aryans abort?The purity of aryanness is kept by among other a judicious control of births.Abortion is part of eugenism aimed at improving the quality of the human population.Eugenics is aryan, white, goy, christian, and it is the way to go.
