[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


How long can they try to keep the female hypergamy question off the table?

The current strategy of importing more people and creating hate-speech laws to silence those who disagree or who suggest alternative solutions that are not in tune with current neoliberal ideals (like curbing female hypergamy, outlawing contraception, etc.) is not sustainable.
>>
I'm talking about actual solutions. Don't bring up, "getting therapy" the current mental health industry is a gaslighting scam, especially when it comes to sexless men without intimacy, whose problems are fundamental and societal. They are not searching for an actual solution but rather a way to silence those who deviate from the system. The goal is to gaslight deviants and make them silent, docile taxpayers not to fix their problems.
>>
File: women hypergamy.png (549 KB, 960x735)
549 KB PNG
The problem in Western society is that natural male behaviors, like rape, are being suppressed, while the female equivalent, hypergamous behavior, is celebrated and encouraged. Western society talks about equality, but it is clearly biased toward the whims of one side. As a result, birth rates are nearly nonexistent, populations are increasingly being replaced to sustain social services and the Ponzi scheme that is the pension system, and 85% of men end up sexless and deprived of intimacy.
>>
Muslims are excluded from proscriptions against home schooling. They won't become feminist. But they will have children and they will vote and they will hold office.
>>
Btw, “it’s natural selection” is not an excuse. In nature, there are predators and consequences. In nature, males can engage in coercive behavior just as females can be hypergamous. You can’t remove these factors and then call it natural, it becomes completely artificial. On top of that, female selection has often proven dysgenic and follows the Runaway Fisherian selection model.
>>
>>537914575
Seth Hatfield explained all of this in his manifesto. Importing immigrants, promoting consumerism, hypergamy, women in the workforce are all tactics part of promoting the modern capitalist state and retaining the current bourgeois order. They want the majority of the male population to be affection-starved so they can sell bullshit solutions and copes (OnlyFans, AI companions, PUAfaggotry).
>>
File: 1490888641805.jpg (51 KB, 497x372)
51 KB JPG
There is no viable solution to free women not finding the majority of men attractive, and the majority of attractive men not wanting to commit/being serial pump n dumpers.
>>
>>537914575
>How long can they
"They", like MSM? The government itself?
The government tends not to address social issues on this level. I can't think of a time a politician has done some speech or commentary about the dating market, besides the grab them by the pussy comment. Which itself should signal much more about women's nature than Trump being vulgar.

Otherwise, social media seems to be talking about it plenty. Maybe the algo is showing me different stuff, but it sure seems like the whole celebrating being a massive whore has died down tremendously. Women might still be behaving this way, but they're getting mocked for having an OF by influencers of either sex. It's only the hyper progressive commies who still try to pretend sex work is a respectable career, but even that mask slips every time one is upset or wants to criticize their political opposition.
The behavior will follow. Women act the way they perceive society to expect them to act. In the 2010's, that was le bad-ass girlboss slut. Today, it seems shifting more towards nobody taking career women seriously, even at work, and dismissing someone entirely if they're a known slut or a sex worker.
You'll always have sluts and sex workers, but MMW, in five years, the norm will be most women desperately avoiding being labeled a slut, which is the natural state of things. It's kind of like when they tried to make obesity attractive by lecturing men about it. It's just not going to happen. Same thing with being a slut. Now you've got a huge amount of millennial women who are sad and lonely wondering why nobody wants to take them seriously, and every gen Z who hasn't already committed to OF sees it.
>>
File: woman moment.png (435 KB, 676x778)
435 KB PNG
>>
>>537914575
because they know that all their power stems from having a woman bitching at her man in almost every household
if they piss off the women, there is no longer anyone tone policing men when they say that politicians should probably be strung up
>>
>>537916641
Their punishment? Burning at the stake.
>>
>>537916641
>what should be their punishment
>>
I'll do good work with all of these OP ty
>>
>>537914575
unironically to allow grooming in some capacity its stops females slutting around at 13 and ruining their pair bonding for life.

Maybe extend romeo and juliet laws to 5-6 years to stop 40 year old losers taking advantage of it.

The last king & queen of England started talking when he was 19 and she was 13
>>
>>537914575
Because it is what they wanted, they wanted whore women and incel men and low birth rates
>>
File: goyim_please.png (3.87 MB, 1536x1792)
3.87 MB PNG
>>537914575
These threads are perfect for me to practice AI, thanks.
>>
File: woman moment 2.png (366 KB, 647x823)
366 KB PNG
>>
>>
>>537917607
what app are you using?
>>
they are by opening the floodgates to uneducated muslims
>>
File: 1782240357901022.png (1.23 MB, 1512x3436)
1.23 MB PNG
>>537914575
>Why aren’t Western governments addressing hypergamy and male sexlessness?
I will explain anon...

The worse the problem becomes, the more power the government gets in return, because government swoops in to fill the man-shaped hole in a woman's life

If you are invisible to women (like in picrel because of height), I recommend you pass on your DNA to the next generation by buying eggs and growing them in a surrogate womb

Someday you will be able to raise these babies with a robo-waifu of your choice
>>
>>537914616
>solution
Take all the rights away from women including voting. Simple. They will be forced to marry, fuck and make kids since they got nothing else to do.
>>
>>537914575
Rapefugees don't care about "hypergamy".
>>
>>537914958
>female selection has often proven dysgenic and follows the Runaway Fisherian selection model
This anon gets it

This is one of the most important things to understand. Women are attracted to traits in men that were critical for survival of their bloodlines tens of thousands of years ago. Women operate on sexual selection instinct that is stuck in the stone age, which is why successful societies will have fathers choose a mate for their daughters. As soon as women are allowed to choose who to pair with, it is only a matter of time before the wheels completely fall off of the entire civilization in which this occurs
>>
>>537920315
I've never got this trend, honestly. Surely one would expect some llond of behavioural change over the generations with the influence of patriarchal selection of partners; but it almost immediately seems to regress at any sign of the binds being loosened.
>>
File: Not my problem.jpg (253 KB, 1500x1000)
253 KB JPG
>>537914575
I'm never dating or getting married and (((they))) can't make me. Imagine wanting to be constantly nagged 24/7 without a moment of peace. I can take care of myself just fine without the need for a vapid woman. Your instincts will compel you to do something stupid but always remember that women can now 'revoke' consent and ruin your life. Don't forget that a woman nowadays has every right to wake up one day and decide that she doesn't love you anymore on a whim. Suddenly you're hit with divorce, losing half your shit, paying child support if you have kids, and god forbid alimony payments. On top of all of this, there are many STDs (HIV, HPV, HCMV, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, Hepatitis, Herpes, Syphilis, Trichomoniasis, Ureaplasma, etc) going around, and I don't trust women to not lie about their past sexual history. Keep in mind that falling marriage rates will bankrupt many Jewish divorce firms. I’ve seen too many friends become shells of their former selves because their girlfriends/wives cheated on them, they’ve never been the same since. The transactional nature of marriage and society's backward laws regarding the divorce make it so that marriage is a fundamental liability to any man, with little to no benefits to make up for it. I bet you that if we told more school-aged youth that the chances of their marriage succeeding is one in two, and that the price of divorce far exceeds the value of the entirety of the marriage, they would put off dating and marriage for as long as humanly possible.

TLDR; it's not worth it to date or get married nowadays.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.