White people make their kids move out at age 18, then put their old people into homes. It didn’t use to be this way.
>>537893759Kikes need to stop trying to make spics a thing. They're never going to be a thing. All they are is the heralds of rot.
>>537893759>Collectivist
>>537893759That worked when is was whites competing with/against whites. Its judeo boomer crapitalism and late stage usury now that endless borrowing has ruined the power of the $
>>537893759CAPITALISM IS THE BEST
>>537893759COMMUNISM IS THE WORST
>>537893759Latinos are only collectivist because most of them are still barely middle class and they aren’t as keyed into the welfare state like Black Americans are. They NEED networks when they lose their house or job or have kids they can afford. Rich Latinos are super elitist that give fuck all about anyone else.
>>537893759Western culture is fucking evil and demonicIt infantilizes teens and then wonders why they make deliberate shitty decisions about their lives just because of the rush of freedom.They cant marry but somehow manage to suck on BBC hoodrats
This has more to do with the promotion of atheism and certain political ideologies than what it has to do with money although it is certainly a factor.
>>537893759>White people make their kids move out at age 18 in Europe because they know the mild-socialism systems will provide them with a home, so there's no risk in making this demand.Wow, much capitalism, very destroy
>>537893759
>>537893759Does that means the Philippines is part of Hispania?
>>537893877We are already a thing, just not in the way they wanted. Basically we are evil socialist Catholics who love tradition and don't like strangers.
>>537893950Those helicopter memes are annoying now that I've read up on the cold war in Latin America. Most of those deaths were actually Catholics protecting the poor from exploitation by corporations that hired drug cartels to kill anyone demanding labor rights. It was not about hunting communists. It was a corrupt government colluding with the super rich to kill poor people.
>>537893759chuds on /pol/ will never admit that socialism is the most natural form of wealth distribution in any society. It is a massive accumulation of wealth in a small group of people that is unnatural and has to be enforced by the state (aka a mafia).>>537898197you mean Pinochet wasn't a cool guy saving his country but was instead a traitor who killed a bunch of innocents because he wanted to remain in power and was also fighting to preserve the privilege of the economic elites and a bootlicker to foreign powers? I am shocked.
>>537893759sounds like brazil would be the model country then
>>537893759>s. It didn’t use to be this way.Thanks to the Welfare state. Another big mistake, women's suffrage. Women in politics Are a catastrophy.Their male counterparts are cynical traitors who destroy civilisation not out of empathy and pathological altruism, but would sell their parents just for money. These two groups in particular are a catastrophy.Now, if capitalism is the issue. Stop using the internet, your car (if you have one), fridge, computer, at least don't be a hypocrite about it.Then let's also define what capitalism is or isn't.Capitalism isn't a importing the third world wholesale or not having children.It's the very opposite. In france for ex, we're basically communists in denial. If you don't think we are, consider this: public spending in France averaged 54.16% of GDP between 1978 and 2025, reaching a record high of 61.7% of GDP in 2020. Not even the former USSR spent that much as a share of its economy. At some point, you have to stop pretending that's capitalism.Also,we're not genuine capitalists. The third-worlders who are currently invading us aren't even coming to France to work. About 70 to 80% come to France to live off subsidies paid for by the native population. And we're doing that because we're commies. We're redistributing our wealth in the name of batshit insane, suicidal ideological concepts like "human rights," "anti-racism," "equality," and "diversity"—the usual Freemasonic, universalist lingo.In our case, it's not even a question of importing cheap labor. We're importing the Third World. Many live on welfare; when they don't, they become drug traffickers, and only a small percentage of them actually work.People often can't make the difference between capitalism and corporatism. capitalism doesn't involved :Government bailouts.Rules or regulations designed mainly to protect large incumbent firms.Subsidies that distort market competitionBarriers to entry (licenses) that block new competitors
>>537901111>sounds like brazil would be the model country thenIt's precisely because of the "nanny state" (which we have in europe) The nanny state encourages individualism because people no longer have to count on family members for welfare or financial support. It even renders low-tier men useless, since women can simply count on the state to be their new provider.Now, you can't have open borders and a welfare state. our leaders think importing the third world is somehow counter the demographic issue but it won't for 2 precise reasons.1 - Immigrants also age..2 - the vast majority of the illegals and the legals live on welfare. So we're dealing with an absurd situation where native europeans are subsidizing their own invaders based on the false promise that 2 digit IQ welfare parasites are doing to magically save the ponzi scheme known as social security.My guess is thhat it has to be deliberate. i refuse to believe our leaders are that fucking stupid. they're doing it to destroy that system and privatise everything.
