What exactly does liberal democracy predicate its legitimacy upon? Older forms of government had ideals they appealed to. The Roman Empire had the will to power. Medieval kingdoms had god's favor. China had the mandate of heaven. Democracy, allegedly, had a mandate from the masses. So where does liberal democracy derive its mandate? And whom does it really serve? It clearly doesn't serve the natives of any Western nation. That much is observable fact. Liberal democracy serves foreigners and uses the natives as tax slaves, while instilling a spirit of despair and tyranny among the population. What, therefore, is the purpose of continuing liberal democracy? And why shouldn't it be replaced?
>>537937580jewish supremacy/thread
>>537937768Now circle back to the closing sentence.
>>537937822all of /pol/ is a forever-churning answer to that questiondo your own homework
The notion that the people rule themselves via democracy and that the government will protect a set of individual freedoms, though this is increasingly at odds with the authoritarian technocracy they want to set up and the restrictions of said freedom necessary to enforce it
>>537937580what door did the proverbial jews walk in? what are their weapons?
>>537937972That's one external pressure. The other is that they imported barbarian savages that will never, ever assimilate. Thus forming conditions for an eventual civil war. The only way a multicultural society can exist is with state violence, which compounds year by year, forever. This is why liberal democracy has no legitimacy whatsoever. It has brought about these conditions.
>>537937580The will of the people. The ideal that the people are ultimately choosing their leaders and that those leaders are required to listen to their constituents or be voted out.A messy system, and it makes Athenian lottary system sound almost nice.
>>537938311>The will of the peopleThat's just window dressing. Liberal democracy has no regard for the will of the people at all. We vote for no mass-immigration, we get mass-immigration. We vote for no war, we get war. This is why this system of government has no legitimacy.
>>537938417You mean their irrational sense of "rights"?
>>537937972Globalist liberal "democracy" has deconstructed the demos and replaced it with a constant illegitimate churn of random alien foreigners. There is no "the people" under this system. It is a falsehood. They try to carry over the image of legitimacy from the previous nation states that they replaced with post-national globalist economic zones.
>>537937580Pure emotional gratification, not matter the cost, no matter the lies. Liberal democracy is inherently defective and only suitable for insane people.
>>537937580>What exactly does liberal democracy predicate its legitimacy upon?Power to the people.That's not how things actually work. But that's the answer to your surface question. We should have a government that actually gives power to the people. White people. It would not resemble this oligarchy's jewish policies.
>>537937580White genocide.
>>537937580That the dumbfuck masses actually believe they have a say who gets voted into power (they don't)
>>537937580>Medieval kingdoms had god's favor.that explains the plague
>>537938169>what door did the proverbial jews walk in?A door made not out of wood
