[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


The far right will somehow find a way to say this is bad.
>>
>>537961137
Honestly if you say anything protects children migroids will lose their minds and come out against it for some reason. They seem to have alot of weird triggers.
>>
>>537961137
Was this what was preventing him from building that promised rail way?
>>
moshi moshi revanced desu
>>
>>537961137
Or you can just run ublock and see no ads
>>
>>537961137
everybody else in USA is wishing for a huge earthquake to just sink all of CA into the ocean
>>
>>537961137
The far left found ways to say that Massie was bad.
-t.anti-ZOG leftist
>>
They did that with TV about 20 years ago. They were doing the same thing.
>>
>>537961137
There is only one issue that matters for judging every politician: Do they support Israel?
>>
He doesn't have the politician permasmile. I have to give him credit for that. Otherwise he looks like one. Shiny suit, slick hair, like the quintessential fucking sleazeball politician. Use car salesmen and real estate agents are higher up the food chain in my opinion, even though they look exactly the same.
>>
>>537962270
>Do they support Israel?

He fixed the YouTube volume
>>
>>537962270
The top one, but not the only one.
>>
>>537961137
>Significantly
Guess it's going to depend on what the meaning of significant is, then...
>>
>>537961137
Youtube has ads?
Huh
>>
>>537961137
Far right here. This is fascism. Fascism is a good thing when it serves good of the people. This is serving the people. Infinijeets does not. I still think California and Newscum suck shit, on balance, all things considered.
>>
>>537961137
over-regulation is always a bad thing.
california found a way to fuck up drinking straws, you think they won't fuck up this?
>>
>>537961137
>doesn't ban ads altogether
ublock it is.
>>
>>537962478
I feel deprived now
Oh, wait; no I don't lol
>>
It's called adblasting and it's been around for at least 2 decades on cable TV
>>
>>537961137
Why is a politician getting involved in how a website runs perfectly legal ads? That's not a partisan issue. He is a faggot meddling in things that should not be the governments concern.
>>
There are ads on YouTube?
>>
>>537963340
I've not seen one for more than a decade, desu.
>>
>>537961137
the far right is blocking ads you dumb fuck
>>
>>537962649
Longer. People complained about this in the 90s.
>>
YouTube shouldn't have any advertising at all and there existed a time when it didn't
>>
File: 75567u6wd.jpg (42 KB, 630x420)
42 KB JPG
ear rape
>>
File: 1779009569946171s.jpg (3 KB, 125x124)
3 KB JPG
why stop at youtube or ads? everything should have a similar volume on every media whatsoever.
>>
>>537961137
This law is irrelevant to anyone that's smart enough to use an adblock.
>>
>>537961137
If they boost audio, I just start muting the ads.
Or I take headphones off (to prevent them getting that data that I am not watching).
Youtube's choice.
Honestly, they are probably helping youtube by doing this.
>>
>>537961137
I'm not a pathological contrarian who lets the opposition decide my views on everything by slavishly making it based on what "the other side" does. This rule is fine and as others have pointed out, was already an FCC rule for broadcast television.
I'm also fine with the left hating jews. Sounds like you're the type who would love jews if you thought it made someone else angry.
>>
>>537961137
Not bad per se, but its a nothingburger that only affects retards who didn't mind watching ads to begin with.
>>
>>537961137
There are silent videos on YouTube. Does this law imply that all ads should be silent too?
>>
>>537964644
Lord forbid us from deciding for ourselves what we want.
>>
You retards don't use an adblocker in 2026?
>>
>>537961137
I think tech regulations are the one thing Democrats get right. Republicans are still luddite boomers who pass retarded shit like internet age verification.
>>
>>537961137
Please include your clients names in the title or comment so my filters catch them
>>
>>537961137
Youtube has ads?
>>
File: 1705960265670036.png (7 KB, 302x360)
7 KB PNG
>>537961137
I remember a story many years ago on like a current affair type "news" show where they were "testing" the ads on TV and claiming that, no goyim, they are actually the same volume. You must not believe your lying ears!

I don't know why you would say the far right would be against this though? Maybe you're just trolling or something because I don't think we even care. A true far right gigachud doesn't watch TV and blocks these gay ads.
>>
>>537961137
Anyone who doesn't use an ad blocker is a Jew worshipping nigger
>>
>>537961137
THIS IS COMMUNISM
>>
>>537966047
Most people dont use computers to watch YouTube.
>>
File: 1779390486994248.jpg (76 KB, 619x619)
76 KB JPG
>>537962270
>There is only one issue that matters for judging every politician: Do they support Israel?
>>
>>537961137
Fix algorithms promoting slop and shadowbanning intelligent people. Forbid to govs to have the possibility to ban videos from jewtube.
>>
>>537961246
It is a distraction you dumbfuck.
They are jiggling their keys in front of you as you coo like a baby. How can you be so clueless?
Is he going to do anything about Los Angeles, San Francisco and Oakland being crime ridden shitholes?
>>
>>537962397
Scott Weiner was recently thrown to the wolves because he was not left wing enough. His crime was something to what Newscum did which is critique and condemn anti-israel actions.
>>
>>537967431
>>537967508
Two Things:
1. Right wing protects pedos so shut the fuck up
2. Scott was an open pedo Jew and I don't care how gay or left wing you are, If you are Jewish GTFO.
>>
File: 1779728712117576.jpg (76 KB, 720x960)
76 KB JPG
>>537961137
Looking forward to Chadvin handing JD's ass to him in '28
>>
Banning this might be good for the critical audience.

The less consumer protection there is, the more profitable a cattle audience is (who just tolerates everything because they only see things positively and always side with authorities). So consumer protection should be good for people on this forum (critical audience). Else every product may be specifically designed against them.

You can see this in media. Where all the media simply panders to audiences that don't install adblock and doesn't know how to pirate (women).
>>
>>537961137
more rules from the government aren't a good thing unless you're a fearful little pussy. there's already multiple ways to NOT see ads, you can also tick stable volume on any video and it regulates volume that way

new rules via government is always bad but weak people think daddy G is saving them. that's the actual problem, the pussies who get to think they won't have to die for something soon.
>>
>>537961137
Thats actually pretty based. Advertising has become especially insidious the last decade or so
>>
>>537961137
Youtube be playing some fucked up ads sometimes is all that i can say
>>
>>537968748
>/pol/tards
>critical audience
Kek! Just kek
>>
File: lol lmao.png (46 KB, 1280x1280)
46 KB PNG
>>537961137
>ads
What are those?
>>
>>537961137
This should be a worldwide law on anything that has an audio or visual component
No louder, no brighter etc
I remember the commercials being louder on TV when I was younger and used to actually watch it
Just looked it up, Canada only finally made a law in 2012
>>
>>537961137
Are people still watching YouTube ads in the year 2026?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.