Do guns actually cause cancer, or is California just being bitchy and difficult and trying to discourage gun sales? I see Prop 65 (cancer warning) stickers on guns and gun accessories sold in that state, and on websites which sell to Californians.
>>538018144There are prop 65 warnings on literally everything. There would be a prop 65 warning on the air if it was possible.
>>538018144
>>538018144don't eat the plastic stock or metal lubricants or lead from ammo or gunpowder residue
>>538018144Literally anything they can do to push their political goals they will do. If they thought ritually sacrificing aborted children in a volcano would help their cause to destroy gun ownership they would do it. I feel stupid even answering this question because this should be apparent to anyone who spends more than a day looking at the history of the subject.
>>538018144Do trannies care about cancer warnings when they pop whiteoids
>>538018217FPBPThis is the answer. California's dumbass prop 65 regulation is so broad the labels are essentially meaningless.I've seen prop 65 labels on fucking trees, at a nursery.
everything in the state of cancer is known to cause california...
>>538018144>Do guns actually cause canceryes, lead cancer
>>538019337Tons of rounds don't have lead faggot. Try again.
>>538019150Same I actually had no idea about this until I saw that label on a cactusIt was a bit of a turning point for me politically
Also, are people actually financing/doing layaway-style payment plans for $100 products? That's also alarming.
>>538019444the lead that gets you is in the primer, not the bullet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_styphnate
>>538019838Still not applicable as a blanket statement about guns, bullets, primers, or even ammunition in general.
Gun powder isn't good to breathe in. Also plastic sheds and can have cancerous elements.Of course the left will exaggerate this though, using their logic smoke a few cigarettes' and you'll defiantly be dead by 30 but you can eat 40 cheese burgers and 200 oz of soda a day and that's fine cause reasons or something.You want to understand the average liberal mindset find the south park episode.Butt Out with Rob Reiner.
>>538019756No, that's just for real guns. Pink .22lr pea shooters are just for bringing up the cart price to the minimum requirement for free shipping, the fact that you can teach your daughter how to defend against non-White attacks is just a bonus.
>>538018144how about cancer warnings on college degrees and the US dollar?no one in these pyramid seats ever wants to admit the real problems
>>538019990That’s right goy let the AI guide you to bullets that are sure to cause the least damage to basic issued ballistic armor plates, very kosher of you
>>538018144Prop 65 allows randos to sue companies that don't include the label. It was either that or they receive a portion of the fine. Several people made this this process into a viable occupation, and now companies stick warnings on everything to preempt them. So customers have learned to ignore them, and they are now pointless.
>>538018144GUN CONTROL USA
>>538018144GUN TRAINING USA
In California you have to put a prop 65 warning on anything that could conceivably bee connected to cancer, regardless of probability or any requirement to state what that connection is. so they even put signs on buildings. It's useless and everyone knows it's useless but if you don't do it som attorneys will try to make a case out of t, and nobody cars enough to put effort into rewriting the law because it was passed by referendum.It's on gun advertising because of lead. there's no deeper meaning.
>>538018144Everything causes cancer. Prop 65 was written too broadly.
>>538018144It's plastics. Plastics cause cancer, but only in CA.
