[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_230226.jpg (267 KB, 1078x966)
267 KB JPG
They are now ramming the chat control laws through behind closed doors.

AI will scan your private messages (and photos) and you WILL be happy.
>>
>>537931013
arent they already doing this anyway?
>>
>>537931013
also what AI?
the EU cant afford datacenters and cant produce their own GPUs.
>>
>>537931013
I mean the only way to actually, genuinely stop this is not, strictly speaking, within legal paramters anymore.
>>
This is just "the government reading your mail without a warrant" which is presumably against the established law, doing it at one layer of remove where the tech companies are doing it on their behalf doesn't change that
>>
File: free1.jpg (1.49 MB, 1200x7000)
1.49 MB JPG
>>537931013
>free speech
what a concept
>>
>>537931013
Whatever. Getting a dumb phone soon anyway to fix my dopamine. Posting merchant memes got boring.
>>
>>537931128
>arent they already doing this anyway?
they dont wanna do three letter agency stuff to access your private data, they just want some fat millenial cow foid to nonchalantly log into a computer, push 2 buttons and surf trough your stuff.

basically its too uncomfortable and expensive for them right now.
>>
>>537931775
but they dont have enough human workers to do this at scale.
they dont have the AI tech and dont have the brains to implement something like this and like everything the EU touches it will be a massive failure that backfires on the idiots who thought its a good idea.
>>
>>537931881
>but they dont have enough human workers to do this at scale.
they just build 2 more datancenters, triple your elecricity bills and AI will peripodically check your phone, pc, console for wrongthink.

we not gonna vote our way out of this. they will sacrifice us to satan sooner than admit defeat.
>>
>>537932145
>they just build 2 more datancenters
you need way more datacenters than that to monitor 500 million people and many more millions of devices.
Europe just doesnt have the infrastructure, the money or the brains to run something like this.
>triple your elecricity bills
then people will not use any devices and take the fight to the streets and as we have seen high tech approach cant easily win against low tech.
also people could produce tons of false positives or just encrypt/talk in a code that AI cant easily crack.
its impossible to monitor everyone.
>>
>>537932335
your optimism is unwarranted but I hope Im wrong.
>its impossible to monitor everyone.
I wish. they dont have to monitor everyone. they just have to monitor problematic ones, such as you, me, op.

You think they are afraid of low iq social media addicted foids? 50% of the population can be ignored by default. add the too old, too young to the list, then browns or whatever.

If they are targeting only white males from the age of 18-55 it might be easier than anticipated.
>>
>>537932736
>they just have to monitor problematic ones
to find the problematic people they still have to scan every existing device.
also mesh networks exist and terrorists or whatever will adapt to that easily.
>You think they are afraid of low iq social media addicted foids?
just because a phone number is connected to some foid doesnt mean its the foid using the device. to figure out for sure you have to scan them all and monitor them 24/7.
>add the too old, too young to the list, then browns or whatever.
all of these make it more difficult. oldfags, youngfags and browns shitpost way more extremist bullshit than anyone else kek
>>
>>537932335
>you need way more datacenters than that to monitor 500 million people and many more millions of devices.
Why do you think these new data centres are projected to pull the equivalent energy of a small country? The globalists are doing away with all pretense; digital id, mass AI surveillance (digital and facial), CBDC - a control grid that will be essentially inescapable.
>>
>>537936024
>these new data centres
how many are getting build in the EU?
and where would they buy the GPUs from?
>>
>>537931184
they just outsource it like everything else
retard
>>
>>537936979
you forgot about
>muh GDPR
>>
>>537931013
Criminals will use encrypted communication that EU cannot wiretap anyway.
It's blatantly obvious that the goal is complete surveillance of the average person, and most likely harassing right wing parties and their voters.
>>
>>537937500
>Criminals will use encrypted communication that EU cannot wiretap anyway.
or write stuff on paper and have couriers deliver them.
>and most likely harassing right wing parties and their voters.
whats funny is that this overreach is what makes more people want to vote for these partys
>>
>>537937500
If it works the way I suspect, you'll need a rooted device.
There have been dumb politicians saying dumb things like having AI "sniff your packets like a dog sniffing your suitcase" but in truth, apple has already shown how to do this.
Whenever an apple device sends/receives data, it does a check against known CSAM hashes, it's not instant, but it queues up and operates relatively quickly, so that they can ban you from their store/products.
In theory it's very easy to do that with just about everything, but the real issue is that due to the fact this needs to work with any and all kinds of communications, it requires all communications on your phone not to be encrypted until after it's sent to their servers for checking, so there's no privacy.
Except of course for the fact that the law specifically states government officials are exempt from this, which is presumably where the silver lining is.
If government officials are exempt, that suggests they MIGHT go software level, which makes the law useless.
If they go hardware level anyway, then it requires the EU to suddenly manufacture some very specific devices, and there will be a thriving black market for the encrypted devices that they won't be able to stop.
Also mesh networking has been spreading like wildfire in different parts of the EU.
>>
>>537931013
Who cares? Smart criminals will manually encrypt their messages and send them over standard SMS/email. Dumb criminals will go to prison. It's natural selection that will breed smarter, more effective criminals.
>>
>>537931128
No.

They want tech companies to break the encryption that current exists, so the Government can sit in the middle of any coms between two people.

Same as UK.
>>
File: untitled.png (28 KB, 1277x764)
28 KB PNG
salmon banners are always bad news :(
>>
File: file.png (306 KB, 1325x793)
306 KB PNG
>>537931881
It's not about enforcing the rule effectively but having the framework to target individuals and/or groups of dissenters.
And the hope that one day It will be feasible to do the same for all citizens
Basically all the G7 countries have been constructing similar legislation thanks to our jewish overlords at the World Economic Forum. I'm still dumbfounded how most people are unable to put two and two together.
(It's Digital Services Act in the case of the EU)
>>
>>537931128
They are about to publish a recommendation. Eventually it will happen. They are not able to move this fast. Candas chat control is 1984 tier though
>>
>>537938113
well fuck
>>
>>537931328
>government reads your mail >:(
>corporations read your mail :)
Stupid shit like this makes me hope for even shittier future for everyone
>>
>>537938977
>For centuries
Man I sure love how back in the 1800s people were asking each other for their papers before taking their donkey across a bridge.
>>
So they'll be able to read mundane messages on normie platforms like whatsapp while criminals continue to use encrypted platforms?
>>
>>537939677
quantum AI and even more backdoors in all hardware beats encryption
>>
>>537931013
Yeah they've been pushing it for years, it was obvious that they would pass it no matter what. If the people complain then just back down and be more stealthy next time.
>>
>>537931128
No they compare known file hashes to pictures on your iphoto and Google drive.
>>
A failed state can churn out all the paper law it wants, it can't execute it reliably.
>B-but its for targeted harassment only
Failed states failed because whoever the failure targets just ships around it
>>
>>537931013
>red is support
>green is opposed
Is this some sort of trick to fool people?
>>
>>537931013
Nooo, not my loli hentai. THey are going to throws me in prison for drawings of kids getting fucked
>>
>>537937500
>Criminals
It's not about current criminals, it's about those who will become criminals once the EU decides that wanting fewer illegal migrants or disagreeing with anything they say or do is illegal enough for them to block your digital euro account. At some point certain normal things that every single one of us says or does daily and thinks nothing of will be made illegal. So you messaged your friend about that barbecue you're making this Sunday? That breaks the climate lockdown rules, pay the fine you monster.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.