If your nation can't do even the bare minimum that was unthinkable to not provide before they clearly don't want you to be a productive member of society, it's basic biology. Competition and everything being free for all is not any different than the LGBT ideology, it's unnatural and only creates division until a more united nation conquers them as history shows.
wordsoup
>>537899468this is a very antisemitic thought
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
>>537899468You're under arrest for anti-semitic posting online
>>537900356Strange how an english native person understands my post but you and the zigger don't. Really really strange...
It looks like the author was trying to weave together a few different arguments about government responsibility, economics, and social unity, but the phrasing got incredibly tangled up.Here is a breakdown of what they were likely trying to say, stripped of the confusing phrasing, followed by a couple of ways to rewrite it depending on what their core focus was.The Core Arguments Being MadeThe State's Failure: If a government fails to provide basic necessities that were historically taken for granted, it signals that the state isn't actually invested in helping its citizens succeed.Economic Chaos: Mixing extreme "free-for-all" competition with a demand for everything to be free creates an unstable, chaotic system.The "Unnatural" Comparison: The author compares this economic chaos to LGBTQ+ advocacy, viewing both as "unnatural" forces that divide society rather than unite it.Historical Consequence: The ultimate point is a warning based on history: a nation fractured by internal division and weak systems will eventually be conquered by a more unified, cohesive power.
Rewrite Option 1: Focus on National Strength and UnityThis version cleans up the grammar while preserving the author's argument that internal division leads to a nation's downfall."When a government fails to provide the basic social foundations that previous generations took for granted, it prevents its citizens from being productive. Hyper-competition combined with a chaotic 'free-for-all' system causes deep social division, much like modern gender and sexual identity politics. History shows that when a nation becomes this fragmented and unnatural in its structure, it inevitably falls to a more unified foreign power."
Rewrite Option 2: Focus on the Economic and Social CritiqueThis version focuses heavily on the idea that the system itself is broken and divisive."It is a basic fact of society that if a nation refuses to provide the bare minimum infrastructure for its people, it is actively hindering their productivity. A system driven by unchecked competition and chaotic demands for free resources is fundamentally unsustainable. Just like LGBTQ+ ideologies, these trends create deep internal friction. Ultimately, history proves that divided nations are always conquered by more cohesive ones."The original text combines an economic critique (welfare and competition) with a social critique (LGBTQ+ topics) to make a point about national survival. The rewrites above streamline those ideas so the argument is easy to read, even if the underlying ideas remain highly controversial.
>>537899468a father has a moral duty to kill anyone who gets between him and his kids
>>537899468picrel isnt just a personal tragedy in the lives of tens of millions of men and children, its also a causus belli for war against the government and its taxpayers
