Are conservatives ever going to find a purpose for living other than being afraid and disgusted by everything that isn't part of their perceived in-group?
We're not afraid we just hate you
>>538005803>Psychological research demonstrates that conservative ideology correlates strongly with high disgust sensitivity and a low tolerance for ambiguity. Appeals to "tradition" or "natural law" are often intellectualized justifications for a visceral, emotional aversion to non-conformity.
>>538005803>We're not afraid we just hate youThis.
>>538006745you're cowards lol
>>538005721You mean Jews.
>>538005721You made another thread.
>>538005870>Psychological research Well there's your problem
>>538005721The conservative in-group is jews and fags, and it is not merely perceived.
>>538005721
>>538005870Where do you fags get off using psychology to try and shame people's disgust in you? You already neutered it so people can't call you mentally ill. Actual freaks
>>538005721Conserving The Lord God's Law would be mean to the Jews.
>>538005721Are faggots ever going to be able to live without announcing to everyone (including children especially children) that they are a faggot and oppressed?
>>538009365
>>538009419>Where do you fags get off using psychology to try and shame people's disgust in you?It's not shaming. It's a description of what the evidence demonstrates.Meanwhile you use "psychology" to shame people all the time, like every same you call someone mentally ill, or low IQ.
>>538009667Do you wear diapers?
>>538009604Announcing things to everyone is protected by your constitution.
>>538009770No. That's a weird thing for you to randomly ask in a conversation. Are you just always thinking about things like that?
>>538009725Right calling homosexuals mentally ill hurt their feelings so they made that not a thing
>>538009796And? I guess straight people should do the same thing but somehow it will be labeled as faggotphobic.
>>538009884>Right calling homosexuals mentally ill hurt their feelings so they made that not a thingThat's a bold claim to make unsubstantiated.>>538010050>I guess straight people should do the same thing but somehow it will be labeled as faggotphobic.Oh no, you got labeled? How will you cope
>>538005870>bashes natural law out of nowhereSounds like biased research that does not understand natural law.
>>538005721>Are conservatives ever going to find a purpose for livingI don't think you want that anon.
>>538010430Okay. And you're just going to assert this, without talking about it. Pretty boring.
>>538010468>only traitors help invadersBut enough about Donald Trump.
>>538010369Fags are like Mexicans, none of them know how they got here
>>538010542Sure, whatever that means. Are you going to talk about anything or just repeat narrative talking points and slogans?
>>538010479They are the ones asserting without basis that natural law, something that came out of the minds of people who were not conservative and showed extremely high openness to experience, are "intellectualized justifications for a visceral, emotional aversion to non-conformity."It is extremely absurd and shows their bias already.
>>538010599Who asserted that, and where?
>>538010567What is actually bumping around in your head? I don't see rhetoric. Oh conservative reactionism? You make it too easy.
>>538005721>Blame America for Canadian problems>Seethe post about American conservatives>It's America's fault>Leaf is so much better than AmericaClassic leaf seetheWhen the leafs post
>>538010632You must have brain damage (or be a bot).I am responding to you reporting what researchers allegedly said (>>538005870).If what you say is accurate, which is already being more charitable to you than what you deserve, it is obvious that they should not be taken seriously.
>>538010714You're going to have to be more specific, and not answer your own questions for me, if you want to engage in an honest conversation.>>538010736I didn't say anything about natural law, other than that conservatives make rhetorical appeals to it that are often thinly veiled justifications for their emotional aversion to non-conformity. This can be true irrespective of the merit of natural law itself.You read what I wrote wrong. No worries.
>>538005721Every other group has an in group preference, why no white people again.You probably heard the term white trash when growing up, stuff like that divided the white race.
>>538010891We have a boarder for a reason, leaf. If your that upset over your communist country you can apply for citizenship so you can vote in our elections, if you're good.
>>538010972Which white people aren't allowed to prefer their in-group? Do you have any examples?>>538010972>stuff like that divided the white race.White people have been divided and fighting one another since the dawn of history.
>>538011036Were you too stupid to respond to anything I wrote? This reads like deflection.
>>538010891That is a stupid game to play. With that excuse you could say that any appeal to natural law, which is something that you have to do if you are even going to consider it, is just an "intellectualized justification for a visceral, emotional aversion to non-conformity."Libertarians, and basically any non-leftist, get falsely labeled as conservatives all the time, which is what makes that specific statement so retarded and evidently an attempt at weaponizing "research" against strains of thought that are inconvenient for would-be social engineers and assorted wannabe oppressors.
