>may>might>could
>>537995663So, how do you define an unmarried couple?IIRC there were already some countries, which would treat unmarried couples, as married, if they were to live together, inside of one household, for an X amount of time.
If I was British I would kms
>>537995663Who with half a brain dates and marries modern women in 2k26??? It's just a retarded idea.
>>537995815if you send her a heart emoji
>>537995663I am telling you guys, the homo roastie complex will make humanity go extinct.I am the savior of all od humanity for BTFO the christ like gays who instigated the war in ukraine.
>>537995815You pretty much answered your own question
>>537995815the colleague you've been porking for last 3 months is coming for half of your pokemon cards bro
>>537995815Cohabited in the same home for 10 years.Means if you lived in the same house for 5 years she gets to keep half your stuff + the house if you owned it.Imagine living with a woman for 2 years and if she breaks up with you half of your assets will be taken by the state and given to her.We'll probably see a lot of men breaking up before the 1 year rule takes effect.
>>537995663This has beena thing in every western country for like at least 40 years
>why are birth rates going down goyim?>policies like this
>>537995663This is a depopulation tactic Literally genocide As usual normgroids cattle won't do shit
>>537996063its still bad fagmen are rejecting marriage slavery so now government is escalating bachelor slaverywhy cant women pay for their own fucking shit?
maybe becoming a muslim isn't that bad, at least you can keep women in the line and wear some funny hat to cover your balding head like jews, but I love my foreskin and pork too much
>>537995663isn't this just common law marriage?
>>537995663Just wait until this is retroactive. Remember that crazy bitch you dated for a year of college? Well now 20 years later you have to pay her half your stuff + interest for 20 years + tip
>>537996172Modern muslim men are actually getting cucked just as much as western men are, only with the exception being countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan, or maybe current Syria.
>>537995663A typical normie:>Fuck marriage, I can live with my gf without that official bullshitThe government:>Not so fast...>>537995888Checked and this!Singlebros, we can't stop winning!
>>537995888It's almost like jews want to really ensure whites don't procreate. This are the kinds of laws you pass to push fertility lower.
>>537996030I don't talk to women
>>537995663We've had this forever, if you live with someone for two years you are considered defacto married
>>537996201Yes, didn't even know there were western countries where this wasn't a thing
>>537996237Looks like I win again. I have been an incel my whole life, not even one single woman wanted anything to do with me.
The very fact that you have to pay alimony to your ex-wife is utterly absurd; why should you have to maintain her standard of living? How is that your problem? You’re equals, aren't you? She should just get a job.
>>537996063Not in the uk
>>537996367Based and emperor Basil the Bulgarslayer-pilled
>>537996332It's not the jews, it's the women. Male jews are controlled by female jews in a similar fashion which means that this cannot be entirely a jewish fault. Women are exactly the same everywhere in any nation across the globe if given the power and opportunity. Whites not procreating means death for jews, parasites cannot survive without a host.
>>537995772It’s literally already the law.Has been since I don’t know… 1300s anyway.Common law marriages are pretty old fashioned and often not what retards think they are
fucking leftists/feminists man
>>537995772>Marriage laws for unmarried couples are beign implemented across the western world
>>537995815>AI Overview >A common law marriage is a legally recognized union between two people who have not obtained a marriage license or participated in a formal ceremony, but who meet specific criteria established by state law.>State laws vary.and a kicker>Because you are located in Tuxedo, NY, it is important to note that New York abolished the creation of common law marriages within its borders in 1933. However, New York will recognize a common law marriage if it was validly created in a state or country that permits them.
>>537996053Half the assets you acquired during the marriage Fucking retards have flooded this place to the point we need oldfags acting as full time teachers
>>537995772>>537995901>>537996053We do that in america is some states if you live with someone you’re romantically entwined with for 7 years. Shared accounts, bed, dates. We call common law marriage
>>537996316Dudes just need to move out of these places. There is no future for anyone like us here.
