Why do people here hate marriage?Getting married is peak white, no?
>>538022773we arent cucks here on/pol/
>>538022773marriage is the leading cause of divorce
>>538022773There's nothing wrong with marriage as long as its not gay or interracial or without the husband in control, none of which likely meet the definition of marriage as it was in the 1950s or before.
its just not that kind of world
>>538022773No
>Why do people here hate marriage?No fault divorce>Getting married is peak white, no?Marriage is the foundation of civilization, so yes
>>538022773>Why do people here hate marriage?i just don't like contracts with government
Who knows! lol
>>538022773
>>538022773Nope. From my observation the purpose of marriage is to ruin a relationship. It's like a snap of fingers, relationship becomes hell in an instant.There is no point involving state or church into your relationship. Neither has the power to sanctify your relationship.Marriage gives ridiculous amount of power to the woman and strips all from the man. It's against natural order and is a sin.If your woman loves you, then she trusts you. She doesn't need a legal contract. If she says that she doesn't consider your relationship secure without legal contract, she doesn't trust or love you.
>>538022773You know you don't have to marry to have a family? You don't need governmental approval to have a woman and kids.
>>538022773a culture and society that supports and socially enforces marriage is peak White. trying to get married in a judeo-compromised culture that promotes promiscuity and casual sex is peak cuck.
>>538022773If marriage didn't exist, would you invent it?Like "baby, what we got is so hot, we need to get the Government involved"https://youtu.be/vXpsT3e8UsM
>>538022969>contracts with governmentIsn't that a contract with your wife? till death us part etc ?
>>538022773I love the idea of marriage. I just don't think I'm going to be able to experience it.
>>538024404That's your contract with God and your wife. The government doesn't give a shit if you break that, because they benefit financially from that too.
>>538024404no, because by signing that contract you agree to play by the government rules, signing with wife would mean that you and your wife make the rules and both agree with them, that's how its always been before modern marriage
>>538022773If marriage wasn’t gay then why are gays desperate for it?
>>538022773marriage is for normalfags
>>538024404civil marriage wasn't a thing until the end 18th century, when French commies commanded that marriage is acskhually the matter of state and not God, and then Bismarck implemented it for similar reasons. Privatization of marriage would turn back things to normal
marriage on paper is a pozzed scam & gay.finding a foid to pump babies into is based & hetero.