>>538005870>expert sayswe also find you guys pitiful
>>538011087I'm not reading about leaf politics. All I read was>Aaaargh! America bad uuuugh! I can't stop watching American politics and telling Americans about their country! Aaaaargh!
>>538011101>With that excuse you could say that any appeal to natural law, which is something that you have to do if you are even going to consider it, is just an "intellectualized justification for a visceral, emotional aversion to non-conformity."In the absence of evidence to support natural law, the only alternative is to be emotional. We already know that nature has very little to do with whether or something is harmful or not. For example, 99.99999999999999999999999999999999% of the universe kills humans instantly.
>>538011135Which evidence have you presented to demonstrate that the expert's evidence is false? You could always do scientific work yourself if you think the data is wrong.
>>538011148>I'm not reading about leaf politics.I was talking about broader political theory, not Canadian politics. I'm not sure how that wasn't clear?
>>538011175>Canadian>Won't pray to VishnuYou are not being Canadian correct! Have you seen the immigration numbers? If I were Canadian, I'd be worshipping a handful god already but I'm American!Is that all you Canadians can think about? Conservative boycunt?
Total leaf and total jeet death (same shit)
>>538011307*Worshipping a Hindu god
>>538011307Too stupid to talk about the topic?
>>538011353Are you assimilating with Hinduism? Yes or no?
Islamabad, Pakistan
Lagos, Nigeria
>>538011375Why would I assimilate to a 2.3% demographic, especially since I'm not a Hindu and have no interest in being one?
Lima, Peru
>>538011353Just eat the curry with your hands, Louis! You don't need to use the white man's, oppressor utensils anymore!
>>538011434>Lagos, NigeriaThat's a cool photograph of one of the most Christian nations on earth.
>>538011438You need to get those numbers up, Louis. America really needs a little India up north. So, you're going to need to convert to Hinduism. I guess you could try Islam but idk why. Anyway, I would like somewhere cool to go vacation in a few years that's close.
>>538011485I like how you can't even communicate without brown people taking over your entire field of consciousness.
>>538011175You just don't know what natural law is.Natural law in the Scottish Enlightenment is not "natural means good." That is the appeal to nature fallacy, and it is a retarded conflation. The point is that law and morality should start from what human beings are actually like: rational, self-interested, sympathetic, judgmental, capable of agency and whatnot. It is not hippie or religious nature worship. It is a moral theory trying not to be full of shit. Saying that human nature matters is not the same as saying every impulse is sacred or that things are good because they are natural. Cruelty, fear, and stupidity are natural too. Natural law does not pretend otherwise. The claim is much narrower: if you want rules for human beings, you should probably begin with the kind of creatures human beings are. It really is not that hard. Read a fucking book, moron.
>>538011607I know you'll be there to Sherpa me around. I believe in you. It's why I know you're a Louis.
>>538011629>Natural law in the Scottish Enlightenment is not "natural means good." That is the appeal to nature fallacy,That's correct. Conservatives appeal to natural law, without actually having any value for it. They are making the appeal to nature fallacy, like you have identified.
>>538011696You need to think of your tourist economy. Grand Hindu temples EVERYWHERE! English speakers can get hired as tour guides. I don't think you want to be insulting Christians when they're going to want to see some cool Hindu festivals. It's just bad politics to be racist like that, bad for the economy too.Don't make Indians sad, I like them and they like Canada.
>>538011234if what you quoted was the greatest ever produced study of the history of mankind, still, the mere choice of you quoting it would have still made you lose the argument instantly. and any argument for the record. and you posted was insurmountable crapThe things you have to do are the following:keep lurkingtap your nostrils with your fingers (if reading things here irks you)if it irks you strive to reach the point it does not irk you anymore or very little.ignore debating shit is a waste of timeif you have to type, do it for questionskeep reading super duper extreme alt-right content for an increase in base knowledge, atleast 25% of your time spent on acquiring info remind yourself that the reason you are online in these place is to find information which allow you to make better choices in real life for you and your family; any other goal is cope.give enough lurking, you will get atwhy I say that the mere act of quoting makes you lose the debate and pitifulwhy that study and most of the studies are crapor if you don't get that, you will at least get some theories why we think so. good enough to start.I can answer some questions if you have
>>538011889>if what you quoted was the greatest ever produced study of the history of mankindIt's never one study that determines consensus. It's a body of evidence collected across many decades. Scientific work is generally open source, so anyone can have a crack at demonstrating the consensus data false, and winning their Nobel prize.