>>537996126Why are you living with a woman you dont intend to marry faggot
>>537996520This does the opposite, it incentivizes casual relationships so that you stay under the threshold for being considered de facto married
>>537995663Nothing new.Until you're too pussy to kill people and perform sabotage and hyperviolence you're gonna keep getting cucked.
>>537996713lol You cant really oust or abolish common law principles or rights.They say they can oust them but all she has to say is as of a common law marriage or in the form of a common law marriage and it’s back because the English tradition holds substance over formSame reason you can’t try to rename your dog a flimasaur to get out of dog licencing regulations or call your car a wagon to avoid paying for a traffic ticket
>>537996808Keeping up appearances so his dad doesn’t write him out of the will for being a closeted turbofaggot would be my guess
>>537995663my property title is excluded from being included in marriage/divorce split ups
>>537995663>men aren’t paying attention That’s because you don’t have to if you stop chasing women. All your problems and doubts vanish instantly. What are they gonna do? Force you into a marriage at gun point? I don’t care what feminist do because I don’t deal with women
Been like this in Canada for a long time actually. Common law marriage doesn't actually require anything other than 2 years of cohabitation and vaguely relationshipy behavior. Any place that has common-law marriage is like this already. It's just a question of whether your partner takes you to court after a break-up.
>>537995663do wymin seriously think it'll go down in their favor? now men will refuse to let women stay at their places and will keep relationships strictly casual situationships
>>537996718This board is just jeets responding to x posts anymore, I wouldn't waste your time trying to correct them.
>>537995815they can tie up the court system until they figure it out.
>>537997172>big brother manipulates and micromanages society>is this what women want?maybe
>>537995663>introduce even more laws that demonize the concept of even willingly co-existing with a woman>Make it so if you try to have a non-standard relationship with a woman she can still rob you and ruin your life off of nothing but her word>"WHY AREN'T PEOPLE HAVING SEX OR GETTING MARRIED?!"As long as the courts favor women and the laws punish people for doing anything beyond being a friendly acquaintance marriages and births are going to plummet. I can't even blame nogs for skipping town, they understood the game decades before everyone else did. You either stay around and get turned into a walking paycheck by some roastie you were dumb enough to fuck a decade ago and lose out on seeing the kid you stuck around for, or you dip on the spot and dodge having to lose a cent and miss out on seeing the kid you know damn well you weren't going to be allowed to visit. Nogs are even beginning to acknowledge it's their retarded mother's faults they're all fatherless. Tyler the Creator released a song last year about how much he wished he could see his dad and the song ends with his mom admitting that no, his dad wasn't an awful scumbag and she was the reason he wasn't there for Tyler.As long as divorce laws exist and women can steal literally anything and everything you own, the birth rates will continue to plummet.
>>537995663https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/a-fairer-end-to-relationships>...>3. Reforming the law for cohabitants on intestacy>Cohabitants currently have no automatic right to inherit when a partner dies without a will, which can leave surviving or separating cohabitants facing serious financial hardship. The consultation seeks views on proposals to modernise the law affecting cohabitants on intestacy and on access to financial provision from a deceased partner’s estate.
>>537996759>if you live with someone you’re romantically entwined with for 7 yearsOnly if you present yourself as a married couple in public. Simply living together is not enough.
>>537995663Guys, this is a simple way out of this. Simply do not own anything in your name. Open a trust fund and have everything there.
>>537997172>now men will refuse to let women stay at their placesThen they'll change the law to not require cohabitation anymore, just 6 months of dating will be enough for the woman to claim half her boyfriend's assets after breaking up.If men adapt to that, they'll change the laws again.Eventually there will be UBI for single women and they'll double the tax on single men to pay for it.
>>537996718>Half the assets you acquired during the marriageSavings and investments (including retirement) count as assets.Plus there's alimony.NEVER let a woman con you into making her a stay-at-home gf/wife. It's already a bad deal but this gives her a way to mooch + receive cash & prizes for leaving.
