How is this bad, again?
>>538018181Removing the electoral college and rank choice voting are bad, but all the rest is good. Electoral college is good because it reduces the influence of overpopulated cities. Rank choice voting is bad because it's easy to manipulate votes by having the zog candidates always win from second or third choice votes.
>>538018462No other country in the world has an electoral college anymore because it doesn't accurately reflect the will of the people anymore. And ranked choice voting gives people the satisfaction that there are more than just two bad choices.
>>538018462So that sounds great we shouldn’t be ruled by irrelevant flyover retards and we shouldn’t have to vote strategically based on who is most likely to win instead of who we think is the best for the job, ranked choice voting is based I can not throw my vote away and go with a long shot.
>>538018462Why should somebody's vote be worth less because of where they live?Also this is literally the purpose of your Senate, to give equal representation to every state regardless of population.
>>538018779
>>538018779>>538018945city slickers are inherently less valuable and more mulch worthy than good hearted country folkthey have less understanding of the world than farm working childrenif this wasnt true cities wouldnt be smoldering trash piles of roaving fent rapists
>>538018181The electoral college is good. When you have ranked choice voting, mandatory voting and a 1:1 weight for votes, you get boomer or nigger capture from cities ruining everywhere else
>>538018181Woaw.BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED
>>538018655>will of the peopledemocracy fag.in america we cherish democracy so much we have laws that guarantee illiterate people (black niggers) the right to vote in europe the result of democracy is a largely disarmed public who go to jail for posting memes and there are muslims and niggers everywhere >>538018779how is democracy working for you in canada? enjoying ten million jeets and the home prices lol
>>538018181because multiparty systems get nothing done. it'll be all compromises, which is newspeak for people won't get what they want and the ones behind the curtain do.the only system that would work is a system where you don't vote for people, you vote for ideas. you have proxy people that vote for you type of ideas, with a reputation score. if they vote for something you don't align with that score goes down. if it gets below a threshold, that person is jailed and replaced. immediately, no 4 year intervals.
>>538018655who cares faggot it's only president, if congress actually did it's job that being to legislate, electoral college is not problem cause people vote for their senators across the state, and local district for the house.
>>538018181That means you will get governed by city fucks. More "diverse", more anti freedom (cities need rules the country side simply doesn't). This is already the case but I can tell you it is probably part of the reason for why doing anything yourself in germany is illegal (you literally aren't allowed to change a lightbulb yourself, no joke; you can't transport anything; you can't tape over the cameras in your car; no epic fireworks).
>>538021961you will never be white, mohammed