>>538005721Are pajeets ever going to realize that it is inevitable that White people will go beyond calling them pajeets and will remove them through forced expulsion or death?
>>538012020If you don't have questions, I'll go
>>538012130Why don't you move to India if all you can think and talk about all day are Indians?
>>538005721Conservatives just like the traditional culture, its not based on hate because if cuckservatives could hate, leftist would never exist
>>538005721canajeet detected
>>538012184It's mostly based on fear, not hatred. They don't feel the hate emotion, they feel the fear emotion, but the outcome is that they conduct more or less the same behavior as people who do feel the hate emotion.
>>538005870Where does it say "fear" or "afraid" in that definition?
>>538012295>MRI studies consistently show that individuals who lean conservative tend to have a larger right amygdala. The amygdala is the brain's primary center for processing emotions, particularly fear, threat detection, and the "fight or flight" response. (Conversely, liberals tend to have a larger anterior cingulate cortex, an area associated with managing uncertainty and conflicting information).>Researchers measuring sympathetic nervous system responses find that conservatives exhibit stronger physiological reactions, such as increased skin conductance (sweating) and a harder eye-blink startle reflex, when exposed to sudden loud noises or threatening images.>Conservatives generally demonstrate a higher "negativity bias." This means their attention is captured more quickly and held longer by negative or threatening stimuli (e.g., pictures of spiders, violent situations) than by positive stimuli.
>>538009830Not that anon, but you type like a complete and total faggot. So, the presumption that you wear diapers, either from persistant anal prolapse or some sick degenerate fetish doesn't sound too far off.Just being honest with you.
>>538009770>>538009830Of course not, he's a jamnigger and doesn't even bother pulling down his pants. That's a job for dalits, bloody benchod.
>>538012392>forgot pic
>>538012385>Not that anon, but you type like a complete and total faggot.I don't know what you think this is supposed to mean to me.> the presumption that you wear diapers, either from persistant anal prolapse or some sick degenerate fetish doesn't sound too far off.No, thinking about those things by default is just objectively unusual. Normal people don't do that.>Just being honest with you.Thanks for being honest about your emotions, little guy.
>>538012383This is why neuroscience should never be bothered to collaborate with pseudoscience like political science.The same fidnings could be framed in an entirely different manner, such as "liberals have a greater tendency towards double-think and can endure cognitive dissonance for longer." And that is even assuming that the "liberals" here are actually liberals (and not just progressives and socialists wearing the skin of liberals). Same goes for the classification of "conservatives" here. It is stupid to use such broad and twisted categories when dealing with something as complex as the human brain and its relation to different politically relevant notions. It is extremely disappointing how easy it is to fool retards with a veneer of academic authority.
>>538012681>The same fidnings could be framed in an entirely different manner, such as "liberals have a greater tendency towards double-think and can endure cognitive dissonance for longer."Why would it be framed that way when the evidence demonstrates something other than that framing? Nothing in my post suggested anything about liberals exhibiting double-think or cognitive dissonance.I'm starting to think conservatives just can't read anything higher than a 4th grade level.
>>538005721One day Canada's national parks and lakes will be a landfill of garbage, shit, and human corpses just like in India.
>>538012916Why do anons who are too stupid to talk about anything keep repeating lines about Indians and feces?
>>538009419Then get the fuck out of my country retard
>>538012844>Conversely, liberals tend to have a larger anterior cingulate cortex, an area associated with managing uncertainty and conflicting informationRetard. If you cannot see how this relates to double-think and enduring cognitive dissonance, then you are simply too stupid to engage in the pertinent literature.I cannot wait for you to say this is a stretch when you rest assured that a larger amygdala necessarily means that the positions of your political opponents, conservatives, are born out of fear. It is quite shocking how biased you are. It literally blinds you from the exact same kind of reasoning you employ when used in another framing.Also, I am not a conservative, you moron. Next time, try to think a bit harder before slinging a lame ass insult.
Little fag leaf (Jeet brownboi) been on the ropes trying to argue his existance on a basket weaving cum guzzling forum.