>>537997601This is the way. If you have a good friend you can even say "that stuff's his, not mine" even though it is yours. They legally can't touch any of it.
>>537997466Unless I understand it wrong, the proposition aims for one's partner to be able to inherit the assets in question from before, and during the relationship alike.>access to financial provision from a deceased partner’s estate.
>>537995663good i hope chad gets ruined from all the women he ruins for the rest of usim with the feminist scum on this onesue them for all they got, they deserve iteach woman they've been with should take half, then half of half, then half of half of half until they become homeless and die in a ditch
>>537996126>why cant women pay for their own fucking shit?muh pay gap, apparently, while they brag about how men are broke and women are becoming CEOs
>>537995663Aren't there more zoomer male neets than female these days? Sounds like it will backfire on women badly or chad whos dicking 50 women at once.
>do a firesale of everything I own to a cousin for a decent sum of money>suddenly no assets
>>537997466Why did you ignore 2?>2. Reforming the law for cohabitants on separation>The very limited set of protections under the current law can leave cohabitants facing significant financial difficulties when relationships end, which disproportionately affects vulnerable groups such as women, children and victim-survivors of domestic abuse (including economic abuse).>The Government invites views on introducing a statutory framework of rights and protections, for eligible cohabitants at the point of separation, supporting its manifesto commitment to “strengthen the rights and protections for women in cohabiting couples”. The government proposes that this framework should be narrower than that which is available on divorce.
>>537996053Ah yes but what meets the definition of cohabited? Pretty sure in Ontario just fucking a bitch and having her sleep over once a week meets the definition and you can be deemed common law. A guy already got hosed from this exact scenario even thought they weren't married and they both had their own houses in their own names.
>>537997065>Common law marriage doesn't actually require anything other than 2 years of cohabitationjust 12 months is enough, actually. it also counts if you split up for 3 months then get back together
>>537997626>Then they'll change the law to not require cohabitation anymore, just 6 months of dating will be enough for the woman to claimokay, only a moron man would date any hole past 3 months if that be the case. in my personal view once I get to fuck her I'm good with not seeing her ever again since I've seen her naked, smelled and probed all her holes after which allure of chasing her vanishes completely.
>>537997855they will find out you did that and confiscate all your future earnings. the only way out is to honor kill her.
>>537996808>women finds rich man>gaslight him endlessly>once the time is right break up and snatch half his shitI can see it
>>537995663Seems like there’s no way to legally defined a non-married couple
>>537997866Thought it was a given, but in retrospect I should have highlighted it as well.Even your second point seems to hint at the possibility, of your assets, from before the relationship, being used to compensate the woman in question.
men:>I'm not getting married because I don't want to get divorcerapedwomen:>>537995663
>>537996520>ZOG and its feminist foot soldiers find a way to screw men over even more than they already are>tradcons: "So fvcking based..."You people are unreal
>>537995663they must have figured out a way to tax it
>>537995663This could work as an incentive to get married or completely backfire wonder how it will go
>>537998434The tax is extracting the mans wealth and handing it off to the biggest spenders in modern history aka western women. The reason they do this is because guys will just save and live like dogs and not buy stupid useless shit whereas most women will easily blow through 20+ grand a year on completely useless shit. They basically hold up majority of the consumer economy I think close to 80% of it. I still remember when I sold my first house my lawyer asked me probably 15 times about women who lived at the house, women who stayed at the house, who were you dating were they staying etc etc etc before he would finally sign off on it for me. They so so so badly wanted to be able to take what was essentially a giant stack of cash and hand it off to some dumb whore who would just piss it all away in no time and also force me to have to go back to work. It's just a covert slave tax as it is, guy won't spend? No problem, this one girl he fucked 3 years ago is now entitled to half his stuff! >Oh my god the consumer economy is booming what caused this recent spike?
>>537995663Simping just got whole lot more expensive it looks.
>>537998074based, hit it and quit it
TOTALSIMPDEATHSOON
>>537997172its not about womenits about western men and women not getting together