>>538013103Being able to manage conflicting information that you come across isn't cognitive dissonance. It's the opposite of that.Cognitive dissonance happens when you aren't able to manage conflicting information.
>>538010972What about boomers you big dummyBig amnesiac dum dum
>>538013282>"liberals have a greater tendency towards double-think and can endure cognitive dissonance for longer.">endure cognitive dissonance for longer>enduring cognitive dissonanceYour point supports what I just said, retard. Jesus, how did you become so stupid?What was that about reading comprehension again? lmao
>>538013364>Your point supports what I just said, retard.No, I didn't say anything about enduring conflicting beliefs for longer. That's not what it means to manage conflicting information. Two pieces of information can contradict each other long before they become anyone's belief.A stronger example of cognitive dissonance is people struggling to cope with the complexity of the world, and creating fantasy conspiracy theories to manufacture cognitive closure on what's "really going on".
>>538013530>realizes he fucked up>denies an obvious case of managing conflicting information>pivots to "muh conspiracy theorists"You are a joke. Never contaminate honest STEM related pursuits with your nonsense.You are dismissed, leafoid.
>>538005803Yeah. You're stupid.
>>538013692I didn't fuck up. My position and calims are exactly the same was they were originally, despite you using different words, that mean different things, to describe what I said.
>>538009365>Conservatives are dying at higher rates than liberals. A new study points to mistrust in medicinehttps://www.fastcompany.com/91561329/widening-health-gap-between-liberals-and-conservativesSo, yeah. You're stupid.
Conservatives whole purpose in life is to not cause problems.
If you cause problems, youre no longer conservative, youre a tranny leftist
>>538012383https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11308703/In other words, conservatives are stupid.
>>538013867Why do they all try so hard to cause problems then?
>>538013919They dont understand that its their only worth
Without liberally educated european aristocrats, conservative whites are not treated or raised well
>>538013867>[Edmund] Burke shocked his contemporaries by insisting with brutal frankness that “illusions” and “prejudices” are socially necessary.https://www.britannica.com/topic/conservatism/Intellectual-roots-of-conservatismIn other words, conservatism's whole purpose is not only to cause problems but also to do nothing about them.
>>538014009They need aristocratic leaders and intellectuals at the helm
they want outward conformity - it's all about posturing and appearances for them for those in power
>>538013782You did fuck up.You failed to understand how a greater capacity to manage conflicting information could ever become a bad thing. Because "greater means gooder, right? and my team is the goodest, duh." That is how much of a simpleton you are. You are a simpleton who regurgitates abstracts, tamed into complacency by ideologically captured academic institutions who constantly provide favorable (and dishonest) framing for his complacent political positions.Hell, you could have noticed the bias just by reading "conservative ideology." What the actual fuck is that? It can mean many different things, besides conservatism not being much of an ideology, but rather a predisposition. Liberalism, progressivism (often wrongly paraded as liberalism), fascism, socialism, among others, are actual ideologies or sets of ideologies with their respective tenets and literature, and those who hold those ideologies (although not all) could be of a conservative predisposition or not, depending on their context.
>>538014001>>538014035I find it troubling that extremely large populations of adult voters are about as dependable as children when it comes to producing reliable outcomes for the wellbeing of their country.Religious tradition being deeply entrenched in a government is always a bad thing. There are basically no good theocracies. America's founding was itself an attempt to escape from that.
>>538009667Most modern psychology is fake, yes. It is an industry designed to keep people "mentally Ill" so it can sell them "Therapy" and "Psychotropic Medication"
>>538012383This must be why you fucking retards go around getting stabbed to death by niggers in public all the time lol
>>538005721>sewer clown is lonely in the sewer and wants others to come down and keep him company in the sewer and become clowns also
>>538014096>You failed to understand how a greater capacity to manage conflicting information could ever become a bad thing.Why would it be better to panic and lose your shit, than to carefully weigh the positives and negatives with evidence?Fear and panic are useful for fight or flight when you see an angry bear running at you, not for creating complex national policy.
>>538006874America would be a better country if it was 80% white
>>538014163Yeah, look at the manchilds at church and its obvious they need help and leadership
>>538005803The feelings of hatred is mutual fuck face, hope you lot die painfully and your world views and religions go with you.
>>538005803fpbp
>>538014239Your economy wouldn't be competitive and you would lose your global status as hegemon, which is also what's happening now as Trump alienates all of your allies.
>>538005721It's not fear. It's revulsion and disgust for objectively contemptible people.
Reminder that you are not immune
>>538014288>random assertions based on 0 evidencelol
>>538014295>>538012383
The leadership of europeans has always been leftist intellectuals
>>538014295True.Everyone hates the straight white man. Especially gay rightwingers.
FREEDOM FOR THE WHITE MANWHITE POWER1488HEIL HITLER
>>538014288>America has been the world's largest economy for 140 years>over 100 of those were when we were 80%+ WhiteJesus fuck this idiot actually believes this lmfao
>>538005870>visceral, emotional aversion to non-conformity.Gee, it's almost like "non-conformists" are trying to be disgusting on purpose
>>538014288Newsflash jeet, we never needed your kind
>>538014303Everyone is subject to hypocrisy and biases, yeah. That's human nature.The difference is that conservatives lean into it, while liberals at least attempt to control for it.People who believe in angels and quanon are just not interested in reality, because accepting the miserable narrative they believe in is still more comforting to them than reality.
>>538014367>>America has been the world's largest economy for 140 years>over 100 of those were when we were 80%+ WhiteRepublicans have been dismantling the institutions that made this happen for about half that time.
You will always hate the straight white man.The leftist intellectual leader.
>>538014386No one puts your own emotions inside of you, anon.
>>538010369homosexuality and mental illness go hand-in-hand, correlation is sometimes causation.My mental health has really improved since I started sleeping with women and not men
>>538014411doesn't change the fact that if the US was 80% white right now, it would be a better countryyou'd rather be a moron than admit it
>>538014166Don't even tell him about the replication crisis or how many academics in the "softer sciences" and humanities have to soften the actual conclusions to not get blacklisted/backlash in extremely left-wing environments.>>538014178You don't get it! It is actually them being gigabrained chads who don't fear the knives of diversity! lol>>538014233>Why would it be better to panic and lose your shit, than to carefully weigh the positives and negatives with evidence?Nobody said this. This is the kind of leap you are blind to. You think a larger amygdala means "they lose their shit more easily." That is extremely stupid.>Fear and panic are useful for fight or flight when you see an angry bear running at you, not for creating complex national policy.Threat assesment is extremely useful when it comes to creating complex national policy, actually. >>538014303He won't admit this because his baseless sense of superiority is all he has.Before the retards here pivot to the IQ studies, and since I know they just read abstracts, here is a video where someone else already took the time to engage with the pertinent literature in a serious manner. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aE0b3nLc-Gk
>>538014288>Your economy wouldn't be competitive and you would lose your global status as hegemonWe were a competitive nation before the country was less than 50% white. we lost our hegemon under biden for the record
>>538014465Ryan Carson died screaming, wondering why this black life that mattered didn't reciprocate the feeling because he was clearly a rational being and not guided by silly things like "threat detection".
>>538014465>>538014572Forgot pic
>>538014452No, I just haven't seen any evidence that that's the case. And you definitely haven't tried to show me any.>>538014465>Nobody said this.If you agree that conservatives are objectively worse than liberals at managing conflicting information that they consume, then you are conceding that liberals are better at making objective decisions. Managing information means parsing which of many conflicting data is true, or most useful, to produce the best outcome.
You see? There it was all along. The hate for Me.
>>538014390Oh, so DEI is an attempt to "control bias", gotcha. So when a conservative claims "blacks aren't typically smart enough to become surgeons" you lower the standards to allow thousands of low-quality black surgeons to enter the medical industry. This means you have some cherry-picked examples to shove in your enemy's face. Same goes for female pilots, they are demonstrably less safe and yet they're hamfisted in due to your bias-phobic mentality.The thing about leftism I disagree with the most is their lack of understanding about genetics. Forced miscegenation will never create a unified race. Brasil tried it the longest and had the most success, and even today their leaders openly admit that the darkest people are at the most disadvantage. Skin colour is a multi-gene aspect of a person, and it will ALWAYS diverge and ALWAYS result in a gradient of preferences and social outcomes. The only way you can fix this "bias" is to constantly shit on pale skin and promote dark skin on manufactured premises.
>>538014616>Nogood night anonenjoy your thread
I cant believe you guillotined your own lords.
>>538014616Are you an evidence-based individual?Where's the evidence that promotion of assililationist "equality driven" policies create better outcomes for me as an individual? Because if they don't then it's blindingly obvious that I won't support them.
>>538011607>brown people taking over your entire field of consciousness.People tend to be like that when they get cancer of they are infested with parasites. Crazy isn't? Why do they want the cancer to go away so bad.
>>538005721Yes seeing the kike species destroyed
>>538005803This. It's nothing to do with fear. I don't fear the rape gangs in Britain. I don't fear the Indian trash being allowed to undercut me in the workplace. I don't fear the petty office tyrants in HR departments who make it their mission to keep people out of work.I hate them. I hate them and want to deport them to the worst African shithole I can find and that's my most humane idea for these people.
>>538014663>Oh, so DEI is an attempt to "control bias"I don't know what DEI is, or what you think DEI is. Often the thing conservatives say about something isn't reflective of what the thing actually is. But who knows, maybe this time you're right.>>538014726>Where's the evidence that promotion of assililationist "equality driven" policies create better outcomes for me as an individual?I don't know if it creates better outcomes outcomes for you personally, but you're in luck, because policy isn't always all about you. sometimes it's about the other people who live in your country.if you're claiming it causes measurable harm to you, then you would have to provide that evidence.
>>538014773>People tend to be like that when they get cancer of they are infested with parasites.No they don't lol. I can't imagine where you learned that from.
I think politics are stupid and I don't know why so many people care about them. It's a waste of time. I can understand maybe bitching about gas prices and that sort of thing when prices go up but other than that what is even the point of caring about politics? Nothing you say is ever going to change anything.
>>538014808It's the same part of the brain. Enlarged amygdala impacts most types of emotion, and fear and disgust are closely related to one another. see:>>538012383
>>538005870Do as many studies as you want, but it won't unrape the girls in the UK. You should really think long and hard about that and ask yourself why you find yourself coming to their defense and the evil racists are the ones trying to save these girls. Really think about that a bit.
>>538014830>I don't know what DEI is,feigned ignorance. you are a malicious actor.>policy isn't always all about you. sometimes it's about the other people who live in your countrythat's why I'm terrified of immigrants from communities that promote harm, such as circumcisers.>if you're claiming it causes measurable harm to you, then you would have to provide that evidence.Being surrounded by people who smell bad makes it hard for me to concentrate at work. Do you want me to distill the smell of unwashed hindu and post it to your locked bag?
>>538014974>but it won't unrape the girls in the UKCrimes happen, that's true. Nevertheless, immigrants as a population commit overwhelmingly less crime than people who were born in the host country.
>>538014907for ten years girls in the uk have been trafficked, raped, and beaten sometimes to death while the cops and social workers have run defense for the gangs, not the girls. 90% of the gangs are pakistani, not even just brown, pakistani.And you'll sit here and say "you're outraged about this because you have poor brain wiring, aren't you?" No, actually, I don't. I just don't think kids should be raped, i mean we used to be in collective agreement on that one once upon a time. But I guess a study shows that not wanting your kids raped and murdered is a sign of really poor brain wiring or something. Jesus fuck you are sick in the head.
>>538014255You modified your genes over the common cold, you’re the ones who will be dying the painful death.
>>538014830Wait, never mind. Sending you a bad smell is merely "anecdotal" I need a whole multi-ethnic super-team of "experts" in olfactory function in order to get some academic papers published in the de-mode journal of the month, then you will believe me.Is there perhaps some roadblocks in this kind of process that your side of politics have set up? Excuse my lack of enthusiasm but I believe that centuries of data has already been collected, processed, refined, approved, and then deemed "counter-productive" and censured by systems of power that wish to lower not just my individual wage, but the collective wages of my social class and race.
>>538014979>>I don't know what DEI is,>feigned ignorance. you are a malicious actor.I hear American conservatives saying it a lot as a buzzword, but I don't live in America so I haven't read anything about it. I can't tell what you think is unreasonable or improbable about this.>Being surrounded by people Are they in your room with you? You should call the police. I see immigrants regularly, but I can't say I've ever taken the time to sniff them.>>538015080Immigrants as a population commit overwhelmingly less crime than people who were born in the host country. Anyone can find outlier examples of something to paint a narrative, but I'm not super interested in emotional stories when discussing policy.
>>538014390>while liberals at least attempt to control for itIs that why these "liberals" go around claiming males can be women? lmaoAlso, if what you say is true, and still the result is that they end up being similarly motivated to deny attitude-inconsistent science, then the baseline for "liberals" must suck major ass, lol.Imagine trying so hard, and still performing about the same as those you claim are inferior. Embarrasing.>>538014572>>538014590What a despicable nigger and what a foolish libtard.>>538014616>if you agree that conservatives are objectively worse than liberals at managing conflicting information that they consume, then you are conceding that liberals are better at making objective decisions.No, not really. Being "better" at managing conflicting information does not necessarily lead to being better at making objective decisions, just like having a fucked up overdeveloped (or underdeveloped) muscle is a liability when it comes to some forms of locomotion and sports.A tendency of a group to being better at managing conflicting information can very easily manifest as doublethink (and the associated need to better endure cognitive dissonance, something you failed to grasp before). Maybe that is why we see "liberals" claiming that men can be women, speech is violence (but silence is violence as well), gender identity is a social construct (but it is beyond dispute the solipsistic judgment of mentally ill retards), question power (unless it agrees with me, then it is just settled), diversity is of utmost importance (unless it is diversity of thought), profit seeking incentives make landlords increase rent (but once rent control comes into play, they won't be incentivized to decrease the supply and stop maintenance expenses, making everything worse), and many other idiotic and contradictory thoughts.
>>538014415Me.
>>538015228>9 out of 10 of the rape gangs are pakistani>ah, but you see, pakistanis are a minority! Bet you don't hate them so much now, huh? So emotional?I am arguing with someone who has the morality of that of a biblical devil. And when we win, and we hold the whip hand, I'll remember that well.
>>538015296>Is that why these "liberals" go around claiming males can be women?Do you have an argument against this that isn't you just mindlessly dismissing something that made you feel uncomfortable, and repeating propaganda you heard about it for the next 20 years to protect yourself from feeling that discomfort?>>538015296>No, not really.Okay, so you don't know what managing information means. Thanks for letting me know.>does not necessarily lead to being better at making objective decisionswhy would being bad at managing information make someone better at making objective decisions?>A tendency of a group to being better at managing conflicting information can very easily manifest as doublethinkNo, doublethink is an example of not being able to manage information.>>538015341So, you didn't actually demonstrate a flaw in what I wrote. You really did just repeat emotional narrative talking points that I already addressed in exceedingly clear terms.
>>538015551>Do you have an argument against this that isn't you just mindlessly dismissing something that made you feel uncomfortable, and repeating propaganda you heard about it for the next 20 years to protect yourself from feeling that discomfort?Yes, that being a woman is about being a female, and sex is defined by gametes. The sex determination system (see sex chromosomes) are not the same as the definition of sex in itself, which is why your retarded response around disorders of sexual development just does not work. It is an extremely basic biological fact that "liberals" fail to properly process (with terrible consequences in sports, education, policy and whatnot).>Okay, so you don't know what managing information means. Thanks for letting me know.Too many words, no substance. Inefficient.>why would being bad at managing information make someone better at making objective decisions?That is not what I said. The statement was "being "better" at managing conflicting information does not necessarily lead to being better at making objective decisions". Then I followed up with an analogy (because you seem bad at understanding what the other party is actually saying). Also, if you cannot understand how such a capacity could lead to being worse at taking objective decisions due to a higher tolerance to conflciting information, evidenced by the multitude of examples of "liberal" doublethink I provided, then you are kinda dumb.>No, doublethink is an example of not being able to manage information.WRONG. It is an example of managing conflicting information, even if one that does not lend itself (quite the contrary, even) to being better at being objective or taking better decisions.
>>538015228>I can't tell what you think is unreasonable or improbable about this.feigned ignorance + reliance on the ignorance of the opponent.https://www.canada.ca/en/security-intelligence-service/corporate/publications/csis-diversity-equity-and-inclusion-strategy-2022.htmlYou can review and confirm that the 2022 directive are still in effecthttps://www.canada.ca/en/security-intelligence-service/corporate/publications/dei-strategy-summary-performance-measures-scorecard.htmlI'm not worried about wasting my time helping people like you understand that conservativism is NOT about ignorance.
>>538015228>Immigrants as a population commit overwhelmingly less crimeThis is how I can tell you're just an absolute fucking retard lmfao. Worse than a republican and I already have zero respect for them. >In Norway, one of the few reports that published the ethnicities of criminals showed that 100% of assault rapes were done by non-Western immigrants. Immigrants from Asia, Africa, South and Central America, and Turkey have much higher crime rates than the general population, with the worst being from Africa. In Sweden, a recent study showed 96% of rapes are committed by immigrants. In both cases, almost exclusively native, white women were raped.The problem with your emotional platitude is that these studies about immigration and crime are very limited in scope and often use incomplete data. I know in one instance all you fucking idiots saw a single study about immigration and crime published by Cato that used data from a single US state (Texas) to draw such sweeping conclusions. The problem is it compared immigrants broadly to the entire native population of Texas which is nearly 2/3 non-White, but when broken down by race the immigrants were committing more crime than White Texans, but less crime than black and brown Texans, so the conclusion was that they were less criminal than Americans broadly which is incredibly dishonest. These studies also compare people who are typically in the top 10% of education, IQ, and income of their respective countries and have to undergo strict vetting before migrating which doesn't reflect the demographic of illegal migrants or say refugees and asylees in Europe. And finally the regression to the mean is immediate with the children of immigrants, with the children of first generation immigrants being just as criminal as their native coethnics, in other words, the children of brown immigrants will likely be more criminal than White natives even in instances of legal immigration.
>>538015228>Are they in your room with you?Yes, I work at a billion dollar manufacturing company. they are playing loud music, wearing deodorant (against policy - an overly scented individual cannot perform with confidence quality control assessments such as taste testing) and eating food with disagreeable scent (against policy - I have been personally reprimanded for cooking muttonbird) and have lowered hygiene standards (against policy - there are shower facilities provided at the factory)do you want a photo so you can report me for racism?
>>538015994You are right about the flaws you are pointing out, but you are commiting a mistake when it comes to regression to the mean.If you took all the blacks with IQs over 120 from Nigeria and put them on an island, their descendants would not regress to the Nigerian nigger average.Regression to the mean in highly heritable traits is largely driven by measurement error (getting lucky, for example, instead of actually measuring something). So, if you see any regression to the mean in my example, it would be down to 115 or so at most. The low-IQ genes won't teleport into the genome of the selected 120 IQ niggerians.
>>538015994>>In Norway, one of the few reports that published the ethnicities of criminals showed that 100% of assault rapes were done by non-Western immigrants. Immigrants from Asia, Africa, South and Central America, and Turkey have much higher crime rates than the general population, with the worst being from Africa. In Sweden, a recent study showed 96% of rapes are committed by immigrants. In both cases, almost exclusively native, white women were raped.This originates from a 2011 Oslo Police report analyzing data from 2010. It found that for the specific category of "assault rapes" (stranger rapes involving physical force), 100% of the perps were Non-Norwegian.However, assault rapes accounted for only a small fraction (roughly 10%) of all reported rapes in the city. The vast majority of rapes in Norway are acquaintance, relationship, or "party" rapes. In those major categories, perpetrators are overwhelmingly ethnic Norwegians.>In Sweden, a recent study showed 96% of rapes are committed by immigrants. In both cases, almost exclusively native, white women were raped.A 2021 peer-reviewed study from Lund University analyzing 15 years of convictions found that 59.2% of men convicted of rape had an immigrant background. A separate 2018 review of 843 district court cases by Swedish Television (SVT) put the number at 58%.Even when isolating only stranger/assault rapes where the victim and attacker didn't know each other, the SVT investigation found the proportion of foreign-born perpetrators was approximately 80-85%, which is still significantly lower than your 96% figure. Native Swedes commit a substantial percentage of total sexual assaults.>In both cases, almost exclusively native, white women were raped.Studies on crime demographics in Sweden and Europe consistently show that immigrant and refugee women face disproportionately high rates of sexual and domestic violence when compared to white women.
>>538012253Cuckservatives live in lalaland, they dont feel fear. Your confusing nazis with cuckservatives
>>538005870Homosexuals, men and women alike, are unnatural aberrations that have no right to live. Same goes for trannies.
>>538018103>Studies on crime demographics in Sweden and Europe consistently show that immigrant and refugee women face disproportionately high rates of sexual and domestic violence when compared to white women.Good. The migrants deserve to be abused and murdered.
>>538018171Correct, nobody is afraid of you noodle armed shitlib subhumans. You will be purged soon.
>>538005721ideally, conservatives want to preserve the state of the world pre-eugenics ban, before retarded subhuman cannibals invaded every corner of the world
